Two polynomials with complex coefficients whose level sets at $0$ and $1$ are the same
For a polynomial $f(X)in mathbb C[X]$, and $ain mathbb C$, let $f^{-1} (a):={mu in mathbb C : f(mu)=a}$.
Now let $f(X), g(X) in mathbb C[X]$ be non-constant polynomials such that $f^{-1}(0)=g^{-1}(0)$ and $f^{-1}(1)=g^{-1}(1)$, then is it true that $f=g$ ?
Let $f^{-1}(0)={mu_1,...,mu_k}; f^{-1}(1)={gamma_1,...,gamma_l}$.
Then $f(X)=c_1prod_{i=1}^k(X-mu_i)^{n_i}, f(X)-1=c_1'prod_{i=1}^l(X-gamma_i)^{n_i'}$
$g(X)=c_2prod_{i=1}^k(X-mu_i)^{m_i}; g(X)-1=c_2'prod_{i=1}^l(X-gamma_i)^{m_i'}$
But I don't know how to proceed further.
Please help
polynomials
add a comment |
For a polynomial $f(X)in mathbb C[X]$, and $ain mathbb C$, let $f^{-1} (a):={mu in mathbb C : f(mu)=a}$.
Now let $f(X), g(X) in mathbb C[X]$ be non-constant polynomials such that $f^{-1}(0)=g^{-1}(0)$ and $f^{-1}(1)=g^{-1}(1)$, then is it true that $f=g$ ?
Let $f^{-1}(0)={mu_1,...,mu_k}; f^{-1}(1)={gamma_1,...,gamma_l}$.
Then $f(X)=c_1prod_{i=1}^k(X-mu_i)^{n_i}, f(X)-1=c_1'prod_{i=1}^l(X-gamma_i)^{n_i'}$
$g(X)=c_2prod_{i=1}^k(X-mu_i)^{m_i}; g(X)-1=c_2'prod_{i=1}^l(X-gamma_i)^{m_i'}$
But I don't know how to proceed further.
Please help
polynomials
A polynomial is determined by its zeroes, counted by multiplicity, along with one more constant factor. Knowing $f^{-1}(0)$ determines the zeros, but not their multiplicity.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 1:46
1
@JairTaylor but different multiplicities will tend to put the solutions of $f(x)=1$ at different points.
– Empy2
Dec 9 at 2:05
@Empy2 Ah, you are right. I see now based on the answer below.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 17:48
add a comment |
For a polynomial $f(X)in mathbb C[X]$, and $ain mathbb C$, let $f^{-1} (a):={mu in mathbb C : f(mu)=a}$.
Now let $f(X), g(X) in mathbb C[X]$ be non-constant polynomials such that $f^{-1}(0)=g^{-1}(0)$ and $f^{-1}(1)=g^{-1}(1)$, then is it true that $f=g$ ?
Let $f^{-1}(0)={mu_1,...,mu_k}; f^{-1}(1)={gamma_1,...,gamma_l}$.
Then $f(X)=c_1prod_{i=1}^k(X-mu_i)^{n_i}, f(X)-1=c_1'prod_{i=1}^l(X-gamma_i)^{n_i'}$
$g(X)=c_2prod_{i=1}^k(X-mu_i)^{m_i}; g(X)-1=c_2'prod_{i=1}^l(X-gamma_i)^{m_i'}$
But I don't know how to proceed further.
Please help
polynomials
For a polynomial $f(X)in mathbb C[X]$, and $ain mathbb C$, let $f^{-1} (a):={mu in mathbb C : f(mu)=a}$.
Now let $f(X), g(X) in mathbb C[X]$ be non-constant polynomials such that $f^{-1}(0)=g^{-1}(0)$ and $f^{-1}(1)=g^{-1}(1)$, then is it true that $f=g$ ?
Let $f^{-1}(0)={mu_1,...,mu_k}; f^{-1}(1)={gamma_1,...,gamma_l}$.
Then $f(X)=c_1prod_{i=1}^k(X-mu_i)^{n_i}, f(X)-1=c_1'prod_{i=1}^l(X-gamma_i)^{n_i'}$
$g(X)=c_2prod_{i=1}^k(X-mu_i)^{m_i}; g(X)-1=c_2'prod_{i=1}^l(X-gamma_i)^{m_i'}$
But I don't know how to proceed further.
Please help
polynomials
polynomials
edited Dec 9 at 4:06
asked Dec 9 at 1:41
user521337
7951314
7951314
A polynomial is determined by its zeroes, counted by multiplicity, along with one more constant factor. Knowing $f^{-1}(0)$ determines the zeros, but not their multiplicity.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 1:46
1
@JairTaylor but different multiplicities will tend to put the solutions of $f(x)=1$ at different points.
– Empy2
Dec 9 at 2:05
@Empy2 Ah, you are right. I see now based on the answer below.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 17:48
add a comment |
A polynomial is determined by its zeroes, counted by multiplicity, along with one more constant factor. Knowing $f^{-1}(0)$ determines the zeros, but not their multiplicity.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 1:46
1
@JairTaylor but different multiplicities will tend to put the solutions of $f(x)=1$ at different points.
– Empy2
Dec 9 at 2:05
@Empy2 Ah, you are right. I see now based on the answer below.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 17:48
A polynomial is determined by its zeroes, counted by multiplicity, along with one more constant factor. Knowing $f^{-1}(0)$ determines the zeros, but not their multiplicity.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 1:46
A polynomial is determined by its zeroes, counted by multiplicity, along with one more constant factor. Knowing $f^{-1}(0)$ determines the zeros, but not their multiplicity.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 1:46
1
1
@JairTaylor but different multiplicities will tend to put the solutions of $f(x)=1$ at different points.
– Empy2
Dec 9 at 2:05
@JairTaylor but different multiplicities will tend to put the solutions of $f(x)=1$ at different points.
– Empy2
Dec 9 at 2:05
@Empy2 Ah, you are right. I see now based on the answer below.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 17:48
@Empy2 Ah, you are right. I see now based on the answer below.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 17:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
We may assume without loss of generality that $deg fgeq deg g$. Let $d=deg f$, let $A=f^{-1}(0)=g^{-1}(0)$, and let $B=f^{-1}(1)=g^{-1}(1)$. Note that $|A|=d-m$ where $m$ is the number of roots that $f'$ has in $A$ (counting multiplicity). Similarly, $|B|=d-n$ where $n$ is the number of roots that $f'$ has in $B$. Thus $$|A|+|B|=2d-(m+n)geq 2d-(d-1)=d+1$$ (since $f'$ has $deg f'=d-1$ roots in total).
But now notice that every point of $Acup B$ is a root of $f-g$. Since $f-g$ has degree at most $d$ and $|Acup B|=|A|+|B|geq d+1$, this implies that $f-g=0$ and so $f=g$.
Beat me to it by 8 s! +1
– Macavity
Dec 9 at 3:58
Generalizing slightly, you've shown for any $c,d in mathbb{C}$ and $p in mathbb{C}[x]$ we have $|p^{-1}(c)| + |p^{-1}(d)| geq 1 + deg p$. Very nice!
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 18:08
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031906%2ftwo-polynomials-with-complex-coefficients-whose-level-sets-at-0-and-1-are-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
We may assume without loss of generality that $deg fgeq deg g$. Let $d=deg f$, let $A=f^{-1}(0)=g^{-1}(0)$, and let $B=f^{-1}(1)=g^{-1}(1)$. Note that $|A|=d-m$ where $m$ is the number of roots that $f'$ has in $A$ (counting multiplicity). Similarly, $|B|=d-n$ where $n$ is the number of roots that $f'$ has in $B$. Thus $$|A|+|B|=2d-(m+n)geq 2d-(d-1)=d+1$$ (since $f'$ has $deg f'=d-1$ roots in total).
But now notice that every point of $Acup B$ is a root of $f-g$. Since $f-g$ has degree at most $d$ and $|Acup B|=|A|+|B|geq d+1$, this implies that $f-g=0$ and so $f=g$.
Beat me to it by 8 s! +1
– Macavity
Dec 9 at 3:58
Generalizing slightly, you've shown for any $c,d in mathbb{C}$ and $p in mathbb{C}[x]$ we have $|p^{-1}(c)| + |p^{-1}(d)| geq 1 + deg p$. Very nice!
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 18:08
add a comment |
We may assume without loss of generality that $deg fgeq deg g$. Let $d=deg f$, let $A=f^{-1}(0)=g^{-1}(0)$, and let $B=f^{-1}(1)=g^{-1}(1)$. Note that $|A|=d-m$ where $m$ is the number of roots that $f'$ has in $A$ (counting multiplicity). Similarly, $|B|=d-n$ where $n$ is the number of roots that $f'$ has in $B$. Thus $$|A|+|B|=2d-(m+n)geq 2d-(d-1)=d+1$$ (since $f'$ has $deg f'=d-1$ roots in total).
But now notice that every point of $Acup B$ is a root of $f-g$. Since $f-g$ has degree at most $d$ and $|Acup B|=|A|+|B|geq d+1$, this implies that $f-g=0$ and so $f=g$.
Beat me to it by 8 s! +1
– Macavity
Dec 9 at 3:58
Generalizing slightly, you've shown for any $c,d in mathbb{C}$ and $p in mathbb{C}[x]$ we have $|p^{-1}(c)| + |p^{-1}(d)| geq 1 + deg p$. Very nice!
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 18:08
add a comment |
We may assume without loss of generality that $deg fgeq deg g$. Let $d=deg f$, let $A=f^{-1}(0)=g^{-1}(0)$, and let $B=f^{-1}(1)=g^{-1}(1)$. Note that $|A|=d-m$ where $m$ is the number of roots that $f'$ has in $A$ (counting multiplicity). Similarly, $|B|=d-n$ where $n$ is the number of roots that $f'$ has in $B$. Thus $$|A|+|B|=2d-(m+n)geq 2d-(d-1)=d+1$$ (since $f'$ has $deg f'=d-1$ roots in total).
But now notice that every point of $Acup B$ is a root of $f-g$. Since $f-g$ has degree at most $d$ and $|Acup B|=|A|+|B|geq d+1$, this implies that $f-g=0$ and so $f=g$.
We may assume without loss of generality that $deg fgeq deg g$. Let $d=deg f$, let $A=f^{-1}(0)=g^{-1}(0)$, and let $B=f^{-1}(1)=g^{-1}(1)$. Note that $|A|=d-m$ where $m$ is the number of roots that $f'$ has in $A$ (counting multiplicity). Similarly, $|B|=d-n$ where $n$ is the number of roots that $f'$ has in $B$. Thus $$|A|+|B|=2d-(m+n)geq 2d-(d-1)=d+1$$ (since $f'$ has $deg f'=d-1$ roots in total).
But now notice that every point of $Acup B$ is a root of $f-g$. Since $f-g$ has degree at most $d$ and $|Acup B|=|A|+|B|geq d+1$, this implies that $f-g=0$ and so $f=g$.
answered Dec 9 at 3:57
Eric Wofsey
179k12204331
179k12204331
Beat me to it by 8 s! +1
– Macavity
Dec 9 at 3:58
Generalizing slightly, you've shown for any $c,d in mathbb{C}$ and $p in mathbb{C}[x]$ we have $|p^{-1}(c)| + |p^{-1}(d)| geq 1 + deg p$. Very nice!
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 18:08
add a comment |
Beat me to it by 8 s! +1
– Macavity
Dec 9 at 3:58
Generalizing slightly, you've shown for any $c,d in mathbb{C}$ and $p in mathbb{C}[x]$ we have $|p^{-1}(c)| + |p^{-1}(d)| geq 1 + deg p$. Very nice!
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 18:08
Beat me to it by 8 s! +1
– Macavity
Dec 9 at 3:58
Beat me to it by 8 s! +1
– Macavity
Dec 9 at 3:58
Generalizing slightly, you've shown for any $c,d in mathbb{C}$ and $p in mathbb{C}[x]$ we have $|p^{-1}(c)| + |p^{-1}(d)| geq 1 + deg p$. Very nice!
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 18:08
Generalizing slightly, you've shown for any $c,d in mathbb{C}$ and $p in mathbb{C}[x]$ we have $|p^{-1}(c)| + |p^{-1}(d)| geq 1 + deg p$. Very nice!
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 18:08
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031906%2ftwo-polynomials-with-complex-coefficients-whose-level-sets-at-0-and-1-are-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
A polynomial is determined by its zeroes, counted by multiplicity, along with one more constant factor. Knowing $f^{-1}(0)$ determines the zeros, but not their multiplicity.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 1:46
1
@JairTaylor but different multiplicities will tend to put the solutions of $f(x)=1$ at different points.
– Empy2
Dec 9 at 2:05
@Empy2 Ah, you are right. I see now based on the answer below.
– Jair Taylor
Dec 9 at 17:48