Is it correct to think of a negative number as a way of showing that you have a deficit in something?
$begingroup$
Is it correct to think of a negative number as a way of showing that you have a deficit in something? For example,
Let $x$ be a real number such that $x=25$.
Let $y$ be a real number such that $y=27$.
Consider this equality:
$$x-(-2)=y$$
The way I think of it is that $x$ is $y$ with a deficit of $2$ and in order for it to equal $y$ we need to remove that deficit and that's why:
$$ -(-2)=+2$$
It's like we have a deficit in something and we want to remove it by substracting it (the deficit).
Is my intuition correct?
arithmetic real-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it correct to think of a negative number as a way of showing that you have a deficit in something? For example,
Let $x$ be a real number such that $x=25$.
Let $y$ be a real number such that $y=27$.
Consider this equality:
$$x-(-2)=y$$
The way I think of it is that $x$ is $y$ with a deficit of $2$ and in order for it to equal $y$ we need to remove that deficit and that's why:
$$ -(-2)=+2$$
It's like we have a deficit in something and we want to remove it by substracting it (the deficit).
Is my intuition correct?
arithmetic real-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it correct to think of a negative number as a way of showing that you have a deficit in something? For example,
Let $x$ be a real number such that $x=25$.
Let $y$ be a real number such that $y=27$.
Consider this equality:
$$x-(-2)=y$$
The way I think of it is that $x$ is $y$ with a deficit of $2$ and in order for it to equal $y$ we need to remove that deficit and that's why:
$$ -(-2)=+2$$
It's like we have a deficit in something and we want to remove it by substracting it (the deficit).
Is my intuition correct?
arithmetic real-numbers
$endgroup$
Is it correct to think of a negative number as a way of showing that you have a deficit in something? For example,
Let $x$ be a real number such that $x=25$.
Let $y$ be a real number such that $y=27$.
Consider this equality:
$$x-(-2)=y$$
The way I think of it is that $x$ is $y$ with a deficit of $2$ and in order for it to equal $y$ we need to remove that deficit and that's why:
$$ -(-2)=+2$$
It's like we have a deficit in something and we want to remove it by substracting it (the deficit).
Is my intuition correct?
arithmetic real-numbers
arithmetic real-numbers
edited Dec 15 '18 at 10:27
Blue
47.8k870152
47.8k870152
asked Dec 15 '18 at 6:17
Ashraf BenmebarekAshraf Benmebarek
485
485
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From the perspective of Group Theory, a negative number is simply an (the) "additive inverse" of a "positive" number. Note: This is more or less an over-simplification, because in $mathbb{R}$ (the set of all real numbers) we have an order relation $le$, and things can get more complicated.
Let $(G,+)$ be a group (If you don't know what a group is, just think of it as a very simple algebraic structure that allows you to perform cancellation). One of the group axioms says that given any element $g$ in $G$, you can find some $tilde{g}$ satisfying
$$g+tilde{g}=tilde{g}+g=0.$$
Then you may ask what $0$ actually is. Again I am not going too deep, so it would be better to treat it as the ordinary $0$ so that the value of any number is unchanged after adding $0$.
Then $tilde{g}$ is called an (the) inverse of $g$. We give it a notation $-g$. Another note that is perhaps hard for you. When you denote something (by using a notation), you have to make sure that it is unique (so you cannot have something like $tilde{g}=2$ and $tilde{g}=3$ simultaneously), and the article "the" has an implicit meaning of uniqueness.
Hence, what is $-2$? $-2$ is just the additive inverse of $2$. So if you have a $2$, after adding $-2$, you get back $0$. This is just something like a deficit of something: suppose you have $2$ apples, and after you have a deficit of $2$ apples, you have no apple left. Alternatively, if your friend got $2$ apples from you, then you have a deficit of $2$ apples. Hence if I add back $2$ apples to you, you have no deficit.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Isn't there a real-world example that shows why -(-2)=2 ?
$endgroup$
– Ashraf Benmebarek
Dec 28 '18 at 15:41
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040223%2fis-it-correct-to-think-of-a-negative-number-as-a-way-of-showing-that-you-have-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From the perspective of Group Theory, a negative number is simply an (the) "additive inverse" of a "positive" number. Note: This is more or less an over-simplification, because in $mathbb{R}$ (the set of all real numbers) we have an order relation $le$, and things can get more complicated.
Let $(G,+)$ be a group (If you don't know what a group is, just think of it as a very simple algebraic structure that allows you to perform cancellation). One of the group axioms says that given any element $g$ in $G$, you can find some $tilde{g}$ satisfying
$$g+tilde{g}=tilde{g}+g=0.$$
Then you may ask what $0$ actually is. Again I am not going too deep, so it would be better to treat it as the ordinary $0$ so that the value of any number is unchanged after adding $0$.
Then $tilde{g}$ is called an (the) inverse of $g$. We give it a notation $-g$. Another note that is perhaps hard for you. When you denote something (by using a notation), you have to make sure that it is unique (so you cannot have something like $tilde{g}=2$ and $tilde{g}=3$ simultaneously), and the article "the" has an implicit meaning of uniqueness.
Hence, what is $-2$? $-2$ is just the additive inverse of $2$. So if you have a $2$, after adding $-2$, you get back $0$. This is just something like a deficit of something: suppose you have $2$ apples, and after you have a deficit of $2$ apples, you have no apple left. Alternatively, if your friend got $2$ apples from you, then you have a deficit of $2$ apples. Hence if I add back $2$ apples to you, you have no deficit.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Isn't there a real-world example that shows why -(-2)=2 ?
$endgroup$
– Ashraf Benmebarek
Dec 28 '18 at 15:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From the perspective of Group Theory, a negative number is simply an (the) "additive inverse" of a "positive" number. Note: This is more or less an over-simplification, because in $mathbb{R}$ (the set of all real numbers) we have an order relation $le$, and things can get more complicated.
Let $(G,+)$ be a group (If you don't know what a group is, just think of it as a very simple algebraic structure that allows you to perform cancellation). One of the group axioms says that given any element $g$ in $G$, you can find some $tilde{g}$ satisfying
$$g+tilde{g}=tilde{g}+g=0.$$
Then you may ask what $0$ actually is. Again I am not going too deep, so it would be better to treat it as the ordinary $0$ so that the value of any number is unchanged after adding $0$.
Then $tilde{g}$ is called an (the) inverse of $g$. We give it a notation $-g$. Another note that is perhaps hard for you. When you denote something (by using a notation), you have to make sure that it is unique (so you cannot have something like $tilde{g}=2$ and $tilde{g}=3$ simultaneously), and the article "the" has an implicit meaning of uniqueness.
Hence, what is $-2$? $-2$ is just the additive inverse of $2$. So if you have a $2$, after adding $-2$, you get back $0$. This is just something like a deficit of something: suppose you have $2$ apples, and after you have a deficit of $2$ apples, you have no apple left. Alternatively, if your friend got $2$ apples from you, then you have a deficit of $2$ apples. Hence if I add back $2$ apples to you, you have no deficit.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Isn't there a real-world example that shows why -(-2)=2 ?
$endgroup$
– Ashraf Benmebarek
Dec 28 '18 at 15:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From the perspective of Group Theory, a negative number is simply an (the) "additive inverse" of a "positive" number. Note: This is more or less an over-simplification, because in $mathbb{R}$ (the set of all real numbers) we have an order relation $le$, and things can get more complicated.
Let $(G,+)$ be a group (If you don't know what a group is, just think of it as a very simple algebraic structure that allows you to perform cancellation). One of the group axioms says that given any element $g$ in $G$, you can find some $tilde{g}$ satisfying
$$g+tilde{g}=tilde{g}+g=0.$$
Then you may ask what $0$ actually is. Again I am not going too deep, so it would be better to treat it as the ordinary $0$ so that the value of any number is unchanged after adding $0$.
Then $tilde{g}$ is called an (the) inverse of $g$. We give it a notation $-g$. Another note that is perhaps hard for you. When you denote something (by using a notation), you have to make sure that it is unique (so you cannot have something like $tilde{g}=2$ and $tilde{g}=3$ simultaneously), and the article "the" has an implicit meaning of uniqueness.
Hence, what is $-2$? $-2$ is just the additive inverse of $2$. So if you have a $2$, after adding $-2$, you get back $0$. This is just something like a deficit of something: suppose you have $2$ apples, and after you have a deficit of $2$ apples, you have no apple left. Alternatively, if your friend got $2$ apples from you, then you have a deficit of $2$ apples. Hence if I add back $2$ apples to you, you have no deficit.
$endgroup$
From the perspective of Group Theory, a negative number is simply an (the) "additive inverse" of a "positive" number. Note: This is more or less an over-simplification, because in $mathbb{R}$ (the set of all real numbers) we have an order relation $le$, and things can get more complicated.
Let $(G,+)$ be a group (If you don't know what a group is, just think of it as a very simple algebraic structure that allows you to perform cancellation). One of the group axioms says that given any element $g$ in $G$, you can find some $tilde{g}$ satisfying
$$g+tilde{g}=tilde{g}+g=0.$$
Then you may ask what $0$ actually is. Again I am not going too deep, so it would be better to treat it as the ordinary $0$ so that the value of any number is unchanged after adding $0$.
Then $tilde{g}$ is called an (the) inverse of $g$. We give it a notation $-g$. Another note that is perhaps hard for you. When you denote something (by using a notation), you have to make sure that it is unique (so you cannot have something like $tilde{g}=2$ and $tilde{g}=3$ simultaneously), and the article "the" has an implicit meaning of uniqueness.
Hence, what is $-2$? $-2$ is just the additive inverse of $2$. So if you have a $2$, after adding $-2$, you get back $0$. This is just something like a deficit of something: suppose you have $2$ apples, and after you have a deficit of $2$ apples, you have no apple left. Alternatively, if your friend got $2$ apples from you, then you have a deficit of $2$ apples. Hence if I add back $2$ apples to you, you have no deficit.
edited Dec 15 '18 at 9:47
answered Dec 15 '18 at 9:39
tonychow0929tonychow0929
29825
29825
$begingroup$
Isn't there a real-world example that shows why -(-2)=2 ?
$endgroup$
– Ashraf Benmebarek
Dec 28 '18 at 15:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Isn't there a real-world example that shows why -(-2)=2 ?
$endgroup$
– Ashraf Benmebarek
Dec 28 '18 at 15:41
$begingroup$
Isn't there a real-world example that shows why -(-2)=2 ?
$endgroup$
– Ashraf Benmebarek
Dec 28 '18 at 15:41
$begingroup$
Isn't there a real-world example that shows why -(-2)=2 ?
$endgroup$
– Ashraf Benmebarek
Dec 28 '18 at 15:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040223%2fis-it-correct-to-think-of-a-negative-number-as-a-way-of-showing-that-you-have-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown