About existence of an irreducible polynomial of degree $n$ in $Z_p[x]$ [duplicate]












1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Existence of irreducible polynomials over finite field

    1 answer




My problem:




Let $n$ be a natural number and $p$ be a prime. Prove that there exists an irreducible polynomial of degree $n$ in $mathbb{Z}_p[x]$ (note: $Z_p$ is the quotient field $mathbb{Z}/pmathbb{Z}$)




Basically I don't have a clear idea to even think about. But somehow I think this relates to the splitting field of $f(x) = x^{p^n} - x$ in $Z_p[x]$, which serves as the extension of $Z_p$ to $p^n$ elements. Is it possible that there exists a factor of this polynomial which has degree $n$?



Please give me a hint. Anything is greatly appreciated.



I have basic knowledge about field extensions, spliting fiels and finite fields. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen finite-fields
Users with the  finite-fields badge can single-handedly close finite-fields questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 25 '18 at 8:23


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This gotta be one of the most frequently asked questions about finite fields on this site. I'm a bit disappointed that veteran users would not search first.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you are also interested in counting how many such polynomials exist, look at this.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This thread covers both the existence and the count, but is a bit more taxing to follow. Honestly, I don't know the earliest thread handling this question. Even back in 2012 some prolific answerers would pay too little attention to site hygiene in their eagerness to answer. But, such things happen to most of us. Back then duplication wasn't as severe a problem as it is today.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:29












  • $begingroup$
    In my case... not a veteran user here; I only joined a month ago. On the other hand, I have posted this count before on AoPS, in 2005 and again in 2018
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Dec 25 '18 at 21:07
















1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Existence of irreducible polynomials over finite field

    1 answer




My problem:




Let $n$ be a natural number and $p$ be a prime. Prove that there exists an irreducible polynomial of degree $n$ in $mathbb{Z}_p[x]$ (note: $Z_p$ is the quotient field $mathbb{Z}/pmathbb{Z}$)




Basically I don't have a clear idea to even think about. But somehow I think this relates to the splitting field of $f(x) = x^{p^n} - x$ in $Z_p[x]$, which serves as the extension of $Z_p$ to $p^n$ elements. Is it possible that there exists a factor of this polynomial which has degree $n$?



Please give me a hint. Anything is greatly appreciated.



I have basic knowledge about field extensions, spliting fiels and finite fields. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen finite-fields
Users with the  finite-fields badge can single-handedly close finite-fields questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 25 '18 at 8:23


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This gotta be one of the most frequently asked questions about finite fields on this site. I'm a bit disappointed that veteran users would not search first.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you are also interested in counting how many such polynomials exist, look at this.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This thread covers both the existence and the count, but is a bit more taxing to follow. Honestly, I don't know the earliest thread handling this question. Even back in 2012 some prolific answerers would pay too little attention to site hygiene in their eagerness to answer. But, such things happen to most of us. Back then duplication wasn't as severe a problem as it is today.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:29












  • $begingroup$
    In my case... not a veteran user here; I only joined a month ago. On the other hand, I have posted this count before on AoPS, in 2005 and again in 2018
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Dec 25 '18 at 21:07














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Existence of irreducible polynomials over finite field

    1 answer




My problem:




Let $n$ be a natural number and $p$ be a prime. Prove that there exists an irreducible polynomial of degree $n$ in $mathbb{Z}_p[x]$ (note: $Z_p$ is the quotient field $mathbb{Z}/pmathbb{Z}$)




Basically I don't have a clear idea to even think about. But somehow I think this relates to the splitting field of $f(x) = x^{p^n} - x$ in $Z_p[x]$, which serves as the extension of $Z_p$ to $p^n$ elements. Is it possible that there exists a factor of this polynomial which has degree $n$?



Please give me a hint. Anything is greatly appreciated.



I have basic knowledge about field extensions, spliting fiels and finite fields. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Existence of irreducible polynomials over finite field

    1 answer




My problem:




Let $n$ be a natural number and $p$ be a prime. Prove that there exists an irreducible polynomial of degree $n$ in $mathbb{Z}_p[x]$ (note: $Z_p$ is the quotient field $mathbb{Z}/pmathbb{Z}$)




Basically I don't have a clear idea to even think about. But somehow I think this relates to the splitting field of $f(x) = x^{p^n} - x$ in $Z_p[x]$, which serves as the extension of $Z_p$ to $p^n$ elements. Is it possible that there exists a factor of this polynomial which has degree $n$?



Please give me a hint. Anything is greatly appreciated.



I have basic knowledge about field extensions, spliting fiels and finite fields. Thank you.





This question already has an answer here:




  • Existence of irreducible polynomials over finite field

    1 answer








field-theory finite-fields






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 25 '18 at 9:29







ElementX

















asked Dec 25 '18 at 5:51









ElementXElementX

404111




404111




marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen finite-fields
Users with the  finite-fields badge can single-handedly close finite-fields questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 25 '18 at 8:23


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Jyrki Lahtonen finite-fields
Users with the  finite-fields badge can single-handedly close finite-fields questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 25 '18 at 8:23


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This gotta be one of the most frequently asked questions about finite fields on this site. I'm a bit disappointed that veteran users would not search first.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you are also interested in counting how many such polynomials exist, look at this.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This thread covers both the existence and the count, but is a bit more taxing to follow. Honestly, I don't know the earliest thread handling this question. Even back in 2012 some prolific answerers would pay too little attention to site hygiene in their eagerness to answer. But, such things happen to most of us. Back then duplication wasn't as severe a problem as it is today.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:29












  • $begingroup$
    In my case... not a veteran user here; I only joined a month ago. On the other hand, I have posted this count before on AoPS, in 2005 and again in 2018
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Dec 25 '18 at 21:07














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This gotta be one of the most frequently asked questions about finite fields on this site. I'm a bit disappointed that veteran users would not search first.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you are also interested in counting how many such polynomials exist, look at this.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This thread covers both the existence and the count, but is a bit more taxing to follow. Honestly, I don't know the earliest thread handling this question. Even back in 2012 some prolific answerers would pay too little attention to site hygiene in their eagerness to answer. But, such things happen to most of us. Back then duplication wasn't as severe a problem as it is today.
    $endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Dec 25 '18 at 8:29












  • $begingroup$
    In my case... not a veteran user here; I only joined a month ago. On the other hand, I have posted this count before on AoPS, in 2005 and again in 2018
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Dec 25 '18 at 21:07








1




1




$begingroup$
This gotta be one of the most frequently asked questions about finite fields on this site. I'm a bit disappointed that veteran users would not search first.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 25 '18 at 8:22




$begingroup$
This gotta be one of the most frequently asked questions about finite fields on this site. I'm a bit disappointed that veteran users would not search first.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 25 '18 at 8:22




1




1




$begingroup$
If you are also interested in counting how many such polynomials exist, look at this.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 25 '18 at 8:26




$begingroup$
If you are also interested in counting how many such polynomials exist, look at this.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 25 '18 at 8:26




1




1




$begingroup$
This thread covers both the existence and the count, but is a bit more taxing to follow. Honestly, I don't know the earliest thread handling this question. Even back in 2012 some prolific answerers would pay too little attention to site hygiene in their eagerness to answer. But, such things happen to most of us. Back then duplication wasn't as severe a problem as it is today.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 25 '18 at 8:29






$begingroup$
This thread covers both the existence and the count, but is a bit more taxing to follow. Honestly, I don't know the earliest thread handling this question. Even back in 2012 some prolific answerers would pay too little attention to site hygiene in their eagerness to answer. But, such things happen to most of us. Back then duplication wasn't as severe a problem as it is today.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 25 '18 at 8:29














$begingroup$
In my case... not a veteran user here; I only joined a month ago. On the other hand, I have posted this count before on AoPS, in 2005 and again in 2018
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Dec 25 '18 at 21:07




$begingroup$
In my case... not a veteran user here; I only joined a month ago. On the other hand, I have posted this count before on AoPS, in 2005 and again in 2018
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Dec 25 '18 at 21:07










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

This is all standard theory. The main steps are:




  1. Show that the splitting field $K$ of $x^{p^n}-x$ has order $p^n$,

  2. Show that $K$'s multiplicative group is cyclic, so has a generator $alpha$,

  3. Observe that $K=Bbb Z_p(alpha)$,

  4. Show the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $Bbb Z_p$ has degree $n$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    OK, now that the standard theory's up, I'll add my favorite argument. We prove that irreducible polynomials of every degree exist by counting them.



    Let $F$ be a field with $q$ elements, for some finite $q$. We count the number of monic polynomials of degree $n$ over $F$ in two ways.

    First, a monic polynomial $x^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+cdots + a_1 x + a_0$ has $n$ coefficients that can freely vary among $q$ values each, for a total of $q^n$ polynomials.

    Second, a monic polynomial can be uniquely factored as a product of monic irreducible polynomials. We choose the power each polynomial is raised to, make sure the sum of the degrees is $n$ - it's an intimidating counting problem, but we can make it easier by thinking in terms of generating functions. Let $P_k$ be the number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $k$, and $M_n$ the total number of monic polynomials of degree $n$. This model gives us that
    $$sum_{n=0}^{infty} M_n t^n = prod_{k=1}^{infty}frac1{(1-t^k)^{P_k}}$$
    (Each $frac1{1-t^k}=1+t^k+t^{2k}+cdots$ factor represents the choice of how many copies of a particular irreducible polynomial of degree $k$ to include)

    So, what now? First, we use that earlier count to simplify the left side:
    $$sum_{n=0}^{infty} M_n t^n = sum_{n=0}^{infty} q^n t^n = frac1{1-qt}$$
    Next, take logarithms* and differentiate with respect to $t$:
    begin{align*}frac1{1-qt} &= prod_{k=1}^{infty}frac1{(1-t^k)^{P_k}}\
    -log(1-qt) &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} -P_klog(1-t^k)\
    frac{q}{1-qt} &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{kP_kt^{k-1}}{1-t^k}\
    sum_{n=1}^{infty} q^nt^n = frac{qt}{1-qt} &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{kP_kt^k}{1-t^k} = sum_{n=1}^{infty}t^nsum_{k|n}kP_k\
    q^n &= sum_{d|n}dP_dend{align*}

    Now, we can extract the values of $P_n$ by a standard technique; Mobius inversion. We get
    $$nP_n = sum_{d|n} mu(d)q^{frac{n}{d}}$$
    where $mu$ is the Mobius function of number theory.



    Now, what we really wanted to know is that $P_n$ is positive for $nge 1$. For this, one key fact: $mu(d)in {-1,0,1}$ for all natural $d$ and $mu(1)=1$, so
    begin{align*}nP_n &= q^n +sum_{k|n, 0<k<n}mu(frac{n}{k})q^k\
    nP_n &ge q^n - sum_{k|n, 0<k<n} q^k ge q^n - sum_{0<k<n}q^k = q^n - frac{q^n-q}{q-1} > 0end{align*}

    We use that $qge 2$ here; we do need at least two elements to have a field, after all. And there it is: any finite field with $q$ elements has irreducible polynomials for every degree. This includes both the prime fields $mathbb{Z}/p$ and fields with prime power order. That such fields exist to have irreducible polynomials over - well, we'll just have to apply this result over the prime fields first.



    *Taking a logarithm? Technically, it's all still formal power series manipulation, that doesn't rely on any form of convergence - but if you feel uncomfortable, we're just taking a derivative and then dividing by the original.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      This is all standard theory. The main steps are:




      1. Show that the splitting field $K$ of $x^{p^n}-x$ has order $p^n$,

      2. Show that $K$'s multiplicative group is cyclic, so has a generator $alpha$,

      3. Observe that $K=Bbb Z_p(alpha)$,

      4. Show the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $Bbb Z_p$ has degree $n$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        This is all standard theory. The main steps are:




        1. Show that the splitting field $K$ of $x^{p^n}-x$ has order $p^n$,

        2. Show that $K$'s multiplicative group is cyclic, so has a generator $alpha$,

        3. Observe that $K=Bbb Z_p(alpha)$,

        4. Show the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $Bbb Z_p$ has degree $n$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          This is all standard theory. The main steps are:




          1. Show that the splitting field $K$ of $x^{p^n}-x$ has order $p^n$,

          2. Show that $K$'s multiplicative group is cyclic, so has a generator $alpha$,

          3. Observe that $K=Bbb Z_p(alpha)$,

          4. Show the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $Bbb Z_p$ has degree $n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is all standard theory. The main steps are:




          1. Show that the splitting field $K$ of $x^{p^n}-x$ has order $p^n$,

          2. Show that $K$'s multiplicative group is cyclic, so has a generator $alpha$,

          3. Observe that $K=Bbb Z_p(alpha)$,

          4. Show the minimal polynomial of $alpha$ over $Bbb Z_p$ has degree $n$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 25 '18 at 6:01









          Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown

          104k1160132




          104k1160132























              1












              $begingroup$

              OK, now that the standard theory's up, I'll add my favorite argument. We prove that irreducible polynomials of every degree exist by counting them.



              Let $F$ be a field with $q$ elements, for some finite $q$. We count the number of monic polynomials of degree $n$ over $F$ in two ways.

              First, a monic polynomial $x^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+cdots + a_1 x + a_0$ has $n$ coefficients that can freely vary among $q$ values each, for a total of $q^n$ polynomials.

              Second, a monic polynomial can be uniquely factored as a product of monic irreducible polynomials. We choose the power each polynomial is raised to, make sure the sum of the degrees is $n$ - it's an intimidating counting problem, but we can make it easier by thinking in terms of generating functions. Let $P_k$ be the number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $k$, and $M_n$ the total number of monic polynomials of degree $n$. This model gives us that
              $$sum_{n=0}^{infty} M_n t^n = prod_{k=1}^{infty}frac1{(1-t^k)^{P_k}}$$
              (Each $frac1{1-t^k}=1+t^k+t^{2k}+cdots$ factor represents the choice of how many copies of a particular irreducible polynomial of degree $k$ to include)

              So, what now? First, we use that earlier count to simplify the left side:
              $$sum_{n=0}^{infty} M_n t^n = sum_{n=0}^{infty} q^n t^n = frac1{1-qt}$$
              Next, take logarithms* and differentiate with respect to $t$:
              begin{align*}frac1{1-qt} &= prod_{k=1}^{infty}frac1{(1-t^k)^{P_k}}\
              -log(1-qt) &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} -P_klog(1-t^k)\
              frac{q}{1-qt} &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{kP_kt^{k-1}}{1-t^k}\
              sum_{n=1}^{infty} q^nt^n = frac{qt}{1-qt} &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{kP_kt^k}{1-t^k} = sum_{n=1}^{infty}t^nsum_{k|n}kP_k\
              q^n &= sum_{d|n}dP_dend{align*}

              Now, we can extract the values of $P_n$ by a standard technique; Mobius inversion. We get
              $$nP_n = sum_{d|n} mu(d)q^{frac{n}{d}}$$
              where $mu$ is the Mobius function of number theory.



              Now, what we really wanted to know is that $P_n$ is positive for $nge 1$. For this, one key fact: $mu(d)in {-1,0,1}$ for all natural $d$ and $mu(1)=1$, so
              begin{align*}nP_n &= q^n +sum_{k|n, 0<k<n}mu(frac{n}{k})q^k\
              nP_n &ge q^n - sum_{k|n, 0<k<n} q^k ge q^n - sum_{0<k<n}q^k = q^n - frac{q^n-q}{q-1} > 0end{align*}

              We use that $qge 2$ here; we do need at least two elements to have a field, after all. And there it is: any finite field with $q$ elements has irreducible polynomials for every degree. This includes both the prime fields $mathbb{Z}/p$ and fields with prime power order. That such fields exist to have irreducible polynomials over - well, we'll just have to apply this result over the prime fields first.



              *Taking a logarithm? Technically, it's all still formal power series manipulation, that doesn't rely on any form of convergence - but if you feel uncomfortable, we're just taking a derivative and then dividing by the original.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                OK, now that the standard theory's up, I'll add my favorite argument. We prove that irreducible polynomials of every degree exist by counting them.



                Let $F$ be a field with $q$ elements, for some finite $q$. We count the number of monic polynomials of degree $n$ over $F$ in two ways.

                First, a monic polynomial $x^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+cdots + a_1 x + a_0$ has $n$ coefficients that can freely vary among $q$ values each, for a total of $q^n$ polynomials.

                Second, a monic polynomial can be uniquely factored as a product of monic irreducible polynomials. We choose the power each polynomial is raised to, make sure the sum of the degrees is $n$ - it's an intimidating counting problem, but we can make it easier by thinking in terms of generating functions. Let $P_k$ be the number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $k$, and $M_n$ the total number of monic polynomials of degree $n$. This model gives us that
                $$sum_{n=0}^{infty} M_n t^n = prod_{k=1}^{infty}frac1{(1-t^k)^{P_k}}$$
                (Each $frac1{1-t^k}=1+t^k+t^{2k}+cdots$ factor represents the choice of how many copies of a particular irreducible polynomial of degree $k$ to include)

