Integration factor - First Order Nonlinear ODE












6












$begingroup$


I can't seem to find the proper integrating factor for this nonlinear first order ODE. I have even tried pulling a bunch of substitution and equation-manipulating tricks, but I can't seem to get a proper integrating factor.



$$frac{1}{x}dx + left(1+x^2y^2right)dy = 0$$



EDIT: Due to MSE users complaining about my lack of proof of work, intent of conceptual understanding, etc, here is exactly why I am stuck.



To start off, this ODE is obviously inexact:



$$frac{partial}{partial y}left(frac{1}{x}right) neq frac{partial}{partial x}left(1+x^2y^2right)$$



And so in order to make this exact (if we choose to go down this route) we must (I'll stick to standard convention/notation) find a function $mu$ such that if we multiply the entire original ODE by it, we will be able to integrate and solve using 'exact ODE' methods. This is shown as:



$$ mu left(frac{1}{x}right)dx + mu left(1+x^2y^2right)dy = 0$$



$$ frac{partial}{partial y} left(muleft(frac{1}{x}right) right) = frac{partial}{partial x} left(mu left(1+x^2y^2right) right)$$



Now expanding by chain rule, we get:



$$mu_y left(frac{1}{x}right) = mu_x left(1+x^2y^2right) + mu left(2xy^2right)$$



Now here is where I'm stuck. We want to avoid dealing with a PDE, so we try to stick to good old ODE techniques by assuming that $mu$ is either a function of only x or only y.
Let's first assume that $mu$ is only a function of y. The following will then be true.



$$ mu_x = 0$$



$$ mu_y left(frac{1}{x} right) = mu left(2xy^2 right)$$



$$ frac{dmu}{mu} = 2x^2y^2 dy$$



By looking at the right hand side, we see that it just won't work - x and y are related, so we can't have that integral.



Now let's assume that $mu$ is only a function of x. The following will then be true.



$$ mu_y = 0$$



$$ mu_x left(1+x^2y^2right) = -mu left(2xy^2right)$$



$$ frac{dmu}{mu} = frac{-2xy^2}{1+x^2y^2} dx$$



And, once again, if you look at the right hand side, we have an integral that we can't immediately work out, just as in the previous case.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Since I've downvoted your question other users started to downvote it too(Perhaps this the culture of MSE) and even silently. I've downvoted your question because of these reasons:meta.math.stackexchange.com/q/13759/103816 I will reconsider my vote once I become sure about the policies of MSE.
    $endgroup$
    – user103816
    May 19 '14 at 4:23








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    '+1', This is all I can say now.
    $endgroup$
    – user103816
    May 19 '14 at 14:39










  • $begingroup$
    "Integrating factor" is from the thesaurus of misconceptions. The real problem is: Here is an ODE; what could we try to arrive at an explicit solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 7 '14 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    It's a Bernoulli by x..
    $endgroup$
    – Dor
    Apr 1 '15 at 16:55
















6












$begingroup$


I can't seem to find the proper integrating factor for this nonlinear first order ODE. I have even tried pulling a bunch of substitution and equation-manipulating tricks, but I can't seem to get a proper integrating factor.



$$frac{1}{x}dx + left(1+x^2y^2right)dy = 0$$



EDIT: Due to MSE users complaining about my lack of proof of work, intent of conceptual understanding, etc, here is exactly why I am stuck.



To start off, this ODE is obviously inexact:



$$frac{partial}{partial y}left(frac{1}{x}right) neq frac{partial}{partial x}left(1+x^2y^2right)$$



And so in order to make this exact (if we choose to go down this route) we must (I'll stick to standard convention/notation) find a function $mu$ such that if we multiply the entire original ODE by it, we will be able to integrate and solve using 'exact ODE' methods. This is shown as:



$$ mu left(frac{1}{x}right)dx + mu left(1+x^2y^2right)dy = 0$$



$$ frac{partial}{partial y} left(muleft(frac{1}{x}right) right) = frac{partial}{partial x} left(mu left(1+x^2y^2right) right)$$



Now expanding by chain rule, we get:



$$mu_y left(frac{1}{x}right) = mu_x left(1+x^2y^2right) + mu left(2xy^2right)$$



Now here is where I'm stuck. We want to avoid dealing with a PDE, so we try to stick to good old ODE techniques by assuming that $mu$ is either a function of only x or only y.
Let's first assume that $mu$ is only a function of y. The following will then be true.



$$ mu_x = 0$$



$$ mu_y left(frac{1}{x} right) = mu left(2xy^2 right)$$



$$ frac{dmu}{mu} = 2x^2y^2 dy$$



By looking at the right hand side, we see that it just won't work - x and y are related, so we can't have that integral.



Now let's assume that $mu$ is only a function of x. The following will then be true.



$$ mu_y = 0$$



$$ mu_x left(1+x^2y^2right) = -mu left(2xy^2right)$$



$$ frac{dmu}{mu} = frac{-2xy^2}{1+x^2y^2} dx$$



And, once again, if you look at the right hand side, we have an integral that we can't immediately work out, just as in the previous case.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Since I've downvoted your question other users started to downvote it too(Perhaps this the culture of MSE) and even silently. I've downvoted your question because of these reasons:meta.math.stackexchange.com/q/13759/103816 I will reconsider my vote once I become sure about the policies of MSE.
    $endgroup$
    – user103816
    May 19 '14 at 4:23








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    '+1', This is all I can say now.
    $endgroup$
    – user103816
    May 19 '14 at 14:39










  • $begingroup$
    "Integrating factor" is from the thesaurus of misconceptions. The real problem is: Here is an ODE; what could we try to arrive at an explicit solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 7 '14 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    It's a Bernoulli by x..
    $endgroup$
    – Dor
    Apr 1 '15 at 16:55














6












6








6


2



$begingroup$


I can't seem to find the proper integrating factor for this nonlinear first order ODE. I have even tried pulling a bunch of substitution and equation-manipulating tricks, but I can't seem to get a proper integrating factor.



$$frac{1}{x}dx + left(1+x^2y^2right)dy = 0$$



EDIT: Due to MSE users complaining about my lack of proof of work, intent of conceptual understanding, etc, here is exactly why I am stuck.



To start off, this ODE is obviously inexact:



$$frac{partial}{partial y}left(frac{1}{x}right) neq frac{partial}{partial x}left(1+x^2y^2right)$$



And so in order to make this exact (if we choose to go down this route) we must (I'll stick to standard convention/notation) find a function $mu$ such that if we multiply the entire original ODE by it, we will be able to integrate and solve using 'exact ODE' methods. This is shown as:



$$ mu left(frac{1}{x}right)dx + mu left(1+x^2y^2right)dy = 0$$



$$ frac{partial}{partial y} left(muleft(frac{1}{x}right) right) = frac{partial}{partial x} left(mu left(1+x^2y^2right) right)$$



Now expanding by chain rule, we get:



$$mu_y left(frac{1}{x}right) = mu_x left(1+x^2y^2right) + mu left(2xy^2right)$$



Now here is where I'm stuck. We want to avoid dealing with a PDE, so we try to stick to good old ODE techniques by assuming that $mu$ is either a function of only x or only y.
Let's first assume that $mu$ is only a function of y. The following will then be true.



$$ mu_x = 0$$



$$ mu_y left(frac{1}{x} right) = mu left(2xy^2 right)$$



$$ frac{dmu}{mu} = 2x^2y^2 dy$$



By looking at the right hand side, we see that it just won't work - x and y are related, so we can't have that integral.



Now let's assume that $mu$ is only a function of x. The following will then be true.



$$ mu_y = 0$$



$$ mu_x left(1+x^2y^2right) = -mu left(2xy^2right)$$



$$ frac{dmu}{mu} = frac{-2xy^2}{1+x^2y^2} dx$$



And, once again, if you look at the right hand side, we have an integral that we can't immediately work out, just as in the previous case.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I can't seem to find the proper integrating factor for this nonlinear first order ODE. I have even tried pulling a bunch of substitution and equation-manipulating tricks, but I can't seem to get a proper integrating factor.



$$frac{1}{x}dx + left(1+x^2y^2right)dy = 0$$



EDIT: Due to MSE users complaining about my lack of proof of work, intent of conceptual understanding, etc, here is exactly why I am stuck.



To start off, this ODE is obviously inexact:



$$frac{partial}{partial y}left(frac{1}{x}right) neq frac{partial}{partial x}left(1+x^2y^2right)$$



And so in order to make this exact (if we choose to go down this route) we must (I'll stick to standard convention/notation) find a function $mu$ such that if we multiply the entire original ODE by it, we will be able to integrate and solve using 'exact ODE' methods. This is shown as:



$$ mu left(frac{1}{x}right)dx + mu left(1+x^2y^2right)dy = 0$$



$$ frac{partial}{partial y} left(muleft(frac{1}{x}right) right) = frac{partial}{partial x} left(mu left(1+x^2y^2right) right)$$



Now expanding by chain rule, we get:



$$mu_y left(frac{1}{x}right) = mu_x left(1+x^2y^2right) + mu left(2xy^2right)$$



Now here is where I'm stuck. We want to avoid dealing with a PDE, so we try to stick to good old ODE techniques by assuming that $mu$ is either a function of only x or only y.
Let's first assume that $mu$ is only a function of y. The following will then be true.



$$ mu_x = 0$$



$$ mu_y left(frac{1}{x} right) = mu left(2xy^2 right)$$



$$ frac{dmu}{mu} = 2x^2y^2 dy$$



By looking at the right hand side, we see that it just won't work - x and y are related, so we can't have that integral.



Now let's assume that $mu$ is only a function of x. The following will then be true.



$$ mu_y = 0$$



$$ mu_x left(1+x^2y^2right) = -mu left(2xy^2right)$$



$$ frac{dmu}{mu} = frac{-2xy^2}{1+x^2y^2} dx$$



And, once again, if you look at the right hand side, we have an integral that we can't immediately work out, just as in the previous case.







ordinary-differential-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 19 '18 at 23:51







Arturo don Juan

















asked May 19 '14 at 3:43









Arturo don JuanArturo don Juan

1,8111032




1,8111032












  • $begingroup$
    Since I've downvoted your question other users started to downvote it too(Perhaps this the culture of MSE) and even silently. I've downvoted your question because of these reasons:meta.math.stackexchange.com/q/13759/103816 I will reconsider my vote once I become sure about the policies of MSE.
    $endgroup$
    – user103816
    May 19 '14 at 4:23








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    '+1', This is all I can say now.
    $endgroup$
    – user103816
    May 19 '14 at 14:39










  • $begingroup$
    "Integrating factor" is from the thesaurus of misconceptions. The real problem is: Here is an ODE; what could we try to arrive at an explicit solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 7 '14 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    It's a Bernoulli by x..
    $endgroup$
    – Dor
    Apr 1 '15 at 16:55


















  • $begingroup$
    Since I've downvoted your question other users started to downvote it too(Perhaps this the culture of MSE) and even silently. I've downvoted your question because of these reasons:meta.math.stackexchange.com/q/13759/103816 I will reconsider my vote once I become sure about the policies of MSE.
    $endgroup$
    – user103816
    May 19 '14 at 4:23








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    '+1', This is all I can say now.
    $endgroup$
    – user103816
    May 19 '14 at 14:39










  • $begingroup$
    "Integrating factor" is from the thesaurus of misconceptions. The real problem is: Here is an ODE; what could we try to arrive at an explicit solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Christian Blatter
    Nov 7 '14 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    It's a Bernoulli by x..
    $endgroup$
    – Dor
    Apr 1 '15 at 16:55
















$begingroup$
Since I've downvoted your question other users started to downvote it too(Perhaps this the culture of MSE) and even silently. I've downvoted your question because of these reasons:meta.math.stackexchange.com/q/13759/103816 I will reconsider my vote once I become sure about the policies of MSE.
$endgroup$
– user103816
May 19 '14 at 4:23






$begingroup$
Since I've downvoted your question other users started to downvote it too(Perhaps this the culture of MSE) and even silently. I've downvoted your question because of these reasons:meta.math.stackexchange.com/q/13759/103816 I will reconsider my vote once I become sure about the policies of MSE.
$endgroup$
– user103816
May 19 '14 at 4:23






1




1




$begingroup$
'+1', This is all I can say now.
$endgroup$
– user103816
May 19 '14 at 14:39




$begingroup$
'+1', This is all I can say now.
$endgroup$
– user103816
May 19 '14 at 14:39












$begingroup$
"Integrating factor" is from the thesaurus of misconceptions. The real problem is: Here is an ODE; what could we try to arrive at an explicit solution?
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 7 '14 at 16:39




$begingroup$
"Integrating factor" is from the thesaurus of misconceptions. The real problem is: Here is an ODE; what could we try to arrive at an explicit solution?
$endgroup$
– Christian Blatter
Nov 7 '14 at 16:39












$begingroup$
It's a Bernoulli by x..
$endgroup$
– Dor
Apr 1 '15 at 16:55




$begingroup$
It's a Bernoulli by x..
$endgroup$
– Dor
Apr 1 '15 at 16:55










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















-1





+50







$begingroup$

It looks to me like we can't find an integrating factor which depends only on $x$ or only on $y$ (in general, $mu$ will be a function of only one variable just in some special cases, so this is not entirely surprising).



For any equation of the form $p(x,y)dx + q(x,y)dy = 0$,
in order to be able to find $mu := mu(x)$ it must be the case that
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q}
end{equation}
is a function of $x$ only. If it is, we can set
begin{equation}
mu(x) = expleft(intfrac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q}dxright).
end{equation}
Here I get
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q} =
frac{-2xy^2}{1 + x^2y^2},
end{equation}
which clearly depends on $y$. Then we can't have a $mu$ which depends only on $x$. To have a $mu$ which depends only on $y$, we must have
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p}
end{equation}
be only a function of $y$. If that's the case, we can set
begin{equation}
mu(y) = expleft(int frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p} dyright).
end{equation}
Here I get
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p} = frac{2xy^2}{frac{1}{x}} = 2x^2y^2,
end{equation}
which clearly depends on $x$. Then we can't have $mu$ depend on $y$ only.



As a result, we must have $mu$ depend on both $x$ and $y$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I agree with your response, but then why would this problem be at the end of the chapter that introduces solving inexact equations via an integrating factor? (It's okay if you don't know)
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo don Juan
    Nov 8 '14 at 7:34



















1












$begingroup$

Assume you're looking for a solution $y(x)$, then mathematic gives:



$$ frac{-1}{x + x^3 y^2} = frac{ dy}{dx} implies frac{exp (-2 y)}{8 x^2} + frac{ exp (-2y) }{16} (2 y^2 +2y +1) = Const $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Jeb, your answer doesn't help at all! I'm interested in how it is done (i.e how does the integrating factor look/come out), not just the plain old solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo don Juan
    May 20 '14 at 23:45













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f801091%2fintegration-factor-first-order-nonlinear-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









-1





+50







$begingroup$

It looks to me like we can't find an integrating factor which depends only on $x$ or only on $y$ (in general, $mu$ will be a function of only one variable just in some special cases, so this is not entirely surprising).



For any equation of the form $p(x,y)dx + q(x,y)dy = 0$,
in order to be able to find $mu := mu(x)$ it must be the case that
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q}
end{equation}
is a function of $x$ only. If it is, we can set
begin{equation}
mu(x) = expleft(intfrac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q}dxright).
end{equation}
Here I get
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q} =
frac{-2xy^2}{1 + x^2y^2},
end{equation}
which clearly depends on $y$. Then we can't have a $mu$ which depends only on $x$. To have a $mu$ which depends only on $y$, we must have
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p}
end{equation}
be only a function of $y$. If that's the case, we can set
begin{equation}
mu(y) = expleft(int frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p} dyright).
end{equation}
Here I get
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p} = frac{2xy^2}{frac{1}{x}} = 2x^2y^2,
end{equation}
which clearly depends on $x$. Then we can't have $mu$ depend on $y$ only.



As a result, we must have $mu$ depend on both $x$ and $y$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I agree with your response, but then why would this problem be at the end of the chapter that introduces solving inexact equations via an integrating factor? (It's okay if you don't know)
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo don Juan
    Nov 8 '14 at 7:34
















-1





+50







$begingroup$

It looks to me like we can't find an integrating factor which depends only on $x$ or only on $y$ (in general, $mu$ will be a function of only one variable just in some special cases, so this is not entirely surprising).



For any equation of the form $p(x,y)dx + q(x,y)dy = 0$,
in order to be able to find $mu := mu(x)$ it must be the case that
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q}
end{equation}
is a function of $x$ only. If it is, we can set
begin{equation}
mu(x) = expleft(intfrac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q}dxright).
end{equation}
Here I get
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q} =
frac{-2xy^2}{1 + x^2y^2},
end{equation}
which clearly depends on $y$. Then we can't have a $mu$ which depends only on $x$. To have a $mu$ which depends only on $y$, we must have
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p}
end{equation}
be only a function of $y$. If that's the case, we can set
begin{equation}
mu(y) = expleft(int frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p} dyright).
end{equation}
Here I get
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p} = frac{2xy^2}{frac{1}{x}} = 2x^2y^2,
end{equation}
which clearly depends on $x$. Then we can't have $mu$ depend on $y$ only.



As a result, we must have $mu$ depend on both $x$ and $y$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I agree with your response, but then why would this problem be at the end of the chapter that introduces solving inexact equations via an integrating factor? (It's okay if you don't know)
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo don Juan
    Nov 8 '14 at 7:34














-1





+50







-1





+50



-1




+50



$begingroup$

It looks to me like we can't find an integrating factor which depends only on $x$ or only on $y$ (in general, $mu$ will be a function of only one variable just in some special cases, so this is not entirely surprising).



For any equation of the form $p(x,y)dx + q(x,y)dy = 0$,
in order to be able to find $mu := mu(x)$ it must be the case that
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q}
end{equation}
is a function of $x$ only. If it is, we can set
begin{equation}
mu(x) = expleft(intfrac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q}dxright).
end{equation}
Here I get
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q} =
frac{-2xy^2}{1 + x^2y^2},
end{equation}
which clearly depends on $y$. Then we can't have a $mu$ which depends only on $x$. To have a $mu$ which depends only on $y$, we must have
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p}
end{equation}
be only a function of $y$. If that's the case, we can set
begin{equation}
mu(y) = expleft(int frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p} dyright).
end{equation}
Here I get
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p} = frac{2xy^2}{frac{1}{x}} = 2x^2y^2,
end{equation}
which clearly depends on $x$. Then we can't have $mu$ depend on $y$ only.



As a result, we must have $mu$ depend on both $x$ and $y$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



It looks to me like we can't find an integrating factor which depends only on $x$ or only on $y$ (in general, $mu$ will be a function of only one variable just in some special cases, so this is not entirely surprising).



For any equation of the form $p(x,y)dx + q(x,y)dy = 0$,
in order to be able to find $mu := mu(x)$ it must be the case that
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q}
end{equation}
is a function of $x$ only. If it is, we can set
begin{equation}
mu(x) = expleft(intfrac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q}dxright).
end{equation}
Here I get
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial p}{partial y} - frac{partial q}{partial x}}{q} =
frac{-2xy^2}{1 + x^2y^2},
end{equation}
which clearly depends on $y$. Then we can't have a $mu$ which depends only on $x$. To have a $mu$ which depends only on $y$, we must have
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p}
end{equation}
be only a function of $y$. If that's the case, we can set
begin{equation}
mu(y) = expleft(int frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p} dyright).
end{equation}
Here I get
begin{equation}
frac{frac{partial q}{partial x} - frac{partial p}{partial y}}{p} = frac{2xy^2}{frac{1}{x}} = 2x^2y^2,
end{equation}
which clearly depends on $x$. Then we can't have $mu$ depend on $y$ only.



As a result, we must have $mu$ depend on both $x$ and $y$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 7 '14 at 16:48

























answered Nov 7 '14 at 16:25









yoknapatawphayoknapatawpha

3,20172342




3,20172342












  • $begingroup$
    I agree with your response, but then why would this problem be at the end of the chapter that introduces solving inexact equations via an integrating factor? (It's okay if you don't know)
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo don Juan
    Nov 8 '14 at 7:34


















  • $begingroup$
    I agree with your response, but then why would this problem be at the end of the chapter that introduces solving inexact equations via an integrating factor? (It's okay if you don't know)
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo don Juan
    Nov 8 '14 at 7:34
















$begingroup$
I agree with your response, but then why would this problem be at the end of the chapter that introduces solving inexact equations via an integrating factor? (It's okay if you don't know)
$endgroup$
– Arturo don Juan
Nov 8 '14 at 7:34




$begingroup$
I agree with your response, but then why would this problem be at the end of the chapter that introduces solving inexact equations via an integrating factor? (It's okay if you don't know)
$endgroup$
– Arturo don Juan
Nov 8 '14 at 7:34











1












$begingroup$

Assume you're looking for a solution $y(x)$, then mathematic gives:



$$ frac{-1}{x + x^3 y^2} = frac{ dy}{dx} implies frac{exp (-2 y)}{8 x^2} + frac{ exp (-2y) }{16} (2 y^2 +2y +1) = Const $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Jeb, your answer doesn't help at all! I'm interested in how it is done (i.e how does the integrating factor look/come out), not just the plain old solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo don Juan
    May 20 '14 at 23:45


















1












$begingroup$

Assume you're looking for a solution $y(x)$, then mathematic gives:



$$ frac{-1}{x + x^3 y^2} = frac{ dy}{dx} implies frac{exp (-2 y)}{8 x^2} + frac{ exp (-2y) }{16} (2 y^2 +2y +1) = Const $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Jeb, your answer doesn't help at all! I'm interested in how it is done (i.e how does the integrating factor look/come out), not just the plain old solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo don Juan
    May 20 '14 at 23:45
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

Assume you're looking for a solution $y(x)$, then mathematic gives:



$$ frac{-1}{x + x^3 y^2} = frac{ dy}{dx} implies frac{exp (-2 y)}{8 x^2} + frac{ exp (-2y) }{16} (2 y^2 +2y +1) = Const $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Assume you're looking for a solution $y(x)$, then mathematic gives:



$$ frac{-1}{x + x^3 y^2} = frac{ dy}{dx} implies frac{exp (-2 y)}{8 x^2} + frac{ exp (-2y) }{16} (2 y^2 +2y +1) = Const $$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered May 19 '14 at 15:41









JebJeb

3,8821713




3,8821713












  • $begingroup$
    Jeb, your answer doesn't help at all! I'm interested in how it is done (i.e how does the integrating factor look/come out), not just the plain old solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo don Juan
    May 20 '14 at 23:45




















  • $begingroup$
    Jeb, your answer doesn't help at all! I'm interested in how it is done (i.e how does the integrating factor look/come out), not just the plain old solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo don Juan
    May 20 '14 at 23:45


















$begingroup$
Jeb, your answer doesn't help at all! I'm interested in how it is done (i.e how does the integrating factor look/come out), not just the plain old solution.
$endgroup$
– Arturo don Juan
May 20 '14 at 23:45






$begingroup$
Jeb, your answer doesn't help at all! I'm interested in how it is done (i.e how does the integrating factor look/come out), not just the plain old solution.
$endgroup$
– Arturo don Juan
May 20 '14 at 23:45




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f801091%2fintegration-factor-first-order-nonlinear-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Måne

Storängen

VLT Carioca