Finding function through a graph
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?
linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?
linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic
2
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
– caverac
2 days ago
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
– shawn k
2 days ago
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
– KM101
2 days ago
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
– caverac
2 days ago
1
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
– KM101
2 days ago
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?
linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic
My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?
linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic
linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic
edited 2 days ago
Misha Lavrov
42k555101
42k555101
asked 2 days ago
shawn k
346
346
2
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
– caverac
2 days ago
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
– shawn k
2 days ago
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
– KM101
2 days ago
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
– caverac
2 days ago
1
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
– KM101
2 days ago
|
show 3 more comments
2
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
– caverac
2 days ago
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
– shawn k
2 days ago
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
– KM101
2 days ago
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
– caverac
2 days ago
1
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
– KM101
2 days ago
2
2
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
– caverac
2 days ago
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
– caverac
2 days ago
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
– shawn k
2 days ago
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
– shawn k
2 days ago
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
– KM101
2 days ago
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
– KM101
2 days ago
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
– caverac
2 days ago
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
– caverac
2 days ago
1
1
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
– KM101
2 days ago
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
– KM101
2 days ago
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.
Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.
This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.
$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$
$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = x$$
+1 for awesomeness!
– shawn k
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.
Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.
This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.
$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$
$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = x$$
+1 for awesomeness!
– shawn k
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.
Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.
This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.
$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$
$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = x$$
+1 for awesomeness!
– shawn k
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.
Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.
This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.
$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$
$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = x$$
From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.
Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.
This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.
$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$
$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = x$$
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
KM101
2,926416
2,926416
+1 for awesomeness!
– shawn k
2 days ago
add a comment |
+1 for awesomeness!
– shawn k
2 days ago
+1 for awesomeness!
– shawn k
2 days ago
+1 for awesomeness!
– shawn k
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020430%2ffinding-function-through-a-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
– caverac
2 days ago
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
– shawn k
2 days ago
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
– KM101
2 days ago
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
– caverac
2 days ago
1
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
– KM101
2 days ago