What mean $int mathcal D(n(x)) delta left(n(x)-frac{1}{N}sum_{k=1}^N delta (x-x_i)right)$?
$begingroup$
In formula (4.5) page 27 of this document, what mean
$$int mathcal D(n(x)) delta left(n(x)-frac{1}{N}sum_{k=1}^N delta (x-x_i)right),$$
where the integral run over all possible normalized, non negative smooth function $n(x)$, and $delta $ is the $delta $ distribution. Could someone explain what is this integral, how it work and why this integral is $1$ ?
probability-theory mathematical-physics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In formula (4.5) page 27 of this document, what mean
$$int mathcal D(n(x)) delta left(n(x)-frac{1}{N}sum_{k=1}^N delta (x-x_i)right),$$
where the integral run over all possible normalized, non negative smooth function $n(x)$, and $delta $ is the $delta $ distribution. Could someone explain what is this integral, how it work and why this integral is $1$ ?
probability-theory mathematical-physics
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Please do not force people to download the whole PDF, simply to be able to know the title and authors and abstract of the document.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 14 '18 at 12:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In formula (4.5) page 27 of this document, what mean
$$int mathcal D(n(x)) delta left(n(x)-frac{1}{N}sum_{k=1}^N delta (x-x_i)right),$$
where the integral run over all possible normalized, non negative smooth function $n(x)$, and $delta $ is the $delta $ distribution. Could someone explain what is this integral, how it work and why this integral is $1$ ?
probability-theory mathematical-physics
$endgroup$
In formula (4.5) page 27 of this document, what mean
$$int mathcal D(n(x)) delta left(n(x)-frac{1}{N}sum_{k=1}^N delta (x-x_i)right),$$
where the integral run over all possible normalized, non negative smooth function $n(x)$, and $delta $ is the $delta $ distribution. Could someone explain what is this integral, how it work and why this integral is $1$ ?
probability-theory mathematical-physics
probability-theory mathematical-physics
edited Dec 14 '18 at 12:19
Did
246k23222458
246k23222458
asked Dec 14 '18 at 11:53
user623855user623855
927
927
2
$begingroup$
Please do not force people to download the whole PDF, simply to be able to know the title and authors and abstract of the document.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 14 '18 at 12:20
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Please do not force people to download the whole PDF, simply to be able to know the title and authors and abstract of the document.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 14 '18 at 12:20
2
2
$begingroup$
Please do not force people to download the whole PDF, simply to be able to know the title and authors and abstract of the document.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 14 '18 at 12:20
$begingroup$
Please do not force people to download the whole PDF, simply to be able to know the title and authors and abstract of the document.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 14 '18 at 12:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Looks like a path integral. Actually the result should be $frac{1}{N}sum_{k=1}^N delta (x-x_i)$. Then when you integrate over $x$ one more time it is $=1$.
Look into distributions to get a explanation for the $delta()$. The one appearing in your integral is a sort of infinite dimensional delta distribution.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I in fact have more difficultie to understand $mathcal D(n(x))$ that the $delta $.
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 14 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
you can approximate it by discretizing n(x) into K pieces with K very large. Then $int mathcal D(n(x))$ is a K dimensional integral.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
It's not so easy to make it rigorous. Its an infinite dimensional integration.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:05
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039268%2fwhat-mean-int-mathcal-dnx-delta-leftnx-frac1n-sum-k-1n-delt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Looks like a path integral. Actually the result should be $frac{1}{N}sum_{k=1}^N delta (x-x_i)$. Then when you integrate over $x$ one more time it is $=1$.
Look into distributions to get a explanation for the $delta()$. The one appearing in your integral is a sort of infinite dimensional delta distribution.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I in fact have more difficultie to understand $mathcal D(n(x))$ that the $delta $.
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 14 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
you can approximate it by discretizing n(x) into K pieces with K very large. Then $int mathcal D(n(x))$ is a K dimensional integral.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
It's not so easy to make it rigorous. Its an infinite dimensional integration.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Looks like a path integral. Actually the result should be $frac{1}{N}sum_{k=1}^N delta (x-x_i)$. Then when you integrate over $x$ one more time it is $=1$.
Look into distributions to get a explanation for the $delta()$. The one appearing in your integral is a sort of infinite dimensional delta distribution.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I in fact have more difficultie to understand $mathcal D(n(x))$ that the $delta $.
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 14 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
you can approximate it by discretizing n(x) into K pieces with K very large. Then $int mathcal D(n(x))$ is a K dimensional integral.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
It's not so easy to make it rigorous. Its an infinite dimensional integration.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Looks like a path integral. Actually the result should be $frac{1}{N}sum_{k=1}^N delta (x-x_i)$. Then when you integrate over $x$ one more time it is $=1$.
Look into distributions to get a explanation for the $delta()$. The one appearing in your integral is a sort of infinite dimensional delta distribution.
$endgroup$
Looks like a path integral. Actually the result should be $frac{1}{N}sum_{k=1}^N delta (x-x_i)$. Then when you integrate over $x$ one more time it is $=1$.
Look into distributions to get a explanation for the $delta()$. The one appearing in your integral is a sort of infinite dimensional delta distribution.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 12:13
tonydotonydo
1477
1477
$begingroup$
I in fact have more difficultie to understand $mathcal D(n(x))$ that the $delta $.
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 14 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
you can approximate it by discretizing n(x) into K pieces with K very large. Then $int mathcal D(n(x))$ is a K dimensional integral.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
It's not so easy to make it rigorous. Its an infinite dimensional integration.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I in fact have more difficultie to understand $mathcal D(n(x))$ that the $delta $.
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 14 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
you can approximate it by discretizing n(x) into K pieces with K very large. Then $int mathcal D(n(x))$ is a K dimensional integral.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
It's not so easy to make it rigorous. Its an infinite dimensional integration.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:05
$begingroup$
I in fact have more difficultie to understand $mathcal D(n(x))$ that the $delta $.
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 14 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
I in fact have more difficultie to understand $mathcal D(n(x))$ that the $delta $.
$endgroup$
– user623855
Dec 14 '18 at 12:54
$begingroup$
you can approximate it by discretizing n(x) into K pieces with K very large. Then $int mathcal D(n(x))$ is a K dimensional integral.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
you can approximate it by discretizing n(x) into K pieces with K very large. Then $int mathcal D(n(x))$ is a K dimensional integral.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
It's not so easy to make it rigorous. Its an infinite dimensional integration.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:05
$begingroup$
It's not so easy to make it rigorous. Its an infinite dimensional integration.
$endgroup$
– tonydo
Dec 14 '18 at 13:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039268%2fwhat-mean-int-mathcal-dnx-delta-leftnx-frac1n-sum-k-1n-delt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Please do not force people to download the whole PDF, simply to be able to know the title and authors and abstract of the document.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 14 '18 at 12:20