Why do $sum na_n x^{n-1}$ and $sum na_n x^n$ have the same radius of convergence?
$begingroup$
Why is it that $sum na_n x^{n-1}$ and $sum na_n x^n$ have the same radius of convergence $R$?
How can I show that
$$lim sup|na_n|^{1/n} = lim sup |na_n x|^{1/n}$$ since this would mean that both series have the same radius of convergence $R$?
real-analysis sequences-and-series convergence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why is it that $sum na_n x^{n-1}$ and $sum na_n x^n$ have the same radius of convergence $R$?
How can I show that
$$lim sup|na_n|^{1/n} = lim sup |na_n x|^{1/n}$$ since this would mean that both series have the same radius of convergence $R$?
real-analysis sequences-and-series convergence
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
You can directly note they have the same radius of converge because one is just x times the other
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 3:54
$begingroup$
That is exactly what I want to prove
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
$begingroup$
can you be more specific?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why is it that $sum na_n x^{n-1}$ and $sum na_n x^n$ have the same radius of convergence $R$?
How can I show that
$$lim sup|na_n|^{1/n} = lim sup |na_n x|^{1/n}$$ since this would mean that both series have the same radius of convergence $R$?
real-analysis sequences-and-series convergence
$endgroup$
Why is it that $sum na_n x^{n-1}$ and $sum na_n x^n$ have the same radius of convergence $R$?
How can I show that
$$lim sup|na_n|^{1/n} = lim sup |na_n x|^{1/n}$$ since this would mean that both series have the same radius of convergence $R$?
real-analysis sequences-and-series convergence
real-analysis sequences-and-series convergence
asked Dec 18 '18 at 3:45
The BoscoThe Bosco
541212
541212
2
$begingroup$
You can directly note they have the same radius of converge because one is just x times the other
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 3:54
$begingroup$
That is exactly what I want to prove
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
$begingroup$
can you be more specific?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
You can directly note they have the same radius of converge because one is just x times the other
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 3:54
$begingroup$
That is exactly what I want to prove
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
$begingroup$
can you be more specific?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 11:55
2
2
$begingroup$
You can directly note they have the same radius of converge because one is just x times the other
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 3:54
$begingroup$
You can directly note they have the same radius of converge because one is just x times the other
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 3:54
$begingroup$
That is exactly what I want to prove
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
$begingroup$
That is exactly what I want to prove
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
$begingroup$
can you be more specific?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 11:55
$begingroup$
can you be more specific?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Instead of using any formula for radius of convergence simply use the fact that $sum na_nx^{n-1}$ converges iff $sum na_nx^n$ does, for any $x neq 0$. Obviously, this implies that they have the same radius of convergence.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But proving that part that one converges iff the other one does is what I don't get.
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
If $sum a_n $ converges then $sum c a_n$ also converges for any constant $c$. Apply this with $c=x$ in one direction and $c =frac 1 x$ in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 11:43
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044751%2fwhy-do-sum-na-n-xn-1-and-sum-na-n-xn-have-the-same-radius-of-convergen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Instead of using any formula for radius of convergence simply use the fact that $sum na_nx^{n-1}$ converges iff $sum na_nx^n$ does, for any $x neq 0$. Obviously, this implies that they have the same radius of convergence.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But proving that part that one converges iff the other one does is what I don't get.
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
If $sum a_n $ converges then $sum c a_n$ also converges for any constant $c$. Apply this with $c=x$ in one direction and $c =frac 1 x$ in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 11:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Instead of using any formula for radius of convergence simply use the fact that $sum na_nx^{n-1}$ converges iff $sum na_nx^n$ does, for any $x neq 0$. Obviously, this implies that they have the same radius of convergence.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But proving that part that one converges iff the other one does is what I don't get.
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
If $sum a_n $ converges then $sum c a_n$ also converges for any constant $c$. Apply this with $c=x$ in one direction and $c =frac 1 x$ in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 11:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Instead of using any formula for radius of convergence simply use the fact that $sum na_nx^{n-1}$ converges iff $sum na_nx^n$ does, for any $x neq 0$. Obviously, this implies that they have the same radius of convergence.
$endgroup$
Instead of using any formula for radius of convergence simply use the fact that $sum na_nx^{n-1}$ converges iff $sum na_nx^n$ does, for any $x neq 0$. Obviously, this implies that they have the same radius of convergence.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 5:59
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
55.4k42057
55.4k42057
$begingroup$
But proving that part that one converges iff the other one does is what I don't get.
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
If $sum a_n $ converges then $sum c a_n$ also converges for any constant $c$. Apply this with $c=x$ in one direction and $c =frac 1 x$ in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 11:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
But proving that part that one converges iff the other one does is what I don't get.
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
If $sum a_n $ converges then $sum c a_n$ also converges for any constant $c$. Apply this with $c=x$ in one direction and $c =frac 1 x$ in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 11:43
$begingroup$
But proving that part that one converges iff the other one does is what I don't get.
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
But proving that part that one converges iff the other one does is what I don't get.
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:09
$begingroup$
If $sum a_n $ converges then $sum c a_n$ also converges for any constant $c$. Apply this with $c=x$ in one direction and $c =frac 1 x$ in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 11:43
$begingroup$
If $sum a_n $ converges then $sum c a_n$ also converges for any constant $c$. Apply this with $c=x$ in one direction and $c =frac 1 x$ in the other direction.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 18 '18 at 11:43
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044751%2fwhy-do-sum-na-n-xn-1-and-sum-na-n-xn-have-the-same-radius-of-convergen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
You can directly note they have the same radius of converge because one is just x times the other
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 3:54
$begingroup$
That is exactly what I want to prove
$endgroup$
– The Bosco
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
$begingroup$
can you be more specific?
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 18 '18 at 11:55