How to show an equation gives a closed curve
$begingroup$
I am analyzing the following dynamical system: $ddot{x} + x +epsilon x^3 = 0$, which I have rewritten to 2D system $dot{x} = y, dot{y} = -x-epsilon x^3$. I have found that this is a conservative system with conserved quantity $E(x, y) = frac{1}{2}y^2 + frac{1}{2}x^2 + frac{1}{4}epsilon x^4$. I am now trying to show that if $epsilon>0$, all orbits are closed. I have already found that in this case the only fixed point is the origin. I suspect that if I can show that the level curves of the conserved quantity are closed, this will imply the orbits also being closed. My first question is whether this reasoning is valid.
My second question (and my main question) is how to show that an equation defines a closed curve. The level curves of the conserved quantity that result in an orbit are given by $frac{1}{2}y^2 + frac{1}{2}x^2 + frac{1}{4}epsilon x^4 = K$, for $K>0$. This looks similar to a circle, but not quite. How can I show that it is indeed still a closed curve?
ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems curves
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am analyzing the following dynamical system: $ddot{x} + x +epsilon x^3 = 0$, which I have rewritten to 2D system $dot{x} = y, dot{y} = -x-epsilon x^3$. I have found that this is a conservative system with conserved quantity $E(x, y) = frac{1}{2}y^2 + frac{1}{2}x^2 + frac{1}{4}epsilon x^4$. I am now trying to show that if $epsilon>0$, all orbits are closed. I have already found that in this case the only fixed point is the origin. I suspect that if I can show that the level curves of the conserved quantity are closed, this will imply the orbits also being closed. My first question is whether this reasoning is valid.
My second question (and my main question) is how to show that an equation defines a closed curve. The level curves of the conserved quantity that result in an orbit are given by $frac{1}{2}y^2 + frac{1}{2}x^2 + frac{1}{4}epsilon x^4 = K$, for $K>0$. This looks similar to a circle, but not quite. How can I show that it is indeed still a closed curve?
ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems curves
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
See also on different topics on the same equation Dynamical system - Duffing equation, Multi-scale approximation from periodic standard form, How to solve $u''+ku+ϵu^3=0$ ?, find an approximate solution, up to the order of epsilon.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Dec 17 '18 at 21:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am analyzing the following dynamical system: $ddot{x} + x +epsilon x^3 = 0$, which I have rewritten to 2D system $dot{x} = y, dot{y} = -x-epsilon x^3$. I have found that this is a conservative system with conserved quantity $E(x, y) = frac{1}{2}y^2 + frac{1}{2}x^2 + frac{1}{4}epsilon x^4$. I am now trying to show that if $epsilon>0$, all orbits are closed. I have already found that in this case the only fixed point is the origin. I suspect that if I can show that the level curves of the conserved quantity are closed, this will imply the orbits also being closed. My first question is whether this reasoning is valid.
My second question (and my main question) is how to show that an equation defines a closed curve. The level curves of the conserved quantity that result in an orbit are given by $frac{1}{2}y^2 + frac{1}{2}x^2 + frac{1}{4}epsilon x^4 = K$, for $K>0$. This looks similar to a circle, but not quite. How can I show that it is indeed still a closed curve?
ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems curves
$endgroup$
I am analyzing the following dynamical system: $ddot{x} + x +epsilon x^3 = 0$, which I have rewritten to 2D system $dot{x} = y, dot{y} = -x-epsilon x^3$. I have found that this is a conservative system with conserved quantity $E(x, y) = frac{1}{2}y^2 + frac{1}{2}x^2 + frac{1}{4}epsilon x^4$. I am now trying to show that if $epsilon>0$, all orbits are closed. I have already found that in this case the only fixed point is the origin. I suspect that if I can show that the level curves of the conserved quantity are closed, this will imply the orbits also being closed. My first question is whether this reasoning is valid.
My second question (and my main question) is how to show that an equation defines a closed curve. The level curves of the conserved quantity that result in an orbit are given by $frac{1}{2}y^2 + frac{1}{2}x^2 + frac{1}{4}epsilon x^4 = K$, for $K>0$. This looks similar to a circle, but not quite. How can I show that it is indeed still a closed curve?
ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems curves
ordinary-differential-equations dynamical-systems curves
asked Dec 17 '18 at 19:01
DashermanDasherman
1,020817
1,020817
$begingroup$
See also on different topics on the same equation Dynamical system - Duffing equation, Multi-scale approximation from periodic standard form, How to solve $u''+ku+ϵu^3=0$ ?, find an approximate solution, up to the order of epsilon.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Dec 17 '18 at 21:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
See also on different topics on the same equation Dynamical system - Duffing equation, Multi-scale approximation from periodic standard form, How to solve $u''+ku+ϵu^3=0$ ?, find an approximate solution, up to the order of epsilon.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Dec 17 '18 at 21:28
$begingroup$
See also on different topics on the same equation Dynamical system - Duffing equation, Multi-scale approximation from periodic standard form, How to solve $u''+ku+ϵu^3=0$ ?, find an approximate solution, up to the order of epsilon.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Dec 17 '18 at 21:28
$begingroup$
See also on different topics on the same equation Dynamical system - Duffing equation, Multi-scale approximation from periodic standard form, How to solve $u''+ku+ϵu^3=0$ ?, find an approximate solution, up to the order of epsilon.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Dec 17 '18 at 21:28
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In polar coordinates $(r,theta)$ where $x = r cos(theta)$, $y = r sin(theta)$, we have $E(x,y) = r^2/2 + epsilon r^4 cos^4(theta)/4$. For any $c>0$, this equals $c$ for exactly one value $r(theta)$, and $r(theta)$ is a continuous function of $theta$. Thus it is indeed a closed curve.
More generally, for a continuous function $f(x,y)$ where $f(x,y) to infty$ as $|(x,y)| to infty$, the level set $L_c = {(x,y): f(x,y) = c}$ is
a compact set. Moreover if $f$ is continuously differentiable we can apply the Implicit Function Theorem: if the gradient $nabla f$ is not $0$ at a point $(x,y)$ of the set, then the level set is a curve in the neighbourhood of that point. If the gradient is never $0$ on the set, these local curves can be put together to form a finite collection of disjoint closed curves.
You can have various interesting situations where the gradient is zero at a point (which is thus a fixed point of the dynamical system), e.g. homoclinic and heteroclinic orbits.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A slightly different interpretation takes the first integral in the form
$$
dot x^2+x^2(1+tfracϵ2x^2)=R^2
$$
and interprets it as a circle equation for the point
$$(dot x, xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}).$$
Here the polar coordinates have a constant radius $R$, so in the representation
$$
dot x=Rcosphitext{ and }xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}=Rsinphi
$$
only $phi$ is variable.
Notice that the function $f(x)=xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}$ is monotonically increasing, thus invertible. This means that the map from $(dot x,x)$ to $(R,phi)$ is bijective.
Name the inverse function $g$, then the derivative of $x=g(Rsinphi)$ is
$$
dot x=g'(Rsinphi),Rcos(phi),dotphi
$$
and because of $f'(x)=1+O(ϵx^2) implies g'(u)=1+O(ϵu^2)$ one finds that $phi$ is monotonically increasing, the solution of the differential equation follows the level curve of the energy function without changing orientation.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044309%2fhow-to-show-an-equation-gives-a-closed-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In polar coordinates $(r,theta)$ where $x = r cos(theta)$, $y = r sin(theta)$, we have $E(x,y) = r^2/2 + epsilon r^4 cos^4(theta)/4$. For any $c>0$, this equals $c$ for exactly one value $r(theta)$, and $r(theta)$ is a continuous function of $theta$. Thus it is indeed a closed curve.
More generally, for a continuous function $f(x,y)$ where $f(x,y) to infty$ as $|(x,y)| to infty$, the level set $L_c = {(x,y): f(x,y) = c}$ is
a compact set. Moreover if $f$ is continuously differentiable we can apply the Implicit Function Theorem: if the gradient $nabla f$ is not $0$ at a point $(x,y)$ of the set, then the level set is a curve in the neighbourhood of that point. If the gradient is never $0$ on the set, these local curves can be put together to form a finite collection of disjoint closed curves.
You can have various interesting situations where the gradient is zero at a point (which is thus a fixed point of the dynamical system), e.g. homoclinic and heteroclinic orbits.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In polar coordinates $(r,theta)$ where $x = r cos(theta)$, $y = r sin(theta)$, we have $E(x,y) = r^2/2 + epsilon r^4 cos^4(theta)/4$. For any $c>0$, this equals $c$ for exactly one value $r(theta)$, and $r(theta)$ is a continuous function of $theta$. Thus it is indeed a closed curve.
More generally, for a continuous function $f(x,y)$ where $f(x,y) to infty$ as $|(x,y)| to infty$, the level set $L_c = {(x,y): f(x,y) = c}$ is
a compact set. Moreover if $f$ is continuously differentiable we can apply the Implicit Function Theorem: if the gradient $nabla f$ is not $0$ at a point $(x,y)$ of the set, then the level set is a curve in the neighbourhood of that point. If the gradient is never $0$ on the set, these local curves can be put together to form a finite collection of disjoint closed curves.
You can have various interesting situations where the gradient is zero at a point (which is thus a fixed point of the dynamical system), e.g. homoclinic and heteroclinic orbits.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In polar coordinates $(r,theta)$ where $x = r cos(theta)$, $y = r sin(theta)$, we have $E(x,y) = r^2/2 + epsilon r^4 cos^4(theta)/4$. For any $c>0$, this equals $c$ for exactly one value $r(theta)$, and $r(theta)$ is a continuous function of $theta$. Thus it is indeed a closed curve.
More generally, for a continuous function $f(x,y)$ where $f(x,y) to infty$ as $|(x,y)| to infty$, the level set $L_c = {(x,y): f(x,y) = c}$ is
a compact set. Moreover if $f$ is continuously differentiable we can apply the Implicit Function Theorem: if the gradient $nabla f$ is not $0$ at a point $(x,y)$ of the set, then the level set is a curve in the neighbourhood of that point. If the gradient is never $0$ on the set, these local curves can be put together to form a finite collection of disjoint closed curves.
You can have various interesting situations where the gradient is zero at a point (which is thus a fixed point of the dynamical system), e.g. homoclinic and heteroclinic orbits.
$endgroup$
In polar coordinates $(r,theta)$ where $x = r cos(theta)$, $y = r sin(theta)$, we have $E(x,y) = r^2/2 + epsilon r^4 cos^4(theta)/4$. For any $c>0$, this equals $c$ for exactly one value $r(theta)$, and $r(theta)$ is a continuous function of $theta$. Thus it is indeed a closed curve.
More generally, for a continuous function $f(x,y)$ where $f(x,y) to infty$ as $|(x,y)| to infty$, the level set $L_c = {(x,y): f(x,y) = c}$ is
a compact set. Moreover if $f$ is continuously differentiable we can apply the Implicit Function Theorem: if the gradient $nabla f$ is not $0$ at a point $(x,y)$ of the set, then the level set is a curve in the neighbourhood of that point. If the gradient is never $0$ on the set, these local curves can be put together to form a finite collection of disjoint closed curves.
You can have various interesting situations where the gradient is zero at a point (which is thus a fixed point of the dynamical system), e.g. homoclinic and heteroclinic orbits.
edited Dec 17 '18 at 19:26
answered Dec 17 '18 at 19:17
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
321k23210462
321k23210462
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A slightly different interpretation takes the first integral in the form
$$
dot x^2+x^2(1+tfracϵ2x^2)=R^2
$$
and interprets it as a circle equation for the point
$$(dot x, xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}).$$
Here the polar coordinates have a constant radius $R$, so in the representation
$$
dot x=Rcosphitext{ and }xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}=Rsinphi
$$
only $phi$ is variable.
Notice that the function $f(x)=xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}$ is monotonically increasing, thus invertible. This means that the map from $(dot x,x)$ to $(R,phi)$ is bijective.
Name the inverse function $g$, then the derivative of $x=g(Rsinphi)$ is
$$
dot x=g'(Rsinphi),Rcos(phi),dotphi
$$
and because of $f'(x)=1+O(ϵx^2) implies g'(u)=1+O(ϵu^2)$ one finds that $phi$ is monotonically increasing, the solution of the differential equation follows the level curve of the energy function without changing orientation.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A slightly different interpretation takes the first integral in the form
$$
dot x^2+x^2(1+tfracϵ2x^2)=R^2
$$
and interprets it as a circle equation for the point
$$(dot x, xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}).$$
Here the polar coordinates have a constant radius $R$, so in the representation
$$
dot x=Rcosphitext{ and }xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}=Rsinphi
$$
only $phi$ is variable.
Notice that the function $f(x)=xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}$ is monotonically increasing, thus invertible. This means that the map from $(dot x,x)$ to $(R,phi)$ is bijective.
Name the inverse function $g$, then the derivative of $x=g(Rsinphi)$ is
$$
dot x=g'(Rsinphi),Rcos(phi),dotphi
$$
and because of $f'(x)=1+O(ϵx^2) implies g'(u)=1+O(ϵu^2)$ one finds that $phi$ is monotonically increasing, the solution of the differential equation follows the level curve of the energy function without changing orientation.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A slightly different interpretation takes the first integral in the form
$$
dot x^2+x^2(1+tfracϵ2x^2)=R^2
$$
and interprets it as a circle equation for the point
$$(dot x, xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}).$$
Here the polar coordinates have a constant radius $R$, so in the representation
$$
dot x=Rcosphitext{ and }xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}=Rsinphi
$$
only $phi$ is variable.
Notice that the function $f(x)=xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}$ is monotonically increasing, thus invertible. This means that the map from $(dot x,x)$ to $(R,phi)$ is bijective.
Name the inverse function $g$, then the derivative of $x=g(Rsinphi)$ is
$$
dot x=g'(Rsinphi),Rcos(phi),dotphi
$$
and because of $f'(x)=1+O(ϵx^2) implies g'(u)=1+O(ϵu^2)$ one finds that $phi$ is monotonically increasing, the solution of the differential equation follows the level curve of the energy function without changing orientation.
$endgroup$
A slightly different interpretation takes the first integral in the form
$$
dot x^2+x^2(1+tfracϵ2x^2)=R^2
$$
and interprets it as a circle equation for the point
$$(dot x, xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}).$$
Here the polar coordinates have a constant radius $R$, so in the representation
$$
dot x=Rcosphitext{ and }xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}=Rsinphi
$$
only $phi$ is variable.
Notice that the function $f(x)=xsqrt{1+tfracϵ2x^2}$ is monotonically increasing, thus invertible. This means that the map from $(dot x,x)$ to $(R,phi)$ is bijective.
Name the inverse function $g$, then the derivative of $x=g(Rsinphi)$ is
$$
dot x=g'(Rsinphi),Rcos(phi),dotphi
$$
and because of $f'(x)=1+O(ϵx^2) implies g'(u)=1+O(ϵu^2)$ one finds that $phi$ is monotonically increasing, the solution of the differential equation follows the level curve of the energy function without changing orientation.
answered Dec 17 '18 at 21:51
LutzLLutzL
57.3k42054
57.3k42054
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044309%2fhow-to-show-an-equation-gives-a-closed-curve%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
See also on different topics on the same equation Dynamical system - Duffing equation, Multi-scale approximation from periodic standard form, How to solve $u''+ku+ϵu^3=0$ ?, find an approximate solution, up to the order of epsilon.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Dec 17 '18 at 21:28