final coalgebra of the 𝓟${_{<κ}}$(A×X) endo-functor in $Set^*$?
$begingroup$
In the paper Coalgebraic Games and Strategies F. Honsell, M. Lenisa, and R. Redamalla use the functor $F_A$(X) = ${mathscr{P}_{<κ}}$(A×X) to define games coalgebraically. This is a functor from the category of $Set^* to Set^*$ where $Set^*$ is the category of sets satisfying the antifoundation axioms.
They state that the final $F_A$ coalgebra is ($G_A$,id) and that a game is to be understood as an element of $G_A$, but I don't know where the final coalgebra construction for $F_A$ is explained in detail. Why would id be the coalgebraic function?
They write
The elements of the final coalgebra $G_A$ are the minimal graphs
up-to bisimilarity.
To add a bit more context as to how this relates to games:
We consider a general notion of 2-player game of perfect information,
where the two players are called Left (L) and Right (R). A game x is
identified with its initial position; at any position, there are moves
for L and R, taking to new positions of the game. By abstracting from
superficial features of positions, games can be viewed as elements of
the final coalgebra for the functor F$_A$(X) = $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$(A×X), where A is a
parametric set of atoms which encode information on moves and
positions, i.e. move names, and the player who has moved, and $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$ is
the set of all subsets of cardinality < κ. The coalgebra structure
captures, for any position, the moves of the players and the
corresponding next positions.
as for the meaning of $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$ this is explained in a later article "Multigames and strategies, coalgebraically"
$mathscr{P}_{<κ}$is the set of all subsets of cardinality < κ, where κ can be ω, if only finitely branching games are considered, or it can be an inaccessible cardinal, if we are interested in more general games.
PS I posted this question on mathoverflow yesterday, thinking I was on math.stackexchange...
category-theory game-theory coalgebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the paper Coalgebraic Games and Strategies F. Honsell, M. Lenisa, and R. Redamalla use the functor $F_A$(X) = ${mathscr{P}_{<κ}}$(A×X) to define games coalgebraically. This is a functor from the category of $Set^* to Set^*$ where $Set^*$ is the category of sets satisfying the antifoundation axioms.
They state that the final $F_A$ coalgebra is ($G_A$,id) and that a game is to be understood as an element of $G_A$, but I don't know where the final coalgebra construction for $F_A$ is explained in detail. Why would id be the coalgebraic function?
They write
The elements of the final coalgebra $G_A$ are the minimal graphs
up-to bisimilarity.
To add a bit more context as to how this relates to games:
We consider a general notion of 2-player game of perfect information,
where the two players are called Left (L) and Right (R). A game x is
identified with its initial position; at any position, there are moves
for L and R, taking to new positions of the game. By abstracting from
superficial features of positions, games can be viewed as elements of
the final coalgebra for the functor F$_A$(X) = $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$(A×X), where A is a
parametric set of atoms which encode information on moves and
positions, i.e. move names, and the player who has moved, and $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$ is
the set of all subsets of cardinality < κ. The coalgebra structure
captures, for any position, the moves of the players and the
corresponding next positions.
as for the meaning of $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$ this is explained in a later article "Multigames and strategies, coalgebraically"
$mathscr{P}_{<κ}$is the set of all subsets of cardinality < κ, where κ can be ω, if only finitely branching games are considered, or it can be an inaccessible cardinal, if we are interested in more general games.
PS I posted this question on mathoverflow yesterday, thinking I was on math.stackexchange...
category-theory game-theory coalgebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the paper Coalgebraic Games and Strategies F. Honsell, M. Lenisa, and R. Redamalla use the functor $F_A$(X) = ${mathscr{P}_{<κ}}$(A×X) to define games coalgebraically. This is a functor from the category of $Set^* to Set^*$ where $Set^*$ is the category of sets satisfying the antifoundation axioms.
They state that the final $F_A$ coalgebra is ($G_A$,id) and that a game is to be understood as an element of $G_A$, but I don't know where the final coalgebra construction for $F_A$ is explained in detail. Why would id be the coalgebraic function?
They write
The elements of the final coalgebra $G_A$ are the minimal graphs
up-to bisimilarity.
To add a bit more context as to how this relates to games:
We consider a general notion of 2-player game of perfect information,
where the two players are called Left (L) and Right (R). A game x is
identified with its initial position; at any position, there are moves
for L and R, taking to new positions of the game. By abstracting from
superficial features of positions, games can be viewed as elements of
the final coalgebra for the functor F$_A$(X) = $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$(A×X), where A is a
parametric set of atoms which encode information on moves and
positions, i.e. move names, and the player who has moved, and $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$ is
the set of all subsets of cardinality < κ. The coalgebra structure
captures, for any position, the moves of the players and the
corresponding next positions.
as for the meaning of $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$ this is explained in a later article "Multigames and strategies, coalgebraically"
$mathscr{P}_{<κ}$is the set of all subsets of cardinality < κ, where κ can be ω, if only finitely branching games are considered, or it can be an inaccessible cardinal, if we are interested in more general games.
PS I posted this question on mathoverflow yesterday, thinking I was on math.stackexchange...
category-theory game-theory coalgebras
$endgroup$
In the paper Coalgebraic Games and Strategies F. Honsell, M. Lenisa, and R. Redamalla use the functor $F_A$(X) = ${mathscr{P}_{<κ}}$(A×X) to define games coalgebraically. This is a functor from the category of $Set^* to Set^*$ where $Set^*$ is the category of sets satisfying the antifoundation axioms.
They state that the final $F_A$ coalgebra is ($G_A$,id) and that a game is to be understood as an element of $G_A$, but I don't know where the final coalgebra construction for $F_A$ is explained in detail. Why would id be the coalgebraic function?
They write
The elements of the final coalgebra $G_A$ are the minimal graphs
up-to bisimilarity.
To add a bit more context as to how this relates to games:
We consider a general notion of 2-player game of perfect information,
where the two players are called Left (L) and Right (R). A game x is
identified with its initial position; at any position, there are moves
for L and R, taking to new positions of the game. By abstracting from
superficial features of positions, games can be viewed as elements of
the final coalgebra for the functor F$_A$(X) = $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$(A×X), where A is a
parametric set of atoms which encode information on moves and
positions, i.e. move names, and the player who has moved, and $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$ is
the set of all subsets of cardinality < κ. The coalgebra structure
captures, for any position, the moves of the players and the
corresponding next positions.
as for the meaning of $mathscr{P}_{<κ}$ this is explained in a later article "Multigames and strategies, coalgebraically"
$mathscr{P}_{<κ}$is the set of all subsets of cardinality < κ, where κ can be ω, if only finitely branching games are considered, or it can be an inaccessible cardinal, if we are interested in more general games.
PS I posted this question on mathoverflow yesterday, thinking I was on math.stackexchange...
category-theory game-theory coalgebras
category-theory game-theory coalgebras
edited Jan 5 at 18:19
Henry Story
asked Jan 5 at 17:43
Henry StoryHenry Story
25818
25818
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062970%2ffinal-coalgebra-of-the-%25ce%25baa%25c3%2597x-endo-functor-in-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062970%2ffinal-coalgebra-of-the-%25ce%25baa%25c3%2597x-endo-functor-in-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown