Trading Places Game Theory [on hold]











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have got the following question from the Tadelis book "Game Theory: An Introduction", Question 12.7:




Two players, 1 and 2, each own a house. Each player $i$ values his own house at $v_i$. The value of player $i$'s house to the other player, i.e., to player $j neq i$, is $frac{3}{2} v_i$. Each player $i$ knows the value $v_i$ of his own house to himself, but not the value of the other player's house. the values $v_i$ are drawn independently from the interval $[0, 1]$ with uniform distribution.



Suppose players announce simultaneously whether they want to exchange their houses. If both players agree to an exchange, the exchange takes places. Otherwise no exchange takes place. Find a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this game in pure strategies in which each player $i$ accepts an exchange if and only if the value $v_i$ does not exceed some threshold $theta_i$.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Patrice Mele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by caverac, Paul Frost, John B, user10354138, user302797 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – caverac, Paul Frost, John B, user10354138, user302797

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I have got the following question from the Tadelis book "Game Theory: An Introduction", Question 12.7:




    Two players, 1 and 2, each own a house. Each player $i$ values his own house at $v_i$. The value of player $i$'s house to the other player, i.e., to player $j neq i$, is $frac{3}{2} v_i$. Each player $i$ knows the value $v_i$ of his own house to himself, but not the value of the other player's house. the values $v_i$ are drawn independently from the interval $[0, 1]$ with uniform distribution.



    Suppose players announce simultaneously whether they want to exchange their houses. If both players agree to an exchange, the exchange takes places. Otherwise no exchange takes place. Find a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this game in pure strategies in which each player $i$ accepts an exchange if and only if the value $v_i$ does not exceed some threshold $theta_i$.











    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Patrice Mele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.











    put on hold as off-topic by caverac, Paul Frost, John B, user10354138, user302797 2 days ago


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – caverac, Paul Frost, John B, user10354138, user302797

    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I have got the following question from the Tadelis book "Game Theory: An Introduction", Question 12.7:




      Two players, 1 and 2, each own a house. Each player $i$ values his own house at $v_i$. The value of player $i$'s house to the other player, i.e., to player $j neq i$, is $frac{3}{2} v_i$. Each player $i$ knows the value $v_i$ of his own house to himself, but not the value of the other player's house. the values $v_i$ are drawn independently from the interval $[0, 1]$ with uniform distribution.



      Suppose players announce simultaneously whether they want to exchange their houses. If both players agree to an exchange, the exchange takes places. Otherwise no exchange takes place. Find a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this game in pure strategies in which each player $i$ accepts an exchange if and only if the value $v_i$ does not exceed some threshold $theta_i$.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Patrice Mele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I have got the following question from the Tadelis book "Game Theory: An Introduction", Question 12.7:




      Two players, 1 and 2, each own a house. Each player $i$ values his own house at $v_i$. The value of player $i$'s house to the other player, i.e., to player $j neq i$, is $frac{3}{2} v_i$. Each player $i$ knows the value $v_i$ of his own house to himself, but not the value of the other player's house. the values $v_i$ are drawn independently from the interval $[0, 1]$ with uniform distribution.



      Suppose players announce simultaneously whether they want to exchange their houses. If both players agree to an exchange, the exchange takes places. Otherwise no exchange takes place. Find a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this game in pure strategies in which each player $i$ accepts an exchange if and only if the value $v_i$ does not exceed some threshold $theta_i$.








      game-theory






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Patrice Mele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Patrice Mele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      caverac

      11.9k21027




      11.9k21027






      New contributor




      Patrice Mele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      Patrice Mele

      41




      41




      New contributor




      Patrice Mele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Patrice Mele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Patrice Mele is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      put on hold as off-topic by caverac, Paul Frost, John B, user10354138, user302797 2 days ago


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – caverac, Paul Frost, John B, user10354138, user302797

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




      put on hold as off-topic by caverac, Paul Frost, John B, user10354138, user302797 2 days ago


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – caverac, Paul Frost, John B, user10354138, user302797

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.



























          active

          oldest

          votes






















          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes

          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna