Finding function through a graph











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












enter image description here



My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
    – caverac
    2 days ago










  • @caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
    – shawn k
    2 days ago










  • $(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
    – KM101
    2 days ago










  • Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
    – caverac
    2 days ago








  • 1




    Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
    – KM101
    2 days ago















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












enter image description here



My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
    – caverac
    2 days ago










  • @caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
    – shawn k
    2 days ago










  • $(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
    – KM101
    2 days ago










  • Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
    – caverac
    2 days ago








  • 1




    Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
    – KM101
    2 days ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











enter image description here



My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?










share|cite|improve this question















enter image description here



My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?







linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Misha Lavrov

42k555101




42k555101










asked 2 days ago









shawn k

346




346








  • 2




    Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
    – caverac
    2 days ago










  • @caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
    – shawn k
    2 days ago










  • $(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
    – KM101
    2 days ago










  • Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
    – caverac
    2 days ago








  • 1




    Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
    – KM101
    2 days ago














  • 2




    Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
    – caverac
    2 days ago










  • @caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
    – shawn k
    2 days ago










  • $(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
    – KM101
    2 days ago










  • Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
    – caverac
    2 days ago








  • 1




    Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
    – KM101
    2 days ago








2




2




Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
– caverac
2 days ago




Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
– caverac
2 days ago












@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
– shawn k
2 days ago




@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
– shawn k
2 days ago












$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
– KM101
2 days ago




$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
– KM101
2 days ago












Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
– caverac
2 days ago






Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
– caverac
2 days ago






1




1




Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
– KM101
2 days ago




Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
– KM101
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.



Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.



This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.



$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$



$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = x$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • +1 for awesomeness!
    – shawn k
    2 days ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020430%2ffinding-function-through-a-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.



Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.



This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.



$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$



$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = x$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • +1 for awesomeness!
    – shawn k
    2 days ago















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.



Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.



This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.



$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$



$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = x$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • +1 for awesomeness!
    – shawn k
    2 days ago













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.



Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.



This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.



$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$



$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = x$$






share|cite|improve this answer














From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.



Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.



This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.



$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$



$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = x$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









KM101

2,926416




2,926416












  • +1 for awesomeness!
    – shawn k
    2 days ago


















  • +1 for awesomeness!
    – shawn k
    2 days ago
















+1 for awesomeness!
– shawn k
2 days ago




+1 for awesomeness!
– shawn k
2 days ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020430%2ffinding-function-through-a-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Cabo Verde

Karlovacs län

Gyllenstierna