Proving projective space is a topological manifold












1














I'm trying to prove that $mathbb{P}^n(mathbb{R})$ is a topological manifold of dimension n.



So I can define $f_i: U_i rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that $f_i([x_0:x_1: dots : x_n])= (x_0, dots x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, dots x_n)$ where $U_i={[x_0:dots : x_n] : x_i=1}$.
then I only need to prove this is an homeomorphism.
Open sets on $mathbb{P}^n(mathbb{R})$ are $pi(A)$ where $A$ is an open set of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
For $f_0$:



Is open because if $A=A_0 times ... times A_n$
$f_0(pi(A))=f_0( .cup_{x_0in A_0} [1:frac{A_1}{x_0}: dots : frac{A_n}{x_0}]) = cup_{x_0 in A_0} frac{A_1}{x_0}times dots times frac{A_n}{x_0}$ which is open.



But I'm not sure how to see this is continuous. I would appreciate any help for doing this
Thanks






general-topology







share|cite|improve this question
























  • You wrote "I only need to prove that this is an homeomorphism". A formula does not define a function, and hence does not define a homeomorphism. You must also specify the domain and range. Notice how this is done in the answer of @FedericoFallucca.
    – Lee Mosher
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:24












  • Oh sorry I forgot that line, already edited it.
    – Johanna
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:30
















1














I'm trying to prove that $mathbb{P}^n(mathbb{R})$ is a topological manifold of dimension n.



So I can define $f_i: U_i rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that $f_i([x_0:x_1: dots : x_n])= (x_0, dots x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, dots x_n)$ where $U_i={[x_0:dots : x_n] : x_i=1}$.
then I only need to prove this is an homeomorphism.
Open sets on $mathbb{P}^n(mathbb{R})$ are $pi(A)$ where $A$ is an open set of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
For $f_0$:



Is open because if $A=A_0 times ... times A_n$
$f_0(pi(A))=f_0( .cup_{x_0in A_0} [1:frac{A_1}{x_0}: dots : frac{A_n}{x_0}]) = cup_{x_0 in A_0} frac{A_1}{x_0}times dots times frac{A_n}{x_0}$ which is open.



But I'm not sure how to see this is continuous. I would appreciate any help for doing this
Thanks






general-topology







share|cite|improve this question
























  • You wrote "I only need to prove that this is an homeomorphism". A formula does not define a function, and hence does not define a homeomorphism. You must also specify the domain and range. Notice how this is done in the answer of @FedericoFallucca.
    – Lee Mosher
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:24












  • Oh sorry I forgot that line, already edited it.
    – Johanna
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:30














1












1








1







I'm trying to prove that $mathbb{P}^n(mathbb{R})$ is a topological manifold of dimension n.



So I can define $f_i: U_i rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that $f_i([x_0:x_1: dots : x_n])= (x_0, dots x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, dots x_n)$ where $U_i={[x_0:dots : x_n] : x_i=1}$.
then I only need to prove this is an homeomorphism.
Open sets on $mathbb{P}^n(mathbb{R})$ are $pi(A)$ where $A$ is an open set of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
For $f_0$:



Is open because if $A=A_0 times ... times A_n$
$f_0(pi(A))=f_0( .cup_{x_0in A_0} [1:frac{A_1}{x_0}: dots : frac{A_n}{x_0}]) = cup_{x_0 in A_0} frac{A_1}{x_0}times dots times frac{A_n}{x_0}$ which is open.



But I'm not sure how to see this is continuous. I would appreciate any help for doing this
Thanks






general-topology







share|cite|improve this question















I'm trying to prove that $mathbb{P}^n(mathbb{R})$ is a topological manifold of dimension n.



So I can define $f_i: U_i rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that $f_i([x_0:x_1: dots : x_n])= (x_0, dots x_{i-1}, x_{i+1}, dots x_n)$ where $U_i={[x_0:dots : x_n] : x_i=1}$.
then I only need to prove this is an homeomorphism.
Open sets on $mathbb{P}^n(mathbb{R})$ are $pi(A)$ where $A$ is an open set of $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
For $f_0$:



Is open because if $A=A_0 times ... times A_n$
$f_0(pi(A))=f_0( .cup_{x_0in A_0} [1:frac{A_1}{x_0}: dots : frac{A_n}{x_0}]) = cup_{x_0 in A_0} frac{A_1}{x_0}times dots times frac{A_n}{x_0}$ which is open.



But I'm not sure how to see this is continuous. I would appreciate any help for doing this
Thanks






general-topology




general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 10 '18 at 15:29

























asked Dec 10 '18 at 14:36









Johanna

599




599












  • You wrote "I only need to prove that this is an homeomorphism". A formula does not define a function, and hence does not define a homeomorphism. You must also specify the domain and range. Notice how this is done in the answer of @FedericoFallucca.
    – Lee Mosher
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:24












  • Oh sorry I forgot that line, already edited it.
    – Johanna
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:30


















  • You wrote "I only need to prove that this is an homeomorphism". A formula does not define a function, and hence does not define a homeomorphism. You must also specify the domain and range. Notice how this is done in the answer of @FedericoFallucca.
    – Lee Mosher
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:24












  • Oh sorry I forgot that line, already edited it.
    – Johanna
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:30
















You wrote "I only need to prove that this is an homeomorphism". A formula does not define a function, and hence does not define a homeomorphism. You must also specify the domain and range. Notice how this is done in the answer of @FedericoFallucca.
– Lee Mosher
Dec 10 '18 at 15:24






You wrote "I only need to prove that this is an homeomorphism". A formula does not define a function, and hence does not define a homeomorphism. You must also specify the domain and range. Notice how this is done in the answer of @FedericoFallucca.
– Lee Mosher
Dec 10 '18 at 15:24














Oh sorry I forgot that line, already edited it.
– Johanna
Dec 10 '18 at 15:30




Oh sorry I forgot that line, already edited it.
– Johanna
Dec 10 '18 at 15:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














$U_i:={[x_0,dots , x_n] : x_ineq 0}$ is an open set of $mathbb{P}^n$ and you can define



$phi_i: U_ito mathbb{R}^n$ such that



$phi_i([x_0,dots , x_n] ):=(frac{x_0}{x_i},dots , frac{x_n}{x_i})$



That it is an omeomorphism but $cup_{i=0}^n U_i=mathbb{P}^n$ and for every $ineq j$



$phi_jcirc phi_i^{-1}(x_1,dots , x_n)= (frac{x_1}{x_j},dots ,frac{1}{x_j},dots , frac{x_n}{x_j}) $



and in $phi_i(U_icap U_j)={(x_1,dots , x_{n}) : x_jneq 0}$
Is infinitely differentiable



Your map is not well defined.. for example $f_0([1,1,dots , 0])=(1,0, dots ,0)$ but $[1,1,0,dots , 0]=[2,2,0 dots, 0]$so $f_0([2,2,0 dots, 0]=(2,0,dots, 0)$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    But I'm using the representative of the class that has a 1 on the i-th coordinate, so $[2,2,0...0] $ is in fact represented by $[1,1,0...0]$. I don't see why I can't do this
    – Johanna
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:38










  • You’re right sorry
    – Federico Fallucca
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:46











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033990%2fproving-projective-space-is-a-topological-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














$U_i:={[x_0,dots , x_n] : x_ineq 0}$ is an open set of $mathbb{P}^n$ and you can define



$phi_i: U_ito mathbb{R}^n$ such that



$phi_i([x_0,dots , x_n] ):=(frac{x_0}{x_i},dots , frac{x_n}{x_i})$



That it is an omeomorphism but $cup_{i=0}^n U_i=mathbb{P}^n$ and for every $ineq j$



$phi_jcirc phi_i^{-1}(x_1,dots , x_n)= (frac{x_1}{x_j},dots ,frac{1}{x_j},dots , frac{x_n}{x_j}) $



and in $phi_i(U_icap U_j)={(x_1,dots , x_{n}) : x_jneq 0}$
Is infinitely differentiable



Your map is not well defined.. for example $f_0([1,1,dots , 0])=(1,0, dots ,0)$ but $[1,1,0,dots , 0]=[2,2,0 dots, 0]$so $f_0([2,2,0 dots, 0]=(2,0,dots, 0)$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    But I'm using the representative of the class that has a 1 on the i-th coordinate, so $[2,2,0...0] $ is in fact represented by $[1,1,0...0]$. I don't see why I can't do this
    – Johanna
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:38










  • You’re right sorry
    – Federico Fallucca
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:46
















0














$U_i:={[x_0,dots , x_n] : x_ineq 0}$ is an open set of $mathbb{P}^n$ and you can define



$phi_i: U_ito mathbb{R}^n$ such that



$phi_i([x_0,dots , x_n] ):=(frac{x_0}{x_i},dots , frac{x_n}{x_i})$



That it is an omeomorphism but $cup_{i=0}^n U_i=mathbb{P}^n$ and for every $ineq j$



$phi_jcirc phi_i^{-1}(x_1,dots , x_n)= (frac{x_1}{x_j},dots ,frac{1}{x_j},dots , frac{x_n}{x_j}) $



and in $phi_i(U_icap U_j)={(x_1,dots , x_{n}) : x_jneq 0}$
Is infinitely differentiable



Your map is not well defined.. for example $f_0([1,1,dots , 0])=(1,0, dots ,0)$ but $[1,1,0,dots , 0]=[2,2,0 dots, 0]$so $f_0([2,2,0 dots, 0]=(2,0,dots, 0)$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    But I'm using the representative of the class that has a 1 on the i-th coordinate, so $[2,2,0...0] $ is in fact represented by $[1,1,0...0]$. I don't see why I can't do this
    – Johanna
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:38










  • You’re right sorry
    – Federico Fallucca
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:46














0












0








0






$U_i:={[x_0,dots , x_n] : x_ineq 0}$ is an open set of $mathbb{P}^n$ and you can define



$phi_i: U_ito mathbb{R}^n$ such that



$phi_i([x_0,dots , x_n] ):=(frac{x_0}{x_i},dots , frac{x_n}{x_i})$



That it is an omeomorphism but $cup_{i=0}^n U_i=mathbb{P}^n$ and for every $ineq j$



$phi_jcirc phi_i^{-1}(x_1,dots , x_n)= (frac{x_1}{x_j},dots ,frac{1}{x_j},dots , frac{x_n}{x_j}) $



and in $phi_i(U_icap U_j)={(x_1,dots , x_{n}) : x_jneq 0}$
Is infinitely differentiable



Your map is not well defined.. for example $f_0([1,1,dots , 0])=(1,0, dots ,0)$ but $[1,1,0,dots , 0]=[2,2,0 dots, 0]$so $f_0([2,2,0 dots, 0]=(2,0,dots, 0)$






share|cite|improve this answer














$U_i:={[x_0,dots , x_n] : x_ineq 0}$ is an open set of $mathbb{P}^n$ and you can define



$phi_i: U_ito mathbb{R}^n$ such that



$phi_i([x_0,dots , x_n] ):=(frac{x_0}{x_i},dots , frac{x_n}{x_i})$



That it is an omeomorphism but $cup_{i=0}^n U_i=mathbb{P}^n$ and for every $ineq j$



$phi_jcirc phi_i^{-1}(x_1,dots , x_n)= (frac{x_1}{x_j},dots ,frac{1}{x_j},dots , frac{x_n}{x_j}) $



and in $phi_i(U_icap U_j)={(x_1,dots , x_{n}) : x_jneq 0}$
Is infinitely differentiable



Your map is not well defined.. for example $f_0([1,1,dots , 0])=(1,0, dots ,0)$ but $[1,1,0,dots , 0]=[2,2,0 dots, 0]$so $f_0([2,2,0 dots, 0]=(2,0,dots, 0)$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 10 '18 at 15:09

























answered Dec 10 '18 at 15:02









Federico Fallucca

1,81318




1,81318








  • 1




    But I'm using the representative of the class that has a 1 on the i-th coordinate, so $[2,2,0...0] $ is in fact represented by $[1,1,0...0]$. I don't see why I can't do this
    – Johanna
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:38










  • You’re right sorry
    – Federico Fallucca
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:46














  • 1




    But I'm using the representative of the class that has a 1 on the i-th coordinate, so $[2,2,0...0] $ is in fact represented by $[1,1,0...0]$. I don't see why I can't do this
    – Johanna
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:38










  • You’re right sorry
    – Federico Fallucca
    Dec 10 '18 at 15:46








1




1




But I'm using the representative of the class that has a 1 on the i-th coordinate, so $[2,2,0...0] $ is in fact represented by $[1,1,0...0]$. I don't see why I can't do this
– Johanna
Dec 10 '18 at 15:38




But I'm using the representative of the class that has a 1 on the i-th coordinate, so $[2,2,0...0] $ is in fact represented by $[1,1,0...0]$. I don't see why I can't do this
– Johanna
Dec 10 '18 at 15:38












You’re right sorry
– Federico Fallucca
Dec 10 '18 at 15:46




You’re right sorry
– Federico Fallucca
Dec 10 '18 at 15:46


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033990%2fproving-projective-space-is-a-topological-manifold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Image
.mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
Read more

Cabo Verde

Image
  Nota: Cabo-verdiano redireciona para este artigo. Para a língua falada em Cabo Verde, veja crioulo cabo-verdiano. Para outros significados, veja Cabo Verde (desambiguação). Coordenadas: 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cabo Verde República de Cabo Verde Bandeira Brasão de Armas Lema: Unidade, Trabalho, Progresso Hino nacional: Cântico da Liberdade Gentílico: cabo-verdiano [ 1 ] Capital Praia 14° 55' N 23° 31' O Cidade mais populosa Praia Língua oficial Português Governo República unitária semipresidencialista [ 2 ]  - Presidente Jorge Carlos Fonseca  - Primeiro-ministro Ulisses Correia e Silva História    - Descoberta 1460   - Independência 00 • de Portugal 5 de Julho de 1975   - Multipartidarismo 13 de Janeiro de 1990  Área    - Total 4 033 km² (146.º)  - Água (%) 0,08 População    - Estimativa para 2017 560 899 [ 3 ] hab. (173.º)
Read more

Gyllenstierna

Image
.mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedrow th{border:0;border-right:1px solid
Read more