$A_n$ is the only subgroup of $S_n$ of index $2$.
$begingroup$
How to prove that the only subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$ of order $n!/2$ is $A_n$?
Why isn't there other possibility?
Thanks :)
group-theory finite-groups permutations symmetric-groups
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How to prove that the only subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$ of order $n!/2$ is $A_n$?
Why isn't there other possibility?
Thanks :)
group-theory finite-groups permutations symmetric-groups
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
$begingroup$
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
4
$begingroup$
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How to prove that the only subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$ of order $n!/2$ is $A_n$?
Why isn't there other possibility?
Thanks :)
group-theory finite-groups permutations symmetric-groups
$endgroup$
How to prove that the only subgroup of the symmetric group $S_n$ of order $n!/2$ is $A_n$?
Why isn't there other possibility?
Thanks :)
group-theory finite-groups permutations symmetric-groups
group-theory finite-groups permutations symmetric-groups
edited Jan 29 '16 at 10:22
mrs
1
1
asked Mar 14 '11 at 20:57
ShinyaSakaiShinyaSakai
3,01012550
3,01012550
4
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
$begingroup$
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
4
$begingroup$
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
$begingroup$
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
4
$begingroup$
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11
4
4
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
$begingroup$
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
$begingroup$
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
4
4
$begingroup$
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11
$begingroup$
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As mentioned by yoyo: if $Hsubset S_n$ is of index 2 then it is normal and $S_n/H$ is isomorphic to $C_2={1,-1}$. We thus have a surjective homomorphism $f:S_nto C_2$ with kernel $H$. All transpositions in $S_n$ are conjugate, hence $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$ (this uses the fact that $C_2$ is commutative). $S_n$ is generated by transpositions, therefore $C_2$ is generated by $f(t)$ (for any transposition $tin S_n$), therefore $f(t)=-1$, therefore ker $f=A_n$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$begingroup$
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
$endgroup$
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
$begingroup$
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
$endgroup$
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
$begingroup$
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
subgroups of index two are normal (exercise). $A_n$ is simple, $ngeq 5$ (exercise). if there were another subgroup $H$ of index two, then $Hcap A_n$ would be normal in $A_n$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
$begingroup$
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
$endgroup$
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Other Way :
$A_n$ is generated by all $3$-cycles in $S_n$.
If $Hneq A_n$ and $|S_n:H|=2$ then at least one 3-cycle is not in $H.$
WLOG assume say $(123)notin H$ so $H,(123)H,(132)H$ are 3 distinct cosets which is a contradiction to the fact that $H$ has index $2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I realize this question is rather old, but if this comes from Hungerford's book, there is a specific way he wants us to solve this problem, so I am providing this for the benefit of those working through Hungerford. First, one must recall that subgroups of index $2$ are normal. Hungerford's suggestion is to use the following fact:
Let $r,s$ be distinct elements of ${1,2,...,n}$. Then $A_n$ ($n ge 3$) is generated by the $3$-cycles ${(rsk) ~|~ 1 le k le n, k ne r,s}$.
Keeping that in mind, we first prove the two easy facts about subgroups of index $2$
Lemma (1): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains the square of every element in $G$.
Proof: Let $g in G$ be arbitrary. Then by Lagrange's theorem, $(gH)^2 = H$ or $g^2H=H$, happening if and only if $g^2 in H$.
Lemma (2): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains all elements of odd order.
Proof: Suppose that $g in G$ is a element of order $2k+1$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$. Then $H = g^{2k+1}H = gH cdot (g^2)^k H = gH$, where $(g^2)^k H = H$ by lemma (1). This, of course, means $g in H$.
From these two lemmas, I think it is pretty clear how one ought to use the given fact: if $H le S_n$ were a subgroup of index $2$, then it would consist of all $3$-cycles, since they have odd order. But by closure this means that $A_n le H$. Since they have the same index, they must also have the same order, implying that they are equal because we are dealing with finite sets.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
$endgroup$
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27024%2fa-n-is-the-only-subgroup-of-s-n-of-index-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As mentioned by yoyo: if $Hsubset S_n$ is of index 2 then it is normal and $S_n/H$ is isomorphic to $C_2={1,-1}$. We thus have a surjective homomorphism $f:S_nto C_2$ with kernel $H$. All transpositions in $S_n$ are conjugate, hence $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$ (this uses the fact that $C_2$ is commutative). $S_n$ is generated by transpositions, therefore $C_2$ is generated by $f(t)$ (for any transposition $tin S_n$), therefore $f(t)=-1$, therefore ker $f=A_n$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$begingroup$
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
$endgroup$
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
$begingroup$
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
$endgroup$
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
$begingroup$
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As mentioned by yoyo: if $Hsubset S_n$ is of index 2 then it is normal and $S_n/H$ is isomorphic to $C_2={1,-1}$. We thus have a surjective homomorphism $f:S_nto C_2$ with kernel $H$. All transpositions in $S_n$ are conjugate, hence $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$ (this uses the fact that $C_2$ is commutative). $S_n$ is generated by transpositions, therefore $C_2$ is generated by $f(t)$ (for any transposition $tin S_n$), therefore $f(t)=-1$, therefore ker $f=A_n$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$begingroup$
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
$endgroup$
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
$begingroup$
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
$endgroup$
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
$begingroup$
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As mentioned by yoyo: if $Hsubset S_n$ is of index 2 then it is normal and $S_n/H$ is isomorphic to $C_2={1,-1}$. We thus have a surjective homomorphism $f:S_nto C_2$ with kernel $H$. All transpositions in $S_n$ are conjugate, hence $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$ (this uses the fact that $C_2$ is commutative). $S_n$ is generated by transpositions, therefore $C_2$ is generated by $f(t)$ (for any transposition $tin S_n$), therefore $f(t)=-1$, therefore ker $f=A_n$.
$endgroup$
As mentioned by yoyo: if $Hsubset S_n$ is of index 2 then it is normal and $S_n/H$ is isomorphic to $C_2={1,-1}$. We thus have a surjective homomorphism $f:S_nto C_2$ with kernel $H$. All transpositions in $S_n$ are conjugate, hence $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$ (this uses the fact that $C_2$ is commutative). $S_n$ is generated by transpositions, therefore $C_2$ is generated by $f(t)$ (for any transposition $tin S_n$), therefore $f(t)=-1$, therefore ker $f=A_n$.
edited Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
answered Mar 14 '11 at 23:01
user8268user8268
16.9k12747
16.9k12747
$begingroup$
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$begingroup$
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
$endgroup$
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
$begingroup$
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
$endgroup$
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
$begingroup$
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$begingroup$
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
$endgroup$
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
$begingroup$
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
$endgroup$
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
$begingroup$
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
$begingroup$
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Very detailed~ thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:28
$begingroup$
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
$endgroup$
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
$begingroup$
$S_n$ in the last line, not $S_2$. Very nice solution.
$endgroup$
– ReverseFlow
Sep 7 '14 at 23:41
$begingroup$
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
$endgroup$
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
$begingroup$
@Genomeme: thanks, corrected
$endgroup$
– user8268
Sep 8 '14 at 21:14
1
1
$begingroup$
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
$begingroup$
@user8268 Can you explain how $f(t)in C_2$ is the same element for every transposition $tin S_n$, and how $S_n$ is generated by transpositions? Thank you.
$endgroup$
– jstnchng
Nov 30 '14 at 18:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
subgroups of index two are normal (exercise). $A_n$ is simple, $ngeq 5$ (exercise). if there were another subgroup $H$ of index two, then $Hcap A_n$ would be normal in $A_n$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
$begingroup$
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
$endgroup$
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
subgroups of index two are normal (exercise). $A_n$ is simple, $ngeq 5$ (exercise). if there were another subgroup $H$ of index two, then $Hcap A_n$ would be normal in $A_n$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
$begingroup$
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
$endgroup$
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
subgroups of index two are normal (exercise). $A_n$ is simple, $ngeq 5$ (exercise). if there were another subgroup $H$ of index two, then $Hcap A_n$ would be normal in $A_n$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
subgroups of index two are normal (exercise). $A_n$ is simple, $ngeq 5$ (exercise). if there were another subgroup $H$ of index two, then $Hcap A_n$ would be normal in $A_n$, contradiction.
answered Mar 14 '11 at 21:08
yoyoyoyo
6,5991726
6,5991726
$begingroup$
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
$begingroup$
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
$endgroup$
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
$begingroup$
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
$endgroup$
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
$begingroup$
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
$begingroup$
It is really a smart shortcut for the special case of $n geq 5$~ Thank you very much~
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 15 '11 at 21:30
6
6
$begingroup$
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
$endgroup$
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
$begingroup$
How do you know that the intersection is not trivial? {1} is normal in every group and does not contradict simplicity. There is a way around this using conjugacy in $S_n$......
$endgroup$
– Vladhagen
Oct 30 '13 at 19:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Other Way :
$A_n$ is generated by all $3$-cycles in $S_n$.
If $Hneq A_n$ and $|S_n:H|=2$ then at least one 3-cycle is not in $H.$
WLOG assume say $(123)notin H$ so $H,(123)H,(132)H$ are 3 distinct cosets which is a contradiction to the fact that $H$ has index $2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Other Way :
$A_n$ is generated by all $3$-cycles in $S_n$.
If $Hneq A_n$ and $|S_n:H|=2$ then at least one 3-cycle is not in $H.$
WLOG assume say $(123)notin H$ so $H,(123)H,(132)H$ are 3 distinct cosets which is a contradiction to the fact that $H$ has index $2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Other Way :
$A_n$ is generated by all $3$-cycles in $S_n$.
If $Hneq A_n$ and $|S_n:H|=2$ then at least one 3-cycle is not in $H.$
WLOG assume say $(123)notin H$ so $H,(123)H,(132)H$ are 3 distinct cosets which is a contradiction to the fact that $H$ has index $2$.
$endgroup$
Other Way :
$A_n$ is generated by all $3$-cycles in $S_n$.
If $Hneq A_n$ and $|S_n:H|=2$ then at least one 3-cycle is not in $H.$
WLOG assume say $(123)notin H$ so $H,(123)H,(132)H$ are 3 distinct cosets which is a contradiction to the fact that $H$ has index $2$.
edited Jan 2 at 19:22
Namaste
1
1
answered Nov 21 '18 at 15:24
SRJSRJ
1,8331620
1,8331620
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I realize this question is rather old, but if this comes from Hungerford's book, there is a specific way he wants us to solve this problem, so I am providing this for the benefit of those working through Hungerford. First, one must recall that subgroups of index $2$ are normal. Hungerford's suggestion is to use the following fact:
Let $r,s$ be distinct elements of ${1,2,...,n}$. Then $A_n$ ($n ge 3$) is generated by the $3$-cycles ${(rsk) ~|~ 1 le k le n, k ne r,s}$.
Keeping that in mind, we first prove the two easy facts about subgroups of index $2$
Lemma (1): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains the square of every element in $G$.
Proof: Let $g in G$ be arbitrary. Then by Lagrange's theorem, $(gH)^2 = H$ or $g^2H=H$, happening if and only if $g^2 in H$.
Lemma (2): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains all elements of odd order.
Proof: Suppose that $g in G$ is a element of order $2k+1$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$. Then $H = g^{2k+1}H = gH cdot (g^2)^k H = gH$, where $(g^2)^k H = H$ by lemma (1). This, of course, means $g in H$.
From these two lemmas, I think it is pretty clear how one ought to use the given fact: if $H le S_n$ were a subgroup of index $2$, then it would consist of all $3$-cycles, since they have odd order. But by closure this means that $A_n le H$. Since they have the same index, they must also have the same order, implying that they are equal because we are dealing with finite sets.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
$endgroup$
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I realize this question is rather old, but if this comes from Hungerford's book, there is a specific way he wants us to solve this problem, so I am providing this for the benefit of those working through Hungerford. First, one must recall that subgroups of index $2$ are normal. Hungerford's suggestion is to use the following fact:
Let $r,s$ be distinct elements of ${1,2,...,n}$. Then $A_n$ ($n ge 3$) is generated by the $3$-cycles ${(rsk) ~|~ 1 le k le n, k ne r,s}$.
Keeping that in mind, we first prove the two easy facts about subgroups of index $2$
Lemma (1): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains the square of every element in $G$.
Proof: Let $g in G$ be arbitrary. Then by Lagrange's theorem, $(gH)^2 = H$ or $g^2H=H$, happening if and only if $g^2 in H$.
Lemma (2): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains all elements of odd order.
Proof: Suppose that $g in G$ is a element of order $2k+1$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$. Then $H = g^{2k+1}H = gH cdot (g^2)^k H = gH$, where $(g^2)^k H = H$ by lemma (1). This, of course, means $g in H$.
From these two lemmas, I think it is pretty clear how one ought to use the given fact: if $H le S_n$ were a subgroup of index $2$, then it would consist of all $3$-cycles, since they have odd order. But by closure this means that $A_n le H$. Since they have the same index, they must also have the same order, implying that they are equal because we are dealing with finite sets.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
$endgroup$
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I realize this question is rather old, but if this comes from Hungerford's book, there is a specific way he wants us to solve this problem, so I am providing this for the benefit of those working through Hungerford. First, one must recall that subgroups of index $2$ are normal. Hungerford's suggestion is to use the following fact:
Let $r,s$ be distinct elements of ${1,2,...,n}$. Then $A_n$ ($n ge 3$) is generated by the $3$-cycles ${(rsk) ~|~ 1 le k le n, k ne r,s}$.
Keeping that in mind, we first prove the two easy facts about subgroups of index $2$
Lemma (1): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains the square of every element in $G$.
Proof: Let $g in G$ be arbitrary. Then by Lagrange's theorem, $(gH)^2 = H$ or $g^2H=H$, happening if and only if $g^2 in H$.
Lemma (2): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains all elements of odd order.
Proof: Suppose that $g in G$ is a element of order $2k+1$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$. Then $H = g^{2k+1}H = gH cdot (g^2)^k H = gH$, where $(g^2)^k H = H$ by lemma (1). This, of course, means $g in H$.
From these two lemmas, I think it is pretty clear how one ought to use the given fact: if $H le S_n$ were a subgroup of index $2$, then it would consist of all $3$-cycles, since they have odd order. But by closure this means that $A_n le H$. Since they have the same index, they must also have the same order, implying that they are equal because we are dealing with finite sets.
$endgroup$
I realize this question is rather old, but if this comes from Hungerford's book, there is a specific way he wants us to solve this problem, so I am providing this for the benefit of those working through Hungerford. First, one must recall that subgroups of index $2$ are normal. Hungerford's suggestion is to use the following fact:
Let $r,s$ be distinct elements of ${1,2,...,n}$. Then $A_n$ ($n ge 3$) is generated by the $3$-cycles ${(rsk) ~|~ 1 le k le n, k ne r,s}$.
Keeping that in mind, we first prove the two easy facts about subgroups of index $2$
Lemma (1): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains the square of every element in $G$.
Proof: Let $g in G$ be arbitrary. Then by Lagrange's theorem, $(gH)^2 = H$ or $g^2H=H$, happening if and only if $g^2 in H$.
Lemma (2): If $H$ is a subgroup of index $2$ in $G$, then $H$ contains all elements of odd order.
Proof: Suppose that $g in G$ is a element of order $2k+1$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$. Then $H = g^{2k+1}H = gH cdot (g^2)^k H = gH$, where $(g^2)^k H = H$ by lemma (1). This, of course, means $g in H$.
From these two lemmas, I think it is pretty clear how one ought to use the given fact: if $H le S_n$ were a subgroup of index $2$, then it would consist of all $3$-cycles, since they have odd order. But by closure this means that $A_n le H$. Since they have the same index, they must also have the same order, implying that they are equal because we are dealing with finite sets.
edited May 3 '17 at 18:23
answered May 3 '17 at 18:09
user193319user193319
2,4362927
2,4362927
$begingroup$
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
$endgroup$
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
$endgroup$
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 '18 at 20:14
$begingroup$
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
$endgroup$
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 '18 at 20:14
$begingroup$
How do 3-cycles have an odd order? Or were you referring to something else?
$endgroup$
– Tomás Palamás
Oct 30 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27024%2fa-n-is-the-only-subgroup-of-s-n-of-index-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
Please make the body of your posts self-contained. The title is an indexing feature, and should not be an integral part of the message. Think of it as the title of a book on the spine; it's there to let people know what the post is about, not to impart information without which you cannot understand what is happening.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Mar 14 '11 at 21:00
$begingroup$
I am terribly sorry. But I don't know how to reedit it.
$endgroup$
– ShinyaSakai
Mar 14 '11 at 21:07
4
$begingroup$
There should be a link below the [abstract algebra] tag that says "edit". Click it, and you can edit.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 14 '11 at 21:11