Metric on real line
$begingroup$
Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space and fix some $x_{0}in X$. Show that the function $f(x) = d(x_{0},x)$ is Lipschitz continuous?
My problem wasn't with solving the question originally I did that using the triangle inequality and showing $lvert f(x) - f(y)rvertle d(x,y)$, but the definition for Lipschitz continuity is $d_Y(f(x),f(y))le K d_X(x,y)$ where $K > 0$, why can we assume that $d_Y$ is the the euclidean metric?
metric-spaces lipschitz-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space and fix some $x_{0}in X$. Show that the function $f(x) = d(x_{0},x)$ is Lipschitz continuous?
My problem wasn't with solving the question originally I did that using the triangle inequality and showing $lvert f(x) - f(y)rvertle d(x,y)$, but the definition for Lipschitz continuity is $d_Y(f(x),f(y))le K d_X(x,y)$ where $K > 0$, why can we assume that $d_Y$ is the the euclidean metric?
metric-spaces lipschitz-functions
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It's implicit in the problem: $f:Xtomathbb R$, is a real function, so it is natural to use the standard metric on $mathbb R$, which is $d_{text{Eucl}}(a,b)=|a-b|$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 17 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space and fix some $x_{0}in X$. Show that the function $f(x) = d(x_{0},x)$ is Lipschitz continuous?
My problem wasn't with solving the question originally I did that using the triangle inequality and showing $lvert f(x) - f(y)rvertle d(x,y)$, but the definition for Lipschitz continuity is $d_Y(f(x),f(y))le K d_X(x,y)$ where $K > 0$, why can we assume that $d_Y$ is the the euclidean metric?
metric-spaces lipschitz-functions
$endgroup$
Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space and fix some $x_{0}in X$. Show that the function $f(x) = d(x_{0},x)$ is Lipschitz continuous?
My problem wasn't with solving the question originally I did that using the triangle inequality and showing $lvert f(x) - f(y)rvertle d(x,y)$, but the definition for Lipschitz continuity is $d_Y(f(x),f(y))le K d_X(x,y)$ where $K > 0$, why can we assume that $d_Y$ is the the euclidean metric?
metric-spaces lipschitz-functions
metric-spaces lipschitz-functions
edited Dec 17 '18 at 20:00
user10354138
7,3772925
7,3772925
asked Dec 17 '18 at 19:51
Scosh_lrScosh_lr
516
516
1
$begingroup$
It's implicit in the problem: $f:Xtomathbb R$, is a real function, so it is natural to use the standard metric on $mathbb R$, which is $d_{text{Eucl}}(a,b)=|a-b|$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 17 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It's implicit in the problem: $f:Xtomathbb R$, is a real function, so it is natural to use the standard metric on $mathbb R$, which is $d_{text{Eucl}}(a,b)=|a-b|$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 17 '18 at 19:54
1
1
$begingroup$
It's implicit in the problem: $f:Xtomathbb R$, is a real function, so it is natural to use the standard metric on $mathbb R$, which is $d_{text{Eucl}}(a,b)=|a-b|$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 17 '18 at 19:54
$begingroup$
It's implicit in the problem: $f:Xtomathbb R$, is a real function, so it is natural to use the standard metric on $mathbb R$, which is $d_{text{Eucl}}(a,b)=|a-b|$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 17 '18 at 19:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is always the metric of your image space you need to look at. And since there was no other metric on $mathbb{R}$ given, which is apparently the image space of $f$, one implicitly means the standard metric, i.e. the Euclidean one.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
And then we just take $K=1$ as well.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 17 '18 at 22:44
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, but I thought he/she already got that.
$endgroup$
– YoungMath
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044357%2fmetric-on-real-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is always the metric of your image space you need to look at. And since there was no other metric on $mathbb{R}$ given, which is apparently the image space of $f$, one implicitly means the standard metric, i.e. the Euclidean one.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
And then we just take $K=1$ as well.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 17 '18 at 22:44
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, but I thought he/she already got that.
$endgroup$
– YoungMath
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is always the metric of your image space you need to look at. And since there was no other metric on $mathbb{R}$ given, which is apparently the image space of $f$, one implicitly means the standard metric, i.e. the Euclidean one.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
And then we just take $K=1$ as well.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 17 '18 at 22:44
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, but I thought he/she already got that.
$endgroup$
– YoungMath
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is always the metric of your image space you need to look at. And since there was no other metric on $mathbb{R}$ given, which is apparently the image space of $f$, one implicitly means the standard metric, i.e. the Euclidean one.
$endgroup$
It is always the metric of your image space you need to look at. And since there was no other metric on $mathbb{R}$ given, which is apparently the image space of $f$, one implicitly means the standard metric, i.e. the Euclidean one.
answered Dec 17 '18 at 20:05
YoungMathYoungMath
190110
190110
1
$begingroup$
And then we just take $K=1$ as well.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 17 '18 at 22:44
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, but I thought he/she already got that.
$endgroup$
– YoungMath
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
And then we just take $K=1$ as well.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 17 '18 at 22:44
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, but I thought he/she already got that.
$endgroup$
– YoungMath
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
1
1
$begingroup$
And then we just take $K=1$ as well.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 17 '18 at 22:44
$begingroup$
And then we just take $K=1$ as well.
$endgroup$
– Henno Brandsma
Dec 17 '18 at 22:44
1
1
$begingroup$
Yeah, but I thought he/she already got that.
$endgroup$
– YoungMath
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
$begingroup$
Yeah, but I thought he/she already got that.
$endgroup$
– YoungMath
Dec 18 '18 at 11:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044357%2fmetric-on-real-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
It's implicit in the problem: $f:Xtomathbb R$, is a real function, so it is natural to use the standard metric on $mathbb R$, which is $d_{text{Eucl}}(a,b)=|a-b|$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 17 '18 at 19:54