                So, what now? First, we use that earlier count to simplify the left side:
                $$sum_{n=0}^{infty} M_n t^n = sum_{n=0}^{infty} q^n t^n = frac1{1-qt}$$
                Next, take logarithms* and differentiate with respect to $t$:
                begin{align*}frac1{1-qt} &= prod_{k=1}^{infty}frac1{(1-t^k)^{P_k}}\
                -log(1-qt) &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} -P_klog(1-t^k)\
                frac{q}{1-qt} &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{kP_kt^{k-1}}{1-t^k}\
                sum_{n=1}^{infty} q^nt^n = frac{qt}{1-qt} &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{kP_kt^k}{1-t^k} = sum_{n=1}^{infty}t^nsum_{k|n}kP_k\
                q^n &= sum_{d|n}dP_dend{align*}

                Now, we can extract the values of $P_n$ by a standard technique; Mobius inversion. We get
                $$nP_n = sum_{d|n} mu(d)q^{frac{n}{d}}$$
                where $mu$ is the Mobius function of number theory.



                Now, what we really wanted to know is that $P_n$ is positive for $nge 1$. For this, one key fact: $mu(d)in {-1,0,1}$ for all natural $d$ and $mu(1)=1$, so
                begin{align*}nP_n &= q^n +sum_{k|n, 0<k<n}mu(frac{n}{k})q^k\
                nP_n &ge q^n - sum_{k|n, 0<k<n} q^k ge q^n - sum_{0<k<n}q^k = q^n - frac{q^n-q}{q-1} > 0end{align*}

                We use that $qge 2$ here; we do need at least two elements to have a field, after all. And there it is: any finite field with $q$ elements has irreducible polynomials for every degree. This includes both the prime fields $mathbb{Z}/p$ and fields with prime power order. That such fields exist to have irreducible polynomials over - well, we'll just have to apply this result over the prime fields first.



                *Taking a logarithm? Technically, it's all still formal power series manipulation, that doesn't rely on any form of convergence - but if you feel uncomfortable, we're just taking a derivative and then dividing by the original.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  OK, now that the standard theory's up, I'll add my favorite argument. We prove that irreducible polynomials of every degree exist by counting them.



                  Let $F$ be a field with $q$ elements, for some finite $q$. We count the number of monic polynomials of degree $n$ over $F$ in two ways.

                  First, a monic polynomial $x^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+cdots + a_1 x + a_0$ has $n$ coefficients that can freely vary among $q$ values each, for a total of $q^n$ polynomials.

                  Second, a monic polynomial can be uniquely factored as a product of monic irreducible polynomials. We choose the power each polynomial is raised to, make sure the sum of the degrees is $n$ - it's an intimidating counting problem, but we can make it easier by thinking in terms of generating functions. Let $P_k$ be the number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $k$, and $M_n$ the total number of monic polynomials of degree $n$. This model gives us that
                  $$sum_{n=0}^{infty} M_n t^n = prod_{k=1}^{infty}frac1{(1-t^k)^{P_k}}$$
                  (Each $frac1{1-t^k}=1+t^k+t^{2k}+cdots$ factor represents the choice of how many copies of a particular irreducible polynomial of degree $k$ to include)

                  So, what now? First, we use that earlier count to simplify the left side:
                  $$sum_{n=0}^{infty} M_n t^n = sum_{n=0}^{infty} q^n t^n = frac1{1-qt}$$
                  Next, take logarithms* and differentiate with respect to $t$:
                  begin{align*}frac1{1-qt} &= prod_{k=1}^{infty}frac1{(1-t^k)^{P_k}}\
                  -log(1-qt) &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} -P_klog(1-t^k)\
                  frac{q}{1-qt} &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{kP_kt^{k-1}}{1-t^k}\
                  sum_{n=1}^{infty} q^nt^n = frac{qt}{1-qt} &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{kP_kt^k}{1-t^k} = sum_{n=1}^{infty}t^nsum_{k|n}kP_k\
                  q^n &= sum_{d|n}dP_dend{align*}

                  Now, we can extract the values of $P_n$ by a standard technique; Mobius inversion. We get
                  $$nP_n = sum_{d|n} mu(d)q^{frac{n}{d}}$$
                  where $mu$ is the Mobius function of number theory.



                  Now, what we really wanted to know is that $P_n$ is positive for $nge 1$. For this, one key fact: $mu(d)in {-1,0,1}$ for all natural $d$ and $mu(1)=1$, so
                  begin{align*}nP_n &= q^n +sum_{k|n, 0<k<n}mu(frac{n}{k})q^k\
                  nP_n &ge q^n - sum_{k|n, 0<k<n} q^k ge q^n - sum_{0<k<n}q^k = q^n - frac{q^n-q}{q-1} > 0end{align*}

                  We use that $qge 2$ here; we do need at least two elements to have a field, after all. And there it is: any finite field with $q$ elements has irreducible polynomials for every degree. This includes both the prime fields $mathbb{Z}/p$ and fields with prime power order. That such fields exist to have irreducible polynomials over - well, we'll just have to apply this result over the prime fields first.



                  *Taking a logarithm? Technically, it's all still formal power series manipulation, that doesn't rely on any form of convergence - but if you feel uncomfortable, we're just taking a derivative and then dividing by the original.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  OK, now that the standard theory's up, I'll add my favorite argument. We prove that irreducible polynomials of every degree exist by counting them.



                  Let $F$ be a field with $q$ elements, for some finite $q$. We count the number of monic polynomials of degree $n$ over $F$ in two ways.

                  First, a monic polynomial $x^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+cdots + a_1 x + a_0$ has $n$ coefficients that can freely vary among $q$ values each, for a total of $q^n$ polynomials.

                  Second, a monic polynomial can be uniquely factored as a product of monic irreducible polynomials. We choose the power each polynomial is raised to, make sure the sum of the degrees is $n$ - it's an intimidating counting problem, but we can make it easier by thinking in terms of generating functions. Let $P_k$ be the number of monic irreducible polynomials of degree $k$, and $M_n$ the total number of monic polynomials of degree $n$. This model gives us that
                  $$sum_{n=0}^{infty} M_n t^n = prod_{k=1}^{infty}frac1{(1-t^k)^{P_k}}$$
                  (Each $frac1{1-t^k}=1+t^k+t^{2k}+cdots$ factor represents the choice of how many copies of a particular irreducible polynomial of degree $k$ to include)

                  So, what now? First, we use that earlier count to simplify the left side:
                  $$sum_{n=0}^{infty} M_n t^n = sum_{n=0}^{infty} q^n t^n = frac1{1-qt}$$
                  Next, take logarithms* and differentiate with respect to $t$:
                  begin{align*}frac1{1-qt} &= prod_{k=1}^{infty}frac1{(1-t^k)^{P_k}}\
                  -log(1-qt) &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} -P_klog(1-t^k)\
                  frac{q}{1-qt} &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{kP_kt^{k-1}}{1-t^k}\
                  sum_{n=1}^{infty} q^nt^n = frac{qt}{1-qt} &= sum_{k=1}^{infty} frac{kP_kt^k}{1-t^k} = sum_{n=1}^{infty}t^nsum_{k|n}kP_k\
                  q^n &= sum_{d|n}dP_dend{align*}

                  Now, we can extract the values of $P_n$ by a standard technique; Mobius inversion. We get
                  $$nP_n = sum_{d|n} mu(d)q^{frac{n}{d}}$$
                  where $mu$ is the Mobius function of number theory.



                  Now, what we really wanted to know is that $P_n$ is positive for $nge 1$. For this, one key fact: $mu(d)in {-1,0,1}$ for all natural $d$ and $mu(1)=1$, so
                  begin{align*}nP_n &= q^n +sum_{k|n, 0<k<n}mu(frac{n}{k})q^k\
                  nP_n &ge q^n - sum_{k|n, 0<k<n} q^k ge q^n - sum_{0<k<n}q^k = q^n - frac{q^n-q}{q-1} > 0end{align*}

                  We use that $qge 2$ here; we do need at least two elements to have a field, after all. And there it is: any finite field with $q$ elements has irreducible polynomials for every degree. This includes both the prime fields $mathbb{Z}/p$ and fields with prime power order. That such fields exist to have irreducible polynomials over - well, we'll just have to apply this result over the prime fields first.



                  *Taking a logarithm? Technically, it's all still formal power series manipulation, that doesn't rely on any form of convergence - but if you feel uncomfortable, we're just taking a derivative and then dividing by the original.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 25 '18 at 7:32









                  jmerryjmerry

                  7,853922




                  7,853922















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bressuire

                      Cabo Verde

                      Gyllenstierna