If domain $A$ of the homomorphism $f$ is a field, and if the range of $f$ has more than one element, then $f$...
$begingroup$
This is a question from Pinter's A book of Abstract Algebra:
If domain A of the homomorphism $f$ is a field, and if the range of
$f$ has more than one element, then $f$ is injective.
Here's my attempt:
Claim. If $text{im} f ne { 0}$ then $f(1)ne 0$.
Proof (by contrapositive). Suppose that $f(1)=0$. Then if $xin A$ then $f(x)= f(xcdot 1) = f(x)f(1)= f(x)cdot 0=0$. Hence, $text{im} f = { 0}$.
To show that $f$ is injective, it is enough to show that $text{ker} f ={ 0}$. Let $x in text{ker} f$. Then $f(x)=0$. We claim that $x=0$. Suppose that $xne 0$. Then there is an element $x^{-1} in A$ such that $xx^{-1} = 1$.
Now,
$f(x)=0 \ Rightarrow f(x)f(x^{-1}) = 0 cdot f(x^{-1}) \ Rightarrow f(xx^{-1})=0 \ Rightarrow f(1)=0$
Which is a contradiction!
Thus, $text{ker} f ={ 0}$ . This completes the proof.
Is this okay or am I missing something? I was wondering if there was some easier way to do this.
abstract-algebra proof-verification ring-theory field-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a question from Pinter's A book of Abstract Algebra:
If domain A of the homomorphism $f$ is a field, and if the range of
$f$ has more than one element, then $f$ is injective.
Here's my attempt:
Claim. If $text{im} f ne { 0}$ then $f(1)ne 0$.
Proof (by contrapositive). Suppose that $f(1)=0$. Then if $xin A$ then $f(x)= f(xcdot 1) = f(x)f(1)= f(x)cdot 0=0$. Hence, $text{im} f = { 0}$.
To show that $f$ is injective, it is enough to show that $text{ker} f ={ 0}$. Let $x in text{ker} f$. Then $f(x)=0$. We claim that $x=0$. Suppose that $xne 0$. Then there is an element $x^{-1} in A$ such that $xx^{-1} = 1$.
Now,
$f(x)=0 \ Rightarrow f(x)f(x^{-1}) = 0 cdot f(x^{-1}) \ Rightarrow f(xx^{-1})=0 \ Rightarrow f(1)=0$
Which is a contradiction!
Thus, $text{ker} f ={ 0}$ . This completes the proof.
Is this okay or am I missing something? I was wondering if there was some easier way to do this.
abstract-algebra proof-verification ring-theory field-theory
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with ideals? If yes, then you can use the fact that a field has only two ideals, namely the field itself or the zero ideal. Since kernels are ideals, so for a homomorphism from a field, either the kernel is just ${0}$ or whole $Bbb{F}$. With the range being non-trivial, kernel has to be ${0}$, hence injective.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:29
$begingroup$
@AnuragA I did prove that fields have no nontrivial ideals (as an exercise in my book). I guess I need to verify that kernel are ideals. However, is my aforementioned proof okay?
$endgroup$
– Ashish K
Dec 25 '18 at 6:49
1
$begingroup$
Yes your proof is good.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a question from Pinter's A book of Abstract Algebra:
If domain A of the homomorphism $f$ is a field, and if the range of
$f$ has more than one element, then $f$ is injective.
Here's my attempt:
Claim. If $text{im} f ne { 0}$ then $f(1)ne 0$.
Proof (by contrapositive). Suppose that $f(1)=0$. Then if $xin A$ then $f(x)= f(xcdot 1) = f(x)f(1)= f(x)cdot 0=0$. Hence, $text{im} f = { 0}$.
To show that $f$ is injective, it is enough to show that $text{ker} f ={ 0}$. Let $x in text{ker} f$. Then $f(x)=0$. We claim that $x=0$. Suppose that $xne 0$. Then there is an element $x^{-1} in A$ such that $xx^{-1} = 1$.
Now,
$f(x)=0 \ Rightarrow f(x)f(x^{-1}) = 0 cdot f(x^{-1}) \ Rightarrow f(xx^{-1})=0 \ Rightarrow f(1)=0$
Which is a contradiction!
Thus, $text{ker} f ={ 0}$ . This completes the proof.
Is this okay or am I missing something? I was wondering if there was some easier way to do this.
abstract-algebra proof-verification ring-theory field-theory
$endgroup$
This is a question from Pinter's A book of Abstract Algebra:
If domain A of the homomorphism $f$ is a field, and if the range of
$f$ has more than one element, then $f$ is injective.
Here's my attempt:
Claim. If $text{im} f ne { 0}$ then $f(1)ne 0$.
Proof (by contrapositive). Suppose that $f(1)=0$. Then if $xin A$ then $f(x)= f(xcdot 1) = f(x)f(1)= f(x)cdot 0=0$. Hence, $text{im} f = { 0}$.
To show that $f$ is injective, it is enough to show that $text{ker} f ={ 0}$. Let $x in text{ker} f$. Then $f(x)=0$. We claim that $x=0$. Suppose that $xne 0$. Then there is an element $x^{-1} in A$ such that $xx^{-1} = 1$.
Now,
$f(x)=0 \ Rightarrow f(x)f(x^{-1}) = 0 cdot f(x^{-1}) \ Rightarrow f(xx^{-1})=0 \ Rightarrow f(1)=0$
Which is a contradiction!
Thus, $text{ker} f ={ 0}$ . This completes the proof.
Is this okay or am I missing something? I was wondering if there was some easier way to do this.
abstract-algebra proof-verification ring-theory field-theory
abstract-algebra proof-verification ring-theory field-theory
asked Dec 25 '18 at 6:23
Ashish KAshish K
890613
890613
4
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with ideals? If yes, then you can use the fact that a field has only two ideals, namely the field itself or the zero ideal. Since kernels are ideals, so for a homomorphism from a field, either the kernel is just ${0}$ or whole $Bbb{F}$. With the range being non-trivial, kernel has to be ${0}$, hence injective.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:29
$begingroup$
@AnuragA I did prove that fields have no nontrivial ideals (as an exercise in my book). I guess I need to verify that kernel are ideals. However, is my aforementioned proof okay?
$endgroup$
– Ashish K
Dec 25 '18 at 6:49
1
$begingroup$
Yes your proof is good.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:53
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with ideals? If yes, then you can use the fact that a field has only two ideals, namely the field itself or the zero ideal. Since kernels are ideals, so for a homomorphism from a field, either the kernel is just ${0}$ or whole $Bbb{F}$. With the range being non-trivial, kernel has to be ${0}$, hence injective.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:29
$begingroup$
@AnuragA I did prove that fields have no nontrivial ideals (as an exercise in my book). I guess I need to verify that kernel are ideals. However, is my aforementioned proof okay?
$endgroup$
– Ashish K
Dec 25 '18 at 6:49
1
$begingroup$
Yes your proof is good.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:53
4
4
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with ideals? If yes, then you can use the fact that a field has only two ideals, namely the field itself or the zero ideal. Since kernels are ideals, so for a homomorphism from a field, either the kernel is just ${0}$ or whole $Bbb{F}$. With the range being non-trivial, kernel has to be ${0}$, hence injective.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:29
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with ideals? If yes, then you can use the fact that a field has only two ideals, namely the field itself or the zero ideal. Since kernels are ideals, so for a homomorphism from a field, either the kernel is just ${0}$ or whole $Bbb{F}$. With the range being non-trivial, kernel has to be ${0}$, hence injective.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:29
$begingroup$
@AnuragA I did prove that fields have no nontrivial ideals (as an exercise in my book). I guess I need to verify that kernel are ideals. However, is my aforementioned proof okay?
$endgroup$
– Ashish K
Dec 25 '18 at 6:49
$begingroup$
@AnuragA I did prove that fields have no nontrivial ideals (as an exercise in my book). I guess I need to verify that kernel are ideals. However, is my aforementioned proof okay?
$endgroup$
– Ashish K
Dec 25 '18 at 6:49
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes your proof is good.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:53
$begingroup$
Yes your proof is good.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:53
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051887%2fif-domain-a-of-the-homomorphism-f-is-a-field-and-if-the-range-of-f-has-mo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051887%2fif-domain-a-of-the-homomorphism-f-is-a-field-and-if-the-range-of-f-has-mo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with ideals? If yes, then you can use the fact that a field has only two ideals, namely the field itself or the zero ideal. Since kernels are ideals, so for a homomorphism from a field, either the kernel is just ${0}$ or whole $Bbb{F}$. With the range being non-trivial, kernel has to be ${0}$, hence injective.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:29
$begingroup$
@AnuragA I did prove that fields have no nontrivial ideals (as an exercise in my book). I guess I need to verify that kernel are ideals. However, is my aforementioned proof okay?
$endgroup$
– Ashish K
Dec 25 '18 at 6:49
1
$begingroup$
Yes your proof is good.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 25 '18 at 6:53