Taylor Series in Fractional Calculus
I recently studied fractional calculus, namely the possibility to define fractional derivatives of some functions, like
$$frac{text{d}^{1/2}}{text{d}x^{1/2}} f(x) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ frac{text{d}^{2/3}}{text{d}x^{2/3}} f(x)$$
and so on.
Now the question that came up into my mind is: if such a construction is possible, can we built " new " Taylor series for well known function in order to take into account (some) fractional derivatives too?
I know the first problems that would arise would be: how could we take the whole possible derivatives of order between $0$ and $1$? They are infinite. And Yeah, that could be a really huge problem..
Are there any example of Fractional Taylor Series?
P.s. I've already read other similar questions, but they are too arid and I didn't find any good answer yet..
derivatives taylor-expansion fractional-calculus
add a comment |
I recently studied fractional calculus, namely the possibility to define fractional derivatives of some functions, like
$$frac{text{d}^{1/2}}{text{d}x^{1/2}} f(x) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ frac{text{d}^{2/3}}{text{d}x^{2/3}} f(x)$$
and so on.
Now the question that came up into my mind is: if such a construction is possible, can we built " new " Taylor series for well known function in order to take into account (some) fractional derivatives too?
I know the first problems that would arise would be: how could we take the whole possible derivatives of order between $0$ and $1$? They are infinite. And Yeah, that could be a really huge problem..
Are there any example of Fractional Taylor Series?
P.s. I've already read other similar questions, but they are too arid and I didn't find any good answer yet..
derivatives taylor-expansion fractional-calculus
How/Why does the Taylor Series expansion work? Does the Taylor Series expansion always work? Why? Try to apply these ideas on Fractional Calculus (though I don't see it working, due to one of the theories of Fractional Calculus being that a fractional derivative may be independent of close values of the original function, ie they don't work like derivatives, you can approximate the derivative by looking at the graph. Conversely, I imagine it hard to approximate a graph by looking at the fractional derivative.)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Feb 27 '16 at 0:54
add a comment |
I recently studied fractional calculus, namely the possibility to define fractional derivatives of some functions, like
$$frac{text{d}^{1/2}}{text{d}x^{1/2}} f(x) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ frac{text{d}^{2/3}}{text{d}x^{2/3}} f(x)$$
and so on.
Now the question that came up into my mind is: if such a construction is possible, can we built " new " Taylor series for well known function in order to take into account (some) fractional derivatives too?
I know the first problems that would arise would be: how could we take the whole possible derivatives of order between $0$ and $1$? They are infinite. And Yeah, that could be a really huge problem..
Are there any example of Fractional Taylor Series?
P.s. I've already read other similar questions, but they are too arid and I didn't find any good answer yet..
derivatives taylor-expansion fractional-calculus
I recently studied fractional calculus, namely the possibility to define fractional derivatives of some functions, like
$$frac{text{d}^{1/2}}{text{d}x^{1/2}} f(x) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ frac{text{d}^{2/3}}{text{d}x^{2/3}} f(x)$$
and so on.
Now the question that came up into my mind is: if such a construction is possible, can we built " new " Taylor series for well known function in order to take into account (some) fractional derivatives too?
I know the first problems that would arise would be: how could we take the whole possible derivatives of order between $0$ and $1$? They are infinite. And Yeah, that could be a really huge problem..
Are there any example of Fractional Taylor Series?
P.s. I've already read other similar questions, but they are too arid and I didn't find any good answer yet..
derivatives taylor-expansion fractional-calculus
derivatives taylor-expansion fractional-calculus
asked Jan 30 '16 at 15:05
Von Neumann
16.3k72543
16.3k72543
How/Why does the Taylor Series expansion work? Does the Taylor Series expansion always work? Why? Try to apply these ideas on Fractional Calculus (though I don't see it working, due to one of the theories of Fractional Calculus being that a fractional derivative may be independent of close values of the original function, ie they don't work like derivatives, you can approximate the derivative by looking at the graph. Conversely, I imagine it hard to approximate a graph by looking at the fractional derivative.)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Feb 27 '16 at 0:54
add a comment |
How/Why does the Taylor Series expansion work? Does the Taylor Series expansion always work? Why? Try to apply these ideas on Fractional Calculus (though I don't see it working, due to one of the theories of Fractional Calculus being that a fractional derivative may be independent of close values of the original function, ie they don't work like derivatives, you can approximate the derivative by looking at the graph. Conversely, I imagine it hard to approximate a graph by looking at the fractional derivative.)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Feb 27 '16 at 0:54
How/Why does the Taylor Series expansion work? Does the Taylor Series expansion always work? Why? Try to apply these ideas on Fractional Calculus (though I don't see it working, due to one of the theories of Fractional Calculus being that a fractional derivative may be independent of close values of the original function, ie they don't work like derivatives, you can approximate the derivative by looking at the graph. Conversely, I imagine it hard to approximate a graph by looking at the fractional derivative.)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Feb 27 '16 at 0:54
How/Why does the Taylor Series expansion work? Does the Taylor Series expansion always work? Why? Try to apply these ideas on Fractional Calculus (though I don't see it working, due to one of the theories of Fractional Calculus being that a fractional derivative may be independent of close values of the original function, ie they don't work like derivatives, you can approximate the derivative by looking at the graph. Conversely, I imagine it hard to approximate a graph by looking at the fractional derivative.)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Feb 27 '16 at 0:54
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Yes:
Series expansion in fractional calculus and fractional differential equations
Fractional calculus and the Taylor-Riemann series
Examples: see p.7-9 of the first link and p.18 of second link.
1
very interesting reference, thanks (+1)
– G Cab
Dec 9 at 0:51
add a comment |
Doing a few calculations, I find the following must be:
$$f^{(n)}(x)=sum_{k=-infty}^inftyfrac{f^{(k)}(a)x^{k-n}}{Gamma(k-n+1)}$$
where we define ${1overGamma(-n)}=0$ for $ninmathbb N$
The regular Taylor series doesn't hold by induction, but this one does.
You could probably adjust $k$ to fit what you want.
(note, it fails to converge for most $f(x)$)
add a comment |
An example of the formula for Caputo fractional derivative at zero is
begin{equation}
D_0^{alpha}f(x) = sum_{n=k}^{infty}frac{f^{(n)}(0)cdot x^{n-alpha}}{Gamma(n+1-alpha)} text{ where } k=text{rounded up } alpha.
end{equation}
Your post is quite terse, and this is has undesirable consequences. For one thing the statement is conclusory, without reasoned mathematical argument to support it. Even more undesirable is the lack of evident connection to the Question's posed problem ("can we buil[d] new Taylor series for well known function[s]").
– hardmath
Dec 9 at 1:05
This is just an example of fractional Taylor series as was requested. I can prove the formula but that will take a couple of pages. Too long for this forum, I think.
– speepyjoe
Dec 10 at 16:21
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1633221%2ftaylor-series-in-fractional-calculus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes:
Series expansion in fractional calculus and fractional differential equations
Fractional calculus and the Taylor-Riemann series
Examples: see p.7-9 of the first link and p.18 of second link.
1
very interesting reference, thanks (+1)
– G Cab
Dec 9 at 0:51
add a comment |
Yes:
Series expansion in fractional calculus and fractional differential equations
Fractional calculus and the Taylor-Riemann series
Examples: see p.7-9 of the first link and p.18 of second link.
1
very interesting reference, thanks (+1)
– G Cab
Dec 9 at 0:51
add a comment |
Yes:
Series expansion in fractional calculus and fractional differential equations
Fractional calculus and the Taylor-Riemann series
Examples: see p.7-9 of the first link and p.18 of second link.
Yes:
Series expansion in fractional calculus and fractional differential equations
Fractional calculus and the Taylor-Riemann series
Examples: see p.7-9 of the first link and p.18 of second link.
answered Jan 30 '16 at 15:15
Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
34.1k42771
34.1k42771
1
very interesting reference, thanks (+1)
– G Cab
Dec 9 at 0:51
add a comment |
1
very interesting reference, thanks (+1)
– G Cab
Dec 9 at 0:51
1
1
very interesting reference, thanks (+1)
– G Cab
Dec 9 at 0:51
very interesting reference, thanks (+1)
– G Cab
Dec 9 at 0:51
add a comment |
Doing a few calculations, I find the following must be:
$$f^{(n)}(x)=sum_{k=-infty}^inftyfrac{f^{(k)}(a)x^{k-n}}{Gamma(k-n+1)}$$
where we define ${1overGamma(-n)}=0$ for $ninmathbb N$
The regular Taylor series doesn't hold by induction, but this one does.
You could probably adjust $k$ to fit what you want.
(note, it fails to converge for most $f(x)$)
add a comment |
Doing a few calculations, I find the following must be:
$$f^{(n)}(x)=sum_{k=-infty}^inftyfrac{f^{(k)}(a)x^{k-n}}{Gamma(k-n+1)}$$
where we define ${1overGamma(-n)}=0$ for $ninmathbb N$
The regular Taylor series doesn't hold by induction, but this one does.
You could probably adjust $k$ to fit what you want.
(note, it fails to converge for most $f(x)$)
add a comment |
Doing a few calculations, I find the following must be:
$$f^{(n)}(x)=sum_{k=-infty}^inftyfrac{f^{(k)}(a)x^{k-n}}{Gamma(k-n+1)}$$
where we define ${1overGamma(-n)}=0$ for $ninmathbb N$
The regular Taylor series doesn't hold by induction, but this one does.
You could probably adjust $k$ to fit what you want.
(note, it fails to converge for most $f(x)$)
Doing a few calculations, I find the following must be:
$$f^{(n)}(x)=sum_{k=-infty}^inftyfrac{f^{(k)}(a)x^{k-n}}{Gamma(k-n+1)}$$
where we define ${1overGamma(-n)}=0$ for $ninmathbb N$
The regular Taylor series doesn't hold by induction, but this one does.
You could probably adjust $k$ to fit what you want.
(note, it fails to converge for most $f(x)$)
edited Jun 16 '16 at 15:52
answered Jun 16 '16 at 15:18
Simply Beautiful Art
50.2k578181
50.2k578181
add a comment |
add a comment |
An example of the formula for Caputo fractional derivative at zero is
begin{equation}
D_0^{alpha}f(x) = sum_{n=k}^{infty}frac{f^{(n)}(0)cdot x^{n-alpha}}{Gamma(n+1-alpha)} text{ where } k=text{rounded up } alpha.
end{equation}
Your post is quite terse, and this is has undesirable consequences. For one thing the statement is conclusory, without reasoned mathematical argument to support it. Even more undesirable is the lack of evident connection to the Question's posed problem ("can we buil[d] new Taylor series for well known function[s]").
– hardmath
Dec 9 at 1:05
This is just an example of fractional Taylor series as was requested. I can prove the formula but that will take a couple of pages. Too long for this forum, I think.
– speepyjoe
Dec 10 at 16:21
add a comment |
An example of the formula for Caputo fractional derivative at zero is
begin{equation}
D_0^{alpha}f(x) = sum_{n=k}^{infty}frac{f^{(n)}(0)cdot x^{n-alpha}}{Gamma(n+1-alpha)} text{ where } k=text{rounded up } alpha.
end{equation}
Your post is quite terse, and this is has undesirable consequences. For one thing the statement is conclusory, without reasoned mathematical argument to support it. Even more undesirable is the lack of evident connection to the Question's posed problem ("can we buil[d] new Taylor series for well known function[s]").
– hardmath
Dec 9 at 1:05
This is just an example of fractional Taylor series as was requested. I can prove the formula but that will take a couple of pages. Too long for this forum, I think.
– speepyjoe
Dec 10 at 16:21
add a comment |
An example of the formula for Caputo fractional derivative at zero is
begin{equation}
D_0^{alpha}f(x) = sum_{n=k}^{infty}frac{f^{(n)}(0)cdot x^{n-alpha}}{Gamma(n+1-alpha)} text{ where } k=text{rounded up } alpha.
end{equation}
An example of the formula for Caputo fractional derivative at zero is
begin{equation}
D_0^{alpha}f(x) = sum_{n=k}^{infty}frac{f^{(n)}(0)cdot x^{n-alpha}}{Gamma(n+1-alpha)} text{ where } k=text{rounded up } alpha.
end{equation}
edited Dec 11 at 16:05
answered Dec 8 at 23:48
speepyjoe
112
112
Your post is quite terse, and this is has undesirable consequences. For one thing the statement is conclusory, without reasoned mathematical argument to support it. Even more undesirable is the lack of evident connection to the Question's posed problem ("can we buil[d] new Taylor series for well known function[s]").
– hardmath
Dec 9 at 1:05
This is just an example of fractional Taylor series as was requested. I can prove the formula but that will take a couple of pages. Too long for this forum, I think.
– speepyjoe
Dec 10 at 16:21
add a comment |
Your post is quite terse, and this is has undesirable consequences. For one thing the statement is conclusory, without reasoned mathematical argument to support it. Even more undesirable is the lack of evident connection to the Question's posed problem ("can we buil[d] new Taylor series for well known function[s]").
– hardmath
Dec 9 at 1:05
This is just an example of fractional Taylor series as was requested. I can prove the formula but that will take a couple of pages. Too long for this forum, I think.
– speepyjoe
Dec 10 at 16:21
Your post is quite terse, and this is has undesirable consequences. For one thing the statement is conclusory, without reasoned mathematical argument to support it. Even more undesirable is the lack of evident connection to the Question's posed problem ("can we buil[d] new Taylor series for well known function[s]").
– hardmath
Dec 9 at 1:05
Your post is quite terse, and this is has undesirable consequences. For one thing the statement is conclusory, without reasoned mathematical argument to support it. Even more undesirable is the lack of evident connection to the Question's posed problem ("can we buil[d] new Taylor series for well known function[s]").
– hardmath
Dec 9 at 1:05
This is just an example of fractional Taylor series as was requested. I can prove the formula but that will take a couple of pages. Too long for this forum, I think.
– speepyjoe
Dec 10 at 16:21
This is just an example of fractional Taylor series as was requested. I can prove the formula but that will take a couple of pages. Too long for this forum, I think.
– speepyjoe
Dec 10 at 16:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1633221%2ftaylor-series-in-fractional-calculus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
How/Why does the Taylor Series expansion work? Does the Taylor Series expansion always work? Why? Try to apply these ideas on Fractional Calculus (though I don't see it working, due to one of the theories of Fractional Calculus being that a fractional derivative may be independent of close values of the original function, ie they don't work like derivatives, you can approximate the derivative by looking at the graph. Conversely, I imagine it hard to approximate a graph by looking at the fractional derivative.)
– Simply Beautiful Art
Feb 27 '16 at 0:54