Portable check empty directory












7















With Bash and Dash, you can check for an empty directory using just the shell
(ignore dotfiles to keep things simple):



set *
if [ -e "$1" ]
then
echo 'not empty'
else
echo 'empty'
fi


However I recently learned that Zsh fails spectacularly in this case:



% set *
zsh: no matches found: *

% echo "$? $#"
1 0


So not only does the set command fail, but it doesn't even set $@. I suppose
I could test if $# is 0, but it appears that Zsh even stops execution:



% { set *; echo 2; }
zsh: no matches found: *


Compare with Bash and Dash:



$ { set *; echo 2; }
2


Can this be done in a way that works in bash, dash and zsh?










share|improve this question

























  • Related: Why is nullglob not default?

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Jan 26 at 22:30
















7















With Bash and Dash, you can check for an empty directory using just the shell
(ignore dotfiles to keep things simple):



set *
if [ -e "$1" ]
then
echo 'not empty'
else
echo 'empty'
fi


However I recently learned that Zsh fails spectacularly in this case:



% set *
zsh: no matches found: *

% echo "$? $#"
1 0


So not only does the set command fail, but it doesn't even set $@. I suppose
I could test if $# is 0, but it appears that Zsh even stops execution:



% { set *; echo 2; }
zsh: no matches found: *


Compare with Bash and Dash:



$ { set *; echo 2; }
2


Can this be done in a way that works in bash, dash and zsh?










share|improve this question

























  • Related: Why is nullglob not default?

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Jan 26 at 22:30














7












7








7








With Bash and Dash, you can check for an empty directory using just the shell
(ignore dotfiles to keep things simple):



set *
if [ -e "$1" ]
then
echo 'not empty'
else
echo 'empty'
fi


However I recently learned that Zsh fails spectacularly in this case:



% set *
zsh: no matches found: *

% echo "$? $#"
1 0


So not only does the set command fail, but it doesn't even set $@. I suppose
I could test if $# is 0, but it appears that Zsh even stops execution:



% { set *; echo 2; }
zsh: no matches found: *


Compare with Bash and Dash:



$ { set *; echo 2; }
2


Can this be done in a way that works in bash, dash and zsh?










share|improve this question
















With Bash and Dash, you can check for an empty directory using just the shell
(ignore dotfiles to keep things simple):



set *
if [ -e "$1" ]
then
echo 'not empty'
else
echo 'empty'
fi


However I recently learned that Zsh fails spectacularly in this case:



% set *
zsh: no matches found: *

% echo "$? $#"
1 0


So not only does the set command fail, but it doesn't even set $@. I suppose
I could test if $# is 0, but it appears that Zsh even stops execution:



% { set *; echo 2; }
zsh: no matches found: *


Compare with Bash and Dash:



$ { set *; echo 2; }
2


Can this be done in a way that works in bash, dash and zsh?







bash zsh wildcards portability dash






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 1:28









terdon

133k32264444




133k32264444










asked Jan 7 at 1:06









ThreeThree

663




663













  • Related: Why is nullglob not default?

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Jan 26 at 22:30



















  • Related: Why is nullglob not default?

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    Jan 26 at 22:30

















Related: Why is nullglob not default?

– Stéphane Chazelas
Jan 26 at 22:30





Related: Why is nullglob not default?

– Stéphane Chazelas
Jan 26 at 22:30










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7














While zsh's default behaviour is to give an error, this is controlled by the nomatch option. You can unset the option to leave the * in place the way that bash and dash do:



setopt -o nonomatch


While that command won't work in either of the others, you can just ignore that:



setopt -o nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true ; set *


This runs setopt on zsh, and suppresses the error output (2>/dev/null) and return code (|| true) of the failed command on the others.



As written it's problematic if there is a file, for example, -e: then you will run set -e and change the shell options to terminate whenever a command fails; there are worse outcomes if you're creative. set -- * will be safer and prevent the option changes.






share|improve this answer

































    3














    Zsh's syntax is not compatible with sh. It's close enough to look like sh, but not close enough that you can take sh code and run it unchanged.



    If you want to run sh code in zsh, for example because you have an sh function or snippet written for sh that you want to use in a zsh script, you can use the emulate builtin. For example, to source a file written for sh in a zsh script:



    emulate sh -c 'source /path/to/file.sh'


    To write a function or script in sh syntax and make it possible to run it in zsh, put this near the beginning:



    emulate -L sh 2>/dev/null || true


    In sh syntax, zsh supports all POSIX constructs (it's about as POSIX compliant as bash --posix or ksh93 or mksh). It also supports some ksh and bash extensions such as arrays (0-indexed in ksh, in bash and under emulate sh, but 1-indexed in native zsh) and [[ … ]]. If you want POSIX sh plus ksh globs, use emulate … ksh … instead of emulate … sh …, and add if [[ -n $BASH ]]; then shopt -s extglob; fi for the sake of bash (note that this is not local to the script/function).



    The native zsh way to enumerate all the entries in a directory except . and .. is



    set -- *(DN)


    This uses the glob qualifiers D to include dot files and N to produce an empty list if there are no matches.



    The native zsh way to enumerate all the entries in a directory except . and .. is a lot more complicated. You need to list dot files, and if you're listing files in the current directory or in a path that isn't guaranteed to be absolute you need take care in case there is a file name that begins with a dash. Here's one way to do it, by using the patterns ..?* .[!.]* * to list all files except . and .. and removing unexpanded patterns.



    set -- ..?*
    if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi
    set -- .[!.]* "$@"
    if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi
    set -- * "$@"
    if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi


    If all you want to do is to test whether a directory is empty, there's a much easier way.



    if ls -A /path/to/directory/ | grep -q '^'; then
    echo "/path/to/directory is not empty"
    else
    echo "/path/to/directory is empty"
    fi





    share|improve this answer


























    • shorter if ls -A | read q; then echo not empty; else echo empty; fi

      – Three
      Jan 13 at 14:25



















    2














    Most portable way would be via set and globstar for all POSIX-compliant shells. This has been shown in Gilles's answer on a related question. I've adapted the method slightly into a function:



    rm -rf empty_dir/
    mkdir empty_dir/
    pwd
    cd empty_dir/
    pwd
    dir_empty(){

    # https://stackoverflow.com/a/9911082/3701431
    if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
    # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/310553/85039
    setopt +o nomatch
    fi

    set -- * .*
    echo "$@"
    for i; do
    [ "$i" = "." ] || [ "$i" = ".." ] && continue
    [ -e "$i" ] && echo "Not empty" && return 1
    done
    echo "Empty" && return 0
    }
    dir_empty
    touch '*'
    dir_empty


    The big problem with zsh is that while ksh and bash behave in more or less consistent manner - that is when we do set * .* you will have 3 positional parameters * . .. in really empty directory - in zsh you will get * .* as positional parameters. Luckily at least for i ; do ... done to iterate over positional parameters works consistently. The rest is just iteration and check for existence of the filename, with . and .. skipped.





