Resource Allocation Problem
$begingroup$
Let $I, J, n in mathbb N$. Furthermore, let $mathbf M in mathbb N^{I times J}$. Finally, for $i in {1, dots, I}$ and $j in {1, dots, J}$, let $M(i,j)$ denote the element in the $i$th row and $j$th column of $mathbf M$. I'd like to solve the following optimization problem:
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
&max_{mathbf x in mathbb N^I} && sum_{i=1}^Isum_{j = 1}^Jmin{M(i,j), x_i} \
&text{ s.t.} && sum_{i=1}^I x_i = n.
end{aligned}
end{equation}
I suspect that the problem can be solved by a "greedy" algorithm with the following form:
- Set $mathbf x equiv mathbf 0$.
- Pick any $mathbf k in arg max sum_{i=1}^Isum_{j = 1}^Jmin{M(i,j), x_i + delta_k}$. In words, find a component of $mathbf x$ which maximally increases the objective value when incremented by one -- allowing for the possibility that there may be multiple components which give maximal increase.
- Set $mathbf x equiv mathbf x + mathbf e_k$, where $mathbf e_k$ is the $k$th coordinate vector.
- If $sum_{i=1}^I x_i = n$, stop; otherwise, return to step 2.
However, I am not sure how to prove that this greedy algorithm leads to an optimal solution.
Can you help me by either providing a proof or counter-example?
optimization convex-optimization integer-programming dynamic-programming mixed-integer-programming
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $I, J, n in mathbb N$. Furthermore, let $mathbf M in mathbb N^{I times J}$. Finally, for $i in {1, dots, I}$ and $j in {1, dots, J}$, let $M(i,j)$ denote the element in the $i$th row and $j$th column of $mathbf M$. I'd like to solve the following optimization problem:
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
&max_{mathbf x in mathbb N^I} && sum_{i=1}^Isum_{j = 1}^Jmin{M(i,j), x_i} \
&text{ s.t.} && sum_{i=1}^I x_i = n.
end{aligned}
end{equation}
I suspect that the problem can be solved by a "greedy" algorithm with the following form:
- Set $mathbf x equiv mathbf 0$.
- Pick any $mathbf k in arg max sum_{i=1}^Isum_{j = 1}^Jmin{M(i,j), x_i + delta_k}$. In words, find a component of $mathbf x$ which maximally increases the objective value when incremented by one -- allowing for the possibility that there may be multiple components which give maximal increase.
- Set $mathbf x equiv mathbf x + mathbf e_k$, where $mathbf e_k$ is the $k$th coordinate vector.
- If $sum_{i=1}^I x_i = n$, stop; otherwise, return to step 2.
However, I am not sure how to prove that this greedy algorithm leads to an optimal solution.
Can you help me by either providing a proof or counter-example?
optimization convex-optimization integer-programming dynamic-programming mixed-integer-programming
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $I, J, n in mathbb N$. Furthermore, let $mathbf M in mathbb N^{I times J}$. Finally, for $i in {1, dots, I}$ and $j in {1, dots, J}$, let $M(i,j)$ denote the element in the $i$th row and $j$th column of $mathbf M$. I'd like to solve the following optimization problem:
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
&max_{mathbf x in mathbb N^I} && sum_{i=1}^Isum_{j = 1}^Jmin{M(i,j), x_i} \
&text{ s.t.} && sum_{i=1}^I x_i = n.
end{aligned}
end{equation}
I suspect that the problem can be solved by a "greedy" algorithm with the following form:
- Set $mathbf x equiv mathbf 0$.
- Pick any $mathbf k in arg max sum_{i=1}^Isum_{j = 1}^Jmin{M(i,j), x_i + delta_k}$. In words, find a component of $mathbf x$ which maximally increases the objective value when incremented by one -- allowing for the possibility that there may be multiple components which give maximal increase.
- Set $mathbf x equiv mathbf x + mathbf e_k$, where $mathbf e_k$ is the $k$th coordinate vector.
- If $sum_{i=1}^I x_i = n$, stop; otherwise, return to step 2.
However, I am not sure how to prove that this greedy algorithm leads to an optimal solution.
Can you help me by either providing a proof or counter-example?
optimization convex-optimization integer-programming dynamic-programming mixed-integer-programming
$endgroup$
Let $I, J, n in mathbb N$. Furthermore, let $mathbf M in mathbb N^{I times J}$. Finally, for $i in {1, dots, I}$ and $j in {1, dots, J}$, let $M(i,j)$ denote the element in the $i$th row and $j$th column of $mathbf M$. I'd like to solve the following optimization problem:
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
&max_{mathbf x in mathbb N^I} && sum_{i=1}^Isum_{j = 1}^Jmin{M(i,j), x_i} \
&text{ s.t.} && sum_{i=1}^I x_i = n.
end{aligned}
end{equation}
I suspect that the problem can be solved by a "greedy" algorithm with the following form:
- Set $mathbf x equiv mathbf 0$.
- Pick any $mathbf k in arg max sum_{i=1}^Isum_{j = 1}^Jmin{M(i,j), x_i + delta_k}$. In words, find a component of $mathbf x$ which maximally increases the objective value when incremented by one -- allowing for the possibility that there may be multiple components which give maximal increase.
- Set $mathbf x equiv mathbf x + mathbf e_k$, where $mathbf e_k$ is the $k$th coordinate vector.
- If $sum_{i=1}^I x_i = n$, stop; otherwise, return to step 2.
However, I am not sure how to prove that this greedy algorithm leads to an optimal solution.
Can you help me by either providing a proof or counter-example?
optimization convex-optimization integer-programming dynamic-programming mixed-integer-programming
optimization convex-optimization integer-programming dynamic-programming mixed-integer-programming
asked Dec 19 '18 at 7:08
GarrettGarrett
5761314
5761314
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046119%2fresource-allocation-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046119%2fresource-allocation-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown