Deciding whether a form in the exterior power $bigwedge^k V$ is decomposable
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be a vector space and $bigwedge^kV$ be the $k$th exterior power. I'm trying to find a condition that characterizes when an element $omega in bigwedge^kV$ is decomposable in the sense that $omega = v_1 wedge ... wedge v_k$ for some $v_i in V$.
Now if $omega$ is decomposable, then $omega^2 = 0$, and I wondered whether the converse holds in the general case? (Or perhaps for some restrictions on the dimension of $V$ or k?). This is trivially true for $k=1$ but I'm not sure about other cases.
differential-geometry differential-forms multilinear-algebra exterior-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be a vector space and $bigwedge^kV$ be the $k$th exterior power. I'm trying to find a condition that characterizes when an element $omega in bigwedge^kV$ is decomposable in the sense that $omega = v_1 wedge ... wedge v_k$ for some $v_i in V$.
Now if $omega$ is decomposable, then $omega^2 = 0$, and I wondered whether the converse holds in the general case? (Or perhaps for some restrictions on the dimension of $V$ or k?). This is trivially true for $k=1$ but I'm not sure about other cases.
differential-geometry differential-forms multilinear-algebra exterior-algebra
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What textbook are you using to learn multilinear/exterior algebra by the way? I've tried to learn the subject several times, but it never seemed to click with me as much as did, say, functional analysis. Your help/recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
$endgroup$
– Chill2Macht
May 13 '16 at 23:01
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/341540/… might be helpful.
$endgroup$
– tom
May 14 '16 at 1:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be a vector space and $bigwedge^kV$ be the $k$th exterior power. I'm trying to find a condition that characterizes when an element $omega in bigwedge^kV$ is decomposable in the sense that $omega = v_1 wedge ... wedge v_k$ for some $v_i in V$.
Now if $omega$ is decomposable, then $omega^2 = 0$, and I wondered whether the converse holds in the general case? (Or perhaps for some restrictions on the dimension of $V$ or k?). This is trivially true for $k=1$ but I'm not sure about other cases.
differential-geometry differential-forms multilinear-algebra exterior-algebra
$endgroup$
Let $V$ be a vector space and $bigwedge^kV$ be the $k$th exterior power. I'm trying to find a condition that characterizes when an element $omega in bigwedge^kV$ is decomposable in the sense that $omega = v_1 wedge ... wedge v_k$ for some $v_i in V$.
Now if $omega$ is decomposable, then $omega^2 = 0$, and I wondered whether the converse holds in the general case? (Or perhaps for some restrictions on the dimension of $V$ or k?). This is trivially true for $k=1$ but I'm not sure about other cases.
differential-geometry differential-forms multilinear-algebra exterior-algebra
differential-geometry differential-forms multilinear-algebra exterior-algebra
edited May 13 '16 at 22:58
Travis
60k767146
60k767146
asked May 13 '16 at 21:33
WoosterWooster
1,395934
1,395934
$begingroup$
What textbook are you using to learn multilinear/exterior algebra by the way? I've tried to learn the subject several times, but it never seemed to click with me as much as did, say, functional analysis. Your help/recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
$endgroup$
– Chill2Macht
May 13 '16 at 23:01
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/341540/… might be helpful.
$endgroup$
– tom
May 14 '16 at 1:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What textbook are you using to learn multilinear/exterior algebra by the way? I've tried to learn the subject several times, but it never seemed to click with me as much as did, say, functional analysis. Your help/recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
$endgroup$
– Chill2Macht
May 13 '16 at 23:01
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/341540/… might be helpful.
$endgroup$
– tom
May 14 '16 at 1:48
$begingroup$
What textbook are you using to learn multilinear/exterior algebra by the way? I've tried to learn the subject several times, but it never seemed to click with me as much as did, say, functional analysis. Your help/recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
$endgroup$
– Chill2Macht
May 13 '16 at 23:01
$begingroup$
What textbook are you using to learn multilinear/exterior algebra by the way? I've tried to learn the subject several times, but it never seemed to click with me as much as did, say, functional analysis. Your help/recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
$endgroup$
– Chill2Macht
May 13 '16 at 23:01
1
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/341540/… might be helpful.
$endgroup$
– tom
May 14 '16 at 1:48
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/341540/… might be helpful.
$endgroup$
– tom
May 14 '16 at 1:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For $k < 2$ and $k > dim V - 2$ it's always true that a $k$-form $omega$ both is decomposable and satisfies $omega wedge omega = 0$.
For $k = 2$ (and provided the field underlying $V$ does not have characteristic $2$), the condition $omega wedge omega = 0$ is both necessary and sufficient for decomposability. (Proving this is a nice exercise.)
The converse is not true in general, however. If $k$ is odd, then all $k$-forms $omega$ satisfy $omega wedge omega = 0$, but not all odd-degree multivectors (or, dually, forms) are decomposable:
Example If $dim V geq 5$, pick a basis $(E_a)$ and denote the dual basis by $(e_a)$. Then, the $3$-form
$$psi := (e^1 wedge e^2 + e^3 wedge e^4) wedge e^5$$
satisfies $psi wedge psi = 0$ but we can show that it is indecomposable: Contracting a vector into a decomposable form yields a decomposable form. On the other hand, $$iota_{E^5} psi = e^1 wedge e^2 + e^3 wedge e^4 ,$$ and computing gives $(iota_{E^5} psi) wedge (iota_{E^5} psi) neq 0$, so by the criterion for $k = 2$, $iota_{E^5} psi$ is indecomposable.
For an algorithm that checks decomposability of a general $k$-form, see this old question.
Remark For $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$, most $k$-forms are not decomposable, and we can quantify this assertion: For $0 leq k leq dim V$, any $k$-vector $E_{a_1} wedge cdots wedge E_{a_k}$ determines a $k$-plane in $V$, namely, $langle E_{a_1}, cdots, E_{a_k} rangle$, and any $k$-plane in $V$ determines an underlying form up to an overall nonzero multiplicative constant. So, we may regard the space $D_k(V)$ of (nonzero) decomposable $k$-forms as a (punctured) line bundle over the space of all $k$-planes in $V$; this latter space is called the Grassmannian (manifold), $Gr(k, V)$, and it has dimension $k (dim V - k)$, so $D_k(V)$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $k (dim V - k) + 1$. On the other hand, the space of all $k$-forms has dimension $n choose k$, and for $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$,
$$dim D_k(V) = k (dim V - k) + 1 < {dim V choose k}$$ (but note that equality holds for $k = 1, dim V - 1$).
Alternatively, the Plücker embedding realizes $Gr(k, V)$ as a projective variety in $Bbb P(Lambda^k V)$, and when $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$ it is a proper subvariety, so its complement is nonempty and Zariski-open (and hence, when the underlying field is $Bbb R$ or $Bbb C$, dense with respect to the usual topology).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's great thanks for your answer and the counter example. I'm now trying to prove the first statement, namely the $k=2$ case, besides writing this out explicitly in a basis (which doesn't seem to help too much), I'm struggling where to start with that, do you have any hints?
$endgroup$
– Wooster
May 13 '16 at 22:15
$begingroup$
You're welcome, I hope you found as useful. As for a hint: One can do this is an adapted basis, but it's faster to suppose that $omega wedge omega = 0$, contract a vector $v$ into $omega wedge omega$, and apply the Leibniz Rule for the wedge product.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 13 '16 at 22:55
$begingroup$
@Wooster I've improved my answer, substantially, I think, to give some more intuition about how rare decomposable $k$-forms are.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 19 '16 at 16:30
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1784312%2fdeciding-whether-a-form-in-the-exterior-power-bigwedgek-v-is-decomposable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For $k < 2$ and $k > dim V - 2$ it's always true that a $k$-form $omega$ both is decomposable and satisfies $omega wedge omega = 0$.
For $k = 2$ (and provided the field underlying $V$ does not have characteristic $2$), the condition $omega wedge omega = 0$ is both necessary and sufficient for decomposability. (Proving this is a nice exercise.)
The converse is not true in general, however. If $k$ is odd, then all $k$-forms $omega$ satisfy $omega wedge omega = 0$, but not all odd-degree multivectors (or, dually, forms) are decomposable:
Example If $dim V geq 5$, pick a basis $(E_a)$ and denote the dual basis by $(e_a)$. Then, the $3$-form
$$psi := (e^1 wedge e^2 + e^3 wedge e^4) wedge e^5$$
satisfies $psi wedge psi = 0$ but we can show that it is indecomposable: Contracting a vector into a decomposable form yields a decomposable form. On the other hand, $$iota_{E^5} psi = e^1 wedge e^2 + e^3 wedge e^4 ,$$ and computing gives $(iota_{E^5} psi) wedge (iota_{E^5} psi) neq 0$, so by the criterion for $k = 2$, $iota_{E^5} psi$ is indecomposable.
For an algorithm that checks decomposability of a general $k$-form, see this old question.
Remark For $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$, most $k$-forms are not decomposable, and we can quantify this assertion: For $0 leq k leq dim V$, any $k$-vector $E_{a_1} wedge cdots wedge E_{a_k}$ determines a $k$-plane in $V$, namely, $langle E_{a_1}, cdots, E_{a_k} rangle$, and any $k$-plane in $V$ determines an underlying form up to an overall nonzero multiplicative constant. So, we may regard the space $D_k(V)$ of (nonzero) decomposable $k$-forms as a (punctured) line bundle over the space of all $k$-planes in $V$; this latter space is called the Grassmannian (manifold), $Gr(k, V)$, and it has dimension $k (dim V - k)$, so $D_k(V)$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $k (dim V - k) + 1$. On the other hand, the space of all $k$-forms has dimension $n choose k$, and for $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$,
$$dim D_k(V) = k (dim V - k) + 1 < {dim V choose k}$$ (but note that equality holds for $k = 1, dim V - 1$).
Alternatively, the Plücker embedding realizes $Gr(k, V)$ as a projective variety in $Bbb P(Lambda^k V)$, and when $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$ it is a proper subvariety, so its complement is nonempty and Zariski-open (and hence, when the underlying field is $Bbb R$ or $Bbb C$, dense with respect to the usual topology).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's great thanks for your answer and the counter example. I'm now trying to prove the first statement, namely the $k=2$ case, besides writing this out explicitly in a basis (which doesn't seem to help too much), I'm struggling where to start with that, do you have any hints?
$endgroup$
– Wooster
May 13 '16 at 22:15
$begingroup$
You're welcome, I hope you found as useful. As for a hint: One can do this is an adapted basis, but it's faster to suppose that $omega wedge omega = 0$, contract a vector $v$ into $omega wedge omega$, and apply the Leibniz Rule for the wedge product.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 13 '16 at 22:55
$begingroup$
@Wooster I've improved my answer, substantially, I think, to give some more intuition about how rare decomposable $k$-forms are.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 19 '16 at 16:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For $k < 2$ and $k > dim V - 2$ it's always true that a $k$-form $omega$ both is decomposable and satisfies $omega wedge omega = 0$.
For $k = 2$ (and provided the field underlying $V$ does not have characteristic $2$), the condition $omega wedge omega = 0$ is both necessary and sufficient for decomposability. (Proving this is a nice exercise.)
The converse is not true in general, however. If $k$ is odd, then all $k$-forms $omega$ satisfy $omega wedge omega = 0$, but not all odd-degree multivectors (or, dually, forms) are decomposable:
Example If $dim V geq 5$, pick a basis $(E_a)$ and denote the dual basis by $(e_a)$. Then, the $3$-form
$$psi := (e^1 wedge e^2 + e^3 wedge e^4) wedge e^5$$
satisfies $psi wedge psi = 0$ but we can show that it is indecomposable: Contracting a vector into a decomposable form yields a decomposable form. On the other hand, $$iota_{E^5} psi = e^1 wedge e^2 + e^3 wedge e^4 ,$$ and computing gives $(iota_{E^5} psi) wedge (iota_{E^5} psi) neq 0$, so by the criterion for $k = 2$, $iota_{E^5} psi$ is indecomposable.
For an algorithm that checks decomposability of a general $k$-form, see this old question.
Remark For $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$, most $k$-forms are not decomposable, and we can quantify this assertion: For $0 leq k leq dim V$, any $k$-vector $E_{a_1} wedge cdots wedge E_{a_k}$ determines a $k$-plane in $V$, namely, $langle E_{a_1}, cdots, E_{a_k} rangle$, and any $k$-plane in $V$ determines an underlying form up to an overall nonzero multiplicative constant. So, we may regard the space $D_k(V)$ of (nonzero) decomposable $k$-forms as a (punctured) line bundle over the space of all $k$-planes in $V$; this latter space is called the Grassmannian (manifold), $Gr(k, V)$, and it has dimension $k (dim V - k)$, so $D_k(V)$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $k (dim V - k) + 1$. On the other hand, the space of all $k$-forms has dimension $n choose k$, and for $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$,
$$dim D_k(V) = k (dim V - k) + 1 < {dim V choose k}$$ (but note that equality holds for $k = 1, dim V - 1$).
Alternatively, the Plücker embedding realizes $Gr(k, V)$ as a projective variety in $Bbb P(Lambda^k V)$, and when $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$ it is a proper subvariety, so its complement is nonempty and Zariski-open (and hence, when the underlying field is $Bbb R$ or $Bbb C$, dense with respect to the usual topology).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's great thanks for your answer and the counter example. I'm now trying to prove the first statement, namely the $k=2$ case, besides writing this out explicitly in a basis (which doesn't seem to help too much), I'm struggling where to start with that, do you have any hints?
$endgroup$
– Wooster
May 13 '16 at 22:15
$begingroup$
You're welcome, I hope you found as useful. As for a hint: One can do this is an adapted basis, but it's faster to suppose that $omega wedge omega = 0$, contract a vector $v$ into $omega wedge omega$, and apply the Leibniz Rule for the wedge product.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 13 '16 at 22:55
$begingroup$
@Wooster I've improved my answer, substantially, I think, to give some more intuition about how rare decomposable $k$-forms are.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 19 '16 at 16:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For $k < 2$ and $k > dim V - 2$ it's always true that a $k$-form $omega$ both is decomposable and satisfies $omega wedge omega = 0$.
For $k = 2$ (and provided the field underlying $V$ does not have characteristic $2$), the condition $omega wedge omega = 0$ is both necessary and sufficient for decomposability. (Proving this is a nice exercise.)
The converse is not true in general, however. If $k$ is odd, then all $k$-forms $omega$ satisfy $omega wedge omega = 0$, but not all odd-degree multivectors (or, dually, forms) are decomposable:
Example If $dim V geq 5$, pick a basis $(E_a)$ and denote the dual basis by $(e_a)$. Then, the $3$-form
$$psi := (e^1 wedge e^2 + e^3 wedge e^4) wedge e^5$$
satisfies $psi wedge psi = 0$ but we can show that it is indecomposable: Contracting a vector into a decomposable form yields a decomposable form. On the other hand, $$iota_{E^5} psi = e^1 wedge e^2 + e^3 wedge e^4 ,$$ and computing gives $(iota_{E^5} psi) wedge (iota_{E^5} psi) neq 0$, so by the criterion for $k = 2$, $iota_{E^5} psi$ is indecomposable.
For an algorithm that checks decomposability of a general $k$-form, see this old question.
Remark For $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$, most $k$-forms are not decomposable, and we can quantify this assertion: For $0 leq k leq dim V$, any $k$-vector $E_{a_1} wedge cdots wedge E_{a_k}$ determines a $k$-plane in $V$, namely, $langle E_{a_1}, cdots, E_{a_k} rangle$, and any $k$-plane in $V$ determines an underlying form up to an overall nonzero multiplicative constant. So, we may regard the space $D_k(V)$ of (nonzero) decomposable $k$-forms as a (punctured) line bundle over the space of all $k$-planes in $V$; this latter space is called the Grassmannian (manifold), $Gr(k, V)$, and it has dimension $k (dim V - k)$, so $D_k(V)$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $k (dim V - k) + 1$. On the other hand, the space of all $k$-forms has dimension $n choose k$, and for $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$,
$$dim D_k(V) = k (dim V - k) + 1 < {dim V choose k}$$ (but note that equality holds for $k = 1, dim V - 1$).
Alternatively, the Plücker embedding realizes $Gr(k, V)$ as a projective variety in $Bbb P(Lambda^k V)$, and when $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$ it is a proper subvariety, so its complement is nonempty and Zariski-open (and hence, when the underlying field is $Bbb R$ or $Bbb C$, dense with respect to the usual topology).
$endgroup$
For $k < 2$ and $k > dim V - 2$ it's always true that a $k$-form $omega$ both is decomposable and satisfies $omega wedge omega = 0$.
For $k = 2$ (and provided the field underlying $V$ does not have characteristic $2$), the condition $omega wedge omega = 0$ is both necessary and sufficient for decomposability. (Proving this is a nice exercise.)
The converse is not true in general, however. If $k$ is odd, then all $k$-forms $omega$ satisfy $omega wedge omega = 0$, but not all odd-degree multivectors (or, dually, forms) are decomposable:
Example If $dim V geq 5$, pick a basis $(E_a)$ and denote the dual basis by $(e_a)$. Then, the $3$-form
$$psi := (e^1 wedge e^2 + e^3 wedge e^4) wedge e^5$$
satisfies $psi wedge psi = 0$ but we can show that it is indecomposable: Contracting a vector into a decomposable form yields a decomposable form. On the other hand, $$iota_{E^5} psi = e^1 wedge e^2 + e^3 wedge e^4 ,$$ and computing gives $(iota_{E^5} psi) wedge (iota_{E^5} psi) neq 0$, so by the criterion for $k = 2$, $iota_{E^5} psi$ is indecomposable.
For an algorithm that checks decomposability of a general $k$-form, see this old question.
Remark For $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$, most $k$-forms are not decomposable, and we can quantify this assertion: For $0 leq k leq dim V$, any $k$-vector $E_{a_1} wedge cdots wedge E_{a_k}$ determines a $k$-plane in $V$, namely, $langle E_{a_1}, cdots, E_{a_k} rangle$, and any $k$-plane in $V$ determines an underlying form up to an overall nonzero multiplicative constant. So, we may regard the space $D_k(V)$ of (nonzero) decomposable $k$-forms as a (punctured) line bundle over the space of all $k$-planes in $V$; this latter space is called the Grassmannian (manifold), $Gr(k, V)$, and it has dimension $k (dim V - k)$, so $D_k(V)$ is a smooth manifold of dimension $k (dim V - k) + 1$. On the other hand, the space of all $k$-forms has dimension $n choose k$, and for $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$,
$$dim D_k(V) = k (dim V - k) + 1 < {dim V choose k}$$ (but note that equality holds for $k = 1, dim V - 1$).
Alternatively, the Plücker embedding realizes $Gr(k, V)$ as a projective variety in $Bbb P(Lambda^k V)$, and when $2 leq k leq dim V - 2$ it is a proper subvariety, so its complement is nonempty and Zariski-open (and hence, when the underlying field is $Bbb R$ or $Bbb C$, dense with respect to the usual topology).
edited Dec 17 '18 at 16:17
answered May 13 '16 at 21:46
TravisTravis
60k767146
60k767146
$begingroup$
That's great thanks for your answer and the counter example. I'm now trying to prove the first statement, namely the $k=2$ case, besides writing this out explicitly in a basis (which doesn't seem to help too much), I'm struggling where to start with that, do you have any hints?
$endgroup$
– Wooster
May 13 '16 at 22:15
$begingroup$
You're welcome, I hope you found as useful. As for a hint: One can do this is an adapted basis, but it's faster to suppose that $omega wedge omega = 0$, contract a vector $v$ into $omega wedge omega$, and apply the Leibniz Rule for the wedge product.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 13 '16 at 22:55
$begingroup$
@Wooster I've improved my answer, substantially, I think, to give some more intuition about how rare decomposable $k$-forms are.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 19 '16 at 16:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That's great thanks for your answer and the counter example. I'm now trying to prove the first statement, namely the $k=2$ case, besides writing this out explicitly in a basis (which doesn't seem to help too much), I'm struggling where to start with that, do you have any hints?
$endgroup$
– Wooster
May 13 '16 at 22:15
$begingroup$
You're welcome, I hope you found as useful. As for a hint: One can do this is an adapted basis, but it's faster to suppose that $omega wedge omega = 0$, contract a vector $v$ into $omega wedge omega$, and apply the Leibniz Rule for the wedge product.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 13 '16 at 22:55
$begingroup$
@Wooster I've improved my answer, substantially, I think, to give some more intuition about how rare decomposable $k$-forms are.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 19 '16 at 16:30
$begingroup$
That's great thanks for your answer and the counter example. I'm now trying to prove the first statement, namely the $k=2$ case, besides writing this out explicitly in a basis (which doesn't seem to help too much), I'm struggling where to start with that, do you have any hints?
$endgroup$
– Wooster
May 13 '16 at 22:15
$begingroup$
That's great thanks for your answer and the counter example. I'm now trying to prove the first statement, namely the $k=2$ case, besides writing this out explicitly in a basis (which doesn't seem to help too much), I'm struggling where to start with that, do you have any hints?
$endgroup$
– Wooster
May 13 '16 at 22:15
$begingroup$
You're welcome, I hope you found as useful. As for a hint: One can do this is an adapted basis, but it's faster to suppose that $omega wedge omega = 0$, contract a vector $v$ into $omega wedge omega$, and apply the Leibniz Rule for the wedge product.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 13 '16 at 22:55
$begingroup$
You're welcome, I hope you found as useful. As for a hint: One can do this is an adapted basis, but it's faster to suppose that $omega wedge omega = 0$, contract a vector $v$ into $omega wedge omega$, and apply the Leibniz Rule for the wedge product.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 13 '16 at 22:55
$begingroup$
@Wooster I've improved my answer, substantially, I think, to give some more intuition about how rare decomposable $k$-forms are.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 19 '16 at 16:30
$begingroup$
@Wooster I've improved my answer, substantially, I think, to give some more intuition about how rare decomposable $k$-forms are.
$endgroup$
– Travis
May 19 '16 at 16:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1784312%2fdeciding-whether-a-form-in-the-exterior-power-bigwedgek-v-is-decomposable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What textbook are you using to learn multilinear/exterior algebra by the way? I've tried to learn the subject several times, but it never seemed to click with me as much as did, say, functional analysis. Your help/recommendations would be greatly appreciated!
$endgroup$
– Chill2Macht
May 13 '16 at 23:01
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/questions/341540/… might be helpful.
$endgroup$
– tom
May 14 '16 at 1:48