A woman planning her family considers the following schemes on the assumption that boys and girls are equally...












1












$begingroup$


A woman planning her family considers the following schemes on the assumption that boys and girls are equally likely at each delivery:



(a) Have three children.



(b) Bear children until the first girl is born or until three are born, whichever is sooner, and then stop.



(c) Bear children until there is one of each sex or until there are three, whichever is sooner, and then stop.



Let $B_{i}$ denote the event that $i$ boys are born, and let $C$ denote the event that more girls are born than boys.



Q1. Find $textbf{P}(B_{1})$ and $textbf{P}(C)$ in each of the cases (a) and (b).



Q2. Find $textbf{P}(B_{1})$ and $textbf{P}(C)$ in case (c).



Q3. Find $textbf{P}(B_{2})$ and $textbf{P}(B_{3})$ in all three cases.



Q4. Let $E$ be the event that the completed family contains equal numbers of boys and girls. Find $textbf{P}(E)$ in all three cases.



MY ATTEMPT



A1. The sample space corresponding to the (a) case is given by
begin{align*}
Omega_{a} = {&(b,b,b),(b,b,g),(b,g,b),(g,b,b),(b,g,g),(g,b,g),(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}
end{align*}



Therefore $textbf{P}(B_{1}) = 3/8$ and $textbf{P}(C) = 4/8 = 1/2$.



On the other hand, the sample space corresponding to the (b) case is given by



begin{align*}
Omega_{b} = {g,(b,g),(b,b,g),(b,b,b)}
end{align*}



Considering that the probability for a girl to be born is equal to that of a boy, we get



begin{align*}
textbf{P}(B_{1}) = textbf{P}({(b,g)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{1}{4}quadtext{and}quadtextbf{P}({g}) = frac{1}{2}
end{align*}



A2. In this case, the sample space is given by
begin{align*}
Omega_{c} = {(b,g),(g,b),(b,b,g),(b,b,b),(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}
end{align*}



Therefore we can express the sought probabilities as



begin{align*}
&textbf{P}(B_{1}) = textbf{P}({(b,g),(g,b),(g,g,b)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{5}{8}\\
&textbf{P}(C) = textbf{P}({(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{1}{4}
end{align*}



A3. Briefly speaking, we have $textbf{P}_{a}(B_{2}) = 3/8$, $textbf{P}_{b}(B_{2}) = 1/8$ and $textbf{P}_{c}(B_{2}) = 1/8$.



Analogously, we have $textbf{P}_{a}(B_{3}) = textbf{P}_{b}(B_{3}) = textbf{P}_{c}(B_{3}) = 1/8$.



A4. We have $textbf{P}_{a}(E) = 0$, $textbf{P}_{b}(E) = 1/4$ and $textbf{P}_{c}(E) = 1/2$.



Firstly, is my answer correct? Secondly, is there another argument which leads to the right answer without enumerating each element from the target sample space and applying the concept of independence of events? Perhaps some symmetry argument, I don't know.



Anyway, thanks in advance for any contribution.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    A woman planning her family considers the following schemes on the assumption that boys and girls are equally likely at each delivery:



    (a) Have three children.



    (b) Bear children until the first girl is born or until three are born, whichever is sooner, and then stop.



    (c) Bear children until there is one of each sex or until there are three, whichever is sooner, and then stop.



    Let $B_{i}$ denote the event that $i$ boys are born, and let $C$ denote the event that more girls are born than boys.



    Q1. Find $textbf{P}(B_{1})$ and $textbf{P}(C)$ in each of the cases (a) and (b).



    Q2. Find $textbf{P}(B_{1})$ and $textbf{P}(C)$ in case (c).



    Q3. Find $textbf{P}(B_{2})$ and $textbf{P}(B_{3})$ in all three cases.



    Q4. Let $E$ be the event that the completed family contains equal numbers of boys and girls. Find $textbf{P}(E)$ in all three cases.



    MY ATTEMPT



    A1. The sample space corresponding to the (a) case is given by
    begin{align*}
    Omega_{a} = {&(b,b,b),(b,b,g),(b,g,b),(g,b,b),(b,g,g),(g,b,g),(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}
    end{align*}



    Therefore $textbf{P}(B_{1}) = 3/8$ and $textbf{P}(C) = 4/8 = 1/2$.



    On the other hand, the sample space corresponding to the (b) case is given by



    begin{align*}
    Omega_{b} = {g,(b,g),(b,b,g),(b,b,b)}
    end{align*}



    Considering that the probability for a girl to be born is equal to that of a boy, we get



    begin{align*}
    textbf{P}(B_{1}) = textbf{P}({(b,g)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{1}{4}quadtext{and}quadtextbf{P}({g}) = frac{1}{2}
    end{align*}



    A2. In this case, the sample space is given by
    begin{align*}
    Omega_{c} = {(b,g),(g,b),(b,b,g),(b,b,b),(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}
    end{align*}



    Therefore we can express the sought probabilities as



    begin{align*}
    &textbf{P}(B_{1}) = textbf{P}({(b,g),(g,b),(g,g,b)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{5}{8}\\
    &textbf{P}(C) = textbf{P}({(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{1}{4}
    end{align*}



    A3. Briefly speaking, we have $textbf{P}_{a}(B_{2}) = 3/8$, $textbf{P}_{b}(B_{2}) = 1/8$ and $textbf{P}_{c}(B_{2}) = 1/8$.



    Analogously, we have $textbf{P}_{a}(B_{3}) = textbf{P}_{b}(B_{3}) = textbf{P}_{c}(B_{3}) = 1/8$.



    A4. We have $textbf{P}_{a}(E) = 0$, $textbf{P}_{b}(E) = 1/4$ and $textbf{P}_{c}(E) = 1/2$.



    Firstly, is my answer correct? Secondly, is there another argument which leads to the right answer without enumerating each element from the target sample space and applying the concept of independence of events? Perhaps some symmetry argument, I don't know.



    Anyway, thanks in advance for any contribution.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      A woman planning her family considers the following schemes on the assumption that boys and girls are equally likely at each delivery:



      (a) Have three children.



      (b) Bear children until the first girl is born or until three are born, whichever is sooner, and then stop.



      (c) Bear children until there is one of each sex or until there are three, whichever is sooner, and then stop.



      Let $B_{i}$ denote the event that $i$ boys are born, and let $C$ denote the event that more girls are born than boys.



      Q1. Find $textbf{P}(B_{1})$ and $textbf{P}(C)$ in each of the cases (a) and (b).



      Q2. Find $textbf{P}(B_{1})$ and $textbf{P}(C)$ in case (c).



      Q3. Find $textbf{P}(B_{2})$ and $textbf{P}(B_{3})$ in all three cases.



      Q4. Let $E$ be the event that the completed family contains equal numbers of boys and girls. Find $textbf{P}(E)$ in all three cases.



      MY ATTEMPT



      A1. The sample space corresponding to the (a) case is given by
      begin{align*}
      Omega_{a} = {&(b,b,b),(b,b,g),(b,g,b),(g,b,b),(b,g,g),(g,b,g),(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}
      end{align*}



      Therefore $textbf{P}(B_{1}) = 3/8$ and $textbf{P}(C) = 4/8 = 1/2$.



      On the other hand, the sample space corresponding to the (b) case is given by



      begin{align*}
      Omega_{b} = {g,(b,g),(b,b,g),(b,b,b)}
      end{align*}



      Considering that the probability for a girl to be born is equal to that of a boy, we get



      begin{align*}
      textbf{P}(B_{1}) = textbf{P}({(b,g)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{1}{4}quadtext{and}quadtextbf{P}({g}) = frac{1}{2}
      end{align*}



      A2. In this case, the sample space is given by
      begin{align*}
      Omega_{c} = {(b,g),(g,b),(b,b,g),(b,b,b),(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}
      end{align*}



      Therefore we can express the sought probabilities as



      begin{align*}
      &textbf{P}(B_{1}) = textbf{P}({(b,g),(g,b),(g,g,b)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{5}{8}\\
      &textbf{P}(C) = textbf{P}({(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{1}{4}
      end{align*}



      A3. Briefly speaking, we have $textbf{P}_{a}(B_{2}) = 3/8$, $textbf{P}_{b}(B_{2}) = 1/8$ and $textbf{P}_{c}(B_{2}) = 1/8$.



      Analogously, we have $textbf{P}_{a}(B_{3}) = textbf{P}_{b}(B_{3}) = textbf{P}_{c}(B_{3}) = 1/8$.



      A4. We have $textbf{P}_{a}(E) = 0$, $textbf{P}_{b}(E) = 1/4$ and $textbf{P}_{c}(E) = 1/2$.



      Firstly, is my answer correct? Secondly, is there another argument which leads to the right answer without enumerating each element from the target sample space and applying the concept of independence of events? Perhaps some symmetry argument, I don't know.



      Anyway, thanks in advance for any contribution.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      A woman planning her family considers the following schemes on the assumption that boys and girls are equally likely at each delivery:



      (a) Have three children.



      (b) Bear children until the first girl is born or until three are born, whichever is sooner, and then stop.



      (c) Bear children until there is one of each sex or until there are three, whichever is sooner, and then stop.



      Let $B_{i}$ denote the event that $i$ boys are born, and let $C$ denote the event that more girls are born than boys.



      Q1. Find $textbf{P}(B_{1})$ and $textbf{P}(C)$ in each of the cases (a) and (b).



      Q2. Find $textbf{P}(B_{1})$ and $textbf{P}(C)$ in case (c).



      Q3. Find $textbf{P}(B_{2})$ and $textbf{P}(B_{3})$ in all three cases.



      Q4. Let $E$ be the event that the completed family contains equal numbers of boys and girls. Find $textbf{P}(E)$ in all three cases.



      MY ATTEMPT



      A1. The sample space corresponding to the (a) case is given by
      begin{align*}
      Omega_{a} = {&(b,b,b),(b,b,g),(b,g,b),(g,b,b),(b,g,g),(g,b,g),(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}
      end{align*}



      Therefore $textbf{P}(B_{1}) = 3/8$ and $textbf{P}(C) = 4/8 = 1/2$.



      On the other hand, the sample space corresponding to the (b) case is given by



      begin{align*}
      Omega_{b} = {g,(b,g),(b,b,g),(b,b,b)}
      end{align*}



      Considering that the probability for a girl to be born is equal to that of a boy, we get



      begin{align*}
      textbf{P}(B_{1}) = textbf{P}({(b,g)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{1}{4}quadtext{and}quadtextbf{P}({g}) = frac{1}{2}
      end{align*}



      A2. In this case, the sample space is given by
      begin{align*}
      Omega_{c} = {(b,g),(g,b),(b,b,g),(b,b,b),(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}
      end{align*}



      Therefore we can express the sought probabilities as



      begin{align*}
      &textbf{P}(B_{1}) = textbf{P}({(b,g),(g,b),(g,g,b)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{5}{8}\\
      &textbf{P}(C) = textbf{P}({(g,g,b),(g,g,g)}) = frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{1}{4}
      end{align*}



      A3. Briefly speaking, we have $textbf{P}_{a}(B_{2}) = 3/8$, $textbf{P}_{b}(B_{2}) = 1/8$ and $textbf{P}_{c}(B_{2}) = 1/8$.



      Analogously, we have $textbf{P}_{a}(B_{3}) = textbf{P}_{b}(B_{3}) = textbf{P}_{c}(B_{3}) = 1/8$.



      A4. We have $textbf{P}_{a}(E) = 0$, $textbf{P}_{b}(E) = 1/4$ and $textbf{P}_{c}(E) = 1/2$.



      Firstly, is my answer correct? Secondly, is there another argument which leads to the right answer without enumerating each element from the target sample space and applying the concept of independence of events? Perhaps some symmetry argument, I don't know.



      Anyway, thanks in advance for any contribution.







      probability proof-verification probability-distributions symmetry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 13 at 1:22







      user1337

















      asked Jan 13 at 1:03









      user1337user1337

      48210




      48210






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          For cases (a) and (c), symmetry says that you will get the same answers if you swap the words "boy" and "girl". In particular, if $G_i$ is the event of having $i$ girls,
          then $P(B_i) = P(G_i)$ for each $i = 0, 1, 2, 3.$



          For (a) we observe that $B_i$ and $G_{(3-i)}$ are the same event, so
          $P(B_0) = P(G_3) = P(B_3).$
          Similarly we find that $P(B_1) = P(B_2).$
          You can compute that $P(B_3) = P(bbb) = frac18,$ which means
          $P(B_0cap B_3) = 2P(B_3) = frac14,$
          therefore $2P(B_1) = P(B_1 cap B_2) = frac34,$
          therefore $P(B_1) = P(B_2) = frac38.$



          In case (a), there must be an odd number of children,
          therefore not equal numbers of boys and girls,
          so $P(E) = 0,$ and symmetry says more boys and more girls are equally likely, so $P(C) = frac12.$
          So now that's all relevant questions answered for case (a), though not in the same order they were asked.



          For case (c) you get either $2$ or $3$ children.
          Two children implies $E$ (because that's the condition for stopping at $2$)
          and three children implies $E^C$ ($E$ complement or "not $E$).
          Whichever sex is born first, you have a $frac12$ chance to get the other sex next,
          so the probability of $2$ children is $frac12,$
          that is, $P(E) = frac12.$



          In case (c), if the event $E^C$ occurs then by symmetry it's equally likely to be more boys or more girls, so $P(C) = frac12(P(E^C)) = frac12(1 - P(E)) = frac14.$



          In case (c) the event $B_1$ can occur in only two ways: if $E$ occurs, or if you have birth order $ggb.$ These events are disjoint. Therefore
          $P(B_1) = P(E) + P(ggb) = frac12 + frac18 = frac58.$
          Now, $B_3$ and $G_3$ are each disjoint from $B_1$ and from each other,
          and by symmetry $P(B_3) = P(G_3) = P(ggg) = frac18.$
          The event $B_0$ cannot occur with two children and therefore is identical to $G_3$,
          so the only $B_i$ event unaccounted for is $B_2$.
          We have
          $P(B_2) = 1 - P(B_0) - P(B_1) - P(B_3) = 1 - frac18 - frac58 - frac18 = frac18.$
          And that's all the questions answered for case (c).



          In the above there are a handful of appearances of individual elements of the sample space, but all the rest is symmetry.



          Case (b) can be related the sequence of events $g, bg, bbg, bbbg, bbbbg, ldots$
          by combining all the events $bbbg, bbbbg, ldots$ into the single event $bbb.$
          This gives us event probabilities $left(frac12right)^n$ for $n = 1, 2, 3$
          for the first three events and
          $1 - sum_{n=1}^3 left(frac12right)^n = left(frac12right)^3$ for the last.
          We could easily extend this to more than $3$ maximum children,
          but all the questions ask about single elements of the sample space,
          so it's hard to say we can do something other than enumerate each element.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Well done! Thank you very much.
            $endgroup$
            – user1337
            Jan 13 at 11:06



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Your approach is well thought out and well executed. I haven't checked all your results, but I checked enough to see that you know what you're doing.



          In some of your cases a faster approach is possible; for instance, $textbf{P}(C)$ in case (a) is obviously $1/2$ because of the boy/girl symmetry. But I don't see a better approach in general.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071588%2fa-woman-planning-her-family-considers-the-following-schemes-on-the-assumption-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            For cases (a) and (c), symmetry says that you will get the same answers if you swap the words "boy" and "girl". In particular, if $G_i$ is the event of having $i$ girls,
            then $P(B_i) = P(G_i)$ for each $i = 0, 1, 2, 3.$



            For (a) we observe that $B_i$ and $G_{(3-i)}$ are the same event, so
            $P(B_0) = P(G_3) = P(B_3).$
            Similarly we find that $P(B_1) = P(B_2).$
            You can compute that $P(B_3) = P(bbb) = frac18,$ which means
            $P(B_0cap B_3) = 2P(B_3) = frac14,$
            therefore $2P(B_1) = P(B_1 cap B_2) = frac34,$
            therefore $P(B_1) = P(B_2) = frac38.$



            In case (a), there must be an odd number of children,
            therefore not equal numbers of boys and girls,
            so $P(E) = 0,$ and symmetry says more boys and more girls are equally likely, so $P(C) = frac12.$
            So now that's all relevant questions answered for case (a), though not in the same order they were asked.



            For case (c) you get either $2$ or $3$ children.
            Two children implies $E$ (because that's the condition for stopping at $2$)
            and three children implies $E^C$ ($E$ complement or "not $E$).
            Whichever sex is born first, you have a $frac12$ chance to get the other sex next,
            so the probability of $2$ children is $frac12,$
            that is, $P(E) = frac12.$



            In case (c), if the event $E^C$ occurs then by symmetry it's equally likely to be more boys or more girls, so $P(C) = frac12(P(E^C)) = frac12(1 - P(E)) = frac14.$



            In case (c) the event $B_1$ can occur in only two ways: if $E$ occurs, or if you have birth order $ggb.$ These events are disjoint. Therefore
            $P(B_1) = P(E) + P(ggb) = frac12 + frac18 = frac58.$
            Now, $B_3$ and $G_3$ are each disjoint from $B_1$ and from each other,
            and by symmetry $P(B_3) = P(G_3) = P(ggg) = frac18.$
            The event $B_0$ cannot occur with two children and therefore is identical to $G_3$,
            so the only $B_i$ event unaccounted for is $B_2$.
            We have
            $P(B_2) = 1 - P(B_0) - P(B_1) - P(B_3) = 1 - frac18 - frac58 - frac18 = frac18.$
            And that's all the questions answered for case (c).



            In the above there are a handful of appearances of individual elements of the sample space, but all the rest is symmetry.



            Case (b) can be related the sequence of events $g, bg, bbg, bbbg, bbbbg, ldots$
            by combining all the events $bbbg, bbbbg, ldots$ into the single event $bbb.$
            This gives us event probabilities $left(frac12right)^n$ for $n = 1, 2, 3$
            for the first three events and
            $1 - sum_{n=1}^3 left(frac12right)^n = left(frac12right)^3$ for the last.
            We could easily extend this to more than $3$ maximum children,
            but all the questions ask about single elements of the sample space,
            so it's hard to say we can do something other than enumerate each element.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Well done! Thank you very much.
              $endgroup$
              – user1337
              Jan 13 at 11:06
















            1












            $begingroup$

            For cases (a) and (c), symmetry says that you will get the same answers if you swap the words "boy" and "girl". In particular, if $G_i$ is the event of having $i$ girls,
            then $P(B_i) = P(G_i)$ for each $i = 0, 1, 2, 3.$



            For (a) we observe that $B_i$ and $G_{(3-i)}$ are the same event, so
            $P(B_0) = P(G_3) = P(B_3).$
            Similarly we find that $P(B_1) = P(B_2).$
            You can compute that $P(B_3) = P(bbb) = frac18,$ which means
            $P(B_0cap B_3) = 2P(B_3) = frac14,$
            therefore $2P(B_1) = P(B_1 cap B_2) = frac34,$
            therefore $P(B_1) = P(B_2) = frac38.$



            In case (a), there must be an odd number of children,
            therefore not equal numbers of boys and girls,
            so $P(E) = 0,$ and symmetry says more boys and more girls are equally likely, so $P(C) = frac12.$
            So now that's all relevant questions answered for case (a), though not in the same order they were asked.



            For case (c) you get either $2$ or $3$ children.
            Two children implies $E$ (because that's the condition for stopping at $2$)
            and three children implies $E^C$ ($E$ complement or "not $E$).
            Whichever sex is born first, you have a $frac12$ chance to get the other sex next,
            so the probability of $2$ children is $frac12,$
            that is, $P(E) = frac12.$



            In case (c), if the event $E^C$ occurs then by symmetry it's equally likely to be more boys or more girls, so $P(C) = frac12(P(E^C)) = frac12(1 - P(E)) = frac14.$



            In case (c) the event $B_1$ can occur in only two ways: if $E$ occurs, or if you have birth order $ggb.$ These events are disjoint. Therefore
            $P(B_1) = P(E) + P(ggb) = frac12 + frac18 = frac58.$
            Now, $B_3$ and $G_3$ are each disjoint from $B_1$ and from each other,
            and by symmetry $P(B_3) = P(G_3) = P(ggg) = frac18.$
            The event $B_0$ cannot occur with two children and therefore is identical to $G_3$,
            so the only $B_i$ event unaccounted for is $B_2$.
            We have
            $P(B_2) = 1 - P(B_0) - P(B_1) - P(B_3) = 1 - frac18 - frac58 - frac18 = frac18.$
            And that's all the questions answered for case (c).



            In the above there are a handful of appearances of individual elements of the sample space, but all the rest is symmetry.



            Case (b) can be related the sequence of events $g, bg, bbg, bbbg, bbbbg, ldots$
            by combining all the events $bbbg, bbbbg, ldots$ into the single event $bbb.$
            This gives us event probabilities $left(frac12right)^n$ for $n = 1, 2, 3$
            for the first three events and
            $1 - sum_{n=1}^3 left(frac12right)^n = left(frac12right)^3$ for the last.
            We could easily extend this to more than $3$ maximum children,
            but all the questions ask about single elements of the sample space,
            so it's hard to say we can do something other than enumerate each element.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Well done! Thank you very much.
              $endgroup$
              – user1337
              Jan 13 at 11:06














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            For cases (a) and (c), symmetry says that you will get the same answers if you swap the words "boy" and "girl". In particular, if $G_i$ is the event of having $i$ girls,
            then $P(B_i) = P(G_i)$ for each $i = 0, 1, 2, 3.$



            For (a) we observe that $B_i$ and $G_{(3-i)}$ are the same event, so
            $P(B_0) = P(G_3) = P(B_3).$
            Similarly we find that $P(B_1) = P(B_2).$
            You can compute that $P(B_3) = P(bbb) = frac18,$ which means
            $P(B_0cap B_3) = 2P(B_3) = frac14,$
            therefore $2P(B_1) = P(B_1 cap B_2) = frac34,$
            therefore $P(B_1) = P(B_2) = frac38.$



            In case (a), there must be an odd number of children,
            therefore not equal numbers of boys and girls,
            so $P(E) = 0,$ and symmetry says more boys and more girls are equally likely, so $P(C) = frac12.$
            So now that's all relevant questions answered for case (a), though not in the same order they were asked.



            For case (c) you get either $2$ or $3$ children.
            Two children implies $E$ (because that's the condition for stopping at $2$)
            and three children implies $E^C$ ($E$ complement or "not $E$).
            Whichever sex is born first, you have a $frac12$ chance to get the other sex next,
            so the probability of $2$ children is $frac12,$
            that is, $P(E) = frac12.$



            In case (c), if the event $E^C$ occurs then by symmetry it's equally likely to be more boys or more girls, so $P(C) = frac12(P(E^C)) = frac12(1 - P(E)) = frac14.$



            In case (c) the event $B_1$ can occur in only two ways: if $E$ occurs, or if you have birth order $ggb.$ These events are disjoint. Therefore
            $P(B_1) = P(E) + P(ggb) = frac12 + frac18 = frac58.$
            Now, $B_3$ and $G_3$ are each disjoint from $B_1$ and from each other,
            and by symmetry $P(B_3) = P(G_3) = P(ggg) = frac18.$
            The event $B_0$ cannot occur with two children and therefore is identical to $G_3$,
            so the only $B_i$ event unaccounted for is $B_2$.
            We have
            $P(B_2) = 1 - P(B_0) - P(B_1) - P(B_3) = 1 - frac18 - frac58 - frac18 = frac18.$
            And that's all the questions answered for case (c).



            In the above there are a handful of appearances of individual elements of the sample space, but all the rest is symmetry.



            Case (b) can be related the sequence of events $g, bg, bbg, bbbg, bbbbg, ldots$
            by combining all the events $bbbg, bbbbg, ldots$ into the single event $bbb.$
            This gives us event probabilities $left(frac12right)^n$ for $n = 1, 2, 3$
            for the first three events and
            $1 - sum_{n=1}^3 left(frac12right)^n = left(frac12right)^3$ for the last.
            We could easily extend this to more than $3$ maximum children,
            but all the questions ask about single elements of the sample space,
            so it's hard to say we can do something other than enumerate each element.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            For cases (a) and (c), symmetry says that you will get the same answers if you swap the words "boy" and "girl". In particular, if $G_i$ is the event of having $i$ girls,
            then $P(B_i) = P(G_i)$ for each $i = 0, 1, 2, 3.$



            For (a) we observe that $B_i$ and $G_{(3-i)}$ are the same event, so
            $P(B_0) = P(G_3) = P(B_3).$
            Similarly we find that $P(B_1) = P(B_2).$
            You can compute that $P(B_3) = P(bbb) = frac18,$ which means
            $P(B_0cap B_3) = 2P(B_3) = frac14,$
            therefore $2P(B_1) = P(B_1 cap B_2) = frac34,$
            therefore $P(B_1) = P(B_2) = frac38.$



            In case (a), there must be an odd number of children,
            therefore not equal numbers of boys and girls,
            so $P(E) = 0,$ and symmetry says more boys and more girls are equally likely, so $P(C) = frac12.$
            So now that's all relevant questions answered for case (a), though not in the same order they were asked.



            For case (c) you get either $2$ or $3$ children.
            Two children implies $E$ (because that's the condition for stopping at $2$)
            and three children implies $E^C$ ($E$ complement or "not $E$).
            Whichever sex is born first, you have a $frac12$ chance to get the other sex next,
            so the probability of $2$ children is $frac12,$
            that is, $P(E) = frac12.$



            In case (c), if the event $E^C$ occurs then by symmetry it's equally likely to be more boys or more girls, so $P(C) = frac12(P(E^C)) = frac12(1 - P(E)) = frac14.$



            In case (c) the event $B_1$ can occur in only two ways: if $E$ occurs, or if you have birth order $ggb.$ These events are disjoint. Therefore
            $P(B_1) = P(E) + P(ggb) = frac12 + frac18 = frac58.$
            Now, $B_3$ and $G_3$ are each disjoint from $B_1$ and from each other,
            and by symmetry $P(B_3) = P(G_3) = P(ggg) = frac18.$
            The event $B_0$ cannot occur with two children and therefore is identical to $G_3$,
            so the only $B_i$ event unaccounted for is $B_2$.
            We have
            $P(B_2) = 1 - P(B_0) - P(B_1) - P(B_3) = 1 - frac18 - frac58 - frac18 = frac18.$
            And that's all the questions answered for case (c).



            In the above there are a handful of appearances of individual elements of the sample space, but all the rest is symmetry.



            Case (b) can be related the sequence of events $g, bg, bbg, bbbg, bbbbg, ldots$
            by combining all the events $bbbg, bbbbg, ldots$ into the single event $bbb.$
            This gives us event probabilities $left(frac12right)^n$ for $n = 1, 2, 3$
            for the first three events and
            $1 - sum_{n=1}^3 left(frac12right)^n = left(frac12right)^3$ for the last.
            We could easily extend this to more than $3$ maximum children,
            but all the questions ask about single elements of the sample space,
            so it's hard to say we can do something other than enumerate each element.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 13 at 5:53









            David KDavid K

            55.8k345121




            55.8k345121












            • $begingroup$
              Well done! Thank you very much.
              $endgroup$
              – user1337
              Jan 13 at 11:06


















            • $begingroup$
              Well done! Thank you very much.
              $endgroup$
              – user1337
              Jan 13 at 11:06
















            $begingroup$
            Well done! Thank you very much.
            $endgroup$
            – user1337
            Jan 13 at 11:06




            $begingroup$
            Well done! Thank you very much.
            $endgroup$
            – user1337
            Jan 13 at 11:06











            1












            $begingroup$

            Your approach is well thought out and well executed. I haven't checked all your results, but I checked enough to see that you know what you're doing.



            In some of your cases a faster approach is possible; for instance, $textbf{P}(C)$ in case (a) is obviously $1/2$ because of the boy/girl symmetry. But I don't see a better approach in general.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Your approach is well thought out and well executed. I haven't checked all your results, but I checked enough to see that you know what you're doing.



              In some of your cases a faster approach is possible; for instance, $textbf{P}(C)$ in case (a) is obviously $1/2$ because of the boy/girl symmetry. But I don't see a better approach in general.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Your approach is well thought out and well executed. I haven't checked all your results, but I checked enough to see that you know what you're doing.



                In some of your cases a faster approach is possible; for instance, $textbf{P}(C)$ in case (a) is obviously $1/2$ because of the boy/girl symmetry. But I don't see a better approach in general.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Your approach is well thought out and well executed. I haven't checked all your results, but I checked enough to see that you know what you're doing.



                In some of your cases a faster approach is possible; for instance, $textbf{P}(C)$ in case (a) is obviously $1/2$ because of the boy/girl symmetry. But I don't see a better approach in general.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 13 at 1:36









                TonyKTonyK

                44.1k358137




                44.1k358137






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071588%2fa-woman-planning-her-family-considers-the-following-schemes-on-the-assumption-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna