How to prove the Tauber's second theorem?
$begingroup$
The Tauber's second theorem states as follows :
$$sum c_n=sLeftrightarrow c_n ; is ; Abel ; Summable ; and ; sum_1^n kc_k=o(n)$$
I search it in all of my textbooks , and the Wikipedia , but no results , wait your nice answer !
calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Tauber's second theorem states as follows :
$$sum c_n=sLeftrightarrow c_n ; is ; Abel ; Summable ; and ; sum_1^n kc_k=o(n)$$
I search it in all of my textbooks , and the Wikipedia , but no results , wait your nice answer !
calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Tauber's second theorem states as follows :
$$sum c_n=sLeftrightarrow c_n ; is ; Abel ; Summable ; and ; sum_1^n kc_k=o(n)$$
I search it in all of my textbooks , and the Wikipedia , but no results , wait your nice answer !
calculus
$endgroup$
The Tauber's second theorem states as follows :
$$sum c_n=sLeftrightarrow c_n ; is ; Abel ; Summable ; and ; sum_1^n kc_k=o(n)$$
I search it in all of my textbooks , and the Wikipedia , but no results , wait your nice answer !
calculus
calculus
asked Dec 15 '18 at 5:41
Alexander LauAlexander Lau
747
747
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think I got one .
$Rightarrow$ The Abel summable comes from the Abel Lemma, to the second part, we use the summation by part $$sum kc_k=-sum s_n+ns_n$$
The $s_n$ denotes the n-th partial sums of $c_n$,and it converges , then we can use the Stolz Law to compute the limit.
$Leftarrow$
$$|sum_1^infty r^nc_n-sum_1^Nc_n|leq (1-r)|sum_1^Nnc_n|+R_N$$
Here $R_N$ is the remainder of that Abel Means , and let $$r=1-1/N$$
letting N tends to infinity , that ends the proof.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040210%2fhow-to-prove-the-taubers-second-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think I got one .
$Rightarrow$ The Abel summable comes from the Abel Lemma, to the second part, we use the summation by part $$sum kc_k=-sum s_n+ns_n$$
The $s_n$ denotes the n-th partial sums of $c_n$,and it converges , then we can use the Stolz Law to compute the limit.
$Leftarrow$
$$|sum_1^infty r^nc_n-sum_1^Nc_n|leq (1-r)|sum_1^Nnc_n|+R_N$$
Here $R_N$ is the remainder of that Abel Means , and let $$r=1-1/N$$
letting N tends to infinity , that ends the proof.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I got one .
$Rightarrow$ The Abel summable comes from the Abel Lemma, to the second part, we use the summation by part $$sum kc_k=-sum s_n+ns_n$$
The $s_n$ denotes the n-th partial sums of $c_n$,and it converges , then we can use the Stolz Law to compute the limit.
$Leftarrow$
$$|sum_1^infty r^nc_n-sum_1^Nc_n|leq (1-r)|sum_1^Nnc_n|+R_N$$
Here $R_N$ is the remainder of that Abel Means , and let $$r=1-1/N$$
letting N tends to infinity , that ends the proof.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I got one .
$Rightarrow$ The Abel summable comes from the Abel Lemma, to the second part, we use the summation by part $$sum kc_k=-sum s_n+ns_n$$
The $s_n$ denotes the n-th partial sums of $c_n$,and it converges , then we can use the Stolz Law to compute the limit.
$Leftarrow$
$$|sum_1^infty r^nc_n-sum_1^Nc_n|leq (1-r)|sum_1^Nnc_n|+R_N$$
Here $R_N$ is the remainder of that Abel Means , and let $$r=1-1/N$$
letting N tends to infinity , that ends the proof.
$endgroup$
I think I got one .
$Rightarrow$ The Abel summable comes from the Abel Lemma, to the second part, we use the summation by part $$sum kc_k=-sum s_n+ns_n$$
The $s_n$ denotes the n-th partial sums of $c_n$,and it converges , then we can use the Stolz Law to compute the limit.
$Leftarrow$
$$|sum_1^infty r^nc_n-sum_1^Nc_n|leq (1-r)|sum_1^Nnc_n|+R_N$$
Here $R_N$ is the remainder of that Abel Means , and let $$r=1-1/N$$
letting N tends to infinity , that ends the proof.
answered Dec 15 '18 at 6:36
Alexander LauAlexander Lau
747
747
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040210%2fhow-to-prove-the-taubers-second-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown