A finite normal extension is also a splitting field
$begingroup$
Let $E/K $ be a finite normal extension, then there exists $p(x)in K[x] $ s.t. $E$ is the splitting field of $p(x) $.
The proof goes as follows:
$E=K(a_1,...,a_n) $ for some $a_1,...,a_nin Omega $ where $Omega $ is the algebraic closure of $K $.
Let $mu_i $ be the minimal polynomial of $a_i $ for $i=1,...,n $
We can send any $a_i $ onto another root of $mu _i $ through an homomorphism that fixes $K $.
Then the thesis follows.
I don't understand why we can send any $a_i $ onto another root of $mu _i $.
Note: the definition that we use of normal extension is:
$L/K$ is a normal extension if every homomorphism $phi :Krightarrow Omega $ that fixes $K $ sends $L $ onto itself.
field-theory galois-theory extension-field
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $E/K $ be a finite normal extension, then there exists $p(x)in K[x] $ s.t. $E$ is the splitting field of $p(x) $.
The proof goes as follows:
$E=K(a_1,...,a_n) $ for some $a_1,...,a_nin Omega $ where $Omega $ is the algebraic closure of $K $.
Let $mu_i $ be the minimal polynomial of $a_i $ for $i=1,...,n $
We can send any $a_i $ onto another root of $mu _i $ through an homomorphism that fixes $K $.
Then the thesis follows.
I don't understand why we can send any $a_i $ onto another root of $mu _i $.
Note: the definition that we use of normal extension is:
$L/K$ is a normal extension if every homomorphism $phi :Krightarrow Omega $ that fixes $K $ sends $L $ onto itself.
field-theory galois-theory extension-field
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $E/K $ be a finite normal extension, then there exists $p(x)in K[x] $ s.t. $E$ is the splitting field of $p(x) $.
The proof goes as follows:
$E=K(a_1,...,a_n) $ for some $a_1,...,a_nin Omega $ where $Omega $ is the algebraic closure of $K $.
Let $mu_i $ be the minimal polynomial of $a_i $ for $i=1,...,n $
We can send any $a_i $ onto another root of $mu _i $ through an homomorphism that fixes $K $.
Then the thesis follows.
I don't understand why we can send any $a_i $ onto another root of $mu _i $.
Note: the definition that we use of normal extension is:
$L/K$ is a normal extension if every homomorphism $phi :Krightarrow Omega $ that fixes $K $ sends $L $ onto itself.
field-theory galois-theory extension-field
$endgroup$
Let $E/K $ be a finite normal extension, then there exists $p(x)in K[x] $ s.t. $E$ is the splitting field of $p(x) $.
The proof goes as follows:
$E=K(a_1,...,a_n) $ for some $a_1,...,a_nin Omega $ where $Omega $ is the algebraic closure of $K $.
Let $mu_i $ be the minimal polynomial of $a_i $ for $i=1,...,n $
We can send any $a_i $ onto another root of $mu _i $ through an homomorphism that fixes $K $.
Then the thesis follows.
I don't understand why we can send any $a_i $ onto another root of $mu _i $.
Note: the definition that we use of normal extension is:
$L/K$ is a normal extension if every homomorphism $phi :Krightarrow Omega $ that fixes $K $ sends $L $ onto itself.
field-theory galois-theory extension-field
field-theory galois-theory extension-field
edited Jan 6 at 11:22
Jyrki Lahtonen
110k13171386
110k13171386
asked Jan 5 at 17:31
Lucio TanziniLucio Tanzini
351114
351114
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here are the steps of a proof.
The $mu_{i}$ are irreducible.
Hence, given any two roots $a, b$ of $mu_{i}$, there is a $K$-isomorphism (meaning that it restricts to the identity on $K$) $$K(a) to K(b)$$ taking $a$ to $b$.
This isomorphism can be extended to an automorphism $phi$ of $Omega$.
Now since $L/K$ is normal, $phi$ has to send $L$ to $L$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062955%2fa-finite-normal-extension-is-also-a-splitting-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here are the steps of a proof.
The $mu_{i}$ are irreducible.
Hence, given any two roots $a, b$ of $mu_{i}$, there is a $K$-isomorphism (meaning that it restricts to the identity on $K$) $$K(a) to K(b)$$ taking $a$ to $b$.
This isomorphism can be extended to an automorphism $phi$ of $Omega$.
Now since $L/K$ is normal, $phi$ has to send $L$ to $L$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here are the steps of a proof.
The $mu_{i}$ are irreducible.
Hence, given any two roots $a, b$ of $mu_{i}$, there is a $K$-isomorphism (meaning that it restricts to the identity on $K$) $$K(a) to K(b)$$ taking $a$ to $b$.
This isomorphism can be extended to an automorphism $phi$ of $Omega$.
Now since $L/K$ is normal, $phi$ has to send $L$ to $L$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here are the steps of a proof.
The $mu_{i}$ are irreducible.
Hence, given any two roots $a, b$ of $mu_{i}$, there is a $K$-isomorphism (meaning that it restricts to the identity on $K$) $$K(a) to K(b)$$ taking $a$ to $b$.
This isomorphism can be extended to an automorphism $phi$ of $Omega$.
Now since $L/K$ is normal, $phi$ has to send $L$ to $L$.
$endgroup$
Here are the steps of a proof.
The $mu_{i}$ are irreducible.
Hence, given any two roots $a, b$ of $mu_{i}$, there is a $K$-isomorphism (meaning that it restricts to the identity on $K$) $$K(a) to K(b)$$ taking $a$ to $b$.
This isomorphism can be extended to an automorphism $phi$ of $Omega$.
Now since $L/K$ is normal, $phi$ has to send $L$ to $L$.
answered Jan 5 at 17:39
Andreas CarantiAndreas Caranti
56.8k34397
56.8k34397
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062955%2fa-finite-normal-extension-is-also-a-splitting-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown