Can't figure out this triangle geometry problem












5












$begingroup$


I have the following triangle:



enter image description here




The following information about it are given:




  • ABCD is a trapezoid (AB || DC)

  • EF || DC

  • Q is the intersection of AC, DB, PN, & EF


Prove that EQ = QF.




Since I don't have any numerical values, I tried solving it by various triangular relation identities via similarities and Thales's theorem. The only way to create a relation between EQ and QF that I could think of was this:



$$bigtriangleup text{APM} sim bigtriangleup text{EPQ} text{ and } bigtriangleup text{PMB} sim bigtriangleup text{PQF}$$



$$begin{cases} frac{AM}{EQ} = frac{PM}{PQ} \
frac{MB}{QF} = frac{PM}{PQ} end{cases}$$



I've then tried to swap around the redundant lengths to try and get to the desired equation, but because I lack direction and methodology I get lost and frustrated. I feel like I'm just doing guesswork.



How can I solve this particular problem, and how do I tackle problems of this kind more effectively?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me what the definition of $Q$ is. I mean, it should be given as the intersection of only two segments. Besides, are you given information on $N$ (middle point of $DC$?) or $M$ (middle point of $AB$?)?
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Jan 2 at 20:46












  • $begingroup$
    @Matteo You need no information about $N$ and $M$ since you can deduce that are midpoint by say Ceva-theorem
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Jan 2 at 20:51










  • $begingroup$
    Q is just a point. No information about middle points is given.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 2 at 20:51
















5












$begingroup$


I have the following triangle:



enter image description here




The following information about it are given:




  • ABCD is a trapezoid (AB || DC)

  • EF || DC

  • Q is the intersection of AC, DB, PN, & EF


Prove that EQ = QF.




Since I don't have any numerical values, I tried solving it by various triangular relation identities via similarities and Thales's theorem. The only way to create a relation between EQ and QF that I could think of was this:



$$bigtriangleup text{APM} sim bigtriangleup text{EPQ} text{ and } bigtriangleup text{PMB} sim bigtriangleup text{PQF}$$



$$begin{cases} frac{AM}{EQ} = frac{PM}{PQ} \
frac{MB}{QF} = frac{PM}{PQ} end{cases}$$



I've then tried to swap around the redundant lengths to try and get to the desired equation, but because I lack direction and methodology I get lost and frustrated. I feel like I'm just doing guesswork.



How can I solve this particular problem, and how do I tackle problems of this kind more effectively?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me what the definition of $Q$ is. I mean, it should be given as the intersection of only two segments. Besides, are you given information on $N$ (middle point of $DC$?) or $M$ (middle point of $AB$?)?
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Jan 2 at 20:46












  • $begingroup$
    @Matteo You need no information about $N$ and $M$ since you can deduce that are midpoint by say Ceva-theorem
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Jan 2 at 20:51










  • $begingroup$
    Q is just a point. No information about middle points is given.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 2 at 20:51














5












5








5





$begingroup$


I have the following triangle:



enter image description here




The following information about it are given:




  • ABCD is a trapezoid (AB || DC)

  • EF || DC

  • Q is the intersection of AC, DB, PN, & EF


Prove that EQ = QF.




Since I don't have any numerical values, I tried solving it by various triangular relation identities via similarities and Thales's theorem. The only way to create a relation between EQ and QF that I could think of was this:



$$bigtriangleup text{APM} sim bigtriangleup text{EPQ} text{ and } bigtriangleup text{PMB} sim bigtriangleup text{PQF}$$



$$begin{cases} frac{AM}{EQ} = frac{PM}{PQ} \
frac{MB}{QF} = frac{PM}{PQ} end{cases}$$



I've then tried to swap around the redundant lengths to try and get to the desired equation, but because I lack direction and methodology I get lost and frustrated. I feel like I'm just doing guesswork.



How can I solve this particular problem, and how do I tackle problems of this kind more effectively?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have the following triangle:



enter image description here




The following information about it are given:




  • ABCD is a trapezoid (AB || DC)

  • EF || DC

  • Q is the intersection of AC, DB, PN, & EF


Prove that EQ = QF.




Since I don't have any numerical values, I tried solving it by various triangular relation identities via similarities and Thales's theorem. The only way to create a relation between EQ and QF that I could think of was this:



$$bigtriangleup text{APM} sim bigtriangleup text{EPQ} text{ and } bigtriangleup text{PMB} sim bigtriangleup text{PQF}$$



$$begin{cases} frac{AM}{EQ} = frac{PM}{PQ} \
frac{MB}{QF} = frac{PM}{PQ} end{cases}$$



I've then tried to swap around the redundant lengths to try and get to the desired equation, but because I lack direction and methodology I get lost and frustrated. I feel like I'm just doing guesswork.



How can I solve this particular problem, and how do I tackle problems of this kind more effectively?







geometry euclidean-geometry geometric-transformation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 5 at 12:59









greedoid

46.1k1160117




46.1k1160117










asked Jan 2 at 20:36









daedsidogdaedsidog

29517




29517












  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me what the definition of $Q$ is. I mean, it should be given as the intersection of only two segments. Besides, are you given information on $N$ (middle point of $DC$?) or $M$ (middle point of $AB$?)?
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Jan 2 at 20:46












  • $begingroup$
    @Matteo You need no information about $N$ and $M$ since you can deduce that are midpoint by say Ceva-theorem
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Jan 2 at 20:51










  • $begingroup$
    Q is just a point. No information about middle points is given.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 2 at 20:51


















  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear to me what the definition of $Q$ is. I mean, it should be given as the intersection of only two segments. Besides, are you given information on $N$ (middle point of $DC$?) or $M$ (middle point of $AB$?)?
    $endgroup$
    – Matteo
    Jan 2 at 20:46












  • $begingroup$
    @Matteo You need no information about $N$ and $M$ since you can deduce that are midpoint by say Ceva-theorem
    $endgroup$
    – greedoid
    Jan 2 at 20:51










  • $begingroup$
    Q is just a point. No information about middle points is given.
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 2 at 20:51
















$begingroup$
It is not clear to me what the definition of $Q$ is. I mean, it should be given as the intersection of only two segments. Besides, are you given information on $N$ (middle point of $DC$?) or $M$ (middle point of $AB$?)?
$endgroup$
– Matteo
Jan 2 at 20:46






$begingroup$
It is not clear to me what the definition of $Q$ is. I mean, it should be given as the intersection of only two segments. Besides, are you given information on $N$ (middle point of $DC$?) or $M$ (middle point of $AB$?)?
$endgroup$
– Matteo
Jan 2 at 20:46














$begingroup$
@Matteo You need no information about $N$ and $M$ since you can deduce that are midpoint by say Ceva-theorem
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Jan 2 at 20:51




$begingroup$
@Matteo You need no information about $N$ and $M$ since you can deduce that are midpoint by say Ceva-theorem
$endgroup$
– greedoid
Jan 2 at 20:51












$begingroup$
Q is just a point. No information about middle points is given.
$endgroup$
– daedsidog
Jan 2 at 20:51




$begingroup$
Q is just a point. No information about middle points is given.
$endgroup$
– daedsidog
Jan 2 at 20:51










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

First and last equality are because of triangle similarty ($BQFsim BDC$ and $AEQ sim ADC$) and in the middle because of Thales theorem (in angle through $Q$).



$$ {QF over CD} = {QBover DB} = {QAover AC} = {EQover CD}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Brilliant, thank you. No matter how many hours I gawk at these sort of problems, the obvious never occurs to me. Do you have any suggestions to remedy this?
    $endgroup$
    – daedsidog
    Jan 2 at 21:01



















0












$begingroup$

Let’s denote $Q$ the intersection of $AC$ and $BD$, $M$ the midpoint of $AB$ and $N$ the midpoint of $DC$.



Let’s first prove that $P, M, Q, N$ are aligned.



The homothetic transformation of center $P$ that transforms $A$ into $D$, transforms $B$ into $C$ as $ABCD$ is a trapezoid. Hence by this homothetic transformation, $M$ and $N$ are aligned with the center $P$.



Considering now the homothetic transformation of center $Q$ that transforms $A$ into $C$ and $B$ into $D$, you get by a similar argument that $M, Q,N$ are aligned.



Finally, $P, M, Q, N$ are aligned. Now, $Q$ is the middle of $EF$ by Thales theorem.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    By similarity twice and by Thales for $angle DPC$ we obtain:
    $$frac{EQ}{AB}=frac{DE}{DA}=frac{CF}{CB}=frac{QF}{AB}.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059949%2fcant-figure-out-this-triangle-geometry-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      First and last equality are because of triangle similarty ($BQFsim BDC$ and $AEQ sim ADC$) and in the middle because of Thales theorem (in angle through $Q$).



      $$ {QF over CD} = {QBover DB} = {QAover AC} = {EQover CD}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Brilliant, thank you. No matter how many hours I gawk at these sort of problems, the obvious never occurs to me. Do you have any suggestions to remedy this?
        $endgroup$
        – daedsidog
        Jan 2 at 21:01
















      2












      $begingroup$

      First and last equality are because of triangle similarty ($BQFsim BDC$ and $AEQ sim ADC$) and in the middle because of Thales theorem (in angle through $Q$).



      $$ {QF over CD} = {QBover DB} = {QAover AC} = {EQover CD}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Brilliant, thank you. No matter how many hours I gawk at these sort of problems, the obvious never occurs to me. Do you have any suggestions to remedy this?
        $endgroup$
        – daedsidog
        Jan 2 at 21:01














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$

      First and last equality are because of triangle similarty ($BQFsim BDC$ and $AEQ sim ADC$) and in the middle because of Thales theorem (in angle through $Q$).



      $$ {QF over CD} = {QBover DB} = {QAover AC} = {EQover CD}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      First and last equality are because of triangle similarty ($BQFsim BDC$ and $AEQ sim ADC$) and in the middle because of Thales theorem (in angle through $Q$).



      $$ {QF over CD} = {QBover DB} = {QAover AC} = {EQover CD}$$







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Jan 2 at 20:56









      greedoidgreedoid

      46.1k1160117




      46.1k1160117












      • $begingroup$
        Brilliant, thank you. No matter how many hours I gawk at these sort of problems, the obvious never occurs to me. Do you have any suggestions to remedy this?
        $endgroup$
        – daedsidog
        Jan 2 at 21:01


















      • $begingroup$
        Brilliant, thank you. No matter how many hours I gawk at these sort of problems, the obvious never occurs to me. Do you have any suggestions to remedy this?
        $endgroup$
        – daedsidog
        Jan 2 at 21:01
















      $begingroup$
      Brilliant, thank you. No matter how many hours I gawk at these sort of problems, the obvious never occurs to me. Do you have any suggestions to remedy this?
      $endgroup$
      – daedsidog
      Jan 2 at 21:01




      $begingroup$
      Brilliant, thank you. No matter how many hours I gawk at these sort of problems, the obvious never occurs to me. Do you have any suggestions to remedy this?
      $endgroup$
      – daedsidog
      Jan 2 at 21:01











      0












      $begingroup$

      Let’s denote $Q$ the intersection of $AC$ and $BD$, $M$ the midpoint of $AB$ and $N$ the midpoint of $DC$.



      Let’s first prove that $P, M, Q, N$ are aligned.



      The homothetic transformation of center $P$ that transforms $A$ into $D$, transforms $B$ into $C$ as $ABCD$ is a trapezoid. Hence by this homothetic transformation, $M$ and $N$ are aligned with the center $P$.



      Considering now the homothetic transformation of center $Q$ that transforms $A$ into $C$ and $B$ into $D$, you get by a similar argument that $M, Q,N$ are aligned.



      Finally, $P, M, Q, N$ are aligned. Now, $Q$ is the middle of $EF$ by Thales theorem.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$

        Let’s denote $Q$ the intersection of $AC$ and $BD$, $M$ the midpoint of $AB$ and $N$ the midpoint of $DC$.



        Let’s first prove that $P, M, Q, N$ are aligned.



        The homothetic transformation of center $P$ that transforms $A$ into $D$, transforms $B$ into $C$ as $ABCD$ is a trapezoid. Hence by this homothetic transformation, $M$ and $N$ are aligned with the center $P$.



        Considering now the homothetic transformation of center $Q$ that transforms $A$ into $C$ and $B$ into $D$, you get by a similar argument that $M, Q,N$ are aligned.



        Finally, $P, M, Q, N$ are aligned. Now, $Q$ is the middle of $EF$ by Thales theorem.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Let’s denote $Q$ the intersection of $AC$ and $BD$, $M$ the midpoint of $AB$ and $N$ the midpoint of $DC$.



          Let’s first prove that $P, M, Q, N$ are aligned.



          The homothetic transformation of center $P$ that transforms $A$ into $D$, transforms $B$ into $C$ as $ABCD$ is a trapezoid. Hence by this homothetic transformation, $M$ and $N$ are aligned with the center $P$.



          Considering now the homothetic transformation of center $Q$ that transforms $A$ into $C$ and $B$ into $D$, you get by a similar argument that $M, Q,N$ are aligned.



          Finally, $P, M, Q, N$ are aligned. Now, $Q$ is the middle of $EF$ by Thales theorem.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Let’s denote $Q$ the intersection of $AC$ and $BD$, $M$ the midpoint of $AB$ and $N$ the midpoint of $DC$.



          Let’s first prove that $P, M, Q, N$ are aligned.



          The homothetic transformation of center $P$ that transforms $A$ into $D$, transforms $B$ into $C$ as $ABCD$ is a trapezoid. Hence by this homothetic transformation, $M$ and $N$ are aligned with the center $P$.



          Considering now the homothetic transformation of center $Q$ that transforms $A$ into $C$ and $B$ into $D$, you get by a similar argument that $M, Q,N$ are aligned.



          Finally, $P, M, Q, N$ are aligned. Now, $Q$ is the middle of $EF$ by Thales theorem.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 2 at 21:03









          mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net

          27k22158




          27k22158























              0












              $begingroup$

              By similarity twice and by Thales for $angle DPC$ we obtain:
              $$frac{EQ}{AB}=frac{DE}{DA}=frac{CF}{CB}=frac{QF}{AB}.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                By similarity twice and by Thales for $angle DPC$ we obtain:
                $$frac{EQ}{AB}=frac{DE}{DA}=frac{CF}{CB}=frac{QF}{AB}.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  By similarity twice and by Thales for $angle DPC$ we obtain:
                  $$frac{EQ}{AB}=frac{DE}{DA}=frac{CF}{CB}=frac{QF}{AB}.$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  By similarity twice and by Thales for $angle DPC$ we obtain:
                  $$frac{EQ}{AB}=frac{DE}{DA}=frac{CF}{CB}=frac{QF}{AB}.$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 2 at 22:01









                  Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg

                  107k1894199




                  107k1894199






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059949%2fcant-figure-out-this-triangle-geometry-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bressuire

                      Cabo Verde

                      Gyllenstierna