Show homomorphism $f mapsto f^2 $ injective but not surjective.
$begingroup$
Let $R=mathbb F_2[x]$, let $psi:R to R$ given by $f mapsto f^2 $ be homomorphism.
How can I show that $psi$ is injective but not surjective?
Could I show that the image of $psi$ does not equal $R$ for surjectivity? If so, how can I explicitly demonstrate this?
For injectivity could I show $ker(psi) = {0_R}$?
EDIT: Extra question, am I correct in thinking $mathbb F_2[x]$ is isomorphic to a proper subring of itself? Is there a way to show this using $psi$ above and the first isomorphism theorem?
abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $R=mathbb F_2[x]$, let $psi:R to R$ given by $f mapsto f^2 $ be homomorphism.
How can I show that $psi$ is injective but not surjective?
Could I show that the image of $psi$ does not equal $R$ for surjectivity? If so, how can I explicitly demonstrate this?
For injectivity could I show $ker(psi) = {0_R}$?
EDIT: Extra question, am I correct in thinking $mathbb F_2[x]$ is isomorphic to a proper subring of itself? Is there a way to show this using $psi$ above and the first isomorphism theorem?
abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $R=mathbb F_2[x]$, let $psi:R to R$ given by $f mapsto f^2 $ be homomorphism.
How can I show that $psi$ is injective but not surjective?
Could I show that the image of $psi$ does not equal $R$ for surjectivity? If so, how can I explicitly demonstrate this?
For injectivity could I show $ker(psi) = {0_R}$?
EDIT: Extra question, am I correct in thinking $mathbb F_2[x]$ is isomorphic to a proper subring of itself? Is there a way to show this using $psi$ above and the first isomorphism theorem?
abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory
$endgroup$
Let $R=mathbb F_2[x]$, let $psi:R to R$ given by $f mapsto f^2 $ be homomorphism.
How can I show that $psi$ is injective but not surjective?
Could I show that the image of $psi$ does not equal $R$ for surjectivity? If so, how can I explicitly demonstrate this?
For injectivity could I show $ker(psi) = {0_R}$?
EDIT: Extra question, am I correct in thinking $mathbb F_2[x]$ is isomorphic to a proper subring of itself? Is there a way to show this using $psi$ above and the first isomorphism theorem?
abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory
abstract-algebra ring-theory field-theory
edited Dec 26 '18 at 21:32
user26857
39.4k124183
39.4k124183
asked May 1 '17 at 11:53
user415105
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Just use the definition for injectivity.
For surjectivity, I think it is sufficient to show that there is no $a in R$ with $a^2 = x$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
For injectivity it is worth noticing that $psi$ is linear, so one just need to check that there is no polynomial $p$ with $p^2 = 0$.
$endgroup$
– user171326
May 1 '17 at 13:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note:
$deg(p^2) = deg(p) + deg(p) = 2deg(p)$
Injectivity:
The above implies that the kernel is trivial.
Non-Surjectivity:
The above implies that odd degree polynomials do not exist in the image.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2260321%2fshow-homomorphism-f-mapsto-f2-injective-but-not-surjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Just use the definition for injectivity.
For surjectivity, I think it is sufficient to show that there is no $a in R$ with $a^2 = x$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
For injectivity it is worth noticing that $psi$ is linear, so one just need to check that there is no polynomial $p$ with $p^2 = 0$.
$endgroup$
– user171326
May 1 '17 at 13:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just use the definition for injectivity.
For surjectivity, I think it is sufficient to show that there is no $a in R$ with $a^2 = x$.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
For injectivity it is worth noticing that $psi$ is linear, so one just need to check that there is no polynomial $p$ with $p^2 = 0$.
$endgroup$
– user171326
May 1 '17 at 13:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Just use the definition for injectivity.
For surjectivity, I think it is sufficient to show that there is no $a in R$ with $a^2 = x$.
$endgroup$
Just use the definition for injectivity.
For surjectivity, I think it is sufficient to show that there is no $a in R$ with $a^2 = x$.
answered May 1 '17 at 11:57
Pieter21Pieter21
2,8451613
2,8451613
1
$begingroup$
For injectivity it is worth noticing that $psi$ is linear, so one just need to check that there is no polynomial $p$ with $p^2 = 0$.
$endgroup$
– user171326
May 1 '17 at 13:00
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
For injectivity it is worth noticing that $psi$ is linear, so one just need to check that there is no polynomial $p$ with $p^2 = 0$.
$endgroup$
– user171326
May 1 '17 at 13:00
1
1
$begingroup$
For injectivity it is worth noticing that $psi$ is linear, so one just need to check that there is no polynomial $p$ with $p^2 = 0$.
$endgroup$
– user171326
May 1 '17 at 13:00
$begingroup$
For injectivity it is worth noticing that $psi$ is linear, so one just need to check that there is no polynomial $p$ with $p^2 = 0$.
$endgroup$
– user171326
May 1 '17 at 13:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note:
$deg(p^2) = deg(p) + deg(p) = 2deg(p)$
Injectivity:
The above implies that the kernel is trivial.
Non-Surjectivity:
The above implies that odd degree polynomials do not exist in the image.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note:
$deg(p^2) = deg(p) + deg(p) = 2deg(p)$
Injectivity:
The above implies that the kernel is trivial.
Non-Surjectivity:
The above implies that odd degree polynomials do not exist in the image.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note:
$deg(p^2) = deg(p) + deg(p) = 2deg(p)$
Injectivity:
The above implies that the kernel is trivial.
Non-Surjectivity:
The above implies that odd degree polynomials do not exist in the image.
$endgroup$
Note:
$deg(p^2) = deg(p) + deg(p) = 2deg(p)$
Injectivity:
The above implies that the kernel is trivial.
Non-Surjectivity:
The above implies that odd degree polynomials do not exist in the image.
edited Dec 26 '18 at 21:32
user26857
39.4k124183
39.4k124183
answered Dec 25 '18 at 6:57
MetricMetric
1,22149
1,22149
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2260321%2fshow-homomorphism-f-mapsto-f2-injective-but-not-surjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown