Find a diagonal form of the quadratic form $f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^nx_i^2 + sum_{i < j}x_ix_j$












1












$begingroup$


Find a diagonal form of the quadratic form
$$f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^nx_i^2 + sum_{i < j}x_ix_j.$$



It turned out to be such a problem:
How to change quadratic form $f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^nx_i^2 + sum_{i < j}x_ix_j$ into diagonal form?



We can solve it with congruent transformation, although it is a little complex.
Besides, I tried to transform it into a diagonal form by orthogonal transformation, since its quadratic matrix has the same diagonal elements and the same non-diagonal elements(I thought that I can find a simple way to find its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, but failed. Maybe you can try it).



Is there any other way?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "standard form"? Is it $f(x) = (Ax mid x)$ for some simmetric linear transformation $A$?
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:10










  • $begingroup$
    I'm sorry, I don't translate very well. The term may be diagonal form. such as this form $q(x)=a_1 x_1^2 + a_2 x_2^2+ ldots +a_n x_n^2$
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:39












  • $begingroup$
    I see, you want a change of variables to make $f$ diagonal.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    yes, I try to solve the problem with congruent transformation, but it is a little complex. I wonder if there is any other way, such as orthogonal transformation
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:46










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, I did not vote down. Some people do but they are not coming to give reasons for their votes. Such a shameful behaviour.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:52
















1












$begingroup$


Find a diagonal form of the quadratic form
$$f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^nx_i^2 + sum_{i < j}x_ix_j.$$



It turned out to be such a problem:
How to change quadratic form $f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^nx_i^2 + sum_{i < j}x_ix_j$ into diagonal form?



We can solve it with congruent transformation, although it is a little complex.
Besides, I tried to transform it into a diagonal form by orthogonal transformation, since its quadratic matrix has the same diagonal elements and the same non-diagonal elements(I thought that I can find a simple way to find its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, but failed. Maybe you can try it).



Is there any other way?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "standard form"? Is it $f(x) = (Ax mid x)$ for some simmetric linear transformation $A$?
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:10










  • $begingroup$
    I'm sorry, I don't translate very well. The term may be diagonal form. such as this form $q(x)=a_1 x_1^2 + a_2 x_2^2+ ldots +a_n x_n^2$
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:39












  • $begingroup$
    I see, you want a change of variables to make $f$ diagonal.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    yes, I try to solve the problem with congruent transformation, but it is a little complex. I wonder if there is any other way, such as orthogonal transformation
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:46










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, I did not vote down. Some people do but they are not coming to give reasons for their votes. Such a shameful behaviour.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:52














1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


Find a diagonal form of the quadratic form
$$f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^nx_i^2 + sum_{i < j}x_ix_j.$$



It turned out to be such a problem:
How to change quadratic form $f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^nx_i^2 + sum_{i < j}x_ix_j$ into diagonal form?



We can solve it with congruent transformation, although it is a little complex.
Besides, I tried to transform it into a diagonal form by orthogonal transformation, since its quadratic matrix has the same diagonal elements and the same non-diagonal elements(I thought that I can find a simple way to find its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, but failed. Maybe you can try it).



Is there any other way?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Find a diagonal form of the quadratic form
$$f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^nx_i^2 + sum_{i < j}x_ix_j.$$



It turned out to be such a problem:
How to change quadratic form $f(x) = sum_{i = 1}^nx_i^2 + sum_{i < j}x_ix_j$ into diagonal form?



We can solve it with congruent transformation, although it is a little complex.
Besides, I tried to transform it into a diagonal form by orthogonal transformation, since its quadratic matrix has the same diagonal elements and the same non-diagonal elements(I thought that I can find a simple way to find its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, but failed. Maybe you can try it).



Is there any other way?







linear-algebra quadratic-forms






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 18 '18 at 16:16







congee

















asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:07









congeecongee

133




133








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "standard form"? Is it $f(x) = (Ax mid x)$ for some simmetric linear transformation $A$?
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:10










  • $begingroup$
    I'm sorry, I don't translate very well. The term may be diagonal form. such as this form $q(x)=a_1 x_1^2 + a_2 x_2^2+ ldots +a_n x_n^2$
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:39












  • $begingroup$
    I see, you want a change of variables to make $f$ diagonal.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    yes, I try to solve the problem with congruent transformation, but it is a little complex. I wonder if there is any other way, such as orthogonal transformation
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:46










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, I did not vote down. Some people do but they are not coming to give reasons for their votes. Such a shameful behaviour.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:52














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "standard form"? Is it $f(x) = (Ax mid x)$ for some simmetric linear transformation $A$?
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:10










  • $begingroup$
    I'm sorry, I don't translate very well. The term may be diagonal form. such as this form $q(x)=a_1 x_1^2 + a_2 x_2^2+ ldots +a_n x_n^2$
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:39












  • $begingroup$
    I see, you want a change of variables to make $f$ diagonal.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    yes, I try to solve the problem with congruent transformation, but it is a little complex. I wonder if there is any other way, such as orthogonal transformation
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:46










  • $begingroup$
    By the way, I did not vote down. Some people do but they are not coming to give reasons for their votes. Such a shameful behaviour.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 6:52








1




1




$begingroup$
What is "standard form"? Is it $f(x) = (Ax mid x)$ for some simmetric linear transformation $A$?
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 6:10




$begingroup$
What is "standard form"? Is it $f(x) = (Ax mid x)$ for some simmetric linear transformation $A$?
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 6:10












$begingroup$
I'm sorry, I don't translate very well. The term may be diagonal form. such as this form $q(x)=a_1 x_1^2 + a_2 x_2^2+ ldots +a_n x_n^2$
$endgroup$
– congee
Dec 18 '18 at 6:39






$begingroup$
I'm sorry, I don't translate very well. The term may be diagonal form. such as this form $q(x)=a_1 x_1^2 + a_2 x_2^2+ ldots +a_n x_n^2$
$endgroup$
– congee
Dec 18 '18 at 6:39














$begingroup$
I see, you want a change of variables to make $f$ diagonal.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 6:40




$begingroup$
I see, you want a change of variables to make $f$ diagonal.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 6:40




1




1




$begingroup$
yes, I try to solve the problem with congruent transformation, but it is a little complex. I wonder if there is any other way, such as orthogonal transformation
$endgroup$
– congee
Dec 18 '18 at 6:46




$begingroup$
yes, I try to solve the problem with congruent transformation, but it is a little complex. I wonder if there is any other way, such as orthogonal transformation
$endgroup$
– congee
Dec 18 '18 at 6:46












$begingroup$
By the way, I did not vote down. Some people do but they are not coming to give reasons for their votes. Such a shameful behaviour.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 6:52




$begingroup$
By the way, I did not vote down. Some people do but they are not coming to give reasons for their votes. Such a shameful behaviour.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 6:52










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

The matrix $M$ of this quadratic form has the form
$$
M=frac12(I_n+J_n),
$$

where $J_n$ is the $ntimes n$ matrix with all ones.



The eigenvalues of $J_n$ are obviously $lambda_1=n$ (multiplicity one) and
$lambda_2=lambda_3=cdots=lambda_n=0$ (multiplicity $n-1$). Therefore the eigenvalues of $M$ are $(n+1)/2$ (multiplicity one) and $1/2$ (multiplicity $n-1$). Implying that there exists an orthogonal coordinate transformation $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)mapsto (x_1',x_2',ldots,x_n')$ such that in the primed coordinates the quadratic form takes the form
$$
Q(x_1',x_2',ldots,x_n')=frac12left((n+1)x_1'^2+x_2'^2+x_3'^2+cdots+x_n'^2right).
$$

An orthonormal basis corresponding to the primed coordinates can be found by orthonormalizing any basis of the $(n-1)$-dimensional subspace
$$V={(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)inBbb{R}^nmid x_1+x_2+ldots+x_n=0}$$
which is equal to the eigenspace of $J_n$ belonging to the eigenvalue zero. The missing basis vector is the unit vector $dfrac1{sqrt n}(1,1,ldots,1)$ spanning the orthogonal complement of $V$.





It is (very likely) possible to describe an orthonormal basis of $V$ with a lot of symmetries. I'm not sure I want to go there, though. I would start with a complex basis consisting of roots of unity of order $n$, and go from there.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    As you said, this quadratic form is positive definite. So, $I_n$ is a diagonal form of it according to Sylvester's law of inertia
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 20 '18 at 5:07












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, @congee. $J_n$ is positive semi-definite, and we add a positive multiple of $I_n$ to it.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 20 '18 at 6:18



















0












$begingroup$

This is too long for the comment box.



The essence of your exercise is given in the following example.



Suppose we have $f(x, y, z) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + xy + xz + yz.$ We complete the square by getting rid of one of the variables, say we pick the first one ($x$ in my notation). So you get,
$$begin{align*}
f(x, y, z) &= (x^2 + xy + xz) + y^2 + z^2 + yz \
&= left( x + dfrac{y}{2} + dfrac{z}{2} right)^2 - frac{y^2}{4} - frac{z^2}{4} -frac{yz}{2} + y^2 + z^2 + yz\
&=u^2 + dfrac{3y^2}{4} + dfrac{yz}{2} + dfrac{3z^2}{4}
end{align*},$$

where $u = x + dfrac{y}{2} + dfrac{z}{2}.$ Now, we can get rid of the second variable, $y$ in my case, by, again, completing the square
$$begin{align*}
f(x, y, z) &= u^2 + left( dfrac{sqrt{3}y}{2} + frac{z}{2sqrt{3}} right)^2-dfrac{z^2}{12}+dfrac{3z^2}{4} = u^2 + v^2+dfrac{5}{6}z^2
end{align*},$$

which is a required representation of $f.$



The case with $x_1, ldots, x_p$ is just guessing a pattern and using induction (I am guessing).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I've tried this method to deal directly with situation that has $n$ variables, but it seems hard to handle for me. It seems that it's easy to find the rule from a simple point of view. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11










  • $begingroup$
    @WillM. When you complete the square, you should put $-frac{yz}2$ instead of $-frac{yz}4$, because $left(x+frac y2+frac z2right)^2=x^2+frac{y^2}4+frac{z^2}4+xy+xz+frac{yz}2$. But then, I don't see how you group together a common factor $frac34$ in the passage that follows.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11












  • $begingroup$
    (correction: I do see how to deal with it, but the error is still there)
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:17










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I didn't notice it just now.
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SaucyO'Path this brute force completing the square method always work... provided you can do the arithmetic. I usually cannot.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:52











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044835%2ffind-a-diagonal-form-of-the-quadratic-form-fx-sum-i-1nx-i2-sum-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

The matrix $M$ of this quadratic form has the form
$$
M=frac12(I_n+J_n),
$$

where $J_n$ is the $ntimes n$ matrix with all ones.



The eigenvalues of $J_n$ are obviously $lambda_1=n$ (multiplicity one) and
$lambda_2=lambda_3=cdots=lambda_n=0$ (multiplicity $n-1$). Therefore the eigenvalues of $M$ are $(n+1)/2$ (multiplicity one) and $1/2$ (multiplicity $n-1$). Implying that there exists an orthogonal coordinate transformation $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)mapsto (x_1',x_2',ldots,x_n')$ such that in the primed coordinates the quadratic form takes the form
$$
Q(x_1',x_2',ldots,x_n')=frac12left((n+1)x_1'^2+x_2'^2+x_3'^2+cdots+x_n'^2right).
$$

An orthonormal basis corresponding to the primed coordinates can be found by orthonormalizing any basis of the $(n-1)$-dimensional subspace
$$V={(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)inBbb{R}^nmid x_1+x_2+ldots+x_n=0}$$
which is equal to the eigenspace of $J_n$ belonging to the eigenvalue zero. The missing basis vector is the unit vector $dfrac1{sqrt n}(1,1,ldots,1)$ spanning the orthogonal complement of $V$.





It is (very likely) possible to describe an orthonormal basis of $V$ with a lot of symmetries. I'm not sure I want to go there, though. I would start with a complex basis consisting of roots of unity of order $n$, and go from there.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    As you said, this quadratic form is positive definite. So, $I_n$ is a diagonal form of it according to Sylvester's law of inertia
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 20 '18 at 5:07












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, @congee. $J_n$ is positive semi-definite, and we add a positive multiple of $I_n$ to it.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 20 '18 at 6:18
















0












$begingroup$

The matrix $M$ of this quadratic form has the form
$$
M=frac12(I_n+J_n),
$$

where $J_n$ is the $ntimes n$ matrix with all ones.



The eigenvalues of $J_n$ are obviously $lambda_1=n$ (multiplicity one) and
$lambda_2=lambda_3=cdots=lambda_n=0$ (multiplicity $n-1$). Therefore the eigenvalues of $M$ are $(n+1)/2$ (multiplicity one) and $1/2$ (multiplicity $n-1$). Implying that there exists an orthogonal coordinate transformation $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)mapsto (x_1',x_2',ldots,x_n')$ such that in the primed coordinates the quadratic form takes the form
$$
Q(x_1',x_2',ldots,x_n')=frac12left((n+1)x_1'^2+x_2'^2+x_3'^2+cdots+x_n'^2right).
$$

An orthonormal basis corresponding to the primed coordinates can be found by orthonormalizing any basis of the $(n-1)$-dimensional subspace
$$V={(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)inBbb{R}^nmid x_1+x_2+ldots+x_n=0}$$
which is equal to the eigenspace of $J_n$ belonging to the eigenvalue zero. The missing basis vector is the unit vector $dfrac1{sqrt n}(1,1,ldots,1)$ spanning the orthogonal complement of $V$.





It is (very likely) possible to describe an orthonormal basis of $V$ with a lot of symmetries. I'm not sure I want to go there, though. I would start with a complex basis consisting of roots of unity of order $n$, and go from there.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    As you said, this quadratic form is positive definite. So, $I_n$ is a diagonal form of it according to Sylvester's law of inertia
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 20 '18 at 5:07












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, @congee. $J_n$ is positive semi-definite, and we add a positive multiple of $I_n$ to it.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 20 '18 at 6:18














0












0








0





$begingroup$

The matrix $M$ of this quadratic form has the form
$$
M=frac12(I_n+J_n),
$$

where $J_n$ is the $ntimes n$ matrix with all ones.



The eigenvalues of $J_n$ are obviously $lambda_1=n$ (multiplicity one) and
$lambda_2=lambda_3=cdots=lambda_n=0$ (multiplicity $n-1$). Therefore the eigenvalues of $M$ are $(n+1)/2$ (multiplicity one) and $1/2$ (multiplicity $n-1$). Implying that there exists an orthogonal coordinate transformation $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)mapsto (x_1',x_2',ldots,x_n')$ such that in the primed coordinates the quadratic form takes the form
$$
Q(x_1',x_2',ldots,x_n')=frac12left((n+1)x_1'^2+x_2'^2+x_3'^2+cdots+x_n'^2right).
$$

An orthonormal basis corresponding to the primed coordinates can be found by orthonormalizing any basis of the $(n-1)$-dimensional subspace
$$V={(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)inBbb{R}^nmid x_1+x_2+ldots+x_n=0}$$
which is equal to the eigenspace of $J_n$ belonging to the eigenvalue zero. The missing basis vector is the unit vector $dfrac1{sqrt n}(1,1,ldots,1)$ spanning the orthogonal complement of $V$.





It is (very likely) possible to describe an orthonormal basis of $V$ with a lot of symmetries. I'm not sure I want to go there, though. I would start with a complex basis consisting of roots of unity of order $n$, and go from there.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The matrix $M$ of this quadratic form has the form
$$
M=frac12(I_n+J_n),
$$

where $J_n$ is the $ntimes n$ matrix with all ones.



The eigenvalues of $J_n$ are obviously $lambda_1=n$ (multiplicity one) and
$lambda_2=lambda_3=cdots=lambda_n=0$ (multiplicity $n-1$). Therefore the eigenvalues of $M$ are $(n+1)/2$ (multiplicity one) and $1/2$ (multiplicity $n-1$). Implying that there exists an orthogonal coordinate transformation $(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)mapsto (x_1',x_2',ldots,x_n')$ such that in the primed coordinates the quadratic form takes the form
$$
Q(x_1',x_2',ldots,x_n')=frac12left((n+1)x_1'^2+x_2'^2+x_3'^2+cdots+x_n'^2right).
$$

An orthonormal basis corresponding to the primed coordinates can be found by orthonormalizing any basis of the $(n-1)$-dimensional subspace
$$V={(x_1,x_2,ldots,x_n)inBbb{R}^nmid x_1+x_2+ldots+x_n=0}$$
which is equal to the eigenspace of $J_n$ belonging to the eigenvalue zero. The missing basis vector is the unit vector $dfrac1{sqrt n}(1,1,ldots,1)$ spanning the orthogonal complement of $V$.





It is (very likely) possible to describe an orthonormal basis of $V$ with a lot of symmetries. I'm not sure I want to go there, though. I would start with a complex basis consisting of roots of unity of order $n$, and go from there.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 18 '18 at 7:39









Jyrki LahtonenJyrki Lahtonen

109k13168371




109k13168371












  • $begingroup$
    As you said, this quadratic form is positive definite. So, $I_n$ is a diagonal form of it according to Sylvester's law of inertia
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 20 '18 at 5:07












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, @congee. $J_n$ is positive semi-definite, and we add a positive multiple of $I_n$ to it.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 20 '18 at 6:18


















  • $begingroup$
    As you said, this quadratic form is positive definite. So, $I_n$ is a diagonal form of it according to Sylvester's law of inertia
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 20 '18 at 5:07












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah, @congee. $J_n$ is positive semi-definite, and we add a positive multiple of $I_n$ to it.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 20 '18 at 6:18
















$begingroup$
As you said, this quadratic form is positive definite. So, $I_n$ is a diagonal form of it according to Sylvester's law of inertia
$endgroup$
– congee
Dec 20 '18 at 5:07






$begingroup$
As you said, this quadratic form is positive definite. So, $I_n$ is a diagonal form of it according to Sylvester's law of inertia
$endgroup$
– congee
Dec 20 '18 at 5:07














$begingroup$
Yeah, @congee. $J_n$ is positive semi-definite, and we add a positive multiple of $I_n$ to it.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 20 '18 at 6:18




$begingroup$
Yeah, @congee. $J_n$ is positive semi-definite, and we add a positive multiple of $I_n$ to it.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 20 '18 at 6:18











0












$begingroup$

This is too long for the comment box.



The essence of your exercise is given in the following example.



Suppose we have $f(x, y, z) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + xy + xz + yz.$ We complete the square by getting rid of one of the variables, say we pick the first one ($x$ in my notation). So you get,
$$begin{align*}
f(x, y, z) &= (x^2 + xy + xz) + y^2 + z^2 + yz \
&= left( x + dfrac{y}{2} + dfrac{z}{2} right)^2 - frac{y^2}{4} - frac{z^2}{4} -frac{yz}{2} + y^2 + z^2 + yz\
&=u^2 + dfrac{3y^2}{4} + dfrac{yz}{2} + dfrac{3z^2}{4}
end{align*},$$

where $u = x + dfrac{y}{2} + dfrac{z}{2}.$ Now, we can get rid of the second variable, $y$ in my case, by, again, completing the square
$$begin{align*}
f(x, y, z) &= u^2 + left( dfrac{sqrt{3}y}{2} + frac{z}{2sqrt{3}} right)^2-dfrac{z^2}{12}+dfrac{3z^2}{4} = u^2 + v^2+dfrac{5}{6}z^2
end{align*},$$

which is a required representation of $f.$



The case with $x_1, ldots, x_p$ is just guessing a pattern and using induction (I am guessing).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I've tried this method to deal directly with situation that has $n$ variables, but it seems hard to handle for me. It seems that it's easy to find the rule from a simple point of view. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11










  • $begingroup$
    @WillM. When you complete the square, you should put $-frac{yz}2$ instead of $-frac{yz}4$, because $left(x+frac y2+frac z2right)^2=x^2+frac{y^2}4+frac{z^2}4+xy+xz+frac{yz}2$. But then, I don't see how you group together a common factor $frac34$ in the passage that follows.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11












  • $begingroup$
    (correction: I do see how to deal with it, but the error is still there)
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:17










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I didn't notice it just now.
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SaucyO'Path this brute force completing the square method always work... provided you can do the arithmetic. I usually cannot.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:52
















0












$begingroup$

This is too long for the comment box.



The essence of your exercise is given in the following example.



Suppose we have $f(x, y, z) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + xy + xz + yz.$ We complete the square by getting rid of one of the variables, say we pick the first one ($x$ in my notation). So you get,
$$begin{align*}
f(x, y, z) &= (x^2 + xy + xz) + y^2 + z^2 + yz \
&= left( x + dfrac{y}{2} + dfrac{z}{2} right)^2 - frac{y^2}{4} - frac{z^2}{4} -frac{yz}{2} + y^2 + z^2 + yz\
&=u^2 + dfrac{3y^2}{4} + dfrac{yz}{2} + dfrac{3z^2}{4}
end{align*},$$

where $u = x + dfrac{y}{2} + dfrac{z}{2}.$ Now, we can get rid of the second variable, $y$ in my case, by, again, completing the square
$$begin{align*}
f(x, y, z) &= u^2 + left( dfrac{sqrt{3}y}{2} + frac{z}{2sqrt{3}} right)^2-dfrac{z^2}{12}+dfrac{3z^2}{4} = u^2 + v^2+dfrac{5}{6}z^2
end{align*},$$

which is a required representation of $f.$



The case with $x_1, ldots, x_p$ is just guessing a pattern and using induction (I am guessing).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I've tried this method to deal directly with situation that has $n$ variables, but it seems hard to handle for me. It seems that it's easy to find the rule from a simple point of view. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11










  • $begingroup$
    @WillM. When you complete the square, you should put $-frac{yz}2$ instead of $-frac{yz}4$, because $left(x+frac y2+frac z2right)^2=x^2+frac{y^2}4+frac{z^2}4+xy+xz+frac{yz}2$. But then, I don't see how you group together a common factor $frac34$ in the passage that follows.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11












  • $begingroup$
    (correction: I do see how to deal with it, but the error is still there)
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:17










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I didn't notice it just now.
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SaucyO'Path this brute force completing the square method always work... provided you can do the arithmetic. I usually cannot.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:52














0












0








0





$begingroup$

This is too long for the comment box.



The essence of your exercise is given in the following example.



Suppose we have $f(x, y, z) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + xy + xz + yz.$ We complete the square by getting rid of one of the variables, say we pick the first one ($x$ in my notation). So you get,
$$begin{align*}
f(x, y, z) &= (x^2 + xy + xz) + y^2 + z^2 + yz \
&= left( x + dfrac{y}{2} + dfrac{z}{2} right)^2 - frac{y^2}{4} - frac{z^2}{4} -frac{yz}{2} + y^2 + z^2 + yz\
&=u^2 + dfrac{3y^2}{4} + dfrac{yz}{2} + dfrac{3z^2}{4}
end{align*},$$

where $u = x + dfrac{y}{2} + dfrac{z}{2}.$ Now, we can get rid of the second variable, $y$ in my case, by, again, completing the square
$$begin{align*}
f(x, y, z) &= u^2 + left( dfrac{sqrt{3}y}{2} + frac{z}{2sqrt{3}} right)^2-dfrac{z^2}{12}+dfrac{3z^2}{4} = u^2 + v^2+dfrac{5}{6}z^2
end{align*},$$

which is a required representation of $f.$



The case with $x_1, ldots, x_p$ is just guessing a pattern and using induction (I am guessing).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



This is too long for the comment box.



The essence of your exercise is given in the following example.



Suppose we have $f(x, y, z) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + xy + xz + yz.$ We complete the square by getting rid of one of the variables, say we pick the first one ($x$ in my notation). So you get,
$$begin{align*}
f(x, y, z) &= (x^2 + xy + xz) + y^2 + z^2 + yz \
&= left( x + dfrac{y}{2} + dfrac{z}{2} right)^2 - frac{y^2}{4} - frac{z^2}{4} -frac{yz}{2} + y^2 + z^2 + yz\
&=u^2 + dfrac{3y^2}{4} + dfrac{yz}{2} + dfrac{3z^2}{4}
end{align*},$$

where $u = x + dfrac{y}{2} + dfrac{z}{2}.$ Now, we can get rid of the second variable, $y$ in my case, by, again, completing the square
$$begin{align*}
f(x, y, z) &= u^2 + left( dfrac{sqrt{3}y}{2} + frac{z}{2sqrt{3}} right)^2-dfrac{z^2}{12}+dfrac{3z^2}{4} = u^2 + v^2+dfrac{5}{6}z^2
end{align*},$$

which is a required representation of $f.$



The case with $x_1, ldots, x_p$ is just guessing a pattern and using induction (I am guessing).







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 18 '18 at 7:51

























answered Dec 18 '18 at 6:51









Will M.Will M.

2,460315




2,460315












  • $begingroup$
    I've tried this method to deal directly with situation that has $n$ variables, but it seems hard to handle for me. It seems that it's easy to find the rule from a simple point of view. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11










  • $begingroup$
    @WillM. When you complete the square, you should put $-frac{yz}2$ instead of $-frac{yz}4$, because $left(x+frac y2+frac z2right)^2=x^2+frac{y^2}4+frac{z^2}4+xy+xz+frac{yz}2$. But then, I don't see how you group together a common factor $frac34$ in the passage that follows.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11












  • $begingroup$
    (correction: I do see how to deal with it, but the error is still there)
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:17










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I didn't notice it just now.
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SaucyO'Path this brute force completing the square method always work... provided you can do the arithmetic. I usually cannot.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:52


















  • $begingroup$
    I've tried this method to deal directly with situation that has $n$ variables, but it seems hard to handle for me. It seems that it's easy to find the rule from a simple point of view. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11










  • $begingroup$
    @WillM. When you complete the square, you should put $-frac{yz}2$ instead of $-frac{yz}4$, because $left(x+frac y2+frac z2right)^2=x^2+frac{y^2}4+frac{z^2}4+xy+xz+frac{yz}2$. But then, I don't see how you group together a common factor $frac34$ in the passage that follows.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:11












  • $begingroup$
    (correction: I do see how to deal with it, but the error is still there)
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:17










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I didn't notice it just now.
    $endgroup$
    – congee
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @SaucyO'Path this brute force completing the square method always work... provided you can do the arithmetic. I usually cannot.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:52
















$begingroup$
I've tried this method to deal directly with situation that has $n$ variables, but it seems hard to handle for me. It seems that it's easy to find the rule from a simple point of view. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– congee
Dec 18 '18 at 7:11




$begingroup$
I've tried this method to deal directly with situation that has $n$ variables, but it seems hard to handle for me. It seems that it's easy to find the rule from a simple point of view. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– congee
Dec 18 '18 at 7:11












$begingroup$
@WillM. When you complete the square, you should put $-frac{yz}2$ instead of $-frac{yz}4$, because $left(x+frac y2+frac z2right)^2=x^2+frac{y^2}4+frac{z^2}4+xy+xz+frac{yz}2$. But then, I don't see how you group together a common factor $frac34$ in the passage that follows.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Dec 18 '18 at 7:11






$begingroup$
@WillM. When you complete the square, you should put $-frac{yz}2$ instead of $-frac{yz}4$, because $left(x+frac y2+frac z2right)^2=x^2+frac{y^2}4+frac{z^2}4+xy+xz+frac{yz}2$. But then, I don't see how you group together a common factor $frac34$ in the passage that follows.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Dec 18 '18 at 7:11














$begingroup$
(correction: I do see how to deal with it, but the error is still there)
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Dec 18 '18 at 7:17




$begingroup$
(correction: I do see how to deal with it, but the error is still there)
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Dec 18 '18 at 7:17












$begingroup$
Yes, I didn't notice it just now.
$endgroup$
– congee
Dec 18 '18 at 7:19




$begingroup$
Yes, I didn't notice it just now.
$endgroup$
– congee
Dec 18 '18 at 7:19




1




1




$begingroup$
@SaucyO'Path this brute force completing the square method always work... provided you can do the arithmetic. I usually cannot.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 7:52




$begingroup$
@SaucyO'Path this brute force completing the square method always work... provided you can do the arithmetic. I usually cannot.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 18 '18 at 7:52


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044835%2ffind-a-diagonal-form-of-the-quadratic-form-fx-sum-i-1nx-i2-sum-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna