Picard's method of succesive approximations












0












$begingroup$



Construct first $3$ succesive approximations $x_0,x_1,x_2$ for the following Cauchy problems:




$$x'=-x+t^2$$
$$x(0)=2$$



I have no idea how to start this... any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Construct first $3$ succesive approximations $x_0,x_1,x_2$ for the following Cauchy problems:




    $$x'=-x+t^2$$
    $$x(0)=2$$



    I have no idea how to start this... any ideas?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Construct first $3$ succesive approximations $x_0,x_1,x_2$ for the following Cauchy problems:




      $$x'=-x+t^2$$
      $$x(0)=2$$



      I have no idea how to start this... any ideas?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      Construct first $3$ succesive approximations $x_0,x_1,x_2$ for the following Cauchy problems:




      $$x'=-x+t^2$$
      $$x(0)=2$$



      I have no idea how to start this... any ideas?







      ordinary-differential-equations approximation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 14 at 11:14









      C. CristiC. Cristi

      1,655318




      1,655318






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You compute successively the functions
          $$
          x_0(t)=x_0, ~~ x_{n+1}(t)=x_0+int_0^tf(s,x_n(s)),ds
          $$

          using your function $f(t,x)=-x+t^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So my $x_0(t) = 2$?
            $endgroup$
            – C. Cristi
            Jan 14 at 11:25










          • $begingroup$
            Also when does the bounds of the integral changes? When $t_0$ is not 0?
            $endgroup$
            – C. Cristi
            Jan 14 at 11:25










          • $begingroup$
            Yes. And if $x(t_0)=x_0$, then the lower integral boundary is $t_0$ instead of $0$.
            $endgroup$
            – LutzL
            Jan 14 at 11:40



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Rewrite your equation as



          $$
          x(t) = x(0) + int_0^t[-x(u) + u^2]{rm d}u tag{1}
          $$



          The ideas is to approximate this with the expression



          $$
          x_{n + 1}(t) = x(0) + int_0^t[-x_n(u) + u^2]{rm d}u tag{2}
          $$



          Start with




          $x_0 = x(0) = 2$




          Replace that in (2) and you get



          $$
          x_1(t) = 2 + int_0^t [-x_0(u) + u^2]{rm d}u = 2 - 2t + frac{t^2}{3} tag{3}
          $$




          $x_1 = 2 - 2t + t^2/3$




          Evaluate this in Eq. (2) again and get



          $$
          x_2(t) = 2 + int_0^t[-x_1(u) + u^2] = 2 - 2t + 2t^2 + frac{t^3}{3} - t^4
          $$



          I will leave the other two for you to complete






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073115%2fpicards-method-of-succesive-approximations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            You compute successively the functions
            $$
            x_0(t)=x_0, ~~ x_{n+1}(t)=x_0+int_0^tf(s,x_n(s)),ds
            $$

            using your function $f(t,x)=-x+t^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              So my $x_0(t) = 2$?
              $endgroup$
              – C. Cristi
              Jan 14 at 11:25










            • $begingroup$
              Also when does the bounds of the integral changes? When $t_0$ is not 0?
              $endgroup$
              – C. Cristi
              Jan 14 at 11:25










            • $begingroup$
              Yes. And if $x(t_0)=x_0$, then the lower integral boundary is $t_0$ instead of $0$.
              $endgroup$
              – LutzL
              Jan 14 at 11:40
















            1












            $begingroup$

            You compute successively the functions
            $$
            x_0(t)=x_0, ~~ x_{n+1}(t)=x_0+int_0^tf(s,x_n(s)),ds
            $$

            using your function $f(t,x)=-x+t^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              So my $x_0(t) = 2$?
              $endgroup$
              – C. Cristi
              Jan 14 at 11:25










            • $begingroup$
              Also when does the bounds of the integral changes? When $t_0$ is not 0?
              $endgroup$
              – C. Cristi
              Jan 14 at 11:25










            • $begingroup$
              Yes. And if $x(t_0)=x_0$, then the lower integral boundary is $t_0$ instead of $0$.
              $endgroup$
              – LutzL
              Jan 14 at 11:40














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            You compute successively the functions
            $$
            x_0(t)=x_0, ~~ x_{n+1}(t)=x_0+int_0^tf(s,x_n(s)),ds
            $$

            using your function $f(t,x)=-x+t^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            You compute successively the functions
            $$
            x_0(t)=x_0, ~~ x_{n+1}(t)=x_0+int_0^tf(s,x_n(s)),ds
            $$

            using your function $f(t,x)=-x+t^2$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 14 at 11:23









            LutzLLutzL

            60.8k42157




            60.8k42157












            • $begingroup$
              So my $x_0(t) = 2$?
              $endgroup$
              – C. Cristi
              Jan 14 at 11:25










            • $begingroup$
              Also when does the bounds of the integral changes? When $t_0$ is not 0?
              $endgroup$
              – C. Cristi
              Jan 14 at 11:25










            • $begingroup$
              Yes. And if $x(t_0)=x_0$, then the lower integral boundary is $t_0$ instead of $0$.
              $endgroup$
              – LutzL
              Jan 14 at 11:40


















            • $begingroup$
              So my $x_0(t) = 2$?
              $endgroup$
              – C. Cristi
              Jan 14 at 11:25










            • $begingroup$
              Also when does the bounds of the integral changes? When $t_0$ is not 0?
              $endgroup$
              – C. Cristi
              Jan 14 at 11:25










            • $begingroup$
              Yes. And if $x(t_0)=x_0$, then the lower integral boundary is $t_0$ instead of $0$.
              $endgroup$
              – LutzL
              Jan 14 at 11:40
















            $begingroup$
            So my $x_0(t) = 2$?
            $endgroup$
            – C. Cristi
            Jan 14 at 11:25




            $begingroup$
            So my $x_0(t) = 2$?
            $endgroup$
            – C. Cristi
            Jan 14 at 11:25












            $begingroup$
            Also when does the bounds of the integral changes? When $t_0$ is not 0?
            $endgroup$
            – C. Cristi
            Jan 14 at 11:25




            $begingroup$
            Also when does the bounds of the integral changes? When $t_0$ is not 0?
            $endgroup$
            – C. Cristi
            Jan 14 at 11:25












            $begingroup$
            Yes. And if $x(t_0)=x_0$, then the lower integral boundary is $t_0$ instead of $0$.
            $endgroup$
            – LutzL
            Jan 14 at 11:40




            $begingroup$
            Yes. And if $x(t_0)=x_0$, then the lower integral boundary is $t_0$ instead of $0$.
            $endgroup$
            – LutzL
            Jan 14 at 11:40











            1












            $begingroup$

            Rewrite your equation as



            $$
            x(t) = x(0) + int_0^t[-x(u) + u^2]{rm d}u tag{1}
            $$



            The ideas is to approximate this with the expression



            $$
            x_{n + 1}(t) = x(0) + int_0^t[-x_n(u) + u^2]{rm d}u tag{2}
            $$



            Start with




            $x_0 = x(0) = 2$




            Replace that in (2) and you get



            $$
            x_1(t) = 2 + int_0^t [-x_0(u) + u^2]{rm d}u = 2 - 2t + frac{t^2}{3} tag{3}
            $$




            $x_1 = 2 - 2t + t^2/3$




            Evaluate this in Eq. (2) again and get



            $$
            x_2(t) = 2 + int_0^t[-x_1(u) + u^2] = 2 - 2t + 2t^2 + frac{t^3}{3} - t^4
            $$



            I will leave the other two for you to complete






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Rewrite your equation as



              $$
              x(t) = x(0) + int_0^t[-x(u) + u^2]{rm d}u tag{1}
              $$



              The ideas is to approximate this with the expression



              $$
              x_{n + 1}(t) = x(0) + int_0^t[-x_n(u) + u^2]{rm d}u tag{2}
              $$



              Start with




              $x_0 = x(0) = 2$




              Replace that in (2) and you get



              $$
              x_1(t) = 2 + int_0^t [-x_0(u) + u^2]{rm d}u = 2 - 2t + frac{t^2}{3} tag{3}
              $$




              $x_1 = 2 - 2t + t^2/3$




              Evaluate this in Eq. (2) again and get



              $$
              x_2(t) = 2 + int_0^t[-x_1(u) + u^2] = 2 - 2t + 2t^2 + frac{t^3}{3} - t^4
              $$



              I will leave the other two for you to complete






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Rewrite your equation as



                $$
                x(t) = x(0) + int_0^t[-x(u) + u^2]{rm d}u tag{1}
                $$



                The ideas is to approximate this with the expression



                $$
                x_{n + 1}(t) = x(0) + int_0^t[-x_n(u) + u^2]{rm d}u tag{2}
                $$



                Start with




                $x_0 = x(0) = 2$




                Replace that in (2) and you get



                $$
                x_1(t) = 2 + int_0^t [-x_0(u) + u^2]{rm d}u = 2 - 2t + frac{t^2}{3} tag{3}
                $$




                $x_1 = 2 - 2t + t^2/3$




                Evaluate this in Eq. (2) again and get



                $$
                x_2(t) = 2 + int_0^t[-x_1(u) + u^2] = 2 - 2t + 2t^2 + frac{t^3}{3} - t^4
                $$



                I will leave the other two for you to complete






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Rewrite your equation as



                $$
                x(t) = x(0) + int_0^t[-x(u) + u^2]{rm d}u tag{1}
                $$



                The ideas is to approximate this with the expression



                $$
                x_{n + 1}(t) = x(0) + int_0^t[-x_n(u) + u^2]{rm d}u tag{2}
                $$



                Start with




                $x_0 = x(0) = 2$




                Replace that in (2) and you get



                $$
                x_1(t) = 2 + int_0^t [-x_0(u) + u^2]{rm d}u = 2 - 2t + frac{t^2}{3} tag{3}
                $$




                $x_1 = 2 - 2t + t^2/3$




                Evaluate this in Eq. (2) again and get



                $$
                x_2(t) = 2 + int_0^t[-x_1(u) + u^2] = 2 - 2t + 2t^2 + frac{t^3}{3} - t^4
                $$



                I will leave the other two for you to complete







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 14 at 11:25









                caveraccaverac

                14.8k31130




                14.8k31130






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073115%2fpicards-method-of-succesive-approximations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna