What are the commutative rings $R$ for which $A otimes _{Bbb Z} B = A otimes _R B$ as abelian groups?












8














This is a follow up.




What are the commutative rings $R$, for which given $R$-modules $A$ and $B$, $A otimes _{Bbb Z} B = A otimes _R B$ as abelian groups?






This is true when $R= Bbb Q$, or $Bbb Z_m$. We can give an $R$-module structure $A otimes _{Bbb Z} B$ satisfying $r (a otimes b) = ra otimes b$.



When $R= Bbb Q$, we get the additional fact that $a otimes rb=ra otimes b$. To see this, note that when $r in Bbb N$, we have



$$ r a otimes b = sum a otimes b = a otimes rb $$ by bilinearity - which extends $r$ to $Bbb Z$ too. When $r=1/m$, $m in Bbb Z$,
$$ frac{1}{m}a otimes b = frac{1}{m} (a otimes b) = frac{1}{m} ( sum (a otimes frac{1}{m} b)) = frac{1}{m} (ma otimes frac{1}{m} b ) = a otimes frac{1}{m} b $$
Thus, we have equality for all $r in Bbb Q$.





I think generalizing to $Bbb Q$ is as far as we can get for this naive strategy. I wonder if there exists better method for the classification.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • nice question. to make it self-contained, you might edit into it that $A$ and $B$ start life as $R$-modules (it's clear from reading your other post)
    – hunter
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:41










  • A guess: you might have this when $Bbb Zto R$ is an epimorphism (as it is in the cases $R = Bbb Q$ and $R = Bbb Z/n$). However, I do not have a proof of this (nor am I convinced that even if this is true, that these are all such rings).
    – Stahl
    Nov 29 '18 at 4:11
















8














This is a follow up.




What are the commutative rings $R$, for which given $R$-modules $A$ and $B$, $A otimes _{Bbb Z} B = A otimes _R B$ as abelian groups?






This is true when $R= Bbb Q$, or $Bbb Z_m$. We can give an $R$-module structure $A otimes _{Bbb Z} B$ satisfying $r (a otimes b) = ra otimes b$.



When $R= Bbb Q$, we get the additional fact that $a otimes rb=ra otimes b$. To see this, note that when $r in Bbb N$, we have



$$ r a otimes b = sum a otimes b = a otimes rb $$ by bilinearity - which extends $r$ to $Bbb Z$ too. When $r=1/m$, $m in Bbb Z$,
$$ frac{1}{m}a otimes b = frac{1}{m} (a otimes b) = frac{1}{m} ( sum (a otimes frac{1}{m} b)) = frac{1}{m} (ma otimes frac{1}{m} b ) = a otimes frac{1}{m} b $$
Thus, we have equality for all $r in Bbb Q$.





I think generalizing to $Bbb Q$ is as far as we can get for this naive strategy. I wonder if there exists better method for the classification.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • nice question. to make it self-contained, you might edit into it that $A$ and $B$ start life as $R$-modules (it's clear from reading your other post)
    – hunter
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:41










  • A guess: you might have this when $Bbb Zto R$ is an epimorphism (as it is in the cases $R = Bbb Q$ and $R = Bbb Z/n$). However, I do not have a proof of this (nor am I convinced that even if this is true, that these are all such rings).
    – Stahl
    Nov 29 '18 at 4:11














8












8








8


2





This is a follow up.




What are the commutative rings $R$, for which given $R$-modules $A$ and $B$, $A otimes _{Bbb Z} B = A otimes _R B$ as abelian groups?






This is true when $R= Bbb Q$, or $Bbb Z_m$. We can give an $R$-module structure $A otimes _{Bbb Z} B$ satisfying $r (a otimes b) = ra otimes b$.



When $R= Bbb Q$, we get the additional fact that $a otimes rb=ra otimes b$. To see this, note that when $r in Bbb N$, we have



$$ r a otimes b = sum a otimes b = a otimes rb $$ by bilinearity - which extends $r$ to $Bbb Z$ too. When $r=1/m$, $m in Bbb Z$,
$$ frac{1}{m}a otimes b = frac{1}{m} (a otimes b) = frac{1}{m} ( sum (a otimes frac{1}{m} b)) = frac{1}{m} (ma otimes frac{1}{m} b ) = a otimes frac{1}{m} b $$
Thus, we have equality for all $r in Bbb Q$.





I think generalizing to $Bbb Q$ is as far as we can get for this naive strategy. I wonder if there exists better method for the classification.










share|cite|improve this question















This is a follow up.




What are the commutative rings $R$, for which given $R$-modules $A$ and $B$, $A otimes _{Bbb Z} B = A otimes _R B$ as abelian groups?






This is true when $R= Bbb Q$, or $Bbb Z_m$. We can give an $R$-module structure $A otimes _{Bbb Z} B$ satisfying $r (a otimes b) = ra otimes b$.



When $R= Bbb Q$, we get the additional fact that $a otimes rb=ra otimes b$. To see this, note that when $r in Bbb N$, we have



$$ r a otimes b = sum a otimes b = a otimes rb $$ by bilinearity - which extends $r$ to $Bbb Z$ too. When $r=1/m$, $m in Bbb Z$,
$$ frac{1}{m}a otimes b = frac{1}{m} (a otimes b) = frac{1}{m} ( sum (a otimes frac{1}{m} b)) = frac{1}{m} (ma otimes frac{1}{m} b ) = a otimes frac{1}{m} b $$
Thus, we have equality for all $r in Bbb Q$.





I think generalizing to $Bbb Q$ is as far as we can get for this naive strategy. I wonder if there exists better method for the classification.







abstract-algebra tensor-products






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 28 '18 at 10:52

























asked Nov 28 '18 at 10:21









CL.

2,1382822




2,1382822












  • nice question. to make it self-contained, you might edit into it that $A$ and $B$ start life as $R$-modules (it's clear from reading your other post)
    – hunter
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:41










  • A guess: you might have this when $Bbb Zto R$ is an epimorphism (as it is in the cases $R = Bbb Q$ and $R = Bbb Z/n$). However, I do not have a proof of this (nor am I convinced that even if this is true, that these are all such rings).
    – Stahl
    Nov 29 '18 at 4:11


















  • nice question. to make it self-contained, you might edit into it that $A$ and $B$ start life as $R$-modules (it's clear from reading your other post)
    – hunter
    Nov 28 '18 at 10:41










  • A guess: you might have this when $Bbb Zto R$ is an epimorphism (as it is in the cases $R = Bbb Q$ and $R = Bbb Z/n$). However, I do not have a proof of this (nor am I convinced that even if this is true, that these are all such rings).
    – Stahl
    Nov 29 '18 at 4:11
















nice question. to make it self-contained, you might edit into it that $A$ and $B$ start life as $R$-modules (it's clear from reading your other post)
– hunter
Nov 28 '18 at 10:41




nice question. to make it self-contained, you might edit into it that $A$ and $B$ start life as $R$-modules (it's clear from reading your other post)
– hunter
Nov 28 '18 at 10:41












A guess: you might have this when $Bbb Zto R$ is an epimorphism (as it is in the cases $R = Bbb Q$ and $R = Bbb Z/n$). However, I do not have a proof of this (nor am I convinced that even if this is true, that these are all such rings).
– Stahl
Nov 29 '18 at 4:11




A guess: you might have this when $Bbb Zto R$ is an epimorphism (as it is in the cases $R = Bbb Q$ and $R = Bbb Z/n$). However, I do not have a proof of this (nor am I convinced that even if this is true, that these are all such rings).
– Stahl
Nov 29 '18 at 4:11










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














First, there is an ambiguity in your question. The usage of $=$ is ambiguous, but I'll interpret it as meaning that the natural map $newcommandtensotimesnewcommandZZ{mathbb{Z}}Atens_ZZ Bto Atens_R B$ is an isomorphism.



Given this interpretation, we can give a simple criterion which rings with this property must satisfy. Namely the natural map $Rtens_ZZ Rto R$ must be an isomorphism. This is also sufficient though, since if this is true, then
$$Atens_ZZ B simeq (Atens_R R)tens_ZZ (Rtens_R B)simeq Atens_R (Rtens_ZZ R)tens_R B simeq Atens_R R tens_R B simeq Atens_R B,$$
where I'm using $simeq$ for natural isomorphism.



Thus the question is reduced to the question of for which rings is the natural map $Rtens_ZZ R to R$ an isomorphism. This is equivalent to asking for which rings is the diagram
$$newcommandid{operatorname{id}}
require{AMScd}
begin{CD}
ZZ @>iota>> R \
@Viota VV @VVid V \
R @>id >> R
end{CD}
$$

a pushout diagram (where $iota$ is the unique map $ZZto R$.



Well, if it is, then for any pair of morphisms $f,g : Rto S$ with $fcirc iota = gcirc iota$, then there is a unique map $h : Rto S$ with $f=hcirc id = g$. Thus $iota$ is an epimorphism.



Conversely if $iota$ is an epimorphism, then for any pair of morphisms $f,g : Rto S$ with $fcirc iota = gcirc iota$, then $f=g$, so the map $h=f=g : Rto S$ satisfies $f=hcircid$ and $g=hcircid$. Thus if $iota$ is epic, this diagram is a pushout.



Hence a commutative ring $R$ has the property that $Atens_ZZ Bsimeq Atens_R B$ for all pairs $A$ and $B$ of $R$-modules if and only if the natural map $ZZto R$ is an epimorphism.



Edit



As for what rings $R$ for which the natural map $ZZto R$ is an epimorphism look like, I'm not sure. In general epis in the category of rings are complicated. That said, if I had to guess the answer in this case, my guess would be that these rings would be the subrings of $Bbb{Q}$ and the rings $ZZ/nZZ$, but that should probably be another question.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I thought this might be the case, but I didn't come up with an argument - very nice! There's a mathoverflow post I saw a bit ago which described or linked to a paper classifying rings such that the map from $Bbb Z$ is an epi, and its very similar to what you say, but you also need to allow some products or sums of such rings as well.
    – Stahl
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:26










  • @Stahl Thanks, I'll have to go search for that, I'd be very interested in learning more about that.
    – jgon
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:29






  • 1




    Actually it appears to be one of the answers to the question I linked xP
    – jgon
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:31











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016990%2fwhat-are-the-commutative-rings-r-for-which-a-otimes-bbb-z-b-a-otimes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














First, there is an ambiguity in your question. The usage of $=$ is ambiguous, but I'll interpret it as meaning that the natural map $newcommandtensotimesnewcommandZZ{mathbb{Z}}Atens_ZZ Bto Atens_R B$ is an isomorphism.



Given this interpretation, we can give a simple criterion which rings with this property must satisfy. Namely the natural map $Rtens_ZZ Rto R$ must be an isomorphism. This is also sufficient though, since if this is true, then
$$Atens_ZZ B simeq (Atens_R R)tens_ZZ (Rtens_R B)simeq Atens_R (Rtens_ZZ R)tens_R B simeq Atens_R R tens_R B simeq Atens_R B,$$
where I'm using $simeq$ for natural isomorphism.



Thus the question is reduced to the question of for which rings is the natural map $Rtens_ZZ R to R$ an isomorphism. This is equivalent to asking for which rings is the diagram
$$newcommandid{operatorname{id}}
require{AMScd}
begin{CD}
ZZ @>iota>> R \
@Viota VV @VVid V \
R @>id >> R
end{CD}
$$

a pushout diagram (where $iota$ is the unique map $ZZto R$.



Well, if it is, then for any pair of morphisms $f,g : Rto S$ with $fcirc iota = gcirc iota$, then there is a unique map $h : Rto S$ with $f=hcirc id = g$. Thus $iota$ is an epimorphism.



Conversely if $iota$ is an epimorphism, then for any pair of morphisms $f,g : Rto S$ with $fcirc iota = gcirc iota$, then $f=g$, so the map $h=f=g : Rto S$ satisfies $f=hcircid$ and $g=hcircid$. Thus if $iota$ is epic, this diagram is a pushout.



Hence a commutative ring $R$ has the property that $Atens_ZZ Bsimeq Atens_R B$ for all pairs $A$ and $B$ of $R$-modules if and only if the natural map $ZZto R$ is an epimorphism.



Edit



As for what rings $R$ for which the natural map $ZZto R$ is an epimorphism look like, I'm not sure. In general epis in the category of rings are complicated. That said, if I had to guess the answer in this case, my guess would be that these rings would be the subrings of $Bbb{Q}$ and the rings $ZZ/nZZ$, but that should probably be another question.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I thought this might be the case, but I didn't come up with an argument - very nice! There's a mathoverflow post I saw a bit ago which described or linked to a paper classifying rings such that the map from $Bbb Z$ is an epi, and its very similar to what you say, but you also need to allow some products or sums of such rings as well.
    – Stahl
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:26










  • @Stahl Thanks, I'll have to go search for that, I'd be very interested in learning more about that.
    – jgon
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:29






  • 1




    Actually it appears to be one of the answers to the question I linked xP
    – jgon
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:31
















3














First, there is an ambiguity in your question. The usage of $=$ is ambiguous, but I'll interpret it as meaning that the natural map $newcommandtensotimesnewcommandZZ{mathbb{Z}}Atens_ZZ Bto Atens_R B$ is an isomorphism.



Given this interpretation, we can give a simple criterion which rings with this property must satisfy. Namely the natural map $Rtens_ZZ Rto R$ must be an isomorphism. This is also sufficient though, since if this is true, then
$$Atens_ZZ B simeq (Atens_R R)tens_ZZ (Rtens_R B)simeq Atens_R (Rtens_ZZ R)tens_R B simeq Atens_R R tens_R B simeq Atens_R B,$$
where I'm using $simeq$ for natural isomorphism.



Thus the question is reduced to the question of for which rings is the natural map $Rtens_ZZ R to R$ an isomorphism. This is equivalent to asking for which rings is the diagram
$$newcommandid{operatorname{id}}
require{AMScd}
begin{CD}
ZZ @>iota>> R \
@Viota VV @VVid V \
R @>id >> R
end{CD}
$$

a pushout diagram (where $iota$ is the unique map $ZZto R$.



Well, if it is, then for any pair of morphisms $f,g : Rto S$ with $fcirc iota = gcirc iota$, then there is a unique map $h : Rto S$ with $f=hcirc id = g$. Thus $iota$ is an epimorphism.



Conversely if $iota$ is an epimorphism, then for any pair of morphisms $f,g : Rto S$ with $fcirc iota = gcirc iota$, then $f=g$, so the map $h=f=g : Rto S$ satisfies $f=hcircid$ and $g=hcircid$. Thus if $iota$ is epic, this diagram is a pushout.



Hence a commutative ring $R$ has the property that $Atens_ZZ Bsimeq Atens_R B$ for all pairs $A$ and $B$ of $R$-modules if and only if the natural map $ZZto R$ is an epimorphism.



Edit



As for what rings $R$ for which the natural map $ZZto R$ is an epimorphism look like, I'm not sure. In general epis in the category of rings are complicated. That said, if I had to guess the answer in this case, my guess would be that these rings would be the subrings of $Bbb{Q}$ and the rings $ZZ/nZZ$, but that should probably be another question.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • I thought this might be the case, but I didn't come up with an argument - very nice! There's a mathoverflow post I saw a bit ago which described or linked to a paper classifying rings such that the map from $Bbb Z$ is an epi, and its very similar to what you say, but you also need to allow some products or sums of such rings as well.
    – Stahl
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:26










  • @Stahl Thanks, I'll have to go search for that, I'd be very interested in learning more about that.
    – jgon
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:29






  • 1




    Actually it appears to be one of the answers to the question I linked xP
    – jgon
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:31














3












3








3






First, there is an ambiguity in your question. The usage of $=$ is ambiguous, but I'll interpret it as meaning that the natural map $newcommandtensotimesnewcommandZZ{mathbb{Z}}Atens_ZZ Bto Atens_R B$ is an isomorphism.



Given this interpretation, we can give a simple criterion which rings with this property must satisfy. Namely the natural map $Rtens_ZZ Rto R$ must be an isomorphism. This is also sufficient though, since if this is true, then
$$Atens_ZZ B simeq (Atens_R R)tens_ZZ (Rtens_R B)simeq Atens_R (Rtens_ZZ R)tens_R B simeq Atens_R R tens_R B simeq Atens_R B,$$
where I'm using $simeq$ for natural isomorphism.



Thus the question is reduced to the question of for which rings is the natural map $Rtens_ZZ R to R$ an isomorphism. This is equivalent to asking for which rings is the diagram
$$newcommandid{operatorname{id}}
require{AMScd}
begin{CD}
ZZ @>iota>> R \
@Viota VV @VVid V \
R @>id >> R
end{CD}
$$

a pushout diagram (where $iota$ is the unique map $ZZto R$.



Well, if it is, then for any pair of morphisms $f,g : Rto S$ with $fcirc iota = gcirc iota$, then there is a unique map $h : Rto S$ with $f=hcirc id = g$. Thus $iota$ is an epimorphism.



Conversely if $iota$ is an epimorphism, then for any pair of morphisms $f,g : Rto S$ with $fcirc iota = gcirc iota$, then $f=g$, so the map $h=f=g : Rto S$ satisfies $f=hcircid$ and $g=hcircid$. Thus if $iota$ is epic, this diagram is a pushout.



Hence a commutative ring $R$ has the property that $Atens_ZZ Bsimeq Atens_R B$ for all pairs $A$ and $B$ of $R$-modules if and only if the natural map $ZZto R$ is an epimorphism.



Edit



As for what rings $R$ for which the natural map $ZZto R$ is an epimorphism look like, I'm not sure. In general epis in the category of rings are complicated. That said, if I had to guess the answer in this case, my guess would be that these rings would be the subrings of $Bbb{Q}$ and the rings $ZZ/nZZ$, but that should probably be another question.






share|cite|improve this answer














First, there is an ambiguity in your question. The usage of $=$ is ambiguous, but I'll interpret it as meaning that the natural map $newcommandtensotimesnewcommandZZ{mathbb{Z}}Atens_ZZ Bto Atens_R B$ is an isomorphism.



Given this interpretation, we can give a simple criterion which rings with this property must satisfy. Namely the natural map $Rtens_ZZ Rto R$ must be an isomorphism. This is also sufficient though, since if this is true, then
$$Atens_ZZ B simeq (Atens_R R)tens_ZZ (Rtens_R B)simeq Atens_R (Rtens_ZZ R)tens_R B simeq Atens_R R tens_R B simeq Atens_R B,$$
where I'm using $simeq$ for natural isomorphism.



Thus the question is reduced to the question of for which rings is the natural map $Rtens_ZZ R to R$ an isomorphism. This is equivalent to asking for which rings is the diagram
$$newcommandid{operatorname{id}}
require{AMScd}
begin{CD}
ZZ @>iota>> R \
@Viota VV @VVid V \
R @>id >> R
end{CD}
$$

a pushout diagram (where $iota$ is the unique map $ZZto R$.



Well, if it is, then for any pair of morphisms $f,g : Rto S$ with $fcirc iota = gcirc iota$, then there is a unique map $h : Rto S$ with $f=hcirc id = g$. Thus $iota$ is an epimorphism.



Conversely if $iota$ is an epimorphism, then for any pair of morphisms $f,g : Rto S$ with $fcirc iota = gcirc iota$, then $f=g$, so the map $h=f=g : Rto S$ satisfies $f=hcircid$ and $g=hcircid$. Thus if $iota$ is epic, this diagram is a pushout.



Hence a commutative ring $R$ has the property that $Atens_ZZ Bsimeq Atens_R B$ for all pairs $A$ and $B$ of $R$-modules if and only if the natural map $ZZto R$ is an epimorphism.



Edit



As for what rings $R$ for which the natural map $ZZto R$ is an epimorphism look like, I'm not sure. In general epis in the category of rings are complicated. That said, if I had to guess the answer in this case, my guess would be that these rings would be the subrings of $Bbb{Q}$ and the rings $ZZ/nZZ$, but that should probably be another question.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 10 '18 at 14:57

























answered Dec 10 '18 at 14:46









jgon

13k21941




13k21941












  • I thought this might be the case, but I didn't come up with an argument - very nice! There's a mathoverflow post I saw a bit ago which described or linked to a paper classifying rings such that the map from $Bbb Z$ is an epi, and its very similar to what you say, but you also need to allow some products or sums of such rings as well.
    – Stahl
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:26










  • @Stahl Thanks, I'll have to go search for that, I'd be very interested in learning more about that.
    – jgon
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:29






  • 1




    Actually it appears to be one of the answers to the question I linked xP
    – jgon
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:31


















  • I thought this might be the case, but I didn't come up with an argument - very nice! There's a mathoverflow post I saw a bit ago which described or linked to a paper classifying rings such that the map from $Bbb Z$ is an epi, and its very similar to what you say, but you also need to allow some products or sums of such rings as well.
    – Stahl
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:26










  • @Stahl Thanks, I'll have to go search for that, I'd be very interested in learning more about that.
    – jgon
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:29






  • 1




    Actually it appears to be one of the answers to the question I linked xP
    – jgon
    Dec 15 '18 at 23:31
















I thought this might be the case, but I didn't come up with an argument - very nice! There's a mathoverflow post I saw a bit ago which described or linked to a paper classifying rings such that the map from $Bbb Z$ is an epi, and its very similar to what you say, but you also need to allow some products or sums of such rings as well.
– Stahl
Dec 15 '18 at 23:26




I thought this might be the case, but I didn't come up with an argument - very nice! There's a mathoverflow post I saw a bit ago which described or linked to a paper classifying rings such that the map from $Bbb Z$ is an epi, and its very similar to what you say, but you also need to allow some products or sums of such rings as well.
– Stahl
Dec 15 '18 at 23:26












@Stahl Thanks, I'll have to go search for that, I'd be very interested in learning more about that.
– jgon
Dec 15 '18 at 23:29




@Stahl Thanks, I'll have to go search for that, I'd be very interested in learning more about that.
– jgon
Dec 15 '18 at 23:29




1




1




Actually it appears to be one of the answers to the question I linked xP
– jgon
Dec 15 '18 at 23:31




Actually it appears to be one of the answers to the question I linked xP
– jgon
Dec 15 '18 at 23:31


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016990%2fwhat-are-the-commutative-rings-r-for-which-a-otimes-bbb-z-b-a-otimes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna