Evaluating series with factorial denominator (sanity check).
$begingroup$
Is my approach to evaluating this series correct?
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n}{(n+1)!}$$
Has partial sum equivalent to:
$$S_m = sum_{n=1}^m frac{n}{(n+1)!} = sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{j-1}{j!} = sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{1}{(j-1)!} - sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{1}{j!} $$
For $j$ such that $m+1>j>2$ the terms of the left sum are cancelled by the terms of the right, leaving
$$ S_m =1-frac{1}{(m+1)!}$$
Hence $ lim_{mrightarrowinfty} S_m = 1$
Apologies for this one. The book I am using hasn't really offered anything on series with factorial denominators (yet). Thanks!
sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is my approach to evaluating this series correct?
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n}{(n+1)!}$$
Has partial sum equivalent to:
$$S_m = sum_{n=1}^m frac{n}{(n+1)!} = sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{j-1}{j!} = sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{1}{(j-1)!} - sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{1}{j!} $$
For $j$ such that $m+1>j>2$ the terms of the left sum are cancelled by the terms of the right, leaving
$$ S_m =1-frac{1}{(m+1)!}$$
Hence $ lim_{mrightarrowinfty} S_m = 1$
Apologies for this one. The book I am using hasn't really offered anything on series with factorial denominators (yet). Thanks!
sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Looks fine to me.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Jan 5 '13 at 23:59
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong. I'm editing to improve formatting, however.
$endgroup$
– Alex Becker
Jan 6 '13 at 0:03
$begingroup$
It should be $S_m$ everywhere
$endgroup$
– leo
Jan 6 '13 at 0:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is my approach to evaluating this series correct?
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n}{(n+1)!}$$
Has partial sum equivalent to:
$$S_m = sum_{n=1}^m frac{n}{(n+1)!} = sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{j-1}{j!} = sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{1}{(j-1)!} - sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{1}{j!} $$
For $j$ such that $m+1>j>2$ the terms of the left sum are cancelled by the terms of the right, leaving
$$ S_m =1-frac{1}{(m+1)!}$$
Hence $ lim_{mrightarrowinfty} S_m = 1$
Apologies for this one. The book I am using hasn't really offered anything on series with factorial denominators (yet). Thanks!
sequences-and-series
$endgroup$
Is my approach to evaluating this series correct?
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n}{(n+1)!}$$
Has partial sum equivalent to:
$$S_m = sum_{n=1}^m frac{n}{(n+1)!} = sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{j-1}{j!} = sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{1}{(j-1)!} - sum_{j=2}^{m+1} frac{1}{j!} $$
For $j$ such that $m+1>j>2$ the terms of the left sum are cancelled by the terms of the right, leaving
$$ S_m =1-frac{1}{(m+1)!}$$
Hence $ lim_{mrightarrowinfty} S_m = 1$
Apologies for this one. The book I am using hasn't really offered anything on series with factorial denominators (yet). Thanks!
sequences-and-series
sequences-and-series
edited Jan 6 '13 at 0:19
Calvin Lin
36.3k349114
36.3k349114
asked Jan 5 '13 at 23:54
conjecturesconjectures
534513
534513
$begingroup$
Looks fine to me.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Jan 5 '13 at 23:59
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong. I'm editing to improve formatting, however.
$endgroup$
– Alex Becker
Jan 6 '13 at 0:03
$begingroup$
It should be $S_m$ everywhere
$endgroup$
– leo
Jan 6 '13 at 0:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Looks fine to me.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Jan 5 '13 at 23:59
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong. I'm editing to improve formatting, however.
$endgroup$
– Alex Becker
Jan 6 '13 at 0:03
$begingroup$
It should be $S_m$ everywhere
$endgroup$
– leo
Jan 6 '13 at 0:04
$begingroup$
Looks fine to me.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Jan 5 '13 at 23:59
$begingroup$
Looks fine to me.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Jan 5 '13 at 23:59
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong. I'm editing to improve formatting, however.
$endgroup$
– Alex Becker
Jan 6 '13 at 0:03
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong. I'm editing to improve formatting, however.
$endgroup$
– Alex Becker
Jan 6 '13 at 0:03
$begingroup$
It should be $S_m$ everywhere
$endgroup$
– leo
Jan 6 '13 at 0:04
$begingroup$
It should be $S_m$ everywhere
$endgroup$
– leo
Jan 6 '13 at 0:04
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your solution is not only correct but also a very nice one.
Once you know the closed form for the partial sum, you can also prove it by induction, starting with $S_1=1-1/2=1/2$ and taking the induction step
$$
begin{align}
S_{m+1}&=S_m+frac{m+1}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1-frac1{(m+1)!}+frac{m+1}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1+frac{m+1-(m+2)}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1-frac1{(m+2)!};.
end{align}
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Cheers Joriki - hadn't actually thought of trying it by induction.
$endgroup$
– conjectures
Jan 6 '13 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n}{(n+1)!}$$= $$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n+1-1}{(n+1)!}$$=
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n!}-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f271228%2fevaluating-series-with-factorial-denominator-sanity-check%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your solution is not only correct but also a very nice one.
Once you know the closed form for the partial sum, you can also prove it by induction, starting with $S_1=1-1/2=1/2$ and taking the induction step
$$
begin{align}
S_{m+1}&=S_m+frac{m+1}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1-frac1{(m+1)!}+frac{m+1}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1+frac{m+1-(m+2)}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1-frac1{(m+2)!};.
end{align}
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Cheers Joriki - hadn't actually thought of trying it by induction.
$endgroup$
– conjectures
Jan 6 '13 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your solution is not only correct but also a very nice one.
Once you know the closed form for the partial sum, you can also prove it by induction, starting with $S_1=1-1/2=1/2$ and taking the induction step
$$
begin{align}
S_{m+1}&=S_m+frac{m+1}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1-frac1{(m+1)!}+frac{m+1}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1+frac{m+1-(m+2)}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1-frac1{(m+2)!};.
end{align}
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Cheers Joriki - hadn't actually thought of trying it by induction.
$endgroup$
– conjectures
Jan 6 '13 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your solution is not only correct but also a very nice one.
Once you know the closed form for the partial sum, you can also prove it by induction, starting with $S_1=1-1/2=1/2$ and taking the induction step
$$
begin{align}
S_{m+1}&=S_m+frac{m+1}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1-frac1{(m+1)!}+frac{m+1}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1+frac{m+1-(m+2)}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1-frac1{(m+2)!};.
end{align}
$$
$endgroup$
Your solution is not only correct but also a very nice one.
Once you know the closed form for the partial sum, you can also prove it by induction, starting with $S_1=1-1/2=1/2$ and taking the induction step
$$
begin{align}
S_{m+1}&=S_m+frac{m+1}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1-frac1{(m+1)!}+frac{m+1}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1+frac{m+1-(m+2)}{(m+2)!}
\
&=1-frac1{(m+2)!};.
end{align}
$$
answered Jan 6 '13 at 8:02
jorikijoriki
170k10183343
170k10183343
$begingroup$
Cheers Joriki - hadn't actually thought of trying it by induction.
$endgroup$
– conjectures
Jan 6 '13 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cheers Joriki - hadn't actually thought of trying it by induction.
$endgroup$
– conjectures
Jan 6 '13 at 10:14
$begingroup$
Cheers Joriki - hadn't actually thought of trying it by induction.
$endgroup$
– conjectures
Jan 6 '13 at 10:14
$begingroup$
Cheers Joriki - hadn't actually thought of trying it by induction.
$endgroup$
– conjectures
Jan 6 '13 at 10:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n}{(n+1)!}$$= $$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n+1-1}{(n+1)!}$$=
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n!}-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n}{(n+1)!}$$= $$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n+1-1}{(n+1)!}$$=
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n!}-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n}{(n+1)!}$$= $$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n+1-1}{(n+1)!}$$=
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n!}-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
$endgroup$
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n}{(n+1)!}$$= $$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{n+1-1}{(n+1)!}$$=
$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{1}{n!}-frac{1}{(n+1)!}$$
answered Dec 19 '18 at 15:15
Kostas GiatzoKostas Giatzo
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f271228%2fevaluating-series-with-factorial-denominator-sanity-check%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Looks fine to me.
$endgroup$
– Brian M. Scott
Jan 5 '13 at 23:59
$begingroup$
I see nothing wrong. I'm editing to improve formatting, however.
$endgroup$
– Alex Becker
Jan 6 '13 at 0:03
$begingroup$
It should be $S_m$ everywhere
$endgroup$
– leo
Jan 6 '13 at 0:04