How many orthogonal projectors on a given subspace are there?












3












$begingroup$


This question is probably trivial, for that I apologize.



Let's take a vector space $V$ equipped with a scalar product and a vector subspace $Ssubset V$.




How many different projectors onto S, orthogonal with respect to the scalar product, can be constructed?
And what if $V$ is, more generally, a Hilbert space and $S$ is a finite-dimensional subspace?




Intuition tells me that there should be only one, but I am not sure that is correct.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Assuming onto $S$ then $S$ is point-wise fixed and its orthogonal complement must be in the kernel. Now note that $V=Soplus S^{perp}$.
    $endgroup$
    – WimC
    Sep 30 '18 at 10:15












  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry, what do you mean by point-wise fixed? (I didn't study linear algebra in English, so I probably know the concept but not the term)
    $endgroup$
    – Angelo Brillante Romeo
    Sep 30 '18 at 10:39
















3












$begingroup$


This question is probably trivial, for that I apologize.



Let's take a vector space $V$ equipped with a scalar product and a vector subspace $Ssubset V$.




How many different projectors onto S, orthogonal with respect to the scalar product, can be constructed?
And what if $V$ is, more generally, a Hilbert space and $S$ is a finite-dimensional subspace?




Intuition tells me that there should be only one, but I am not sure that is correct.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Assuming onto $S$ then $S$ is point-wise fixed and its orthogonal complement must be in the kernel. Now note that $V=Soplus S^{perp}$.
    $endgroup$
    – WimC
    Sep 30 '18 at 10:15












  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry, what do you mean by point-wise fixed? (I didn't study linear algebra in English, so I probably know the concept but not the term)
    $endgroup$
    – Angelo Brillante Romeo
    Sep 30 '18 at 10:39














3












3








3





$begingroup$


This question is probably trivial, for that I apologize.



Let's take a vector space $V$ equipped with a scalar product and a vector subspace $Ssubset V$.




How many different projectors onto S, orthogonal with respect to the scalar product, can be constructed?
And what if $V$ is, more generally, a Hilbert space and $S$ is a finite-dimensional subspace?




Intuition tells me that there should be only one, but I am not sure that is correct.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This question is probably trivial, for that I apologize.



Let's take a vector space $V$ equipped with a scalar product and a vector subspace $Ssubset V$.




How many different projectors onto S, orthogonal with respect to the scalar product, can be constructed?
And what if $V$ is, more generally, a Hilbert space and $S$ is a finite-dimensional subspace?




Intuition tells me that there should be only one, but I am not sure that is correct.







linear-algebra hilbert-spaces orthogonality projection






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 31 '18 at 18:11









Hanno

2,274628




2,274628










asked Sep 30 '18 at 8:47









Angelo Brillante RomeoAngelo Brillante Romeo

1006




1006












  • $begingroup$
    Assuming onto $S$ then $S$ is point-wise fixed and its orthogonal complement must be in the kernel. Now note that $V=Soplus S^{perp}$.
    $endgroup$
    – WimC
    Sep 30 '18 at 10:15












  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry, what do you mean by point-wise fixed? (I didn't study linear algebra in English, so I probably know the concept but not the term)
    $endgroup$
    – Angelo Brillante Romeo
    Sep 30 '18 at 10:39


















  • $begingroup$
    Assuming onto $S$ then $S$ is point-wise fixed and its orthogonal complement must be in the kernel. Now note that $V=Soplus S^{perp}$.
    $endgroup$
    – WimC
    Sep 30 '18 at 10:15












  • $begingroup$
    I am sorry, what do you mean by point-wise fixed? (I didn't study linear algebra in English, so I probably know the concept but not the term)
    $endgroup$
    – Angelo Brillante Romeo
    Sep 30 '18 at 10:39
















$begingroup$
Assuming onto $S$ then $S$ is point-wise fixed and its orthogonal complement must be in the kernel. Now note that $V=Soplus S^{perp}$.
$endgroup$
– WimC
Sep 30 '18 at 10:15






$begingroup$
Assuming onto $S$ then $S$ is point-wise fixed and its orthogonal complement must be in the kernel. Now note that $V=Soplus S^{perp}$.
$endgroup$
– WimC
Sep 30 '18 at 10:15














$begingroup$
I am sorry, what do you mean by point-wise fixed? (I didn't study linear algebra in English, so I probably know the concept but not the term)
$endgroup$
– Angelo Brillante Romeo
Sep 30 '18 at 10:39




$begingroup$
I am sorry, what do you mean by point-wise fixed? (I didn't study linear algebra in English, so I probably know the concept but not the term)
$endgroup$
– Angelo Brillante Romeo
Sep 30 '18 at 10:39










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Start by ignoring the scalar (or inner) product, and fix a subspace $Ssubset V$.



All the projectors onto $S,$ (which means that the image equals $S$) are in 1-to-1 correspondence with subspaces $Ksubset V$ such that that $Soplus K=V$. The
mutual relationship between projector and complementing subspace $K$ is determined by $K=ker(text{ projector })$. This holds true in every vector space $V$.



In the lucky case where a scalar product is available for $V$, a distinguished choice for the complementing subspace can be made, namely the orthogonal complement $S^perp$. It is uniquely determined by $S$.



It follows that there is exactly one orthogonal projector onto $S$, thus confirming your intuition.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2936411%2fhow-many-orthogonal-projectors-on-a-given-subspace-are-there%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Start by ignoring the scalar (or inner) product, and fix a subspace $Ssubset V$.



    All the projectors onto $S,$ (which means that the image equals $S$) are in 1-to-1 correspondence with subspaces $Ksubset V$ such that that $Soplus K=V$. The
    mutual relationship between projector and complementing subspace $K$ is determined by $K=ker(text{ projector })$. This holds true in every vector space $V$.



    In the lucky case where a scalar product is available for $V$, a distinguished choice for the complementing subspace can be made, namely the orthogonal complement $S^perp$. It is uniquely determined by $S$.



    It follows that there is exactly one orthogonal projector onto $S$, thus confirming your intuition.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Start by ignoring the scalar (or inner) product, and fix a subspace $Ssubset V$.



      All the projectors onto $S,$ (which means that the image equals $S$) are in 1-to-1 correspondence with subspaces $Ksubset V$ such that that $Soplus K=V$. The
      mutual relationship between projector and complementing subspace $K$ is determined by $K=ker(text{ projector })$. This holds true in every vector space $V$.



      In the lucky case where a scalar product is available for $V$, a distinguished choice for the complementing subspace can be made, namely the orthogonal complement $S^perp$. It is uniquely determined by $S$.



      It follows that there is exactly one orthogonal projector onto $S$, thus confirming your intuition.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Start by ignoring the scalar (or inner) product, and fix a subspace $Ssubset V$.



        All the projectors onto $S,$ (which means that the image equals $S$) are in 1-to-1 correspondence with subspaces $Ksubset V$ such that that $Soplus K=V$. The
        mutual relationship between projector and complementing subspace $K$ is determined by $K=ker(text{ projector })$. This holds true in every vector space $V$.



        In the lucky case where a scalar product is available for $V$, a distinguished choice for the complementing subspace can be made, namely the orthogonal complement $S^perp$. It is uniquely determined by $S$.



        It follows that there is exactly one orthogonal projector onto $S$, thus confirming your intuition.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Start by ignoring the scalar (or inner) product, and fix a subspace $Ssubset V$.



        All the projectors onto $S,$ (which means that the image equals $S$) are in 1-to-1 correspondence with subspaces $Ksubset V$ such that that $Soplus K=V$. The
        mutual relationship between projector and complementing subspace $K$ is determined by $K=ker(text{ projector })$. This holds true in every vector space $V$.



        In the lucky case where a scalar product is available for $V$, a distinguished choice for the complementing subspace can be made, namely the orthogonal complement $S^perp$. It is uniquely determined by $S$.



        It follows that there is exactly one orthogonal projector onto $S$, thus confirming your intuition.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 31 '18 at 17:54









        HannoHanno

        2,274628




        2,274628






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2936411%2fhow-many-orthogonal-projectors-on-a-given-subspace-are-there%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna