How to use Element-wise Proofs?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Proof using element wise:
(A ∩ B ∩ C)’ = A’ ∪ B’ ∪ C’
I'm getting some issue proving this question.
calculus algebra-precalculus discrete-mathematics
asked Dec 5 at 19:08
Emmanuel Simon
31
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Proof using element wise:
(A ∩ B ∩ C)’ = A’ ∪ B’ ∪ C’
I'm getting some issue proving this question.
calculus algebra-precalculus discrete-mathematics
asked Dec 5 at 19:08
Emmanuel Simon
31
1
Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 5 at 19:11
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Proof using element wise:
(A ∩ B ∩ C)’ = A’ ∪ B’ ∪ C’
I'm getting some issue proving this question.
calculus algebra-precalculus discrete-mathematics
asked Dec 5 at 19:08
Emmanuel Simon
31
Proof using element wise:
(A ∩ B ∩ C)’ = A’ ∪ B’ ∪ C’
I'm getting some issue proving this question.
calculus algebra-precalculus discrete-mathematics
calculus algebra-precalculus discrete-mathematics
asked Dec 5 at 19:08
Emmanuel Simon
31
asked Dec 5 at 19:08
Emmanuel Simon
31
asked Dec 5 at 19:08
Emmanuel Simon
31
asked Dec 5 at 19:08
Emmanuel Simon
31
asked Dec 5 at 19:08
Emmanuel Simon
31
31
1
Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 5 at 19:11
add a comment |
1
Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 5 at 19:11
1
1
Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 5 at 19:11
Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 5 at 19:11
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
By an "element wise" proof I assume you mean the most basic method in set proofs- by considering individual elements in the sets. To prove "X= Y" for sets X and Y, prove both "X is a subset of Y" and "X is a subset of Y". And to prove "X is a subset of Y you start "if x is in X" and use the properties of both X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".
Here "X" is (A ∩ B ∩ C)'. If x is in (A ∩ B ∩ C)’ then x is not in A ∩ B ∩ C. That, in turn, means that x is not in at least one of A, B, or C. So I would use "cases":
case 1: x is not in A. Then x is in A' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 2: x is not in B. Then x is in B' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 3: x is not in C. Then x is in C' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
That proves that (A ∩ B ∩ C)'is a subset of A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
Now do that the other way. If x is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C' then x is in at least one of A', B', C'. Again do "cases":
case 1: x is in A', x is not in A so ...
answered Dec 5 at 19:39
user247327
10.3k1515
Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
– Emmanuel Simon
Dec 5 at 20:14
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027504%2fhow-to-use-element-wise-proofs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
By an "element wise" proof I assume you mean the most basic method in set proofs- by considering individual elements in the sets. To prove "X= Y" for sets X and Y, prove both "X is a subset of Y" and "X is a subset of Y". And to prove "X is a subset of Y you start "if x is in X" and use the properties of both X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".
Here "X" is (A ∩ B ∩ C)'. If x is in (A ∩ B ∩ C)’ then x is not in A ∩ B ∩ C. That, in turn, means that x is not in at least one of A, B, or C. So I would use "cases":
case 1: x is not in A. Then x is in A' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 2: x is not in B. Then x is in B' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 3: x is not in C. Then x is in C' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
That proves that (A ∩ B ∩ C)'is a subset of A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
Now do that the other way. If x is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C' then x is in at least one of A', B', C'. Again do "cases":
case 1: x is in A', x is not in A so ...
answered Dec 5 at 19:39
user247327
10.3k1515
Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
– Emmanuel Simon
Dec 5 at 20:14
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
By an "element wise" proof I assume you mean the most basic method in set proofs- by considering individual elements in the sets. To prove "X= Y" for sets X and Y, prove both "X is a subset of Y" and "X is a subset of Y". And to prove "X is a subset of Y you start "if x is in X" and use the properties of both X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".
Here "X" is (A ∩ B ∩ C)'. If x is in (A ∩ B ∩ C)’ then x is not in A ∩ B ∩ C. That, in turn, means that x is not in at least one of A, B, or C. So I would use "cases":
case 1: x is not in A. Then x is in A' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 2: x is not in B. Then x is in B' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 3: x is not in C. Then x is in C' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
That proves that (A ∩ B ∩ C)'is a subset of A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
Now do that the other way. If x is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C' then x is in at least one of A', B', C'. Again do "cases":
case 1: x is in A', x is not in A so ...
answered Dec 5 at 19:39
user247327
10.3k1515
Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
– Emmanuel Simon
Dec 5 at 20:14
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
By an "element wise" proof I assume you mean the most basic method in set proofs- by considering individual elements in the sets. To prove "X= Y" for sets X and Y, prove both "X is a subset of Y" and "X is a subset of Y". And to prove "X is a subset of Y you start "if x is in X" and use the properties of both X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".
Here "X" is (A ∩ B ∩ C)'. If x is in (A ∩ B ∩ C)’ then x is not in A ∩ B ∩ C. That, in turn, means that x is not in at least one of A, B, or C. So I would use "cases":
case 1: x is not in A. Then x is in A' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 2: x is not in B. Then x is in B' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 3: x is not in C. Then x is in C' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
That proves that (A ∩ B ∩ C)'is a subset of A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
Now do that the other way. If x is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C' then x is in at least one of A', B', C'. Again do "cases":
case 1: x is in A', x is not in A so ...
answered Dec 5 at 19:39
user247327
10.3k1515
By an "element wise" proof I assume you mean the most basic method in set proofs- by considering individual elements in the sets. To prove "X= Y" for sets X and Y, prove both "X is a subset of Y" and "X is a subset of Y". And to prove "X is a subset of Y you start "if x is in X" and use the properties of both X and Y to conclude "then x is in Y".
Here "X" is (A ∩ B ∩ C)'. If x is in (A ∩ B ∩ C)’ then x is not in A ∩ B ∩ C. That, in turn, means that x is not in at least one of A, B, or C. So I would use "cases":
case 1: x is not in A. Then x is in A' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 2: x is not in B. Then x is in B' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
case 3: x is not in C. Then x is in C' so is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
That proves that (A ∩ B ∩ C)'is a subset of A' ∪ B' ∪ C'.
Now do that the other way. If x is in A' ∪ B' ∪ C' then x is in at least one of A', B', C'. Again do "cases":
case 1: x is in A', x is not in A so ...
answered Dec 5 at 19:39
user247327
10.3k1515
answered Dec 5 at 19:39
user247327
10.3k1515
answered Dec 5 at 19:39
user247327
10.3k1515
answered Dec 5 at 19:39
user247327
10.3k1515
10.3k1515
Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
– Emmanuel Simon
Dec 5 at 20:14
add a comment |
Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
– Emmanuel Simon
Dec 5 at 20:14
Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
– Emmanuel Simon
Dec 5 at 20:14
Thank you for make me understanding "element-wise" proof, this was helpful.
– Emmanuel Simon
Dec 5 at 20:14
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027504%2fhow-to-use-element-wise-proofs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Welcome to stackexchange. Please edit the question to show us what you've tried and where the :"issue" is. Then perhaps we can help.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 5 at 19:11