    Try it online in ksh!



    Try it online in zsh!






    share|improve this answer


























    • @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 7 at 2:25











    • turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

      – thrig
      Jan 7 at 3:02











    • @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 7 at 3:16











    • @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 7 at 3:18






    • 1





      The expansion of .* not including . and .. is what you generally want and was done in the public domain version of ksh before zsh (pdksh inherited it from the Forsyth shell on which it is based). In other shells whether . and .. is included depends on whether readdir() returns them or not which is not guaranteed.

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      Jan 27 at 0:01



















    2














    There are several problems with that



    set *
    if [ -e "$1" ]
    then
    echo 'not empty'
    else
    echo 'empty'
    fi


    code:




    • if the nullglob option (from zsh but now supported by most other shells) is enabled, set * becomes set which lists all the shell variables (and functions in some shells)

    • if the first non-hidden file has a name that starts with - or +, it will be treated as an option by set. Those two issues can be fixed by using set -- * instead.


    • * expands only non-hidden files, so it's not a test whether the directory is empty or not but whether it contains non-hidden files or not. With some shells, you can use a dotglob or globdot option of play with a FIGNORE special variable to work around that.


    • [ -e "$1" ] tests whether a stat() system call succeeds or not. If the first file a symlink to an inaccessible location, that will return false. You shouldn't need to stat() (not even lstat()) any file to know whether a directory is empty or not, only check that it has some content.


    • * expansion involves opening the current directory, retrieving all the entries, storing all the non-hidden one and sorting them, which is also quite inefficient.


    The most efficient way to check if a directory is non-empty (has any entry other than . and ..) in zsh is with the F glob qualifier (F for full, here meaning non-empty):



    if [ .(NF) ]; then
    echo . is not empty
    fi


    N is the nullglob glob qualifier. So .(NF) expands to . if . is full and nothing otherwise.



    After the lstat() on the directory, if zsh finds it has a link-count greater than 2, then that means it has at least one subdirectory so is not empty, so we don't even need to open that directory (that also means, in that case we can tell that the directory is non-empty even if we don't have read access to it). Otherwise, zsh opens the directory, reads its content and stops at the first entry that is neither . nor .. without having to read, store nor sort everything.



    With POSIX shells (zsh only behaves (more) POSIXly in sh emulation), it is very awkward to check that a directory is non-empty with globs only.



    One way is with:



    set .[!.]* '.[!.]'[*] .[.]?* [*] *
    if [ "$#$1$2$3$4$5" = '5.[!.]*.[!.][*].[.]?*[*]*' ]; then
    echo empty
    else
    echo not empty
    fi


    (assuming no glob-related option is changed from the default (POSIX only specifies noglob) and that the GLOBIGNORE (for bash) and FIGNORE (for ksh) variables are not set, and that (for yash) none of the file names contain sequences of bytes not forming valid characters).



    The idea is that in POSIX shells, when a glob doesn't match, it is left unexpanded (a misfeature introduced by the Bourne shell in the late 70s). So with set -- *, if we get $1 == *, we don't know whether it was because there was no match or whether there was a file called *.



    Your (flawed) approach to work around that was to use [ -e "$1" ]. Here instead, we use set -- [*] *. That allows to disambiguate the two cases, because if there is no file, the above will stay [*] *, and if there is a file called *, that becomes * *. We do something similar for hidden files. That is a bit awkward because of yet another misfeature of the Bourne shell (also fixed by zsh, the Forsyth shell, pdksh and fish) whereby the expansion of .* does include the special (pseudo-)entries . and .. when reported by readdir().



    So to make it work in all those shells, you could do:



    cwd_empty()
    if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
    eval '! [ .(NF) ]'
    else
    set .[!.]* '.[!.]'[*] .[.]?* [*] *
    [ "$#$1$2$3$4$5" = '5.[!.]*.[!.][*].[.]?*[*]*' ]
    fi


    In any case, the syntax of zsh by default is not compatible with the POSIX sh syntax as it has fixed most of the major issues in the Bourne shell (well before POSIX.2 was first published) in a non-backward compatible way, including that * left unexpanded when there's no match (pre-Bourne shells didn't have that issue, csh, tcsh and fish don't either), and .* including . and .. but several others like split+glob performed upon parameter or arithmetic expansion, so you can't expect code written in the POSIX sh to always work in zsh unless you turn on sh emulation.



    That sh emulation is especially there so that you use POSIX code in zsh.



    If you want to source a file written in POSIX sh inside zsh, you can do:



    emulate sh -c 'source that-file'


    Then that file will be evaluated in sh emulation and any function declared within will retain that emulation mode.






    share|improve this answer


























    • thanks. a shorter, but less robust version for non-zsh is set .[!.]* *; [ "$*" = '.[!.]* *' ]

      – Three
      Jan 26 at 23:50











    • @Three, yes, it fails when the first character of $IFS is not space or when there's a file called * or .[!.]* or ..foo...

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      Jan 26 at 23:53











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492912%2fportable-check-empty-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    While zsh's default behaviour is to give an error, this is controlled by the nomatch option. You can unset the option to leave the * in place the way that bash and dash do:



    setopt -o nonomatch


    While that command won't work in either of the others, you can just ignore that:



    setopt -o nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true ; set *


    This runs setopt on zsh, and suppresses the error output (2>/dev/null) and return code (|| true) of the failed command on the others.



    As written it's problematic if there is a file, for example, -e: then you will run set -e and change the shell options to terminate whenever a command fails; there are worse outcomes if you're creative. set -- * will be safer and prevent the option changes.






    share|improve this answer






























      7














      While zsh's default behaviour is to give an error, this is controlled by the nomatch option. You can unset the option to leave the * in place the way that bash and dash do:



      setopt -o nonomatch


      While that command won't work in either of the others, you can just ignore that:



      setopt -o nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true ; set *


      This runs setopt on zsh, and suppresses the error output (2>/dev/null) and return code (|| true) of the failed command on the others.



      As written it's problematic if there is a file, for example, -e: then you will run set -e and change the shell options to terminate whenever a command fails; there are worse outcomes if you're creative. set -- * will be safer and prevent the option changes.






      share|improve this answer




























        7












        7








        7







        While zsh's default behaviour is to give an error, this is controlled by the nomatch option. You can unset the option to leave the * in place the way that bash and dash do:



        setopt -o nonomatch


        While that command won't work in either of the others, you can just ignore that:



        setopt -o nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true ; set *


        This runs setopt on zsh, and suppresses the error output (2>/dev/null) and return code (|| true) of the failed command on the others.



        As written it's problematic if there is a file, for example, -e: then you will run set -e and change the shell options to terminate whenever a command fails; there are worse outcomes if you're creative. set -- * will be safer and prevent the option changes.






        share|improve this answer















        While zsh's default behaviour is to give an error, this is controlled by the nomatch option. You can unset the option to leave the * in place the way that bash and dash do:



        setopt -o nonomatch


        While that command won't work in either of the others, you can just ignore that:



        setopt -o nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true ; set *


        This runs setopt on zsh, and suppresses the error output (2>/dev/null) and return code (|| true) of the failed command on the others.



        As written it's problematic if there is a file, for example, -e: then you will run set -e and change the shell options to terminate whenever a command fails; there are worse outcomes if you're creative. set -- * will be safer and prevent the option changes.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jan 7 at 2:02

























        answered Jan 7 at 1:55









        Michael HomerMichael Homer

        50.3k8138176




        50.3k8138176

























            3














            Zsh's syntax is not compatible with sh. It's close enough to look like sh, but not close enough that you can take sh code and run it unchanged.



            If you want to run sh code in zsh, for example because you have an sh function or snippet written for sh that you want to use in a zsh script, you can use the emulate builtin. For example, to source a file written for sh in a zsh script:



            emulate sh -c 'source /path/to/file.sh'


            To write a function or script in sh syntax and make it possible to run it in zsh, put this near the beginning:



            emulate -L sh 2>/dev/null || true


            In sh syntax, zsh supports all POSIX constructs (it's about as POSIX compliant as bash --posix or ksh93 or mksh). It also supports some ksh and bash extensions such as arrays (0-indexed in ksh, in bash and under emulate sh, but 1-indexed in native zsh) and [[ … ]]. If you want POSIX sh plus ksh globs, use emulate … ksh … instead of emulate … sh …, and add if [[ -n $BASH ]]; then shopt -s extglob; fi for the sake of bash (note that this is not local to the script/function).



            The native zsh way to enumerate all the entries in a directory except . and .. is



            set -- *(DN)


            This uses the glob qualifiers D to include dot files and N to produce an empty list if there are no matches.



            The native zsh way to enumerate all the entries in a directory except . and .. is a lot more complicated. You need to list dot files, and if you're listing files in the current directory or in a path that isn't guaranteed to be absolute you need take care in case there is a file name that begins with a dash. Here's one way to do it, by using the patterns ..?* .[!.]* * to list all files except . and .. and removing unexpanded patterns.



            set -- ..?*
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi
            set -- .[!.]* "$@"
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi
            set -- * "$@"
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi


            If all you want to do is to test whether a directory is empty, there's a much easier way.



            if ls -A /path/to/directory/ | grep -q '^'; then
            echo "/path/to/directory is not empty"
            else
            echo "/path/to/directory is empty"
            fi





            share|improve this answer


























            • shorter if ls -A | read q; then echo not empty; else echo empty; fi

              – Three
              Jan 13 at 14:25
















            3














            Zsh's syntax is not compatible with sh. It's close enough to look like sh, but not close enough that you can take sh code and run it unchanged.



            If you want to run sh code in zsh, for example because you have an sh function or snippet written for sh that you want to use in a zsh script, you can use the emulate builtin. For example, to source a file written for sh in a zsh script:



            emulate sh -c 'source /path/to/file.sh'


            To write a function or script in sh syntax and make it possible to run it in zsh, put this near the beginning:



            emulate -L sh 2>/dev/null || true


            In sh syntax, zsh supports all POSIX constructs (it's about as POSIX compliant as bash --posix or ksh93 or mksh). It also supports some ksh and bash extensions such as arrays (0-indexed in ksh, in bash and under emulate sh, but 1-indexed in native zsh) and [[ … ]]. If you want POSIX sh plus ksh globs, use emulate … ksh … instead of emulate … sh …, and add if [[ -n $BASH ]]; then shopt -s extglob; fi for the sake of bash (note that this is not local to the script/function).



            The native zsh way to enumerate all the entries in a directory except . and .. is



            set -- *(DN)


            This uses the glob qualifiers D to include dot files and N to produce an empty list if there are no matches.



            The native zsh way to enumerate all the entries in a directory except . and .. is a lot more complicated. You need to list dot files, and if you're listing files in the current directory or in a path that isn't guaranteed to be absolute you need take care in case there is a file name that begins with a dash. Here's one way to do it, by using the patterns ..?* .[!.]* * to list all files except . and .. and removing unexpanded patterns.



            set -- ..?*
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi
            set -- .[!.]* "$@"
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi
            set -- * "$@"
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi


            If all you want to do is to test whether a directory is empty, there's a much easier way.



            if ls -A /path/to/directory/ | grep -q '^'; then
            echo "/path/to/directory is not empty"
            else
            echo "/path/to/directory is empty"
            fi





            share|improve this answer


























            • shorter if ls -A | read q; then echo not empty; else echo empty; fi

              – Three
              Jan 13 at 14:25














            3












            3








            3







            Zsh's syntax is not compatible with sh. It's close enough to look like sh, but not close enough that you can take sh code and run it unchanged.



            If you want to run sh code in zsh, for example because you have an sh function or snippet written for sh that you want to use in a zsh script, you can use the emulate builtin. For example, to source a file written for sh in a zsh script:



            emulate sh -c 'source /path/to/file.sh'


            To write a function or script in sh syntax and make it possible to run it in zsh, put this near the beginning:



            emulate -L sh 2>/dev/null || true


            In sh syntax, zsh supports all POSIX constructs (it's about as POSIX compliant as bash --posix or ksh93 or mksh). It also supports some ksh and bash extensions such as arrays (0-indexed in ksh, in bash and under emulate sh, but 1-indexed in native zsh) and [[ … ]]. If you want POSIX sh plus ksh globs, use emulate … ksh … instead of emulate … sh …, and add if [[ -n $BASH ]]; then shopt -s extglob; fi for the sake of bash (note that this is not local to the script/function).



            The native zsh way to enumerate all the entries in a directory except . and .. is



            set -- *(DN)


            This uses the glob qualifiers D to include dot files and N to produce an empty list if there are no matches.



            The native zsh way to enumerate all the entries in a directory except . and .. is a lot more complicated. You need to list dot files, and if you're listing files in the current directory or in a path that isn't guaranteed to be absolute you need take care in case there is a file name that begins with a dash. Here's one way to do it, by using the patterns ..?* .[!.]* * to list all files except . and .. and removing unexpanded patterns.



            set -- ..?*
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi
            set -- .[!.]* "$@"
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi
            set -- * "$@"
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi


            If all you want to do is to test whether a directory is empty, there's a much easier way.



            if ls -A /path/to/directory/ | grep -q '^'; then
            echo "/path/to/directory is not empty"
            else
            echo "/path/to/directory is empty"
            fi





            share|improve this answer















            Zsh's syntax is not compatible with sh. It's close enough to look like sh, but not close enough that you can take sh code and run it unchanged.



            If you want to run sh code in zsh, for example because you have an sh function or snippet written for sh that you want to use in a zsh script, you can use the emulate builtin. For example, to source a file written for sh in a zsh script:



            emulate sh -c 'source /path/to/file.sh'


            To write a function or script in sh syntax and make it possible to run it in zsh, put this near the beginning:



            emulate -L sh 2>/dev/null || true


            In sh syntax, zsh supports all POSIX constructs (it's about as POSIX compliant as bash --posix or ksh93 or mksh). It also supports some ksh and bash extensions such as arrays (0-indexed in ksh, in bash and under emulate sh, but 1-indexed in native zsh) and [[ … ]]. If you want POSIX sh plus ksh globs, use emulate … ksh … instead of emulate … sh …, and add if [[ -n $BASH ]]; then shopt -s extglob; fi for the sake of bash (note that this is not local to the script/function).



            The native zsh way to enumerate all the entries in a directory except . and .. is



            set -- *(DN)


            This uses the glob qualifiers D to include dot files and N to produce an empty list if there are no matches.



            The native zsh way to enumerate all the entries in a directory except . and .. is a lot more complicated. You need to list dot files, and if you're listing files in the current directory or in a path that isn't guaranteed to be absolute you need take care in case there is a file name that begins with a dash. Here's one way to do it, by using the patterns ..?* .[!.]* * to list all files except . and .. and removing unexpanded patterns.



            set -- ..?*
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi
            set -- .[!.]* "$@"
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi
            set -- * "$@"
            if [ "$#" -eq 1 ] && ! [ -e "$1" ] && ! [ -L "$1" ]; then shift; fi


            If all you want to do is to test whether a directory is empty, there's a much easier way.



            if ls -A /path/to/directory/ | grep -q '^'; then
            echo "/path/to/directory is not empty"
            else
            echo "/path/to/directory is empty"
            fi






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 26 at 22:27









            Stéphane Chazelas

            311k57587945




            311k57587945










            answered Jan 13 at 10:35









            GillesGilles

            544k12811021620




            544k12811021620













            • shorter if ls -A | read q; then echo not empty; else echo empty; fi

              – Three
              Jan 13 at 14:25



















            • shorter if ls -A | read q; then echo not empty; else echo empty; fi

              – Three
              Jan 13 at 14:25

















            shorter if ls -A | read q; then echo not empty; else echo empty; fi

            – Three
            Jan 13 at 14:25





            shorter if ls -A | read q; then echo not empty; else echo empty; fi

            – Three
            Jan 13 at 14:25











            2














            Most portable way would be via set and globstar for all POSIX-compliant shells. This has been shown in Gilles's answer on a related question. I've adapted the method slightly into a function:



            rm -rf empty_dir/
            mkdir empty_dir/
            pwd
            cd empty_dir/
            pwd
            dir_empty(){

            # https://stackoverflow.com/a/9911082/3701431
            if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
            # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/310553/85039
            setopt +o nomatch
            fi

            set -- * .*
            echo "$@"
            for i; do
            [ "$i" = "." ] || [ "$i" = ".." ] && continue
            [ -e "$i" ] && echo "Not empty" && return 1
            done
            echo "Empty" && return 0
            }
            dir_empty
            touch '*'
            dir_empty


            The big problem with zsh is that while ksh and bash behave in more or less consistent manner - that is when we do set * .* you will have 3 positional parameters * . .. in really empty directory - in zsh you will get * .* as positional parameters. Luckily at least for i ; do ... done to iterate over positional parameters works consistently. The rest is just iteration and check for existence of the filename, with . and .. skipped.





            Try it online in ksh!



            Try it online in zsh!






            share|improve this answer


























            • @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 2:25











            • turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

              – thrig
              Jan 7 at 3:02











            • @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 3:16











            • @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 3:18






            • 1





              The expansion of .* not including . and .. is what you generally want and was done in the public domain version of ksh before zsh (pdksh inherited it from the Forsyth shell on which it is based). In other shells whether . and .. is included depends on whether readdir() returns them or not which is not guaranteed.

              – Stéphane Chazelas
              Jan 27 at 0:01
















            2














            Most portable way would be via set and globstar for all POSIX-compliant shells. This has been shown in Gilles's answer on a related question. I've adapted the method slightly into a function:



            rm -rf empty_dir/
            mkdir empty_dir/
            pwd
            cd empty_dir/
            pwd
            dir_empty(){

            # https://stackoverflow.com/a/9911082/3701431
            if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
            # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/310553/85039
            setopt +o nomatch
            fi

            set -- * .*
            echo "$@"
            for i; do
            [ "$i" = "." ] || [ "$i" = ".." ] && continue
            [ -e "$i" ] && echo "Not empty" && return 1
            done
            echo "Empty" && return 0
            }
            dir_empty
            touch '*'
            dir_empty


            The big problem with zsh is that while ksh and bash behave in more or less consistent manner - that is when we do set * .* you will have 3 positional parameters * . .. in really empty directory - in zsh you will get * .* as positional parameters. Luckily at least for i ; do ... done to iterate over positional parameters works consistently. The rest is just iteration and check for existence of the filename, with . and .. skipped.





            Try it online in ksh!



            Try it online in zsh!






            share|improve this answer


























            • @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 2:25











            • turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

              – thrig
              Jan 7 at 3:02











            • @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 3:16











            • @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 3:18






            • 1





              The expansion of .* not including . and .. is what you generally want and was done in the public domain version of ksh before zsh (pdksh inherited it from the Forsyth shell on which it is based). In other shells whether . and .. is included depends on whether readdir() returns them or not which is not guaranteed.

              – Stéphane Chazelas
              Jan 27 at 0:01














            2












            2








            2







            Most portable way would be via set and globstar for all POSIX-compliant shells. This has been shown in Gilles's answer on a related question. I've adapted the method slightly into a function:



            rm -rf empty_dir/
            mkdir empty_dir/
            pwd
            cd empty_dir/
            pwd
            dir_empty(){

            # https://stackoverflow.com/a/9911082/3701431
            if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
            # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/310553/85039
            setopt +o nomatch
            fi

            set -- * .*
            echo "$@"
            for i; do
            [ "$i" = "." ] || [ "$i" = ".." ] && continue
            [ -e "$i" ] && echo "Not empty" && return 1
            done
            echo "Empty" && return 0
            }
            dir_empty
            touch '*'
            dir_empty


            The big problem with zsh is that while ksh and bash behave in more or less consistent manner - that is when we do set * .* you will have 3 positional parameters * . .. in really empty directory - in zsh you will get * .* as positional parameters. Luckily at least for i ; do ... done to iterate over positional parameters works consistently. The rest is just iteration and check for existence of the filename, with . and .. skipped.





            Try it online in ksh!



            Try it online in zsh!






            share|improve this answer















            Most portable way would be via set and globstar for all POSIX-compliant shells. This has been shown in Gilles's answer on a related question. I've adapted the method slightly into a function:



            rm -rf empty_dir/
            mkdir empty_dir/
            pwd
            cd empty_dir/
            pwd
            dir_empty(){

            # https://stackoverflow.com/a/9911082/3701431
            if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
            # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/310553/85039
            setopt +o nomatch
            fi

            set -- * .*
            echo "$@"
            for i; do
            [ "$i" = "." ] || [ "$i" = ".." ] && continue
            [ -e "$i" ] && echo "Not empty" && return 1
            done
            echo "Empty" && return 0
            }
            dir_empty
            touch '*'
            dir_empty


            The big problem with zsh is that while ksh and bash behave in more or less consistent manner - that is when we do set * .* you will have 3 positional parameters * . .. in really empty directory - in zsh you will get * .* as positional parameters. Luckily at least for i ; do ... done to iterate over positional parameters works consistently. The rest is just iteration and check for existence of the filename, with . and .. skipped.





            Try it online in ksh!



            Try it online in zsh!







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 7 at 3:13

























            answered Jan 7 at 2:02









            Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy

            10.7k42763




            10.7k42763













            • @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 2:25











            • turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

              – thrig
              Jan 7 at 3:02











            • @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 3:16











            • @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 3:18






            • 1





              The expansion of .* not including . and .. is what you generally want and was done in the public domain version of ksh before zsh (pdksh inherited it from the Forsyth shell on which it is based). In other shells whether . and .. is included depends on whether readdir() returns them or not which is not guaranteed.

              – Stéphane Chazelas
              Jan 27 at 0:01



















            • @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 2:25











            • turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

              – thrig
              Jan 7 at 3:02











            • @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 3:16











            • @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 3:18






            • 1





              The expansion of .* not including . and .. is what you generally want and was done in the public domain version of ksh before zsh (pdksh inherited it from the Forsyth shell on which it is based). In other shells whether . and .. is included depends on whether readdir() returns them or not which is not guaranteed.

              – Stéphane Chazelas
              Jan 27 at 0:01

















            @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

            – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
            Jan 7 at 2:25





            @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

            – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
            Jan 7 at 2:25













            turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

            – thrig
            Jan 7 at 3:02





            turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

            – thrig
            Jan 7 at 3:02













            @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

            – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
            Jan 7 at 3:16





            @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

            – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
            Jan 7 at 3:16













            @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

            – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
            Jan 7 at 3:18





            @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

            – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
            Jan 7 at 3:18




            1




            1





            The expansion of .* not including . and .. is what you generally want and was done in the public domain version of ksh before zsh (pdksh inherited it from the Forsyth shell on which it is based). In other shells whether . and .. is included depends on whether readdir() returns them or not which is not guaranteed.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            Jan 27 at 0:01





            The expansion of .* not including . and .. is what you generally want and was done in the public domain version of ksh before zsh (pdksh inherited it from the Forsyth shell on which it is based). In other shells whether . and .. is included depends on whether readdir() returns them or not which is not guaranteed.

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            Jan 27 at 0:01











            2














            There are several problems with that



            set *
            if [ -e "$1" ]
            then
            echo 'not empty'
            else
            echo 'empty'
            fi


            code:




            • if the nullglob option (from zsh but now supported by most other shells) is enabled, set * becomes set which lists all the shell variables (and functions in some shells)

            • if the first non-hidden file has a name that starts with - or +, it will be treated as an option by set. Those two issues can be fixed by using set -- * instead.


            • * expands only non-hidden files, so it's not a test whether the directory is empty or not but whether it contains non-hidden files or not. With some shells, you can use a dotglob or globdot option of play with a FIGNORE special variable to work around that.


            • [ -e "$1" ] tests whether a stat() system call succeeds or not. If the first file a symlink to an inaccessible location, that will return false. You shouldn't need to stat() (not even lstat()) any file to know whether a directory is empty or not, only check that it has some content.


            • * expansion involves opening the current directory, retrieving all the entries, storing all the non-hidden one and sorting them, which is also quite inefficient.


            The most efficient way to check if a directory is non-empty (has any entry other than . and ..) in zsh is with the F glob qualifier (F for full, here meaning non-empty):



            if [ .(NF) ]; then
            echo . is not empty
            fi


            N is the nullglob glob qualifier. So .(NF) expands to . if . is full and nothing otherwise.



            After the lstat() on the directory, if zsh finds it has a link-count greater than 2, then that means it has at least one subdirectory so is not empty, so we don't even need to open that directory (that also means, in that case we can tell that the directory is non-empty even if we don't have read access to it). Otherwise, zsh opens the directory, reads its content and stops at the first entry that is neither . nor .. without having to read, store nor sort everything.



            With POSIX shells (zsh only behaves (more) POSIXly in sh emulation), it is very awkward to check that a directory is non-empty with globs only.



            One way is with:



            set .[!.]* '.[!.]'[*] .[.]?* [*] *
            if [ "$#$1$2$3$4$5" = '5.[!.]*.[!.][*].[.]?*[*]*' ]; then
            echo empty
            else
            echo not empty
            fi


            (assuming no glob-related option is changed from the default (POSIX only specifies noglob) and that the GLOBIGNORE (for bash) and FIGNORE (for ksh) variables are not set, and that (for yash) none of the file names contain sequences of bytes not forming valid characters).



            The idea is that in POSIX shells, when a glob doesn't match, it is left unexpanded (a misfeature introduced by the Bourne shell in the late 70s). So with set -- *, if we get $1 == *, we don't know whether it was because there was no match or whether there was a file called *.



            Your (flawed) approach to work around that was to use [ -e "$1" ]. Here instead, we use set -- [*] *. That allows to disambiguate the two cases, because if there is no file, the above will stay [*] *, and if there is a file called *, that becomes * *. We do something similar for hidden files. That is a bit awkward because of yet another misfeature of the Bourne shell (also fixed by zsh, the Forsyth shell, pdksh and fish) whereby the expansion of .* does include the special (pseudo-)entries . and .. when reported by readdir().



            So to make it work in all those shells, you could do:



            cwd_empty()
            if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
            eval '! [ .(NF) ]'
            else
            set .[!.]* '.[!.]'[*] .[.]?* [*] *
            [ "$#$1$2$3$4$5" = '5.[!.]*.[!.][*].[.]?*[*]*' ]
            fi


            In any case, the syntax of zsh by default is not compatible with the POSIX sh syntax as it has fixed most of the major issues in the Bourne shell (well before POSIX.2 was first published) in a non-backward compatible way, including that * left unexpanded when there's no match (pre-Bourne shells didn't have that issue, csh, tcsh and fish don't either), and .* including . and .. but several others like split+glob performed upon parameter or arithmetic expansion, so you can't expect code written in the POSIX sh to always work in zsh unless you turn on sh emulation.



            That sh emulation is especially there so that you use POSIX code in zsh.



            If you want to source a file written in POSIX sh inside zsh, you can do:



            emulate sh -c 'source that-file'


            Then that file will be evaluated in sh emulation and any function declared within will retain that emulation mode.






            share|improve this answer


























            • thanks. a shorter, but less robust version for non-zsh is set .[!.]* *; [ "$*" = '.[!.]* *' ]

              – Three
              Jan 26 at 23:50











            • @Three, yes, it fails when the first character of $IFS is not space or when there's a file called * or .[!.]* or ..foo...

              – Stéphane Chazelas
              Jan 26 at 23:53
















            2














            There are several problems with that



            set *
            if [ -e "$1" ]
            then
            echo 'not empty'
            else
            echo 'empty'
            fi


            code:




            • if the nullglob option (from zsh but now supported by most other shells) is enabled, set * becomes set which lists all the shell variables (and functions in some shells)

            • if the first non-hidden file has a name that starts with - or +, it will be treated as an option by set. Those two issues can be fixed by using set -- * instead.


            • * expands only non-hidden files, so it's not a test whether the directory is empty or not but whether it contains non-hidden files or not. With some shells, you can use a dotglob or globdot option of play with a FIGNORE special variable to work around that.


            • [ -e "$1" ] tests whether a stat() system call succeeds or not. If the first file a symlink to an inaccessible location, that will return false. You shouldn't need to stat() (not even lstat()) any file to know whether a directory is empty or not, only check that it has some content.


            • * expansion involves opening the current directory, retrieving all the entries, storing all the non-hidden one and sorting them, which is also quite inefficient.


            The most efficient way to check if a directory is non-empty (has any entry other than . and ..) in zsh is with the F glob qualifier (F for full, here meaning non-empty):



            if [ .(NF) ]; then
            echo . is not empty
            fi


            N is the nullglob glob qualifier. So .(NF) expands to . if . is full and nothing otherwise.



            After the lstat() on the directory, if zsh finds it has a link-count greater than 2, then that means it has at least one subdirectory so is not empty, so we don't even need to open that directory (that also means, in that case we can tell that the directory is non-empty even if we don't have read access to it). Otherwise, zsh opens the directory, reads its content and stops at the first entry that is neither . nor .. without having to read, store nor sort everything.



            With POSIX shells (zsh only behaves (more) POSIXly in sh emulation), it is very awkward to check that a directory is non-empty with globs only.



            One way is with:



            set .[!.]* '.[!.]'[*] .[.]?* [*] *
            if [ "$#$1$2$3$4$5" = '5.[!.]*.[!.][*].[.]?*[*]*' ]; then
            echo empty
            else
            echo not empty
            fi


            (assuming no glob-related option is changed from the default (POSIX only specifies noglob) and that the GLOBIGNORE (for bash) and FIGNORE (for ksh) variables are not set, and that (for yash) none of the file names contain sequences of bytes not forming valid characters).



            The idea is that in POSIX shells, when a glob doesn't match, it is left unexpanded (a misfeature introduced by the Bourne shell in the late 70s). So with set -- *, if we get $1 == *, we don't know whether it was because there was no match or whether there was a file called *.



            Your (flawed) approach to work around that was to use [ -e "$1" ]. Here instead, we use set -- [*] *. That allows to disambiguate the two cases, because if there is no file, the above will stay [*] *, and if there is a file called *, that becomes * *. We do something similar for hidden files. That is a bit awkward because of yet another misfeature of the Bourne shell (also fixed by zsh, the Forsyth shell, pdksh and fish) whereby the expansion of .* does include the special (pseudo-)entries . and .. when reported by readdir().



            So to make it work in all those shells, you could do:



            cwd_empty()
            if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
            eval '! [ .(NF) ]'
            else
            set .[!.]* '.[!.]'[*] .[.]?* [*] *
            [ "$#$1$2$3$4$5" = '5.[!.]*.[!.][*].[.]?*[*]*' ]
            fi


            In any case, the syntax of zsh by default is not compatible with the POSIX sh syntax as it has fixed most of the major issues in the Bourne shell (well before POSIX.2 was first published) in a non-backward compatible way, including that * left unexpanded when there's no match (pre-Bourne shells didn't have that issue, csh, tcsh and fish don't either), and .* including . and .. but several others like split+glob performed upon parameter or arithmetic expansion, so you can't expect code written in the POSIX sh to always work in zsh unless you turn on sh emulation.



            That sh emulation is especially there so that you use POSIX code in zsh.



            If you want to source a file written in POSIX sh inside zsh, you can do:



            emulate sh -c 'source that-file'


            Then that file will be evaluated in sh emulation and any function declared within will retain that emulation mode.






            share|improve this answer


























            • thanks. a shorter, but less robust version for non-zsh is set .[!.]* *; [ "$*" = '.[!.]* *' ]

              – Three
              Jan 26 at 23:50











            • @Three, yes, it fails when the first character of $IFS is not space or when there's a file called * or .[!.]* or ..foo...

              – Stéphane Chazelas
              Jan 26 at 23:53














            2












            2








            2







            There are several problems with that



            set *
            if [ -e "$1" ]
            then
            echo 'not empty'
            else
            echo 'empty'
            fi


            code:




            • if the nullglob option (from zsh but now supported by most other shells) is enabled, set * becomes set which lists all the shell variables (and functions in some shells)

            • if the first non-hidden file has a name that starts with - or +, it will be treated as an option by set. Those two issues can be fixed by using set -- * instead.


            • * expands only non-hidden files, so it's not a test whether the directory is empty or not but whether it contains non-hidden files or not. With some shells, you can use a dotglob or globdot option of play with a FIGNORE special variable to work around that.


            • [ -e "$1" ] tests whether a stat() system call succeeds or not. If the first file a symlink to an inaccessible location, that will return false. You shouldn't need to stat() (not even lstat()) any file to know whether a directory is empty or not, only check that it has some content.


            • * expansion involves opening the current directory, retrieving all the entries, storing all the non-hidden one and sorting them, which is also quite inefficient.


            The most efficient way to check if a directory is non-empty (has any entry other than . and ..) in zsh is with the F glob qualifier (F for full, here meaning non-empty):



            if [ .(NF) ]; then
            echo . is not empty
            fi


            N is the nullglob glob qualifier. So .(NF) expands to . if . is full and nothing otherwise.



            After the lstat() on the directory, if zsh finds it has a link-count greater than 2, then that means it has at least one subdirectory so is not empty, so we don't even need to open that directory (that also means, in that case we can tell that the directory is non-empty even if we don't have read access to it). Otherwise, zsh opens the directory, reads its content and stops at the first entry that is neither . nor .. without having to read, store nor sort everything.



            With POSIX shells (zsh only behaves (more) POSIXly in sh emulation), it is very awkward to check that a directory is non-empty with globs only.



            One way is with:



            set .[!.]* '.[!.]'[*] .[.]?* [*] *
            if [ "$#$1$2$3$4$5" = '5.[!.]*.[!.][*].[.]?*[*]*' ]; then
            echo empty
            else
            echo not empty
            fi


            (assuming no glob-related option is changed from the default (POSIX only specifies noglob) and that the GLOBIGNORE (for bash) and FIGNORE (for ksh) variables are not set, and that (for yash) none of the file names contain sequences of bytes not forming valid characters).



            The idea is that in POSIX shells, when a glob doesn't match, it is left unexpanded (a misfeature introduced by the Bourne shell in the late 70s). So with set -- *, if we get $1 == *, we don't know whether it was because there was no match or whether there was a file called *.



            Your (flawed) approach to work around that was to use [ -e "$1" ]. Here instead, we use set -- [*] *. That allows to disambiguate the two cases, because if there is no file, the above will stay [*] *, and if there is a file called *, that becomes * *. We do something similar for hidden files. That is a bit awkward because of yet another misfeature of the Bourne shell (also fixed by zsh, the Forsyth shell, pdksh and fish) whereby the expansion of .* does include the special (pseudo-)entries . and .. when reported by readdir().



            So to make it work in all those shells, you could do:



            cwd_empty()
            if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
            eval '! [ .(NF) ]'
            else
            set .[!.]* '.[!.]'[*] .[.]?* [*] *
            [ "$#$1$2$3$4$5" = '5.[!.]*.[!.][*].[.]?*[*]*' ]
            fi


            In any case, the syntax of zsh by default is not compatible with the POSIX sh syntax as it has fixed most of the major issues in the Bourne shell (well before POSIX.2 was first published) in a non-backward compatible way, including that * left unexpanded when there's no match (pre-Bourne shells didn't have that issue, csh, tcsh and fish don't either), and .* including . and .. but several others like split+glob performed upon parameter or arithmetic expansion, so you can't expect code written in the POSIX sh to always work in zsh unless you turn on sh emulation.



            That sh emulation is especially there so that you use POSIX code in zsh.



            If you want to source a file written in POSIX sh inside zsh, you can do:



            emulate sh -c 'source that-file'


            Then that file will be evaluated in sh emulation and any function declared within will retain that emulation mode.






            share|improve this answer















            There are several problems with that



            set *
            if [ -e "$1" ]
            then
            echo 'not empty'
            else
            echo 'empty'
            fi


            code:




            • if the nullglob option (from zsh but now supported by most other shells) is enabled, set * becomes set which lists all the shell variables (and functions in some shells)

            • if the first non-hidden file has a name that starts with - or +, it will be treated as an option by set. Those two issues can be fixed by using set -- * instead.


            • * expands only non-hidden files, so it's not a test whether the directory is empty or not but whether it contains non-hidden files or not. With some shells, you can use a dotglob or globdot option of play with a FIGNORE special variable to work around that.


            • [ -e "$1" ] tests whether a stat() system call succeeds or not. If the first file a symlink to an inaccessible location, that will return false. You shouldn't need to stat() (not even lstat()) any file to know whether a directory is empty or not, only check that it has some content.


            • * expansion involves opening the current directory, retrieving all the entries, storing all the non-hidden one and sorting them, which is also quite inefficient.


            The most efficient way to check if a directory is non-empty (has any entry other than . and ..) in zsh is with the F glob qualifier (F for full, here meaning non-empty):



            if [ .(NF) ]; then
            echo . is not empty
            fi


            N is the nullglob glob qualifier. So .(NF) expands to . if . is full and nothing otherwise.



            After the lstat() on the directory, if zsh finds it has a link-count greater than 2, then that means it has at least one subdirectory so is not empty, so we don't even need to open that directory (that also means, in that case we can tell that the directory is non-empty even if we don't have read access to it). Otherwise, zsh opens the directory, reads its content and stops at the first entry that is neither . nor .. without having to read, store nor sort everything.



            With POSIX shells (zsh only behaves (more) POSIXly in sh emulation), it is very awkward to check that a directory is non-empty with globs only.



            One way is with:



            set .[!.]* '.[!.]'[*] .[.]?* [*] *
            if [ "$#$1$2$3$4$5" = '5.[!.]*.[!.][*].[.]?*[*]*' ]; then
            echo empty
            else
            echo not empty
            fi


            (assuming no glob-related option is changed from the default (POSIX only specifies noglob) and that the GLOBIGNORE (for bash) and FIGNORE (for ksh) variables are not set, and that (for yash) none of the file names contain sequences of bytes not forming valid characters).



            The idea is that in POSIX shells, when a glob doesn't match, it is left unexpanded (a misfeature introduced by the Bourne shell in the late 70s). So with set -- *, if we get $1 == *, we don't know whether it was because there was no match or whether there was a file called *.



            Your (flawed) approach to work around that was to use [ -e "$1" ]. Here instead, we use set -- [*] *. That allows to disambiguate the two cases, because if there is no file, the above will stay [*] *, and if there is a file called *, that becomes * *. We do something similar for hidden files. That is a bit awkward because of yet another misfeature of the Bourne shell (also fixed by zsh, the Forsyth shell, pdksh and fish) whereby the expansion of .* does include the special (pseudo-)entries . and .. when reported by readdir().



            So to make it work in all those shells, you could do:



            cwd_empty()
            if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
            eval '! [ .(NF) ]'
            else
            set .[!.]* '.[!.]'[*] .[.]?* [*] *
            [ "$#$1$2$3$4$5" = '5.[!.]*.[!.][*].[.]?*[*]*' ]
            fi


            In any case, the syntax of zsh by default is not compatible with the POSIX sh syntax as it has fixed most of the major issues in the Bourne shell (well before POSIX.2 was first published) in a non-backward compatible way, including that * left unexpanded when there's no match (pre-Bourne shells didn't have that issue, csh, tcsh and fish don't either), and .* including . and .. but several others like split+glob performed upon parameter or arithmetic expansion, so you can't expect code written in the POSIX sh to always work in zsh unless you turn on sh emulation.



            That sh emulation is especially there so that you use POSIX code in zsh.



            If you want to source a file written in POSIX sh inside zsh, you can do:



            emulate sh -c 'source that-file'


            Then that file will be evaluated in sh emulation and any function declared within will retain that emulation mode.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 28 at 17:32

























            answered Jan 26 at 23:26









            Stéphane ChazelasStéphane Chazelas

            311k57587945




            311k57587945













            • thanks. a shorter, but less robust version for non-zsh is set .[!.]* *; [ "$*" = '.[!.]* *' ]

              – Three
              Jan 26 at 23:50











            • @Three, yes, it fails when the first character of $IFS is not space or when there's a file called * or .[!.]* or ..foo...

              – Stéphane Chazelas
              Jan 26 at 23:53



















            • thanks. a shorter, but less robust version for non-zsh is set .[!.]* *; [ "$*" = '.[!.]* *' ]

              – Three
              Jan 26 at 23:50











            • @Three, yes, it fails when the first character of $IFS is not space or when there's a file called * or .[!.]* or ..foo...

              – Stéphane Chazelas
              Jan 26 at 23:53

















            thanks. a shorter, but less robust version for non-zsh is set .[!.]* *; [ "$*" = '.[!.]* *' ]

            – Three
            Jan 26 at 23:50





            thanks. a shorter, but less robust version for non-zsh is set .[!.]* *; [ "$*" = '.[!.]* *' ]

            – Three
            Jan 26 at 23:50













            @Three, yes, it fails when the first character of $IFS is not space or when there's a file called * or .[!.]* or ..foo...

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            Jan 26 at 23:53





            @Three, yes, it fails when the first character of $IFS is not space or when there's a file called * or .[!.]* or ..foo...

            – Stéphane Chazelas
            Jan 26 at 23:53


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492912%2fportable-check-empty-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Cabo Verde

            Gyllenstierna