Solving PDEs by adding small perturbation terms and taking limits












1














When trying to solve some PDE problem, sometimes we made approximation problem that is easier to solve than the original one. We do that by adding a new term(s) in the original problem. Then we try to use the solution of the approximation problem to get the solution of the original problem.



Well known method for doing something like this is the vanishing viscosity method. The vanishing viscosity method consists in viewing problem
$$(OP) hspace{1cm}
u_t+g(u)_x = 0\[2ex]
$$

as the limit of the problem
$$(AP) hspace{1cm}
u_t+g(u)_x =nu varDelta u \[2ex]
$$

when $nu rightarrow 0 $. So we could find solution of a original problem by finding the solution of the approximation problem by letting $nu rightarrow 0 $. Additional info on the vanishing viscosity method could be found in a lot of books (Dafermos, for example).



Before asking the question, just to mention that my areas of interest are conservation and balance laws, and I work more with systems than with single equations.



My question is this: what are the other possible choices we can use other than $nu varDelta u$ for the term we add in the original problem?



I am especially interested in the cases where we let $nu rightarrow 0$ in the approximation problem and then make some conclusion about solution of the original problem.



I found a few papers that deal with PDE problems with relaxation (for example, in case of 2x2 systems, they add perturbation terms $(phi (u_2)-u_1)/nu$ and then try to find zero relaxation limit by letting $nu rightarrow 0 $ ) and PDE problems with damping (they add some terms like $nu cdot u$ but they never let $nu rightarrow 0 $). Also problems with damping are more interesting to me than with the relaxation.



Does anyone know any reference in the literature with some other choices other the few mentioned above? Also it would be very helpful to me if someone knows some work that deals with PDE problem with damping and in some moment authors let $nu rightarrow 0 $.










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    When trying to solve some PDE problem, sometimes we made approximation problem that is easier to solve than the original one. We do that by adding a new term(s) in the original problem. Then we try to use the solution of the approximation problem to get the solution of the original problem.



    Well known method for doing something like this is the vanishing viscosity method. The vanishing viscosity method consists in viewing problem
    $$(OP) hspace{1cm}
    u_t+g(u)_x = 0\[2ex]
    $$

    as the limit of the problem
    $$(AP) hspace{1cm}
    u_t+g(u)_x =nu varDelta u \[2ex]
    $$

    when $nu rightarrow 0 $. So we could find solution of a original problem by finding the solution of the approximation problem by letting $nu rightarrow 0 $. Additional info on the vanishing viscosity method could be found in a lot of books (Dafermos, for example).



    Before asking the question, just to mention that my areas of interest are conservation and balance laws, and I work more with systems than with single equations.



    My question is this: what are the other possible choices we can use other than $nu varDelta u$ for the term we add in the original problem?



    I am especially interested in the cases where we let $nu rightarrow 0$ in the approximation problem and then make some conclusion about solution of the original problem.



    I found a few papers that deal with PDE problems with relaxation (for example, in case of 2x2 systems, they add perturbation terms $(phi (u_2)-u_1)/nu$ and then try to find zero relaxation limit by letting $nu rightarrow 0 $ ) and PDE problems with damping (they add some terms like $nu cdot u$ but they never let $nu rightarrow 0 $). Also problems with damping are more interesting to me than with the relaxation.



    Does anyone know any reference in the literature with some other choices other the few mentioned above? Also it would be very helpful to me if someone knows some work that deals with PDE problem with damping and in some moment authors let $nu rightarrow 0 $.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1


      1





      When trying to solve some PDE problem, sometimes we made approximation problem that is easier to solve than the original one. We do that by adding a new term(s) in the original problem. Then we try to use the solution of the approximation problem to get the solution of the original problem.



      Well known method for doing something like this is the vanishing viscosity method. The vanishing viscosity method consists in viewing problem
      $$(OP) hspace{1cm}
      u_t+g(u)_x = 0\[2ex]
      $$

      as the limit of the problem
      $$(AP) hspace{1cm}
      u_t+g(u)_x =nu varDelta u \[2ex]
      $$

      when $nu rightarrow 0 $. So we could find solution of a original problem by finding the solution of the approximation problem by letting $nu rightarrow 0 $. Additional info on the vanishing viscosity method could be found in a lot of books (Dafermos, for example).



      Before asking the question, just to mention that my areas of interest are conservation and balance laws, and I work more with systems than with single equations.



      My question is this: what are the other possible choices we can use other than $nu varDelta u$ for the term we add in the original problem?



      I am especially interested in the cases where we let $nu rightarrow 0$ in the approximation problem and then make some conclusion about solution of the original problem.



      I found a few papers that deal with PDE problems with relaxation (for example, in case of 2x2 systems, they add perturbation terms $(phi (u_2)-u_1)/nu$ and then try to find zero relaxation limit by letting $nu rightarrow 0 $ ) and PDE problems with damping (they add some terms like $nu cdot u$ but they never let $nu rightarrow 0 $). Also problems with damping are more interesting to me than with the relaxation.



      Does anyone know any reference in the literature with some other choices other the few mentioned above? Also it would be very helpful to me if someone knows some work that deals with PDE problem with damping and in some moment authors let $nu rightarrow 0 $.










      share|cite|improve this question













      When trying to solve some PDE problem, sometimes we made approximation problem that is easier to solve than the original one. We do that by adding a new term(s) in the original problem. Then we try to use the solution of the approximation problem to get the solution of the original problem.



      Well known method for doing something like this is the vanishing viscosity method. The vanishing viscosity method consists in viewing problem
      $$(OP) hspace{1cm}
      u_t+g(u)_x = 0\[2ex]
      $$

      as the limit of the problem
      $$(AP) hspace{1cm}
      u_t+g(u)_x =nu varDelta u \[2ex]
      $$

      when $nu rightarrow 0 $. So we could find solution of a original problem by finding the solution of the approximation problem by letting $nu rightarrow 0 $. Additional info on the vanishing viscosity method could be found in a lot of books (Dafermos, for example).



      Before asking the question, just to mention that my areas of interest are conservation and balance laws, and I work more with systems than with single equations.



      My question is this: what are the other possible choices we can use other than $nu varDelta u$ for the term we add in the original problem?



      I am especially interested in the cases where we let $nu rightarrow 0$ in the approximation problem and then make some conclusion about solution of the original problem.



      I found a few papers that deal with PDE problems with relaxation (for example, in case of 2x2 systems, they add perturbation terms $(phi (u_2)-u_1)/nu$ and then try to find zero relaxation limit by letting $nu rightarrow 0 $ ) and PDE problems with damping (they add some terms like $nu cdot u$ but they never let $nu rightarrow 0 $). Also problems with damping are more interesting to me than with the relaxation.



      Does anyone know any reference in the literature with some other choices other the few mentioned above? Also it would be very helpful to me if someone knows some work that deals with PDE problem with damping and in some moment authors let $nu rightarrow 0 $.







      reference-request pde relaxations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 9 '18 at 21:28









      Mark

      4617




      4617



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033042%2fsolving-pdes-by-adding-small-perturbation-terms-and-taking-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033042%2fsolving-pdes-by-adding-small-perturbation-terms-and-taking-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna