Given $f(x)=o(1), g(x)=O(h(x)) text{ as } xto a $, show that $f(x)g(x)=o(h(x))$
$begingroup$
We are given that $f(x)=o(1)$ as $ xto a $, $g(x)=O(h(x))$ as $ xto a $. It is required to prove or show that $f(x)g(x)=o(h(x))$ as $ xto a $
I just multiplied the two functions to get: $$f(x)g(x)=o(1)O(h(x))=color{red}{o(1)O(1)h(x) = o(1)h(x)=o(h(x))} text{ as $xto a$ } $$
My main question is whether or not the part in red is a valid use of the properties of asymptotic expressions.
calculus limits discrete-mathematics asymptotics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We are given that $f(x)=o(1)$ as $ xto a $, $g(x)=O(h(x))$ as $ xto a $. It is required to prove or show that $f(x)g(x)=o(h(x))$ as $ xto a $
I just multiplied the two functions to get: $$f(x)g(x)=o(1)O(h(x))=color{red}{o(1)O(1)h(x) = o(1)h(x)=o(h(x))} text{ as $xto a$ } $$
My main question is whether or not the part in red is a valid use of the properties of asymptotic expressions.
calculus limits discrete-mathematics asymptotics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We are given that $f(x)=o(1)$ as $ xto a $, $g(x)=O(h(x))$ as $ xto a $. It is required to prove or show that $f(x)g(x)=o(h(x))$ as $ xto a $
I just multiplied the two functions to get: $$f(x)g(x)=o(1)O(h(x))=color{red}{o(1)O(1)h(x) = o(1)h(x)=o(h(x))} text{ as $xto a$ } $$
My main question is whether or not the part in red is a valid use of the properties of asymptotic expressions.
calculus limits discrete-mathematics asymptotics
$endgroup$
We are given that $f(x)=o(1)$ as $ xto a $, $g(x)=O(h(x))$ as $ xto a $. It is required to prove or show that $f(x)g(x)=o(h(x))$ as $ xto a $
I just multiplied the two functions to get: $$f(x)g(x)=o(1)O(h(x))=color{red}{o(1)O(1)h(x) = o(1)h(x)=o(h(x))} text{ as $xto a$ } $$
My main question is whether or not the part in red is a valid use of the properties of asymptotic expressions.
calculus limits discrete-mathematics asymptotics
calculus limits discrete-mathematics asymptotics
asked Dec 14 '18 at 10:27
E.NoleE.Nole
113112
113112
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Recall that by definition as $xto a$
$$f(x)=o(1)iff f(x)=1cdot omega_1(x) quad omega_1(x)to 0$$
$$g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$$
then
$$f(x)g(x)=h(x)cdotomega_1(x)cdotomega_2(x)=h(x)cdot omega_3(x) quad omega_3(x)to 0$$
indeed we have that $|omega_2(x)|le M$ and by squeeze theorem
$$|omega_3(x)|=|omega_1(x)cdotomega_2(x)|le M|omega_1(x)to 0$$
In the same way we can see that
$O(h(x))=h(x)cdot O(1)$
$o(1)cdot O(1)=o(1)$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was given slightly different definitions so I'd like to clarify, How is $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$? The limsup part is where I'm particularly lost. The definition I know is that $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$
$endgroup$
– E.Nole
Dec 14 '18 at 15:40
1
$begingroup$
Your definition $$lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$$ is uncorrect we should have $$limsup_{xrightarrow a} left|frac{g(x)}{h(x)}right| = C < infty$$ Refer to formal definition. The definition I used is more general since include also te case with $h(x)=0$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 15:50
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039192%2fgiven-fx-o1-gx-ohx-text-as-x-to-a-show-that-fxgx-ohx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Recall that by definition as $xto a$
$$f(x)=o(1)iff f(x)=1cdot omega_1(x) quad omega_1(x)to 0$$
$$g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$$
then
$$f(x)g(x)=h(x)cdotomega_1(x)cdotomega_2(x)=h(x)cdot omega_3(x) quad omega_3(x)to 0$$
indeed we have that $|omega_2(x)|le M$ and by squeeze theorem
$$|omega_3(x)|=|omega_1(x)cdotomega_2(x)|le M|omega_1(x)to 0$$
In the same way we can see that
$O(h(x))=h(x)cdot O(1)$
$o(1)cdot O(1)=o(1)$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was given slightly different definitions so I'd like to clarify, How is $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$? The limsup part is where I'm particularly lost. The definition I know is that $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$
$endgroup$
– E.Nole
Dec 14 '18 at 15:40
1
$begingroup$
Your definition $$lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$$ is uncorrect we should have $$limsup_{xrightarrow a} left|frac{g(x)}{h(x)}right| = C < infty$$ Refer to formal definition. The definition I used is more general since include also te case with $h(x)=0$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 15:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Recall that by definition as $xto a$
$$f(x)=o(1)iff f(x)=1cdot omega_1(x) quad omega_1(x)to 0$$
$$g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$$
then
$$f(x)g(x)=h(x)cdotomega_1(x)cdotomega_2(x)=h(x)cdot omega_3(x) quad omega_3(x)to 0$$
indeed we have that $|omega_2(x)|le M$ and by squeeze theorem
$$|omega_3(x)|=|omega_1(x)cdotomega_2(x)|le M|omega_1(x)to 0$$
In the same way we can see that
$O(h(x))=h(x)cdot O(1)$
$o(1)cdot O(1)=o(1)$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I was given slightly different definitions so I'd like to clarify, How is $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$? The limsup part is where I'm particularly lost. The definition I know is that $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$
$endgroup$
– E.Nole
Dec 14 '18 at 15:40
1
$begingroup$
Your definition $$lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$$ is uncorrect we should have $$limsup_{xrightarrow a} left|frac{g(x)}{h(x)}right| = C < infty$$ Refer to formal definition. The definition I used is more general since include also te case with $h(x)=0$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 15:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Recall that by definition as $xto a$
$$f(x)=o(1)iff f(x)=1cdot omega_1(x) quad omega_1(x)to 0$$
$$g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$$
then
$$f(x)g(x)=h(x)cdotomega_1(x)cdotomega_2(x)=h(x)cdot omega_3(x) quad omega_3(x)to 0$$
indeed we have that $|omega_2(x)|le M$ and by squeeze theorem
$$|omega_3(x)|=|omega_1(x)cdotomega_2(x)|le M|omega_1(x)to 0$$
In the same way we can see that
$O(h(x))=h(x)cdot O(1)$
$o(1)cdot O(1)=o(1)$
$endgroup$
Recall that by definition as $xto a$
$$f(x)=o(1)iff f(x)=1cdot omega_1(x) quad omega_1(x)to 0$$
$$g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$$
then
$$f(x)g(x)=h(x)cdotomega_1(x)cdotomega_2(x)=h(x)cdot omega_3(x) quad omega_3(x)to 0$$
indeed we have that $|omega_2(x)|le M$ and by squeeze theorem
$$|omega_3(x)|=|omega_1(x)cdotomega_2(x)|le M|omega_1(x)to 0$$
In the same way we can see that
$O(h(x))=h(x)cdot O(1)$
$o(1)cdot O(1)=o(1)$
edited Dec 14 '18 at 10:45
answered Dec 14 '18 at 10:30
gimusigimusi
1
1
$begingroup$
I was given slightly different definitions so I'd like to clarify, How is $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$? The limsup part is where I'm particularly lost. The definition I know is that $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$
$endgroup$
– E.Nole
Dec 14 '18 at 15:40
1
$begingroup$
Your definition $$lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$$ is uncorrect we should have $$limsup_{xrightarrow a} left|frac{g(x)}{h(x)}right| = C < infty$$ Refer to formal definition. The definition I used is more general since include also te case with $h(x)=0$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 15:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was given slightly different definitions so I'd like to clarify, How is $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$? The limsup part is where I'm particularly lost. The definition I know is that $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$
$endgroup$
– E.Nole
Dec 14 '18 at 15:40
1
$begingroup$
Your definition $$lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$$ is uncorrect we should have $$limsup_{xrightarrow a} left|frac{g(x)}{h(x)}right| = C < infty$$ Refer to formal definition. The definition I used is more general since include also te case with $h(x)=0$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 15:50
$begingroup$
I was given slightly different definitions so I'd like to clarify, How is $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$? The limsup part is where I'm particularly lost. The definition I know is that $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$
$endgroup$
– E.Nole
Dec 14 '18 at 15:40
$begingroup$
I was given slightly different definitions so I'd like to clarify, How is $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff g(x)=h(x)cdot omega_2(x) quad limsup|omega_2(x)|in mathbb R$? The limsup part is where I'm particularly lost. The definition I know is that $g(x)=O(h(x)) iff lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$
$endgroup$
– E.Nole
Dec 14 '18 at 15:40
1
1
$begingroup$
Your definition $$lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$$ is uncorrect we should have $$limsup_{xrightarrow a} left|frac{g(x)}{h(x)}right| = C < infty$$ Refer to formal definition. The definition I used is more general since include also te case with $h(x)=0$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 15:50
$begingroup$
Your definition $$lim_{xrightarrow a} frac{g(x)}{h(x)} = C < infty$$ is uncorrect we should have $$limsup_{xrightarrow a} left|frac{g(x)}{h(x)}right| = C < infty$$ Refer to formal definition. The definition I used is more general since include also te case with $h(x)=0$.
$endgroup$
– gimusi
Dec 14 '18 at 15:50
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039192%2fgiven-fx-o1-gx-ohx-text-as-x-to-a-show-that-fxgx-ohx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown