A counterexample to “a associates b”, then “a strongly associates b”
$begingroup$
In this article, the author gives the following counterexample for "a associates b" but not "a strongly associates b" at the end of the first page.
However, in $[1,2]$, the values of both $x,y$ are zero, so there is no need for choosing $c(t) = 3- 2t$ in that interval, i.e choosing $c(t) = 1 $ in $[1,2]$ is also a possible choice, and in the latter case, $c$ is a unit element of $C[0,3]$ which invalidates this "counterexample".
Considering the fact that this article is read by many mathematicians and published, what is wrong in my view that this example is still a counterexample ?
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this article, the author gives the following counterexample for "a associates b" but not "a strongly associates b" at the end of the first page.
However, in $[1,2]$, the values of both $x,y$ are zero, so there is no need for choosing $c(t) = 3- 2t$ in that interval, i.e choosing $c(t) = 1 $ in $[1,2]$ is also a possible choice, and in the latter case, $c$ is a unit element of $C[0,3]$ which invalidates this "counterexample".
Considering the fact that this article is read by many mathematicians and published, what is wrong in my view that this example is still a counterexample ?
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this article, the author gives the following counterexample for "a associates b" but not "a strongly associates b" at the end of the first page.
However, in $[1,2]$, the values of both $x,y$ are zero, so there is no need for choosing $c(t) = 3- 2t$ in that interval, i.e choosing $c(t) = 1 $ in $[1,2]$ is also a possible choice, and in the latter case, $c$ is a unit element of $C[0,3]$ which invalidates this "counterexample".
Considering the fact that this article is read by many mathematicians and published, what is wrong in my view that this example is still a counterexample ?
abstract-algebra ring-theory
$endgroup$
In this article, the author gives the following counterexample for "a associates b" but not "a strongly associates b" at the end of the first page.
However, in $[1,2]$, the values of both $x,y$ are zero, so there is no need for choosing $c(t) = 3- 2t$ in that interval, i.e choosing $c(t) = 1 $ in $[1,2]$ is also a possible choice, and in the latter case, $c$ is a unit element of $C[0,3]$ which invalidates this "counterexample".
Considering the fact that this article is read by many mathematicians and published, what is wrong in my view that this example is still a counterexample ?
abstract-algebra ring-theory
abstract-algebra ring-theory
asked Dec 18 '18 at 5:58
onurcanbektasonurcanbektas
3,36011036
3,36011036
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your proposed definition of $c$ is not continuous, and so is not an element of $C[0,3]$. The point is that $c$ needs to be $1$ on $[0,1]$ and $-1$ on $[2,3]$, so in order to be continuous it would need to pass through $0$ in between, and so it cannot be a unit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044827%2fa-counterexample-to-a-associates-b-then-a-strongly-associates-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your proposed definition of $c$ is not continuous, and so is not an element of $C[0,3]$. The point is that $c$ needs to be $1$ on $[0,1]$ and $-1$ on $[2,3]$, so in order to be continuous it would need to pass through $0$ in between, and so it cannot be a unit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your proposed definition of $c$ is not continuous, and so is not an element of $C[0,3]$. The point is that $c$ needs to be $1$ on $[0,1]$ and $-1$ on $[2,3]$, so in order to be continuous it would need to pass through $0$ in between, and so it cannot be a unit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your proposed definition of $c$ is not continuous, and so is not an element of $C[0,3]$. The point is that $c$ needs to be $1$ on $[0,1]$ and $-1$ on $[2,3]$, so in order to be continuous it would need to pass through $0$ in between, and so it cannot be a unit.
$endgroup$
Your proposed definition of $c$ is not continuous, and so is not an element of $C[0,3]$. The point is that $c$ needs to be $1$ on $[0,1]$ and $-1$ on $[2,3]$, so in order to be continuous it would need to pass through $0$ in between, and so it cannot be a unit.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 6:03
Eric WofseyEric Wofsey
183k13209337
183k13209337
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044827%2fa-counterexample-to-a-associates-b-then-a-strongly-associates-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown