Problem 3. Page 240. Barry Simon. (Associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure )
$begingroup$
In $[0,1]$ let $M$ consists of all finite unions of sets of the form $[c,d)$ where $c,d$ are rational, or $[c,1]$ where $c$ is rational.
($M$ is a algebra).
Given a monotone function $bar{alpha}$, if $([c_j,d_j))_{j=1}^{l}$ is a disjoint finite family of half-open intervals.
Let $alpha(bigcup_{j=1}^{l} [c_j,d_j) )=sum_{j=1}^{l} (bar{alpha}(d_j)-bar{alpha}(c_j))$ finitely additive.
In $M$, let $bar{alpha}(x)=0$ if $x<1/2$ and $bar{alpha}(x)=1$ if $xgeq 1/2.$
Prove that the associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $mu$ has $mu(A)=0$ if $1/2notin A$ and $mu(A)=1$ if $1/2in A$.
For any Baire set $A.$
I have this:
$mu(A)=int_{X} mathcal{X}_{A}d(bar{alpha})=lim_n sum_{j=1}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1})-bar{alpha}(x_{j}))$
Why this sum is $0$ when $1/2not in A?$
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure stieltjes-integral
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In $[0,1]$ let $M$ consists of all finite unions of sets of the form $[c,d)$ where $c,d$ are rational, or $[c,1]$ where $c$ is rational.
($M$ is a algebra).
Given a monotone function $bar{alpha}$, if $([c_j,d_j))_{j=1}^{l}$ is a disjoint finite family of half-open intervals.
Let $alpha(bigcup_{j=1}^{l} [c_j,d_j) )=sum_{j=1}^{l} (bar{alpha}(d_j)-bar{alpha}(c_j))$ finitely additive.
In $M$, let $bar{alpha}(x)=0$ if $x<1/2$ and $bar{alpha}(x)=1$ if $xgeq 1/2.$
Prove that the associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $mu$ has $mu(A)=0$ if $1/2notin A$ and $mu(A)=1$ if $1/2in A$.
For any Baire set $A.$
I have this:
$mu(A)=int_{X} mathcal{X}_{A}d(bar{alpha})=lim_n sum_{j=1}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1})-bar{alpha}(x_{j}))$
Why this sum is $0$ when $1/2not in A?$
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure stieltjes-integral
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In $[0,1]$ let $M$ consists of all finite unions of sets of the form $[c,d)$ where $c,d$ are rational, or $[c,1]$ where $c$ is rational.
($M$ is a algebra).
Given a monotone function $bar{alpha}$, if $([c_j,d_j))_{j=1}^{l}$ is a disjoint finite family of half-open intervals.
Let $alpha(bigcup_{j=1}^{l} [c_j,d_j) )=sum_{j=1}^{l} (bar{alpha}(d_j)-bar{alpha}(c_j))$ finitely additive.
In $M$, let $bar{alpha}(x)=0$ if $x<1/2$ and $bar{alpha}(x)=1$ if $xgeq 1/2.$
Prove that the associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $mu$ has $mu(A)=0$ if $1/2notin A$ and $mu(A)=1$ if $1/2in A$.
For any Baire set $A.$
I have this:
$mu(A)=int_{X} mathcal{X}_{A}d(bar{alpha})=lim_n sum_{j=1}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1})-bar{alpha}(x_{j}))$
Why this sum is $0$ when $1/2not in A?$
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure stieltjes-integral
$endgroup$
In $[0,1]$ let $M$ consists of all finite unions of sets of the form $[c,d)$ where $c,d$ are rational, or $[c,1]$ where $c$ is rational.
($M$ is a algebra).
Given a monotone function $bar{alpha}$, if $([c_j,d_j))_{j=1}^{l}$ is a disjoint finite family of half-open intervals.
Let $alpha(bigcup_{j=1}^{l} [c_j,d_j) )=sum_{j=1}^{l} (bar{alpha}(d_j)-bar{alpha}(c_j))$ finitely additive.
In $M$, let $bar{alpha}(x)=0$ if $x<1/2$ and $bar{alpha}(x)=1$ if $xgeq 1/2.$
Prove that the associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $mu$ has $mu(A)=0$ if $1/2notin A$ and $mu(A)=1$ if $1/2in A$.
For any Baire set $A.$
I have this:
$mu(A)=int_{X} mathcal{X}_{A}d(bar{alpha})=lim_n sum_{j=1}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1})-bar{alpha}(x_{j}))$
Why this sum is $0$ when $1/2not in A?$
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure stieltjes-integral
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure stieltjes-integral
asked Nov 25 '18 at 20:57
eraldcoileraldcoil
504211
504211
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In the partition $bigcup_{j=1}^{n-1}[x_j,x_{j+1})$ of $[0,1]$, there is a specific $i$ with $frac{1}{2}in[x_i,x_{i+1})$. Consider $frac{1}{2}notin A$. Then there is a $Ninmathbb{N}$, such that for all $nge N:$ $[x_i,x_{i+1})subseteq [0,1]backslash A$. This implies that $chi_A(x_i)=0$, such that
$$mu(A)=lim_{nrightarrowinfty} sum_{j=1\jneq i}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-))$$
Then it follows for each $jin{1,ldots,n-1}$ with $ jneq i$ that either $x_j,x_{j+1}lefrac{1}{2}$ or $x_j,x_{j+1}>frac{1}{2}$, such that
$$bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)=0,$$
such that $mu(A)=0.$ Note, that you have to consider the left sided limits $bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)$ and $bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)$ as in the definition of Stieltjes integral.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013383%2fproblem-3-page-240-barry-simon-associated-lebesgue-stieltjes-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In the partition $bigcup_{j=1}^{n-1}[x_j,x_{j+1})$ of $[0,1]$, there is a specific $i$ with $frac{1}{2}in[x_i,x_{i+1})$. Consider $frac{1}{2}notin A$. Then there is a $Ninmathbb{N}$, such that for all $nge N:$ $[x_i,x_{i+1})subseteq [0,1]backslash A$. This implies that $chi_A(x_i)=0$, such that
$$mu(A)=lim_{nrightarrowinfty} sum_{j=1\jneq i}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-))$$
Then it follows for each $jin{1,ldots,n-1}$ with $ jneq i$ that either $x_j,x_{j+1}lefrac{1}{2}$ or $x_j,x_{j+1}>frac{1}{2}$, such that
$$bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)=0,$$
such that $mu(A)=0.$ Note, that you have to consider the left sided limits $bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)$ and $bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)$ as in the definition of Stieltjes integral.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the partition $bigcup_{j=1}^{n-1}[x_j,x_{j+1})$ of $[0,1]$, there is a specific $i$ with $frac{1}{2}in[x_i,x_{i+1})$. Consider $frac{1}{2}notin A$. Then there is a $Ninmathbb{N}$, such that for all $nge N:$ $[x_i,x_{i+1})subseteq [0,1]backslash A$. This implies that $chi_A(x_i)=0$, such that
$$mu(A)=lim_{nrightarrowinfty} sum_{j=1\jneq i}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-))$$
Then it follows for each $jin{1,ldots,n-1}$ with $ jneq i$ that either $x_j,x_{j+1}lefrac{1}{2}$ or $x_j,x_{j+1}>frac{1}{2}$, such that
$$bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)=0,$$
such that $mu(A)=0.$ Note, that you have to consider the left sided limits $bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)$ and $bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)$ as in the definition of Stieltjes integral.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the partition $bigcup_{j=1}^{n-1}[x_j,x_{j+1})$ of $[0,1]$, there is a specific $i$ with $frac{1}{2}in[x_i,x_{i+1})$. Consider $frac{1}{2}notin A$. Then there is a $Ninmathbb{N}$, such that for all $nge N:$ $[x_i,x_{i+1})subseteq [0,1]backslash A$. This implies that $chi_A(x_i)=0$, such that
$$mu(A)=lim_{nrightarrowinfty} sum_{j=1\jneq i}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-))$$
Then it follows for each $jin{1,ldots,n-1}$ with $ jneq i$ that either $x_j,x_{j+1}lefrac{1}{2}$ or $x_j,x_{j+1}>frac{1}{2}$, such that
$$bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)=0,$$
such that $mu(A)=0.$ Note, that you have to consider the left sided limits $bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)$ and $bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)$ as in the definition of Stieltjes integral.
$endgroup$
In the partition $bigcup_{j=1}^{n-1}[x_j,x_{j+1})$ of $[0,1]$, there is a specific $i$ with $frac{1}{2}in[x_i,x_{i+1})$. Consider $frac{1}{2}notin A$. Then there is a $Ninmathbb{N}$, such that for all $nge N:$ $[x_i,x_{i+1})subseteq [0,1]backslash A$. This implies that $chi_A(x_i)=0$, such that
$$mu(A)=lim_{nrightarrowinfty} sum_{j=1\jneq i}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-))$$
Then it follows for each $jin{1,ldots,n-1}$ with $ jneq i$ that either $x_j,x_{j+1}lefrac{1}{2}$ or $x_j,x_{j+1}>frac{1}{2}$, such that
$$bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)=0,$$
such that $mu(A)=0.$ Note, that you have to consider the left sided limits $bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)$ and $bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)$ as in the definition of Stieltjes integral.
edited Jan 13 at 0:11
answered Jan 13 at 0:01
user408858user408858
479213
479213
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013383%2fproblem-3-page-240-barry-simon-associated-lebesgue-stieltjes-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown