Applying the divided difference operator












1












$begingroup$


This question is about divided difference operators.



How do I perform $partial _2$ or $partial_3$ on $x_1^2x_2$?



$partial_i$ is defined as $frac{p-r_i.p}{x_i-x_{i+1}}$, where $r_i$ is the reflection operator; i.e. $r_i.p(x_1,x_2,dots,x_i,x_{i+1},dots,x_n)=p(x_1,x_2,dots,x_{i+1},x_i,dots,x_n)$.



Do I just assume that $x_1^2x_2=x_1^2x_2x_3^0x_4^0$?



Edit: I have another question. The calculation of Schubert polynomials uss the following formula: $S_{pi}=partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}S_{w_0^n}$. What does $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}$ mean? Do I just concatenate $pi^{-1}$ and $w_0^n$ as words? Like if $w_0^3=321$ and $pi=(12)$, we get $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}=partial_{1321}$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    See my answer to this mathoverflow question: mathoverflow.net/questions/216242/free-kx-1-dots-x-ns-n-module/…
    $endgroup$
    – David Hill
    May 4 '16 at 14:30
















1












$begingroup$


This question is about divided difference operators.



How do I perform $partial _2$ or $partial_3$ on $x_1^2x_2$?



$partial_i$ is defined as $frac{p-r_i.p}{x_i-x_{i+1}}$, where $r_i$ is the reflection operator; i.e. $r_i.p(x_1,x_2,dots,x_i,x_{i+1},dots,x_n)=p(x_1,x_2,dots,x_{i+1},x_i,dots,x_n)$.



Do I just assume that $x_1^2x_2=x_1^2x_2x_3^0x_4^0$?



Edit: I have another question. The calculation of Schubert polynomials uss the following formula: $S_{pi}=partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}S_{w_0^n}$. What does $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}$ mean? Do I just concatenate $pi^{-1}$ and $w_0^n$ as words? Like if $w_0^3=321$ and $pi=(12)$, we get $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}=partial_{1321}$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    See my answer to this mathoverflow question: mathoverflow.net/questions/216242/free-kx-1-dots-x-ns-n-module/…
    $endgroup$
    – David Hill
    May 4 '16 at 14:30














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


This question is about divided difference operators.



How do I perform $partial _2$ or $partial_3$ on $x_1^2x_2$?



$partial_i$ is defined as $frac{p-r_i.p}{x_i-x_{i+1}}$, where $r_i$ is the reflection operator; i.e. $r_i.p(x_1,x_2,dots,x_i,x_{i+1},dots,x_n)=p(x_1,x_2,dots,x_{i+1},x_i,dots,x_n)$.



Do I just assume that $x_1^2x_2=x_1^2x_2x_3^0x_4^0$?



Edit: I have another question. The calculation of Schubert polynomials uss the following formula: $S_{pi}=partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}S_{w_0^n}$. What does $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}$ mean? Do I just concatenate $pi^{-1}$ and $w_0^n$ as words? Like if $w_0^3=321$ and $pi=(12)$, we get $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}=partial_{1321}$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This question is about divided difference operators.



How do I perform $partial _2$ or $partial_3$ on $x_1^2x_2$?



$partial_i$ is defined as $frac{p-r_i.p}{x_i-x_{i+1}}$, where $r_i$ is the reflection operator; i.e. $r_i.p(x_1,x_2,dots,x_i,x_{i+1},dots,x_n)=p(x_1,x_2,dots,x_{i+1},x_i,dots,x_n)$.



Do I just assume that $x_1^2x_2=x_1^2x_2x_3^0x_4^0$?



Edit: I have another question. The calculation of Schubert polynomials uss the following formula: $S_{pi}=partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}S_{w_0^n}$. What does $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}$ mean? Do I just concatenate $pi^{-1}$ and $w_0^n$ as words? Like if $w_0^3=321$ and $pi=(12)$, we get $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^n}=partial_{1321}$?







combinatorics representation-theory schubert-calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 5 at 15:50









Matt Samuel

38.8k63769




38.8k63769










asked May 4 '16 at 12:31









fierydemonfierydemon

4,58522158




4,58522158












  • $begingroup$
    See my answer to this mathoverflow question: mathoverflow.net/questions/216242/free-kx-1-dots-x-ns-n-module/…
    $endgroup$
    – David Hill
    May 4 '16 at 14:30


















  • $begingroup$
    See my answer to this mathoverflow question: mathoverflow.net/questions/216242/free-kx-1-dots-x-ns-n-module/…
    $endgroup$
    – David Hill
    May 4 '16 at 14:30
















$begingroup$
See my answer to this mathoverflow question: mathoverflow.net/questions/216242/free-kx-1-dots-x-ns-n-module/…
$endgroup$
– David Hill
May 4 '16 at 14:30




$begingroup$
See my answer to this mathoverflow question: mathoverflow.net/questions/216242/free-kx-1-dots-x-ns-n-module/…
$endgroup$
– David Hill
May 4 '16 at 14:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

For the first question: Yes, $x_1^2x_2 = x_1^2x_2^1x_3^0x_4^0$, hence
$$partial_2(x_1^2x_2) = frac{x_1^2x_2 - x_1^2x_3}{x_2-x_3} = x_1^2.$$



For the second question: No, it is not just concatenation. To compute $partial_w$ you need to find a reduced word $I = [i_1, i_2, ldots, i_m]$ for $w$: write $w = r_{i_1}r_{i_2} dotsb r_{i_m}$ with $m$ minimal. Then $partial_w = partial_{i_1}partial_{i_2} dotsb partial_{i_m}.$



In your example, with permutations written in second-line notation, $w_0^3 = 321$ and $pi = 213$, hence $pi^{-1}w_0^3 = 312 = r_2r_1$. Therefore $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^3} = partial_2partial_1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    To Ayush: If my answer is not clear enough for you to accept it, please let me know what else should I add. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Catalin Zara
    Nov 30 '16 at 21:06











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1771223%2fapplying-the-divided-difference-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

For the first question: Yes, $x_1^2x_2 = x_1^2x_2^1x_3^0x_4^0$, hence
$$partial_2(x_1^2x_2) = frac{x_1^2x_2 - x_1^2x_3}{x_2-x_3} = x_1^2.$$



For the second question: No, it is not just concatenation. To compute $partial_w$ you need to find a reduced word $I = [i_1, i_2, ldots, i_m]$ for $w$: write $w = r_{i_1}r_{i_2} dotsb r_{i_m}$ with $m$ minimal. Then $partial_w = partial_{i_1}partial_{i_2} dotsb partial_{i_m}.$



In your example, with permutations written in second-line notation, $w_0^3 = 321$ and $pi = 213$, hence $pi^{-1}w_0^3 = 312 = r_2r_1$. Therefore $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^3} = partial_2partial_1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    To Ayush: If my answer is not clear enough for you to accept it, please let me know what else should I add. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Catalin Zara
    Nov 30 '16 at 21:06
















1












$begingroup$

For the first question: Yes, $x_1^2x_2 = x_1^2x_2^1x_3^0x_4^0$, hence
$$partial_2(x_1^2x_2) = frac{x_1^2x_2 - x_1^2x_3}{x_2-x_3} = x_1^2.$$



For the second question: No, it is not just concatenation. To compute $partial_w$ you need to find a reduced word $I = [i_1, i_2, ldots, i_m]$ for $w$: write $w = r_{i_1}r_{i_2} dotsb r_{i_m}$ with $m$ minimal. Then $partial_w = partial_{i_1}partial_{i_2} dotsb partial_{i_m}.$



In your example, with permutations written in second-line notation, $w_0^3 = 321$ and $pi = 213$, hence $pi^{-1}w_0^3 = 312 = r_2r_1$. Therefore $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^3} = partial_2partial_1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    To Ayush: If my answer is not clear enough for you to accept it, please let me know what else should I add. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Catalin Zara
    Nov 30 '16 at 21:06














1












1








1





$begingroup$

For the first question: Yes, $x_1^2x_2 = x_1^2x_2^1x_3^0x_4^0$, hence
$$partial_2(x_1^2x_2) = frac{x_1^2x_2 - x_1^2x_3}{x_2-x_3} = x_1^2.$$



For the second question: No, it is not just concatenation. To compute $partial_w$ you need to find a reduced word $I = [i_1, i_2, ldots, i_m]$ for $w$: write $w = r_{i_1}r_{i_2} dotsb r_{i_m}$ with $m$ minimal. Then $partial_w = partial_{i_1}partial_{i_2} dotsb partial_{i_m}.$



In your example, with permutations written in second-line notation, $w_0^3 = 321$ and $pi = 213$, hence $pi^{-1}w_0^3 = 312 = r_2r_1$. Therefore $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^3} = partial_2partial_1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



For the first question: Yes, $x_1^2x_2 = x_1^2x_2^1x_3^0x_4^0$, hence
$$partial_2(x_1^2x_2) = frac{x_1^2x_2 - x_1^2x_3}{x_2-x_3} = x_1^2.$$



For the second question: No, it is not just concatenation. To compute $partial_w$ you need to find a reduced word $I = [i_1, i_2, ldots, i_m]$ for $w$: write $w = r_{i_1}r_{i_2} dotsb r_{i_m}$ with $m$ minimal. Then $partial_w = partial_{i_1}partial_{i_2} dotsb partial_{i_m}.$



In your example, with permutations written in second-line notation, $w_0^3 = 321$ and $pi = 213$, hence $pi^{-1}w_0^3 = 312 = r_2r_1$. Therefore $partial_{pi^{-1}w_0^3} = partial_2partial_1$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited May 4 '16 at 16:04

























answered May 4 '16 at 14:02









Catalin ZaraCatalin Zara

3,752514




3,752514












  • $begingroup$
    To Ayush: If my answer is not clear enough for you to accept it, please let me know what else should I add. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Catalin Zara
    Nov 30 '16 at 21:06


















  • $begingroup$
    To Ayush: If my answer is not clear enough for you to accept it, please let me know what else should I add. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Catalin Zara
    Nov 30 '16 at 21:06
















$begingroup$
To Ayush: If my answer is not clear enough for you to accept it, please let me know what else should I add. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Catalin Zara
Nov 30 '16 at 21:06




$begingroup$
To Ayush: If my answer is not clear enough for you to accept it, please let me know what else should I add. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Catalin Zara
Nov 30 '16 at 21:06


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1771223%2fapplying-the-divided-difference-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Cabo Verde

Gyllenstierna