McCormick envelope of two variables which are also defined in terms of an envelope
I have a equation which is defined as $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M$ where $M$ is the McCormick envelope of product of variables $x_ix_j$ and $C$ is defined as envelope of cosine function.
The McCormick envelope is defined as
begin{align*}
langle x_ix_jrangle^M &= { alpha ge x_i^lx_j+x_j^lx_i-x_i^lx_j^l \
&qquad alpha ge x_i^ux_j+x_j^ux_i-x_i^ux_j^u \
&qquad alpha le x_i^lx_j+x_j^ux_i-x_i^lx_j^u \
&qquad alpha le x_i^ux_j+x_j^lx_i-x_i^ux_j^l},
end{align*}
where $x^l,x^u$ are constants for both $x_i,x_j$ and known.
The envelope for cosine function is defined as
begin{align*}
langle cos(theta)rangle^C &= {beta le 1-frac{1-cos(theta^m)}{(theta^m)^2}theta^2\
&qquad betagefrac{cos(theta^l)-cos(theta^u)}{(theta^l-theta^u)}(theta-theta^l)+cos(theta^l)},
end{align*}
where $theta^l,theta^u,theta^m$ are constants and known.
Now, I have to define the McCormick envelope of $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M$. Is it equivalent/true to write $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta rangle^Crangle^M$ as
begin{align*}
langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M = langle alpha beta rangle^M &= { gamma ge alpha^lbeta+beta^lalpha-alpha^lbeta^l \
&qquad gamma ge alpha^ubeta+beta^ualpha-alpha^ubeta^u \
&qquad gamma le alpha^lbeta+beta^ualpha-alpha^lbeta^u \
&qquad gamma le alpha^ubeta+beta^lalpha-alpha^ubeta^l}?
end{align*}
If this is true, then how to define $alpha^l,alpha^u,beta^l,beta^u$? Do the first two inequalities of $langle x_ix_jrangle^M$ becomes the lower limit for $alpha$ and the last two ineqaulites of $langle x_ix_jrangle^M$ becomes upper limit of $alpha$? Or is there any other/better way to define McCormick envelope for such equation?
real-analysis convex-optimization constraints
add a comment |
I have a equation which is defined as $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M$ where $M$ is the McCormick envelope of product of variables $x_ix_j$ and $C$ is defined as envelope of cosine function.
The McCormick envelope is defined as
begin{align*}
langle x_ix_jrangle^M &= { alpha ge x_i^lx_j+x_j^lx_i-x_i^lx_j^l \
&qquad alpha ge x_i^ux_j+x_j^ux_i-x_i^ux_j^u \
&qquad alpha le x_i^lx_j+x_j^ux_i-x_i^lx_j^u \
&qquad alpha le x_i^ux_j+x_j^lx_i-x_i^ux_j^l},
end{align*}
where $x^l,x^u$ are constants for both $x_i,x_j$ and known.
The envelope for cosine function is defined as
begin{align*}
langle cos(theta)rangle^C &= {beta le 1-frac{1-cos(theta^m)}{(theta^m)^2}theta^2\
&qquad betagefrac{cos(theta^l)-cos(theta^u)}{(theta^l-theta^u)}(theta-theta^l)+cos(theta^l)},
end{align*}
where $theta^l,theta^u,theta^m$ are constants and known.
Now, I have to define the McCormick envelope of $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M$. Is it equivalent/true to write $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta rangle^Crangle^M$ as
begin{align*}
langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M = langle alpha beta rangle^M &= { gamma ge alpha^lbeta+beta^lalpha-alpha^lbeta^l \
&qquad gamma ge alpha^ubeta+beta^ualpha-alpha^ubeta^u \
&qquad gamma le alpha^lbeta+beta^ualpha-alpha^lbeta^u \
&qquad gamma le alpha^ubeta+beta^lalpha-alpha^ubeta^l}?
end{align*}
If this is true, then how to define $alpha^l,alpha^u,beta^l,beta^u$? Do the first two inequalities of $langle x_ix_jrangle^M$ becomes the lower limit for $alpha$ and the last two ineqaulites of $langle x_ix_jrangle^M$ becomes upper limit of $alpha$? Or is there any other/better way to define McCormick envelope for such equation?
real-analysis convex-optimization constraints
add a comment |
I have a equation which is defined as $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M$ where $M$ is the McCormick envelope of product of variables $x_ix_j$ and $C$ is defined as envelope of cosine function.
The McCormick envelope is defined as
begin{align*}
langle x_ix_jrangle^M &= { alpha ge x_i^lx_j+x_j^lx_i-x_i^lx_j^l \
&qquad alpha ge x_i^ux_j+x_j^ux_i-x_i^ux_j^u \
&qquad alpha le x_i^lx_j+x_j^ux_i-x_i^lx_j^u \
&qquad alpha le x_i^ux_j+x_j^lx_i-x_i^ux_j^l},
end{align*}
where $x^l,x^u$ are constants for both $x_i,x_j$ and known.
The envelope for cosine function is defined as
begin{align*}
langle cos(theta)rangle^C &= {beta le 1-frac{1-cos(theta^m)}{(theta^m)^2}theta^2\
&qquad betagefrac{cos(theta^l)-cos(theta^u)}{(theta^l-theta^u)}(theta-theta^l)+cos(theta^l)},
end{align*}
where $theta^l,theta^u,theta^m$ are constants and known.
Now, I have to define the McCormick envelope of $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M$. Is it equivalent/true to write $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta rangle^Crangle^M$ as
begin{align*}
langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M = langle alpha beta rangle^M &= { gamma ge alpha^lbeta+beta^lalpha-alpha^lbeta^l \
&qquad gamma ge alpha^ubeta+beta^ualpha-alpha^ubeta^u \
&qquad gamma le alpha^lbeta+beta^ualpha-alpha^lbeta^u \
&qquad gamma le alpha^ubeta+beta^lalpha-alpha^ubeta^l}?
end{align*}
If this is true, then how to define $alpha^l,alpha^u,beta^l,beta^u$? Do the first two inequalities of $langle x_ix_jrangle^M$ becomes the lower limit for $alpha$ and the last two ineqaulites of $langle x_ix_jrangle^M$ becomes upper limit of $alpha$? Or is there any other/better way to define McCormick envelope for such equation?
real-analysis convex-optimization constraints
I have a equation which is defined as $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M$ where $M$ is the McCormick envelope of product of variables $x_ix_j$ and $C$ is defined as envelope of cosine function.
The McCormick envelope is defined as
begin{align*}
langle x_ix_jrangle^M &= { alpha ge x_i^lx_j+x_j^lx_i-x_i^lx_j^l \
&qquad alpha ge x_i^ux_j+x_j^ux_i-x_i^ux_j^u \
&qquad alpha le x_i^lx_j+x_j^ux_i-x_i^lx_j^u \
&qquad alpha le x_i^ux_j+x_j^lx_i-x_i^ux_j^l},
end{align*}
where $x^l,x^u$ are constants for both $x_i,x_j$ and known.
The envelope for cosine function is defined as
begin{align*}
langle cos(theta)rangle^C &= {beta le 1-frac{1-cos(theta^m)}{(theta^m)^2}theta^2\
&qquad betagefrac{cos(theta^l)-cos(theta^u)}{(theta^l-theta^u)}(theta-theta^l)+cos(theta^l)},
end{align*}
where $theta^l,theta^u,theta^m$ are constants and known.
Now, I have to define the McCormick envelope of $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M$. Is it equivalent/true to write $langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta rangle^Crangle^M$ as
begin{align*}
langlelangle x_ix_jrangle^Mlangle cos(theta)rangle^Crangle^M = langle alpha beta rangle^M &= { gamma ge alpha^lbeta+beta^lalpha-alpha^lbeta^l \
&qquad gamma ge alpha^ubeta+beta^ualpha-alpha^ubeta^u \
&qquad gamma le alpha^lbeta+beta^ualpha-alpha^lbeta^u \
&qquad gamma le alpha^ubeta+beta^lalpha-alpha^ubeta^l}?
end{align*}
If this is true, then how to define $alpha^l,alpha^u,beta^l,beta^u$? Do the first two inequalities of $langle x_ix_jrangle^M$ becomes the lower limit for $alpha$ and the last two ineqaulites of $langle x_ix_jrangle^M$ becomes upper limit of $alpha$? Or is there any other/better way to define McCormick envelope for such equation?
real-analysis convex-optimization constraints
real-analysis convex-optimization constraints
edited Dec 12 '18 at 15:54
AryanSonwatikar
31312
31312
asked Dec 12 '18 at 15:24
Muhammad UsmanMuhammad Usman
136
136
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036813%2fmccormick-envelope-of-two-variables-which-are-also-defined-in-terms-of-an-envelo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036813%2fmccormick-envelope-of-two-variables-which-are-also-defined-in-terms-of-an-envelo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown