Problem 3. Page 240. Barry Simon. (Associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure )












2












$begingroup$


In $[0,1]$ let $M$ consists of all finite unions of sets of the form $[c,d)$ where $c,d$ are rational, or $[c,1]$ where $c$ is rational.
($M$ is a algebra).



Given a monotone function $bar{alpha}$, if $([c_j,d_j))_{j=1}^{l}$ is a disjoint finite family of half-open intervals.
Let $alpha(bigcup_{j=1}^{l} [c_j,d_j) )=sum_{j=1}^{l} (bar{alpha}(d_j)-bar{alpha}(c_j))$ finitely additive.



In $M$, let $bar{alpha}(x)=0$ if $x<1/2$ and $bar{alpha}(x)=1$ if $xgeq 1/2.$



Prove that the associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $mu$ has $mu(A)=0$ if $1/2notin A$ and $mu(A)=1$ if $1/2in A$.
For any Baire set $A.$



I have this:
$mu(A)=int_{X} mathcal{X}_{A}d(bar{alpha})=lim_n sum_{j=1}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1})-bar{alpha}(x_{j}))$



Why this sum is $0$ when $1/2not in A?$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    In $[0,1]$ let $M$ consists of all finite unions of sets of the form $[c,d)$ where $c,d$ are rational, or $[c,1]$ where $c$ is rational.
    ($M$ is a algebra).



    Given a monotone function $bar{alpha}$, if $([c_j,d_j))_{j=1}^{l}$ is a disjoint finite family of half-open intervals.
    Let $alpha(bigcup_{j=1}^{l} [c_j,d_j) )=sum_{j=1}^{l} (bar{alpha}(d_j)-bar{alpha}(c_j))$ finitely additive.



    In $M$, let $bar{alpha}(x)=0$ if $x<1/2$ and $bar{alpha}(x)=1$ if $xgeq 1/2.$



    Prove that the associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $mu$ has $mu(A)=0$ if $1/2notin A$ and $mu(A)=1$ if $1/2in A$.
    For any Baire set $A.$



    I have this:
    $mu(A)=int_{X} mathcal{X}_{A}d(bar{alpha})=lim_n sum_{j=1}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1})-bar{alpha}(x_{j}))$



    Why this sum is $0$ when $1/2not in A?$










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      In $[0,1]$ let $M$ consists of all finite unions of sets of the form $[c,d)$ where $c,d$ are rational, or $[c,1]$ where $c$ is rational.
      ($M$ is a algebra).



      Given a monotone function $bar{alpha}$, if $([c_j,d_j))_{j=1}^{l}$ is a disjoint finite family of half-open intervals.
      Let $alpha(bigcup_{j=1}^{l} [c_j,d_j) )=sum_{j=1}^{l} (bar{alpha}(d_j)-bar{alpha}(c_j))$ finitely additive.



      In $M$, let $bar{alpha}(x)=0$ if $x<1/2$ and $bar{alpha}(x)=1$ if $xgeq 1/2.$



      Prove that the associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $mu$ has $mu(A)=0$ if $1/2notin A$ and $mu(A)=1$ if $1/2in A$.
      For any Baire set $A.$



      I have this:
      $mu(A)=int_{X} mathcal{X}_{A}d(bar{alpha})=lim_n sum_{j=1}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1})-bar{alpha}(x_{j}))$



      Why this sum is $0$ when $1/2not in A?$










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      In $[0,1]$ let $M$ consists of all finite unions of sets of the form $[c,d)$ where $c,d$ are rational, or $[c,1]$ where $c$ is rational.
      ($M$ is a algebra).



      Given a monotone function $bar{alpha}$, if $([c_j,d_j))_{j=1}^{l}$ is a disjoint finite family of half-open intervals.
      Let $alpha(bigcup_{j=1}^{l} [c_j,d_j) )=sum_{j=1}^{l} (bar{alpha}(d_j)-bar{alpha}(c_j))$ finitely additive.



      In $M$, let $bar{alpha}(x)=0$ if $x<1/2$ and $bar{alpha}(x)=1$ if $xgeq 1/2.$



      Prove that the associated Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure $mu$ has $mu(A)=0$ if $1/2notin A$ and $mu(A)=1$ if $1/2in A$.
      For any Baire set $A.$



      I have this:
      $mu(A)=int_{X} mathcal{X}_{A}d(bar{alpha})=lim_n sum_{j=1}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1})-bar{alpha}(x_{j}))$



      Why this sum is $0$ when $1/2not in A?$







      real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure stieltjes-integral






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 25 '18 at 20:57









      eraldcoileraldcoil

      504211




      504211






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          In the partition $bigcup_{j=1}^{n-1}[x_j,x_{j+1})$ of $[0,1]$, there is a specific $i$ with $frac{1}{2}in[x_i,x_{i+1})$. Consider $frac{1}{2}notin A$. Then there is a $Ninmathbb{N}$, such that for all $nge N:$ $[x_i,x_{i+1})subseteq [0,1]backslash A$. This implies that $chi_A(x_i)=0$, such that



          $$mu(A)=lim_{nrightarrowinfty} sum_{j=1\jneq i}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-))$$



          Then it follows for each $jin{1,ldots,n-1}$ with $ jneq i$ that either $x_j,x_{j+1}lefrac{1}{2}$ or $x_j,x_{j+1}>frac{1}{2}$, such that



          $$bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)=0,$$



          such that $mu(A)=0.$ Note, that you have to consider the left sided limits $bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)$ and $bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)$ as in the definition of Stieltjes integral.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013383%2fproblem-3-page-240-barry-simon-associated-lebesgue-stieltjes-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            In the partition $bigcup_{j=1}^{n-1}[x_j,x_{j+1})$ of $[0,1]$, there is a specific $i$ with $frac{1}{2}in[x_i,x_{i+1})$. Consider $frac{1}{2}notin A$. Then there is a $Ninmathbb{N}$, such that for all $nge N:$ $[x_i,x_{i+1})subseteq [0,1]backslash A$. This implies that $chi_A(x_i)=0$, such that



            $$mu(A)=lim_{nrightarrowinfty} sum_{j=1\jneq i}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-))$$



            Then it follows for each $jin{1,ldots,n-1}$ with $ jneq i$ that either $x_j,x_{j+1}lefrac{1}{2}$ or $x_j,x_{j+1}>frac{1}{2}$, such that



            $$bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)=0,$$



            such that $mu(A)=0.$ Note, that you have to consider the left sided limits $bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)$ and $bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)$ as in the definition of Stieltjes integral.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              In the partition $bigcup_{j=1}^{n-1}[x_j,x_{j+1})$ of $[0,1]$, there is a specific $i$ with $frac{1}{2}in[x_i,x_{i+1})$. Consider $frac{1}{2}notin A$. Then there is a $Ninmathbb{N}$, such that for all $nge N:$ $[x_i,x_{i+1})subseteq [0,1]backslash A$. This implies that $chi_A(x_i)=0$, such that



              $$mu(A)=lim_{nrightarrowinfty} sum_{j=1\jneq i}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-))$$



              Then it follows for each $jin{1,ldots,n-1}$ with $ jneq i$ that either $x_j,x_{j+1}lefrac{1}{2}$ or $x_j,x_{j+1}>frac{1}{2}$, such that



              $$bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)=0,$$



              such that $mu(A)=0.$ Note, that you have to consider the left sided limits $bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)$ and $bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)$ as in the definition of Stieltjes integral.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                In the partition $bigcup_{j=1}^{n-1}[x_j,x_{j+1})$ of $[0,1]$, there is a specific $i$ with $frac{1}{2}in[x_i,x_{i+1})$. Consider $frac{1}{2}notin A$. Then there is a $Ninmathbb{N}$, such that for all $nge N:$ $[x_i,x_{i+1})subseteq [0,1]backslash A$. This implies that $chi_A(x_i)=0$, such that



                $$mu(A)=lim_{nrightarrowinfty} sum_{j=1\jneq i}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-))$$



                Then it follows for each $jin{1,ldots,n-1}$ with $ jneq i$ that either $x_j,x_{j+1}lefrac{1}{2}$ or $x_j,x_{j+1}>frac{1}{2}$, such that



                $$bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)=0,$$



                such that $mu(A)=0.$ Note, that you have to consider the left sided limits $bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)$ and $bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)$ as in the definition of Stieltjes integral.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                In the partition $bigcup_{j=1}^{n-1}[x_j,x_{j+1})$ of $[0,1]$, there is a specific $i$ with $frac{1}{2}in[x_i,x_{i+1})$. Consider $frac{1}{2}notin A$. Then there is a $Ninmathbb{N}$, such that for all $nge N:$ $[x_i,x_{i+1})subseteq [0,1]backslash A$. This implies that $chi_A(x_i)=0$, such that



                $$mu(A)=lim_{nrightarrowinfty} sum_{j=1\jneq i}^{n-1} mathcal{X}_{A}(x_j)(bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-))$$



                Then it follows for each $jin{1,ldots,n-1}$ with $ jneq i$ that either $x_j,x_{j+1}lefrac{1}{2}$ or $x_j,x_{j+1}>frac{1}{2}$, such that



                $$bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)-bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)=0,$$



                such that $mu(A)=0.$ Note, that you have to consider the left sided limits $bar{alpha}(x_{j+1}-)$ and $bar{alpha}(x_{j}-)$ as in the definition of Stieltjes integral.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jan 13 at 0:11

























                answered Jan 13 at 0:01









                user408858user408858

                479213




                479213






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013383%2fproblem-3-page-240-barry-simon-associated-lebesgue-stieltjes-measure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna