If all $a,b,c$ divides $a+b+c$, then $a+b+c=6$, $a,b,c$ positive, distinct, co-prime [closed]











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite













$a,b,c$ are positive, distinct, co-prime integers. If all $a,b,c$ divides $a+b+c$, then $a+b+c=6$. Co-prime does not mean pairwise co-prime in this text, but that $gcd(a,b,c)=1$.




Found it out while testing my tool BigZ and leave it on ME for someone who want to prove it.



Is it okay to use MSE as a "proof calculator"?










share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by Carl Mummert, DRF, José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Cesareo Dec 5 at 19:32


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, DRF, José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Cesareo

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

















    up vote
    -1
    down vote

    favorite













    $a,b,c$ are positive, distinct, co-prime integers. If all $a,b,c$ divides $a+b+c$, then $a+b+c=6$. Co-prime does not mean pairwise co-prime in this text, but that $gcd(a,b,c)=1$.




    Found it out while testing my tool BigZ and leave it on ME for someone who want to prove it.



    Is it okay to use MSE as a "proof calculator"?










    share|cite|improve this question















    closed as off-topic by Carl Mummert, DRF, José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Cesareo Dec 5 at 19:32


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, DRF, José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Cesareo

    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      favorite












      $a,b,c$ are positive, distinct, co-prime integers. If all $a,b,c$ divides $a+b+c$, then $a+b+c=6$. Co-prime does not mean pairwise co-prime in this text, but that $gcd(a,b,c)=1$.




      Found it out while testing my tool BigZ and leave it on ME for someone who want to prove it.



      Is it okay to use MSE as a "proof calculator"?










      share|cite|improve this question
















      $a,b,c$ are positive, distinct, co-prime integers. If all $a,b,c$ divides $a+b+c$, then $a+b+c=6$. Co-prime does not mean pairwise co-prime in this text, but that $gcd(a,b,c)=1$.




      Found it out while testing my tool BigZ and leave it on ME for someone who want to prove it.



      Is it okay to use MSE as a "proof calculator"?







      elementary-number-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 5 at 16:54

























      asked Dec 4 at 20:21









      Lehs

      6,87531662




      6,87531662




      closed as off-topic by Carl Mummert, DRF, José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Cesareo Dec 5 at 19:32


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, DRF, José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Cesareo

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




      closed as off-topic by Carl Mummert, DRF, José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Cesareo Dec 5 at 19:32


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, DRF, José Carlos Santos, amWhy, Cesareo

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          Order the numbers as $a<b<c$.



          Now $c,|,a+b+cimplies c,|,a+bimplies a+b=nc$ for some $nin N$. But clearly $a+b<2c$ so we must have $n=1$ and $a+b=c$



          Note: if $gcd(a,b)=d$ then $d$ also divides $c$, so relative primality tells us that $d=1$



          The assumption $a,|,a+b+c$ now tells us $a,|,2a+2bimplies a,|,2b$. Since $gcd(a,b)=1$, it follows that $a,|,2$ so $ain {1,2}$.



          Case: $a=1$. Then we have $b+1=c$ and $b,|,c+1$ Thus $b$ divides both $c-1$ and $c+1$ but the gcd of those terms is $2$. Hence $b=2$, $c=3$ and $a+b+c=6$ as desired.



          Case: $a=2$. Then $b+2=c$ and $b,|,c+2$. Then $b$ divides both $c-2$ and $c+2$ so $b$ divides $4$. But that is impossible (since $b>a$ this would imply $b=4$ and $c=6$, but $(2,4,6)$ are not mutually coprime).






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Suppose $a> b> c$ (we can do that because of symmetry, equality is excluded because they are coprime). Then $$amid b+c implies kcdot a = b+c <2a implies k<2$$
            So $k=1$ and now we have $b+c=a$. So $$ bmid a+b+c =2aimplies bmid 2$$ and $$ cmid a+b+c =2aimplies cmid 2$$
            So $c=1$ and $b=2$ and thus $a=3$.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              a,b,c are not pairwise coprime, but (a,b.c)=1, but they are pairwise different.
              – miracle173
              Dec 4 at 21:02










            • Thanks.........@miracle173
              – greedoid
              Dec 4 at 21:03






            • 1




              why $bmid 2aimplies bmid 2$ and $cmid 2aimplies cmid 2$?
              – miracle173
              Dec 5 at 1:36


















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            It is also not too difficult to solve for $(a,b,c)inmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}^3$ such that $a$, $b$, and $c$ divides $a+b+c$. Up to permutation, all solutions $(a,b,c)$ are given in the five infinite families below, i.e., the equations (1)-(5).



            The trivial case is when $c=-a-b$, that is, we have an infinite family of solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,b,-a-b),,tag{1}$$ where $a,binmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$ are such that $a+bneq 0$. From now on, we assume that $a+b+cneq 0$.



            Without loss of generality, we suppose that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$. Hence, it follows immediately that $0<|a+b+c|leq |a|+|b|+|c|leq 3|c|$. As $c$ divides $a+b+c$, we can then conclude that
            $a+b+cin{pm c,pm 2c,pm3c}$.



            If $a+b+c=+c$, then $a+b=0$. Then, we have an infinite family of solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,-a,na),,tag{2}$$ where $a,ninmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



            If $a+b+c=-c$, then $a+b=-2c$. Since $a$ and $b$ must divide $c$, we conclude that $a=b=-c$. Consequently, we have solutions $(a,b,c)=(a,a,-a)$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. Nonetheless, these solutions are obtained by permuting the solutions in (2) with $n=1$.



            If $a+b+c=+2c$, then $a+b=c$. Therefore, $a$ and $b=c-a$ are divisors of $a+b+c=2c$. Let $2c=ka$ for some integer $kneq 0$. Then, $b=c-a=c-dfrac{2c}{k}$. Since $dfrac{2c}{b}$ is an integer, we must have $dfrac{2c}{c-frac{2c}{k}}=dfrac{2k}{k-2}=2+dfrac{4}{k-2}$.
            That is, $k-2mid 4$, so $kin{-2,0,1,3,4,6}$. Note also that $|a|leq |c|$ implies that $|k|geq 2$. Therefore, $kin{-2,3,4,6}$.




            • The case $k=-2$ gives $a=-c$ and $b=2c$, yielding solutions $(a,b,c)=(a,-2a,-a)$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. However, these solutions violate the assumption that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$.


            • The case $k=3$ gives $c=3t$ for some $tinmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$, along with $a=2t$ and $b=t$, yielding solutions $(a,b,c)=(2t,t,3t)$ with $tinmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. However, these solution violate the assumption that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$.


            • The case $k=4$ gives $c=2a$ and $b=a$, yielding solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,a,2a)
              tag{3}$$
              with $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.


            • The case $k=6$ gives $c=3a$ and $b=2a$, yielding solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,2a,3a)tag{4}$$ with $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



            If $a+b+c=-2c$, then $a+b=-3c$, but $3|c|=|a+b|leq |a|+|b|leq 2|c|$, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.



            If $a+b+c=+3c$, then $a+b=2c$. Since $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$, this situation can occurs iff $a=b=c$, so we have solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,a,a)tag{5}$$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



            If $a+b+c=-3c$, then $a+b=-4c$, but $4|c|=|a+b|leq |a|+|b|leq 2|c|$, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.



            In particular, all solutions $(a,b,c)inmathbb{Z}_{>0}^3$ with $aleq bleq c$ are of the form $(a,b,c)=(a,a,2a)$, $(a,b,c)=(a,2a,3a)$, and $(a,b,c)=(a,a,a)$ with $ainmathbb{Z}_{>0}$. Among these positive-integer solutions, the triples $(a,b,c)$ with $gcd(a,b,c)=1$ are then $(a,b,c)=(1,1,2)$, $(a,b,c)=(1,2,3)$, and $(a,b,c)=(1,1,1)$. Hence, the only triple $(a,b,c)$ which further satisfies the condition that $a$, $b$, and $c$ are pairwise distinct is $(a,b,c)=(1,2,3)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer






























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Hint: since $$a|a+b+c\b|a+b+c\c|a+b+c$$therefore $$abc|a+b+c$$since $a,b,c$ are co-primes. Can you finish now?






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Co-prime for me means that $gcd (a,b,c)=1$. $gcd (1,2,2)=1$
                – Lehs
                Dec 4 at 20:27






              • 1




                Please explain it more. I am not able to get the result. I don't know about the OP.
                – jayant98
                Dec 4 at 20:28










              • @Lehs the example of 1,2,2 wil not satisfy as a,b,c should be distinct.
                – jayant98
                Dec 4 at 20:29






              • 1




                As has been remarked, this hint is not correct since the OP is not assuming that $(a,b,c)$ are pairwise relatively prime.
                – lulu
                Dec 4 at 20:58










              • Then what does the co-prime mean?
                – Mostafa Ayaz
                Dec 4 at 21:07


















              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              3
              down vote



              accepted










              Order the numbers as $a<b<c$.



              Now $c,|,a+b+cimplies c,|,a+bimplies a+b=nc$ for some $nin N$. But clearly $a+b<2c$ so we must have $n=1$ and $a+b=c$



              Note: if $gcd(a,b)=d$ then $d$ also divides $c$, so relative primality tells us that $d=1$



              The assumption $a,|,a+b+c$ now tells us $a,|,2a+2bimplies a,|,2b$. Since $gcd(a,b)=1$, it follows that $a,|,2$ so $ain {1,2}$.



              Case: $a=1$. Then we have $b+1=c$ and $b,|,c+1$ Thus $b$ divides both $c-1$ and $c+1$ but the gcd of those terms is $2$. Hence $b=2$, $c=3$ and $a+b+c=6$ as desired.



              Case: $a=2$. Then $b+2=c$ and $b,|,c+2$. Then $b$ divides both $c-2$ and $c+2$ so $b$ divides $4$. But that is impossible (since $b>a$ this would imply $b=4$ and $c=6$, but $(2,4,6)$ are not mutually coprime).






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                3
                down vote



                accepted










                Order the numbers as $a<b<c$.



                Now $c,|,a+b+cimplies c,|,a+bimplies a+b=nc$ for some $nin N$. But clearly $a+b<2c$ so we must have $n=1$ and $a+b=c$



                Note: if $gcd(a,b)=d$ then $d$ also divides $c$, so relative primality tells us that $d=1$



                The assumption $a,|,a+b+c$ now tells us $a,|,2a+2bimplies a,|,2b$. Since $gcd(a,b)=1$, it follows that $a,|,2$ so $ain {1,2}$.



                Case: $a=1$. Then we have $b+1=c$ and $b,|,c+1$ Thus $b$ divides both $c-1$ and $c+1$ but the gcd of those terms is $2$. Hence $b=2$, $c=3$ and $a+b+c=6$ as desired.



                Case: $a=2$. Then $b+2=c$ and $b,|,c+2$. Then $b$ divides both $c-2$ and $c+2$ so $b$ divides $4$. But that is impossible (since $b>a$ this would imply $b=4$ and $c=6$, but $(2,4,6)$ are not mutually coprime).






                share|cite|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  Order the numbers as $a<b<c$.



                  Now $c,|,a+b+cimplies c,|,a+bimplies a+b=nc$ for some $nin N$. But clearly $a+b<2c$ so we must have $n=1$ and $a+b=c$



                  Note: if $gcd(a,b)=d$ then $d$ also divides $c$, so relative primality tells us that $d=1$



                  The assumption $a,|,a+b+c$ now tells us $a,|,2a+2bimplies a,|,2b$. Since $gcd(a,b)=1$, it follows that $a,|,2$ so $ain {1,2}$.



                  Case: $a=1$. Then we have $b+1=c$ and $b,|,c+1$ Thus $b$ divides both $c-1$ and $c+1$ but the gcd of those terms is $2$. Hence $b=2$, $c=3$ and $a+b+c=6$ as desired.



                  Case: $a=2$. Then $b+2=c$ and $b,|,c+2$. Then $b$ divides both $c-2$ and $c+2$ so $b$ divides $4$. But that is impossible (since $b>a$ this would imply $b=4$ and $c=6$, but $(2,4,6)$ are not mutually coprime).






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Order the numbers as $a<b<c$.



                  Now $c,|,a+b+cimplies c,|,a+bimplies a+b=nc$ for some $nin N$. But clearly $a+b<2c$ so we must have $n=1$ and $a+b=c$



                  Note: if $gcd(a,b)=d$ then $d$ also divides $c$, so relative primality tells us that $d=1$



                  The assumption $a,|,a+b+c$ now tells us $a,|,2a+2bimplies a,|,2b$. Since $gcd(a,b)=1$, it follows that $a,|,2$ so $ain {1,2}$.



                  Case: $a=1$. Then we have $b+1=c$ and $b,|,c+1$ Thus $b$ divides both $c-1$ and $c+1$ but the gcd of those terms is $2$. Hence $b=2$, $c=3$ and $a+b+c=6$ as desired.



                  Case: $a=2$. Then $b+2=c$ and $b,|,c+2$. Then $b$ divides both $c-2$ and $c+2$ so $b$ divides $4$. But that is impossible (since $b>a$ this would imply $b=4$ and $c=6$, but $(2,4,6)$ are not mutually coprime).







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 4 at 20:51









                  lulu

                  38.5k24476




                  38.5k24476






















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      Suppose $a> b> c$ (we can do that because of symmetry, equality is excluded because they are coprime). Then $$amid b+c implies kcdot a = b+c <2a implies k<2$$
                      So $k=1$ and now we have $b+c=a$. So $$ bmid a+b+c =2aimplies bmid 2$$ and $$ cmid a+b+c =2aimplies cmid 2$$
                      So $c=1$ and $b=2$ and thus $a=3$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                      • 1




                        a,b,c are not pairwise coprime, but (a,b.c)=1, but they are pairwise different.
                        – miracle173
                        Dec 4 at 21:02










                      • Thanks.........@miracle173
                        – greedoid
                        Dec 4 at 21:03






                      • 1




                        why $bmid 2aimplies bmid 2$ and $cmid 2aimplies cmid 2$?
                        – miracle173
                        Dec 5 at 1:36















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      Suppose $a> b> c$ (we can do that because of symmetry, equality is excluded because they are coprime). Then $$amid b+c implies kcdot a = b+c <2a implies k<2$$
                      So $k=1$ and now we have $b+c=a$. So $$ bmid a+b+c =2aimplies bmid 2$$ and $$ cmid a+b+c =2aimplies cmid 2$$
                      So $c=1$ and $b=2$ and thus $a=3$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer



















                      • 1




                        a,b,c are not pairwise coprime, but (a,b.c)=1, but they are pairwise different.
                        – miracle173
                        Dec 4 at 21:02










                      • Thanks.........@miracle173
                        – greedoid
                        Dec 4 at 21:03






                      • 1




                        why $bmid 2aimplies bmid 2$ and $cmid 2aimplies cmid 2$?
                        – miracle173
                        Dec 5 at 1:36













                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote









                      Suppose $a> b> c$ (we can do that because of symmetry, equality is excluded because they are coprime). Then $$amid b+c implies kcdot a = b+c <2a implies k<2$$
                      So $k=1$ and now we have $b+c=a$. So $$ bmid a+b+c =2aimplies bmid 2$$ and $$ cmid a+b+c =2aimplies cmid 2$$
                      So $c=1$ and $b=2$ and thus $a=3$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      Suppose $a> b> c$ (we can do that because of symmetry, equality is excluded because they are coprime). Then $$amid b+c implies kcdot a = b+c <2a implies k<2$$
                      So $k=1$ and now we have $b+c=a$. So $$ bmid a+b+c =2aimplies bmid 2$$ and $$ cmid a+b+c =2aimplies cmid 2$$
                      So $c=1$ and $b=2$ and thus $a=3$.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Dec 4 at 21:00









                      miracle173

                      7,32222247




                      7,32222247










                      answered Dec 4 at 20:56









                      greedoid

                      36.5k114592




                      36.5k114592








                      • 1




                        a,b,c are not pairwise coprime, but (a,b.c)=1, but they are pairwise different.
                        – miracle173
                        Dec 4 at 21:02










                      • Thanks.........@miracle173
                        – greedoid
                        Dec 4 at 21:03






                      • 1




                        why $bmid 2aimplies bmid 2$ and $cmid 2aimplies cmid 2$?
                        – miracle173
                        Dec 5 at 1:36














                      • 1




                        a,b,c are not pairwise coprime, but (a,b.c)=1, but they are pairwise different.
                        – miracle173
                        Dec 4 at 21:02










                      • Thanks.........@miracle173
                        – greedoid
                        Dec 4 at 21:03






                      • 1




                        why $bmid 2aimplies bmid 2$ and $cmid 2aimplies cmid 2$?
                        – miracle173
                        Dec 5 at 1:36








                      1




                      1




                      a,b,c are not pairwise coprime, but (a,b.c)=1, but they are pairwise different.
                      – miracle173
                      Dec 4 at 21:02




                      a,b,c are not pairwise coprime, but (a,b.c)=1, but they are pairwise different.
                      – miracle173
                      Dec 4 at 21:02












                      Thanks.........@miracle173
                      – greedoid
                      Dec 4 at 21:03




                      Thanks.........@miracle173
                      – greedoid
                      Dec 4 at 21:03




                      1




                      1




                      why $bmid 2aimplies bmid 2$ and $cmid 2aimplies cmid 2$?
                      – miracle173
                      Dec 5 at 1:36




                      why $bmid 2aimplies bmid 2$ and $cmid 2aimplies cmid 2$?
                      – miracle173
                      Dec 5 at 1:36










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      It is also not too difficult to solve for $(a,b,c)inmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}^3$ such that $a$, $b$, and $c$ divides $a+b+c$. Up to permutation, all solutions $(a,b,c)$ are given in the five infinite families below, i.e., the equations (1)-(5).



                      The trivial case is when $c=-a-b$, that is, we have an infinite family of solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,b,-a-b),,tag{1}$$ where $a,binmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$ are such that $a+bneq 0$. From now on, we assume that $a+b+cneq 0$.



                      Without loss of generality, we suppose that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$. Hence, it follows immediately that $0<|a+b+c|leq |a|+|b|+|c|leq 3|c|$. As $c$ divides $a+b+c$, we can then conclude that
                      $a+b+cin{pm c,pm 2c,pm3c}$.



                      If $a+b+c=+c$, then $a+b=0$. Then, we have an infinite family of solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,-a,na),,tag{2}$$ where $a,ninmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                      If $a+b+c=-c$, then $a+b=-2c$. Since $a$ and $b$ must divide $c$, we conclude that $a=b=-c$. Consequently, we have solutions $(a,b,c)=(a,a,-a)$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. Nonetheless, these solutions are obtained by permuting the solutions in (2) with $n=1$.



                      If $a+b+c=+2c$, then $a+b=c$. Therefore, $a$ and $b=c-a$ are divisors of $a+b+c=2c$. Let $2c=ka$ for some integer $kneq 0$. Then, $b=c-a=c-dfrac{2c}{k}$. Since $dfrac{2c}{b}$ is an integer, we must have $dfrac{2c}{c-frac{2c}{k}}=dfrac{2k}{k-2}=2+dfrac{4}{k-2}$.
                      That is, $k-2mid 4$, so $kin{-2,0,1,3,4,6}$. Note also that $|a|leq |c|$ implies that $|k|geq 2$. Therefore, $kin{-2,3,4,6}$.




                      • The case $k=-2$ gives $a=-c$ and $b=2c$, yielding solutions $(a,b,c)=(a,-2a,-a)$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. However, these solutions violate the assumption that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$.


                      • The case $k=3$ gives $c=3t$ for some $tinmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$, along with $a=2t$ and $b=t$, yielding solutions $(a,b,c)=(2t,t,3t)$ with $tinmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. However, these solution violate the assumption that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$.


                      • The case $k=4$ gives $c=2a$ and $b=a$, yielding solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,a,2a)
                        tag{3}$$
                        with $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.


                      • The case $k=6$ gives $c=3a$ and $b=2a$, yielding solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,2a,3a)tag{4}$$ with $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                      If $a+b+c=-2c$, then $a+b=-3c$, but $3|c|=|a+b|leq |a|+|b|leq 2|c|$, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.



                      If $a+b+c=+3c$, then $a+b=2c$. Since $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$, this situation can occurs iff $a=b=c$, so we have solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,a,a)tag{5}$$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                      If $a+b+c=-3c$, then $a+b=-4c$, but $4|c|=|a+b|leq |a|+|b|leq 2|c|$, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.



                      In particular, all solutions $(a,b,c)inmathbb{Z}_{>0}^3$ with $aleq bleq c$ are of the form $(a,b,c)=(a,a,2a)$, $(a,b,c)=(a,2a,3a)$, and $(a,b,c)=(a,a,a)$ with $ainmathbb{Z}_{>0}$. Among these positive-integer solutions, the triples $(a,b,c)$ with $gcd(a,b,c)=1$ are then $(a,b,c)=(1,1,2)$, $(a,b,c)=(1,2,3)$, and $(a,b,c)=(1,1,1)$. Hence, the only triple $(a,b,c)$ which further satisfies the condition that $a$, $b$, and $c$ are pairwise distinct is $(a,b,c)=(1,2,3)$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer



























                        up vote
                        2
                        down vote













                        It is also not too difficult to solve for $(a,b,c)inmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}^3$ such that $a$, $b$, and $c$ divides $a+b+c$. Up to permutation, all solutions $(a,b,c)$ are given in the five infinite families below, i.e., the equations (1)-(5).



                        The trivial case is when $c=-a-b$, that is, we have an infinite family of solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,b,-a-b),,tag{1}$$ where $a,binmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$ are such that $a+bneq 0$. From now on, we assume that $a+b+cneq 0$.



                        Without loss of generality, we suppose that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$. Hence, it follows immediately that $0<|a+b+c|leq |a|+|b|+|c|leq 3|c|$. As $c$ divides $a+b+c$, we can then conclude that
                        $a+b+cin{pm c,pm 2c,pm3c}$.



                        If $a+b+c=+c$, then $a+b=0$. Then, we have an infinite family of solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,-a,na),,tag{2}$$ where $a,ninmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                        If $a+b+c=-c$, then $a+b=-2c$. Since $a$ and $b$ must divide $c$, we conclude that $a=b=-c$. Consequently, we have solutions $(a,b,c)=(a,a,-a)$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. Nonetheless, these solutions are obtained by permuting the solutions in (2) with $n=1$.



                        If $a+b+c=+2c$, then $a+b=c$. Therefore, $a$ and $b=c-a$ are divisors of $a+b+c=2c$. Let $2c=ka$ for some integer $kneq 0$. Then, $b=c-a=c-dfrac{2c}{k}$. Since $dfrac{2c}{b}$ is an integer, we must have $dfrac{2c}{c-frac{2c}{k}}=dfrac{2k}{k-2}=2+dfrac{4}{k-2}$.
                        That is, $k-2mid 4$, so $kin{-2,0,1,3,4,6}$. Note also that $|a|leq |c|$ implies that $|k|geq 2$. Therefore, $kin{-2,3,4,6}$.




                        • The case $k=-2$ gives $a=-c$ and $b=2c$, yielding solutions $(a,b,c)=(a,-2a,-a)$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. However, these solutions violate the assumption that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$.


                        • The case $k=3$ gives $c=3t$ for some $tinmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$, along with $a=2t$ and $b=t$, yielding solutions $(a,b,c)=(2t,t,3t)$ with $tinmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. However, these solution violate the assumption that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$.


                        • The case $k=4$ gives $c=2a$ and $b=a$, yielding solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,a,2a)
                          tag{3}$$
                          with $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.


                        • The case $k=6$ gives $c=3a$ and $b=2a$, yielding solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,2a,3a)tag{4}$$ with $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                        If $a+b+c=-2c$, then $a+b=-3c$, but $3|c|=|a+b|leq |a|+|b|leq 2|c|$, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.



                        If $a+b+c=+3c$, then $a+b=2c$. Since $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$, this situation can occurs iff $a=b=c$, so we have solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,a,a)tag{5}$$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                        If $a+b+c=-3c$, then $a+b=-4c$, but $4|c|=|a+b|leq |a|+|b|leq 2|c|$, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.



                        In particular, all solutions $(a,b,c)inmathbb{Z}_{>0}^3$ with $aleq bleq c$ are of the form $(a,b,c)=(a,a,2a)$, $(a,b,c)=(a,2a,3a)$, and $(a,b,c)=(a,a,a)$ with $ainmathbb{Z}_{>0}$. Among these positive-integer solutions, the triples $(a,b,c)$ with $gcd(a,b,c)=1$ are then $(a,b,c)=(1,1,2)$, $(a,b,c)=(1,2,3)$, and $(a,b,c)=(1,1,1)$. Hence, the only triple $(a,b,c)$ which further satisfies the condition that $a$, $b$, and $c$ are pairwise distinct is $(a,b,c)=(1,2,3)$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote









                          It is also not too difficult to solve for $(a,b,c)inmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}^3$ such that $a$, $b$, and $c$ divides $a+b+c$. Up to permutation, all solutions $(a,b,c)$ are given in the five infinite families below, i.e., the equations (1)-(5).



                          The trivial case is when $c=-a-b$, that is, we have an infinite family of solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,b,-a-b),,tag{1}$$ where $a,binmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$ are such that $a+bneq 0$. From now on, we assume that $a+b+cneq 0$.



                          Without loss of generality, we suppose that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$. Hence, it follows immediately that $0<|a+b+c|leq |a|+|b|+|c|leq 3|c|$. As $c$ divides $a+b+c$, we can then conclude that
                          $a+b+cin{pm c,pm 2c,pm3c}$.



                          If $a+b+c=+c$, then $a+b=0$. Then, we have an infinite family of solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,-a,na),,tag{2}$$ where $a,ninmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                          If $a+b+c=-c$, then $a+b=-2c$. Since $a$ and $b$ must divide $c$, we conclude that $a=b=-c$. Consequently, we have solutions $(a,b,c)=(a,a,-a)$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. Nonetheless, these solutions are obtained by permuting the solutions in (2) with $n=1$.



                          If $a+b+c=+2c$, then $a+b=c$. Therefore, $a$ and $b=c-a$ are divisors of $a+b+c=2c$. Let $2c=ka$ for some integer $kneq 0$. Then, $b=c-a=c-dfrac{2c}{k}$. Since $dfrac{2c}{b}$ is an integer, we must have $dfrac{2c}{c-frac{2c}{k}}=dfrac{2k}{k-2}=2+dfrac{4}{k-2}$.
                          That is, $k-2mid 4$, so $kin{-2,0,1,3,4,6}$. Note also that $|a|leq |c|$ implies that $|k|geq 2$. Therefore, $kin{-2,3,4,6}$.




                          • The case $k=-2$ gives $a=-c$ and $b=2c$, yielding solutions $(a,b,c)=(a,-2a,-a)$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. However, these solutions violate the assumption that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$.


                          • The case $k=3$ gives $c=3t$ for some $tinmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$, along with $a=2t$ and $b=t$, yielding solutions $(a,b,c)=(2t,t,3t)$ with $tinmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. However, these solution violate the assumption that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$.


                          • The case $k=4$ gives $c=2a$ and $b=a$, yielding solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,a,2a)
                            tag{3}$$
                            with $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.


                          • The case $k=6$ gives $c=3a$ and $b=2a$, yielding solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,2a,3a)tag{4}$$ with $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                          If $a+b+c=-2c$, then $a+b=-3c$, but $3|c|=|a+b|leq |a|+|b|leq 2|c|$, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.



                          If $a+b+c=+3c$, then $a+b=2c$. Since $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$, this situation can occurs iff $a=b=c$, so we have solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,a,a)tag{5}$$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                          If $a+b+c=-3c$, then $a+b=-4c$, but $4|c|=|a+b|leq |a|+|b|leq 2|c|$, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.



                          In particular, all solutions $(a,b,c)inmathbb{Z}_{>0}^3$ with $aleq bleq c$ are of the form $(a,b,c)=(a,a,2a)$, $(a,b,c)=(a,2a,3a)$, and $(a,b,c)=(a,a,a)$ with $ainmathbb{Z}_{>0}$. Among these positive-integer solutions, the triples $(a,b,c)$ with $gcd(a,b,c)=1$ are then $(a,b,c)=(1,1,2)$, $(a,b,c)=(1,2,3)$, and $(a,b,c)=(1,1,1)$. Hence, the only triple $(a,b,c)$ which further satisfies the condition that $a$, $b$, and $c$ are pairwise distinct is $(a,b,c)=(1,2,3)$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          It is also not too difficult to solve for $(a,b,c)inmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}^3$ such that $a$, $b$, and $c$ divides $a+b+c$. Up to permutation, all solutions $(a,b,c)$ are given in the five infinite families below, i.e., the equations (1)-(5).



                          The trivial case is when $c=-a-b$, that is, we have an infinite family of solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,b,-a-b),,tag{1}$$ where $a,binmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$ are such that $a+bneq 0$. From now on, we assume that $a+b+cneq 0$.



                          Without loss of generality, we suppose that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$. Hence, it follows immediately that $0<|a+b+c|leq |a|+|b|+|c|leq 3|c|$. As $c$ divides $a+b+c$, we can then conclude that
                          $a+b+cin{pm c,pm 2c,pm3c}$.



                          If $a+b+c=+c$, then $a+b=0$. Then, we have an infinite family of solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,-a,na),,tag{2}$$ where $a,ninmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                          If $a+b+c=-c$, then $a+b=-2c$. Since $a$ and $b$ must divide $c$, we conclude that $a=b=-c$. Consequently, we have solutions $(a,b,c)=(a,a,-a)$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. Nonetheless, these solutions are obtained by permuting the solutions in (2) with $n=1$.



                          If $a+b+c=+2c$, then $a+b=c$. Therefore, $a$ and $b=c-a$ are divisors of $a+b+c=2c$. Let $2c=ka$ for some integer $kneq 0$. Then, $b=c-a=c-dfrac{2c}{k}$. Since $dfrac{2c}{b}$ is an integer, we must have $dfrac{2c}{c-frac{2c}{k}}=dfrac{2k}{k-2}=2+dfrac{4}{k-2}$.
                          That is, $k-2mid 4$, so $kin{-2,0,1,3,4,6}$. Note also that $|a|leq |c|$ implies that $|k|geq 2$. Therefore, $kin{-2,3,4,6}$.




                          • The case $k=-2$ gives $a=-c$ and $b=2c$, yielding solutions $(a,b,c)=(a,-2a,-a)$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. However, these solutions violate the assumption that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$.


                          • The case $k=3$ gives $c=3t$ for some $tinmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$, along with $a=2t$ and $b=t$, yielding solutions $(a,b,c)=(2t,t,3t)$ with $tinmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$. However, these solution violate the assumption that $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$.


                          • The case $k=4$ gives $c=2a$ and $b=a$, yielding solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,a,2a)
                            tag{3}$$
                            with $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.


                          • The case $k=6$ gives $c=3a$ and $b=2a$, yielding solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,2a,3a)tag{4}$$ with $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                          If $a+b+c=-2c$, then $a+b=-3c$, but $3|c|=|a+b|leq |a|+|b|leq 2|c|$, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.



                          If $a+b+c=+3c$, then $a+b=2c$. Since $|a|leq |b|leq |c|$, this situation can occurs iff $a=b=c$, so we have solutions $$(a,b,c)=(a,a,a)tag{5}$$ for $ainmathbb{Z}_{neq 0}$.



                          If $a+b+c=-3c$, then $a+b=-4c$, but $4|c|=|a+b|leq |a|+|b|leq 2|c|$, leading to a contradiction. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.



                          In particular, all solutions $(a,b,c)inmathbb{Z}_{>0}^3$ with $aleq bleq c$ are of the form $(a,b,c)=(a,a,2a)$, $(a,b,c)=(a,2a,3a)$, and $(a,b,c)=(a,a,a)$ with $ainmathbb{Z}_{>0}$. Among these positive-integer solutions, the triples $(a,b,c)$ with $gcd(a,b,c)=1$ are then $(a,b,c)=(1,1,2)$, $(a,b,c)=(1,2,3)$, and $(a,b,c)=(1,1,1)$. Hence, the only triple $(a,b,c)$ which further satisfies the condition that $a$, $b$, and $c$ are pairwise distinct is $(a,b,c)=(1,2,3)$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Dec 4 at 21:14

























                          answered Dec 4 at 20:50









                          Batominovski

                          33.4k33292




                          33.4k33292






















                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote













                              Hint: since $$a|a+b+c\b|a+b+c\c|a+b+c$$therefore $$abc|a+b+c$$since $a,b,c$ are co-primes. Can you finish now?






                              share|cite|improve this answer





















                              • Co-prime for me means that $gcd (a,b,c)=1$. $gcd (1,2,2)=1$
                                – Lehs
                                Dec 4 at 20:27






                              • 1




                                Please explain it more. I am not able to get the result. I don't know about the OP.
                                – jayant98
                                Dec 4 at 20:28










                              • @Lehs the example of 1,2,2 wil not satisfy as a,b,c should be distinct.
                                – jayant98
                                Dec 4 at 20:29






                              • 1




                                As has been remarked, this hint is not correct since the OP is not assuming that $(a,b,c)$ are pairwise relatively prime.
                                – lulu
                                Dec 4 at 20:58










                              • Then what does the co-prime mean?
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Dec 4 at 21:07















                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote













                              Hint: since $$a|a+b+c\b|a+b+c\c|a+b+c$$therefore $$abc|a+b+c$$since $a,b,c$ are co-primes. Can you finish now?






                              share|cite|improve this answer





















                              • Co-prime for me means that $gcd (a,b,c)=1$. $gcd (1,2,2)=1$
                                – Lehs
                                Dec 4 at 20:27






                              • 1




                                Please explain it more. I am not able to get the result. I don't know about the OP.
                                – jayant98
                                Dec 4 at 20:28










                              • @Lehs the example of 1,2,2 wil not satisfy as a,b,c should be distinct.
                                – jayant98
                                Dec 4 at 20:29






                              • 1




                                As has been remarked, this hint is not correct since the OP is not assuming that $(a,b,c)$ are pairwise relatively prime.
                                – lulu
                                Dec 4 at 20:58










                              • Then what does the co-prime mean?
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Dec 4 at 21:07













                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote









                              Hint: since $$a|a+b+c\b|a+b+c\c|a+b+c$$therefore $$abc|a+b+c$$since $a,b,c$ are co-primes. Can you finish now?






                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              Hint: since $$a|a+b+c\b|a+b+c\c|a+b+c$$therefore $$abc|a+b+c$$since $a,b,c$ are co-primes. Can you finish now?







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Dec 4 at 20:24









                              Mostafa Ayaz

                              13.6k3836




                              13.6k3836












                              • Co-prime for me means that $gcd (a,b,c)=1$. $gcd (1,2,2)=1$
                                – Lehs
                                Dec 4 at 20:27






                              • 1




                                Please explain it more. I am not able to get the result. I don't know about the OP.
                                – jayant98
                                Dec 4 at 20:28










                              • @Lehs the example of 1,2,2 wil not satisfy as a,b,c should be distinct.
                                – jayant98
                                Dec 4 at 20:29






                              • 1




                                As has been remarked, this hint is not correct since the OP is not assuming that $(a,b,c)$ are pairwise relatively prime.
                                – lulu
                                Dec 4 at 20:58










                              • Then what does the co-prime mean?
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Dec 4 at 21:07


















                              • Co-prime for me means that $gcd (a,b,c)=1$. $gcd (1,2,2)=1$
                                – Lehs
                                Dec 4 at 20:27






                              • 1




                                Please explain it more. I am not able to get the result. I don't know about the OP.
                                – jayant98
                                Dec 4 at 20:28










                              • @Lehs the example of 1,2,2 wil not satisfy as a,b,c should be distinct.
                                – jayant98
                                Dec 4 at 20:29






                              • 1




                                As has been remarked, this hint is not correct since the OP is not assuming that $(a,b,c)$ are pairwise relatively prime.
                                – lulu
                                Dec 4 at 20:58










                              • Then what does the co-prime mean?
                                – Mostafa Ayaz
                                Dec 4 at 21:07
















                              Co-prime for me means that $gcd (a,b,c)=1$. $gcd (1,2,2)=1$
                              – Lehs
                              Dec 4 at 20:27




                              Co-prime for me means that $gcd (a,b,c)=1$. $gcd (1,2,2)=1$
                              – Lehs
                              Dec 4 at 20:27




                              1




                              1




                              Please explain it more. I am not able to get the result. I don't know about the OP.
                              – jayant98
                              Dec 4 at 20:28




                              Please explain it more. I am not able to get the result. I don't know about the OP.
                              – jayant98
                              Dec 4 at 20:28












                              @Lehs the example of 1,2,2 wil not satisfy as a,b,c should be distinct.
                              – jayant98
                              Dec 4 at 20:29




                              @Lehs the example of 1,2,2 wil not satisfy as a,b,c should be distinct.
                              – jayant98
                              Dec 4 at 20:29




                              1




                              1




                              As has been remarked, this hint is not correct since the OP is not assuming that $(a,b,c)$ are pairwise relatively prime.
                              – lulu
                              Dec 4 at 20:58




                              As has been remarked, this hint is not correct since the OP is not assuming that $(a,b,c)$ are pairwise relatively prime.
                              – lulu
                              Dec 4 at 20:58












                              Then what does the co-prime mean?
                              – Mostafa Ayaz
                              Dec 4 at 21:07




                              Then what does the co-prime mean?
                              – Mostafa Ayaz
                              Dec 4 at 21:07



                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Bressuire

                              Cabo Verde

                              Gyllenstierna