Sufficient statistics for $p$ for a random sample from $text{Ber}(p)$ distribution
Let $X_1,X_2, X_3$ be a random sample from Bernoulli distribution $B(p)$. Which of the following is sufficient statistic for $p$ ?
$(A) X_{1}^{2}+X_{2}^{2}+X_{3}^{2}$
$(B) X_1+2X_{2}+X_{3}$
$(C) 2X_1-X_{2}-X_{3}$
$(D) X_1+X_{2}$
$(E) 3X_1+2X_{2}-4X_{3}$
We know $T=sum_i^3 X_i$ is sufficient statistic for $p$ via Neymann Factorization theorem.
The reasoning for different options.
$(A)$ It's not a one-one function of sufficient statistic $T$ (If it was $T^2$ , was it sufficient statistic then? My answer is yes because it is one to one function of sufficient statistic our random variable is positive am I right?).
$(B)X_1+X_{2}+X_{3}+X_{2}$ It contains original statistic therefor it is suffient statistic for $p$.
$(D)$ It doesn't include $X_3$ So it's not sufficient statistic for $p$
All other options include subtraction in it so I ruled out all of them.
I think my reasoning is not very good I lack some intuition behind finding sufficient statistic. Correct me here, please.
statistics statistical-inference estimation binomial-distribution
|
show 3 more comments
Let $X_1,X_2, X_3$ be a random sample from Bernoulli distribution $B(p)$. Which of the following is sufficient statistic for $p$ ?
$(A) X_{1}^{2}+X_{2}^{2}+X_{3}^{2}$
$(B) X_1+2X_{2}+X_{3}$
$(C) 2X_1-X_{2}-X_{3}$
$(D) X_1+X_{2}$
$(E) 3X_1+2X_{2}-4X_{3}$
We know $T=sum_i^3 X_i$ is sufficient statistic for $p$ via Neymann Factorization theorem.
The reasoning for different options.
$(A)$ It's not a one-one function of sufficient statistic $T$ (If it was $T^2$ , was it sufficient statistic then? My answer is yes because it is one to one function of sufficient statistic our random variable is positive am I right?).
$(B)X_1+X_{2}+X_{3}+X_{2}$ It contains original statistic therefor it is suffient statistic for $p$.
$(D)$ It doesn't include $X_3$ So it's not sufficient statistic for $p$
All other options include subtraction in it so I ruled out all of them.
I think my reasoning is not very good I lack some intuition behind finding sufficient statistic. Correct me here, please.
statistics statistical-inference estimation binomial-distribution
Actually it seems only option E is correct.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 7:56
@StubbornAtom Can you tell me how? One more thing is that I took an example in B such that $T=2$ and my conditional distribution of sample give T=2 is not independent of the parameter.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:04
No one answers my question. :(
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:59
I eliminated the other options, did not check E. (Arre beta thoda सब्र kar :P)
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 9:04
@StubbornAtom Ok bro :)
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 9:05
|
show 3 more comments
Let $X_1,X_2, X_3$ be a random sample from Bernoulli distribution $B(p)$. Which of the following is sufficient statistic for $p$ ?
$(A) X_{1}^{2}+X_{2}^{2}+X_{3}^{2}$
$(B) X_1+2X_{2}+X_{3}$
$(C) 2X_1-X_{2}-X_{3}$
$(D) X_1+X_{2}$
$(E) 3X_1+2X_{2}-4X_{3}$
We know $T=sum_i^3 X_i$ is sufficient statistic for $p$ via Neymann Factorization theorem.
The reasoning for different options.
$(A)$ It's not a one-one function of sufficient statistic $T$ (If it was $T^2$ , was it sufficient statistic then? My answer is yes because it is one to one function of sufficient statistic our random variable is positive am I right?).
$(B)X_1+X_{2}+X_{3}+X_{2}$ It contains original statistic therefor it is suffient statistic for $p$.
$(D)$ It doesn't include $X_3$ So it's not sufficient statistic for $p$
All other options include subtraction in it so I ruled out all of them.
I think my reasoning is not very good I lack some intuition behind finding sufficient statistic. Correct me here, please.
statistics statistical-inference estimation binomial-distribution
Let $X_1,X_2, X_3$ be a random sample from Bernoulli distribution $B(p)$. Which of the following is sufficient statistic for $p$ ?
$(A) X_{1}^{2}+X_{2}^{2}+X_{3}^{2}$
$(B) X_1+2X_{2}+X_{3}$
$(C) 2X_1-X_{2}-X_{3}$
$(D) X_1+X_{2}$
$(E) 3X_1+2X_{2}-4X_{3}$
We know $T=sum_i^3 X_i$ is sufficient statistic for $p$ via Neymann Factorization theorem.
The reasoning for different options.
$(A)$ It's not a one-one function of sufficient statistic $T$ (If it was $T^2$ , was it sufficient statistic then? My answer is yes because it is one to one function of sufficient statistic our random variable is positive am I right?).
$(B)X_1+X_{2}+X_{3}+X_{2}$ It contains original statistic therefor it is suffient statistic for $p$.
$(D)$ It doesn't include $X_3$ So it's not sufficient statistic for $p$
All other options include subtraction in it so I ruled out all of them.
I think my reasoning is not very good I lack some intuition behind finding sufficient statistic. Correct me here, please.
statistics statistical-inference estimation binomial-distribution
statistics statistical-inference estimation binomial-distribution
edited Dec 16 '18 at 14:50
StubbornAtom
5,40411138
5,40411138
asked Dec 12 '18 at 7:11
Daman deepDaman deep
643218
643218
Actually it seems only option E is correct.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 7:56
@StubbornAtom Can you tell me how? One more thing is that I took an example in B such that $T=2$ and my conditional distribution of sample give T=2 is not independent of the parameter.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:04
No one answers my question. :(
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:59
I eliminated the other options, did not check E. (Arre beta thoda सब्र kar :P)
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 9:04
@StubbornAtom Ok bro :)
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 9:05
|
show 3 more comments
Actually it seems only option E is correct.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 7:56
@StubbornAtom Can you tell me how? One more thing is that I took an example in B such that $T=2$ and my conditional distribution of sample give T=2 is not independent of the parameter.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:04
No one answers my question. :(
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:59
I eliminated the other options, did not check E. (Arre beta thoda सब्र kar :P)
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 9:04
@StubbornAtom Ok bro :)
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 9:05
Actually it seems only option E is correct.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 7:56
Actually it seems only option E is correct.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 7:56
@StubbornAtom Can you tell me how? One more thing is that I took an example in B such that $T=2$ and my conditional distribution of sample give T=2 is not independent of the parameter.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:04
@StubbornAtom Can you tell me how? One more thing is that I took an example in B such that $T=2$ and my conditional distribution of sample give T=2 is not independent of the parameter.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:04
No one answers my question. :(
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:59
No one answers my question. :(
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:59
I eliminated the other options, did not check E. (Arre beta thoda सब्र kar :P)
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 9:04
I eliminated the other options, did not check E. (Arre beta thoda सब्र kar :P)
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 9:04
@StubbornAtom Ok bro :)
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 9:05
@StubbornAtom Ok bro :)
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 9:05
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Since $T=X_1+X_2+X_3$ is a minimal sufficient statistic for $p$, implying that it is a function of every other sufficient statistic, option (D) is eliminated.
Now $X_i^2$ is a one-to-one function function of $X_i$ because $X_iin{0,1}$ for each $i$.
So $X_1^2+X_2^2+X_3^2$ is also a one-to-one function of $T$, implying that the former is sufficient for $p$. (Thanks to @Alex for pointing this out)
For the remaining options I create a table of the possible values that the statistics can take:
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline (X_1,X_2,X_3)&T_1=X_1+2X_2+X_3&T_2=2X_1-X_2-X_3&T_3=3X_1+2X_2-4X_3\ hline(0,0,0)&0&0&0\
hline(0,0,1)&1&-1&-4\
hline(0,1,0)&2&-1&2\
hline (0,1,1)&3&-2&-2\
hline (1,0,0)&1&2&3\
hline (1,0,1)&2&1&-1\
hline (1,1,0)&3&1&5\
hline (1,1,1)&4&0&1\
hline
end{array}
I am looking whether $T_1,T_2,T_3$ are one-to-one functions of the sample $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ or not. If they are, then they are sufficient statistics. If you can see right away that the only bijection is $$T_3:{0,1}^3to{-4,-2,ldots,3,5}$$, then you are done. Because a bijection with the sample implies that observing $T_3(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ and observing $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ are equivalent. In other words, $T_3$ is a sufficient statistic for $p$.
Alternatively, if you consider the case $T_1=2$, you will find that the conditional distribution $P({X_1,X_2,X_3}mid T_1)$ depends on $p$. Similar argument holds for $T_2$ if you consider the case $T_2=0$. Also it is apparent from the table above that $P({X_1,X_2,X_3}mid T_3)$ is independent of $p$ for all possible values of $T_3$, because $T_3$ takes 8 distinct values corresponding to 8 different tuples.
I used the following threads for reference:
Verification of sufficiency of a linear combination of the sample $(X_i)_{ige1}$ where $X_istackrel{text{i.i.d}}simtext{Ber}(theta)$
Sufficiency or Insufficiency
Bhai this question came in 2 marks. You sure there isn't any other way. Seems like in exam it will be time-consuming.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:03
@Daman I am aware this is an MCQ question. If you are given that there is only one correct answer, then the job becomes slightly quicker. The only checking is between three possible options. So if you can detect which among the three is a bijective function of $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$, you have an answer. Depends on how exactly can you detect the bijection - just by looking at the statistic or by drawing a table. I am not saying this is the only way to solve the problem; there may well be a faster/easier solution.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 11:21
Ok bhai . Let me understand this one first. I didn't get it yet.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:23
I understood it bhai. Thanks!
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:53
1
@Daman I used it to denote the set of all 3 tuples of $0$ and $1$.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 13 '18 at 10:54
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036351%2fsufficient-statistics-for-p-for-a-random-sample-from-textberp-distribut%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Since $T=X_1+X_2+X_3$ is a minimal sufficient statistic for $p$, implying that it is a function of every other sufficient statistic, option (D) is eliminated.
Now $X_i^2$ is a one-to-one function function of $X_i$ because $X_iin{0,1}$ for each $i$.
So $X_1^2+X_2^2+X_3^2$ is also a one-to-one function of $T$, implying that the former is sufficient for $p$. (Thanks to @Alex for pointing this out)
For the remaining options I create a table of the possible values that the statistics can take:
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline (X_1,X_2,X_3)&T_1=X_1+2X_2+X_3&T_2=2X_1-X_2-X_3&T_3=3X_1+2X_2-4X_3\ hline(0,0,0)&0&0&0\
hline(0,0,1)&1&-1&-4\
hline(0,1,0)&2&-1&2\
hline (0,1,1)&3&-2&-2\
hline (1,0,0)&1&2&3\
hline (1,0,1)&2&1&-1\
hline (1,1,0)&3&1&5\
hline (1,1,1)&4&0&1\
hline
end{array}
I am looking whether $T_1,T_2,T_3$ are one-to-one functions of the sample $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ or not. If they are, then they are sufficient statistics. If you can see right away that the only bijection is $$T_3:{0,1}^3to{-4,-2,ldots,3,5}$$, then you are done. Because a bijection with the sample implies that observing $T_3(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ and observing $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ are equivalent. In other words, $T_3$ is a sufficient statistic for $p$.
Alternatively, if you consider the case $T_1=2$, you will find that the conditional distribution $P({X_1,X_2,X_3}mid T_1)$ depends on $p$. Similar argument holds for $T_2$ if you consider the case $T_2=0$. Also it is apparent from the table above that $P({X_1,X_2,X_3}mid T_3)$ is independent of $p$ for all possible values of $T_3$, because $T_3$ takes 8 distinct values corresponding to 8 different tuples.
I used the following threads for reference:
Verification of sufficiency of a linear combination of the sample $(X_i)_{ige1}$ where $X_istackrel{text{i.i.d}}simtext{Ber}(theta)$
Sufficiency or Insufficiency
Bhai this question came in 2 marks. You sure there isn't any other way. Seems like in exam it will be time-consuming.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:03
@Daman I am aware this is an MCQ question. If you are given that there is only one correct answer, then the job becomes slightly quicker. The only checking is between three possible options. So if you can detect which among the three is a bijective function of $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$, you have an answer. Depends on how exactly can you detect the bijection - just by looking at the statistic or by drawing a table. I am not saying this is the only way to solve the problem; there may well be a faster/easier solution.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 11:21
Ok bhai . Let me understand this one first. I didn't get it yet.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:23
I understood it bhai. Thanks!
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:53
1
@Daman I used it to denote the set of all 3 tuples of $0$ and $1$.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 13 '18 at 10:54
|
show 4 more comments
Since $T=X_1+X_2+X_3$ is a minimal sufficient statistic for $p$, implying that it is a function of every other sufficient statistic, option (D) is eliminated.
Now $X_i^2$ is a one-to-one function function of $X_i$ because $X_iin{0,1}$ for each $i$.
So $X_1^2+X_2^2+X_3^2$ is also a one-to-one function of $T$, implying that the former is sufficient for $p$. (Thanks to @Alex for pointing this out)
For the remaining options I create a table of the possible values that the statistics can take:
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline (X_1,X_2,X_3)&T_1=X_1+2X_2+X_3&T_2=2X_1-X_2-X_3&T_3=3X_1+2X_2-4X_3\ hline(0,0,0)&0&0&0\
hline(0,0,1)&1&-1&-4\
hline(0,1,0)&2&-1&2\
hline (0,1,1)&3&-2&-2\
hline (1,0,0)&1&2&3\
hline (1,0,1)&2&1&-1\
hline (1,1,0)&3&1&5\
hline (1,1,1)&4&0&1\
hline
end{array}
I am looking whether $T_1,T_2,T_3$ are one-to-one functions of the sample $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ or not. If they are, then they are sufficient statistics. If you can see right away that the only bijection is $$T_3:{0,1}^3to{-4,-2,ldots,3,5}$$, then you are done. Because a bijection with the sample implies that observing $T_3(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ and observing $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ are equivalent. In other words, $T_3$ is a sufficient statistic for $p$.
Alternatively, if you consider the case $T_1=2$, you will find that the conditional distribution $P({X_1,X_2,X_3}mid T_1)$ depends on $p$. Similar argument holds for $T_2$ if you consider the case $T_2=0$. Also it is apparent from the table above that $P({X_1,X_2,X_3}mid T_3)$ is independent of $p$ for all possible values of $T_3$, because $T_3$ takes 8 distinct values corresponding to 8 different tuples.
I used the following threads for reference:
Verification of sufficiency of a linear combination of the sample $(X_i)_{ige1}$ where $X_istackrel{text{i.i.d}}simtext{Ber}(theta)$
Sufficiency or Insufficiency
Bhai this question came in 2 marks. You sure there isn't any other way. Seems like in exam it will be time-consuming.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:03
@Daman I am aware this is an MCQ question. If you are given that there is only one correct answer, then the job becomes slightly quicker. The only checking is between three possible options. So if you can detect which among the three is a bijective function of $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$, you have an answer. Depends on how exactly can you detect the bijection - just by looking at the statistic or by drawing a table. I am not saying this is the only way to solve the problem; there may well be a faster/easier solution.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 11:21
Ok bhai . Let me understand this one first. I didn't get it yet.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:23
I understood it bhai. Thanks!
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:53
1
@Daman I used it to denote the set of all 3 tuples of $0$ and $1$.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 13 '18 at 10:54
|
show 4 more comments
Since $T=X_1+X_2+X_3$ is a minimal sufficient statistic for $p$, implying that it is a function of every other sufficient statistic, option (D) is eliminated.
Now $X_i^2$ is a one-to-one function function of $X_i$ because $X_iin{0,1}$ for each $i$.
So $X_1^2+X_2^2+X_3^2$ is also a one-to-one function of $T$, implying that the former is sufficient for $p$. (Thanks to @Alex for pointing this out)
For the remaining options I create a table of the possible values that the statistics can take:
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline (X_1,X_2,X_3)&T_1=X_1+2X_2+X_3&T_2=2X_1-X_2-X_3&T_3=3X_1+2X_2-4X_3\ hline(0,0,0)&0&0&0\
hline(0,0,1)&1&-1&-4\
hline(0,1,0)&2&-1&2\
hline (0,1,1)&3&-2&-2\
hline (1,0,0)&1&2&3\
hline (1,0,1)&2&1&-1\
hline (1,1,0)&3&1&5\
hline (1,1,1)&4&0&1\
hline
end{array}
I am looking whether $T_1,T_2,T_3$ are one-to-one functions of the sample $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ or not. If they are, then they are sufficient statistics. If you can see right away that the only bijection is $$T_3:{0,1}^3to{-4,-2,ldots,3,5}$$, then you are done. Because a bijection with the sample implies that observing $T_3(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ and observing $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ are equivalent. In other words, $T_3$ is a sufficient statistic for $p$.
Alternatively, if you consider the case $T_1=2$, you will find that the conditional distribution $P({X_1,X_2,X_3}mid T_1)$ depends on $p$. Similar argument holds for $T_2$ if you consider the case $T_2=0$. Also it is apparent from the table above that $P({X_1,X_2,X_3}mid T_3)$ is independent of $p$ for all possible values of $T_3$, because $T_3$ takes 8 distinct values corresponding to 8 different tuples.
I used the following threads for reference:
Verification of sufficiency of a linear combination of the sample $(X_i)_{ige1}$ where $X_istackrel{text{i.i.d}}simtext{Ber}(theta)$
Sufficiency or Insufficiency
Since $T=X_1+X_2+X_3$ is a minimal sufficient statistic for $p$, implying that it is a function of every other sufficient statistic, option (D) is eliminated.
Now $X_i^2$ is a one-to-one function function of $X_i$ because $X_iin{0,1}$ for each $i$.
So $X_1^2+X_2^2+X_3^2$ is also a one-to-one function of $T$, implying that the former is sufficient for $p$. (Thanks to @Alex for pointing this out)
For the remaining options I create a table of the possible values that the statistics can take:
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline (X_1,X_2,X_3)&T_1=X_1+2X_2+X_3&T_2=2X_1-X_2-X_3&T_3=3X_1+2X_2-4X_3\ hline(0,0,0)&0&0&0\
hline(0,0,1)&1&-1&-4\
hline(0,1,0)&2&-1&2\
hline (0,1,1)&3&-2&-2\
hline (1,0,0)&1&2&3\
hline (1,0,1)&2&1&-1\
hline (1,1,0)&3&1&5\
hline (1,1,1)&4&0&1\
hline
end{array}
I am looking whether $T_1,T_2,T_3$ are one-to-one functions of the sample $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ or not. If they are, then they are sufficient statistics. If you can see right away that the only bijection is $$T_3:{0,1}^3to{-4,-2,ldots,3,5}$$, then you are done. Because a bijection with the sample implies that observing $T_3(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ and observing $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ are equivalent. In other words, $T_3$ is a sufficient statistic for $p$.
Alternatively, if you consider the case $T_1=2$, you will find that the conditional distribution $P({X_1,X_2,X_3}mid T_1)$ depends on $p$. Similar argument holds for $T_2$ if you consider the case $T_2=0$. Also it is apparent from the table above that $P({X_1,X_2,X_3}mid T_3)$ is independent of $p$ for all possible values of $T_3$, because $T_3$ takes 8 distinct values corresponding to 8 different tuples.
I used the following threads for reference:
Verification of sufficiency of a linear combination of the sample $(X_i)_{ige1}$ where $X_istackrel{text{i.i.d}}simtext{Ber}(theta)$
Sufficiency or Insufficiency
edited Dec 16 '18 at 14:45
answered Dec 12 '18 at 10:47
StubbornAtomStubbornAtom
5,40411138
5,40411138
Bhai this question came in 2 marks. You sure there isn't any other way. Seems like in exam it will be time-consuming.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:03
@Daman I am aware this is an MCQ question. If you are given that there is only one correct answer, then the job becomes slightly quicker. The only checking is between three possible options. So if you can detect which among the three is a bijective function of $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$, you have an answer. Depends on how exactly can you detect the bijection - just by looking at the statistic or by drawing a table. I am not saying this is the only way to solve the problem; there may well be a faster/easier solution.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 11:21
Ok bhai . Let me understand this one first. I didn't get it yet.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:23
I understood it bhai. Thanks!
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:53
1
@Daman I used it to denote the set of all 3 tuples of $0$ and $1$.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 13 '18 at 10:54
|
show 4 more comments
Bhai this question came in 2 marks. You sure there isn't any other way. Seems like in exam it will be time-consuming.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:03
@Daman I am aware this is an MCQ question. If you are given that there is only one correct answer, then the job becomes slightly quicker. The only checking is between three possible options. So if you can detect which among the three is a bijective function of $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$, you have an answer. Depends on how exactly can you detect the bijection - just by looking at the statistic or by drawing a table. I am not saying this is the only way to solve the problem; there may well be a faster/easier solution.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 11:21
Ok bhai . Let me understand this one first. I didn't get it yet.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:23
I understood it bhai. Thanks!
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:53
1
@Daman I used it to denote the set of all 3 tuples of $0$ and $1$.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 13 '18 at 10:54
Bhai this question came in 2 marks. You sure there isn't any other way. Seems like in exam it will be time-consuming.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:03
Bhai this question came in 2 marks. You sure there isn't any other way. Seems like in exam it will be time-consuming.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:03
@Daman I am aware this is an MCQ question. If you are given that there is only one correct answer, then the job becomes slightly quicker. The only checking is between three possible options. So if you can detect which among the three is a bijective function of $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$, you have an answer. Depends on how exactly can you detect the bijection - just by looking at the statistic or by drawing a table. I am not saying this is the only way to solve the problem; there may well be a faster/easier solution.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 11:21
@Daman I am aware this is an MCQ question. If you are given that there is only one correct answer, then the job becomes slightly quicker. The only checking is between three possible options. So if you can detect which among the three is a bijective function of $(X_1,X_2,X_3)$, you have an answer. Depends on how exactly can you detect the bijection - just by looking at the statistic or by drawing a table. I am not saying this is the only way to solve the problem; there may well be a faster/easier solution.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 11:21
Ok bhai . Let me understand this one first. I didn't get it yet.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:23
Ok bhai . Let me understand this one first. I didn't get it yet.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:23
I understood it bhai. Thanks!
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:53
I understood it bhai. Thanks!
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 11:53
1
1
@Daman I used it to denote the set of all 3 tuples of $0$ and $1$.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 13 '18 at 10:54
@Daman I used it to denote the set of all 3 tuples of $0$ and $1$.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 13 '18 at 10:54
|
show 4 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036351%2fsufficient-statistics-for-p-for-a-random-sample-from-textberp-distribut%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Actually it seems only option E is correct.
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 7:56
@StubbornAtom Can you tell me how? One more thing is that I took an example in B such that $T=2$ and my conditional distribution of sample give T=2 is not independent of the parameter.
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:04
No one answers my question. :(
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 8:59
I eliminated the other options, did not check E. (Arre beta thoda सब्र kar :P)
– StubbornAtom
Dec 12 '18 at 9:04
@StubbornAtom Ok bro :)
– Daman deep
Dec 12 '18 at 9:05