Symbol to show if a is greater than, less than, or equal to b?
$begingroup$
In some problems, one is asked to determine if the entity on the left hand side is greater than, less than, or equal to the entity on the right hand side. Is there a mathematical symbol to denote this? A proof in this case might proceed like:
To prove that a <the symbol> b
i.e. to prove that
...
proof-writing
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In some problems, one is asked to determine if the entity on the left hand side is greater than, less than, or equal to the entity on the right hand side. Is there a mathematical symbol to denote this? A proof in this case might proceed like:
To prove that a <the symbol> b
i.e. to prove that
...
proof-writing
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This info is packed in the value of $text{sgn}(a-b)$, the signum of $a-b$.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Jan 7 at 1:33
2
$begingroup$
What's wrong with "Is $agt b$ or is $a lt b$ or is $a=b$?", and then proving that one and only one of those options must hold., and which one actually holds.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Jan 7 at 1:35
1
$begingroup$
It's irritating but no there is no standard notation. But there's nothing wrong with saying "I will use the symbol BLAH to mean whichever of the relations, >,<, or = applies between terms. Now $2x + 5 BLAH 10a + 7$ if and only if $x BLAH 5a + 1$ so ....."
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Jan 7 at 1:40
2
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out, you could use $text{sgn}(a-b)$ if space is limited. However, it is far better just to say something like "let's prove which of $a$ and $b$ is larger, or if they are equal." That's far more readable. Frankly, I wouldn't even use the $>$/$<$/$=$ symbols.
$endgroup$
– Ben W
Jan 7 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Agree with others. Just use words. Mathematics doesn't always need to be decorated with strange symbols. And if the strange symbols reduced readability and comprehension, they should definitely not be used.
$endgroup$
– bubba
Jan 7 at 4:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In some problems, one is asked to determine if the entity on the left hand side is greater than, less than, or equal to the entity on the right hand side. Is there a mathematical symbol to denote this? A proof in this case might proceed like:
To prove that a <the symbol> b
i.e. to prove that
...
proof-writing
$endgroup$
In some problems, one is asked to determine if the entity on the left hand side is greater than, less than, or equal to the entity on the right hand side. Is there a mathematical symbol to denote this? A proof in this case might proceed like:
To prove that a <the symbol> b
i.e. to prove that
...
proof-writing
proof-writing
asked Jan 7 at 1:27
Kedar MhaswadeKedar Mhaswade
1012
1012
2
$begingroup$
This info is packed in the value of $text{sgn}(a-b)$, the signum of $a-b$.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Jan 7 at 1:33
2
$begingroup$
What's wrong with "Is $agt b$ or is $a lt b$ or is $a=b$?", and then proving that one and only one of those options must hold., and which one actually holds.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Jan 7 at 1:35
1
$begingroup$
It's irritating but no there is no standard notation. But there's nothing wrong with saying "I will use the symbol BLAH to mean whichever of the relations, >,<, or = applies between terms. Now $2x + 5 BLAH 10a + 7$ if and only if $x BLAH 5a + 1$ so ....."
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Jan 7 at 1:40
2
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out, you could use $text{sgn}(a-b)$ if space is limited. However, it is far better just to say something like "let's prove which of $a$ and $b$ is larger, or if they are equal." That's far more readable. Frankly, I wouldn't even use the $>$/$<$/$=$ symbols.
$endgroup$
– Ben W
Jan 7 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Agree with others. Just use words. Mathematics doesn't always need to be decorated with strange symbols. And if the strange symbols reduced readability and comprehension, they should definitely not be used.
$endgroup$
– bubba
Jan 7 at 4:41
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
This info is packed in the value of $text{sgn}(a-b)$, the signum of $a-b$.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Jan 7 at 1:33
2
$begingroup$
What's wrong with "Is $agt b$ or is $a lt b$ or is $a=b$?", and then proving that one and only one of those options must hold., and which one actually holds.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Jan 7 at 1:35
1
$begingroup$
It's irritating but no there is no standard notation. But there's nothing wrong with saying "I will use the symbol BLAH to mean whichever of the relations, >,<, or = applies between terms. Now $2x + 5 BLAH 10a + 7$ if and only if $x BLAH 5a + 1$ so ....."
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Jan 7 at 1:40
2
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out, you could use $text{sgn}(a-b)$ if space is limited. However, it is far better just to say something like "let's prove which of $a$ and $b$ is larger, or if they are equal." That's far more readable. Frankly, I wouldn't even use the $>$/$<$/$=$ symbols.
$endgroup$
– Ben W
Jan 7 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Agree with others. Just use words. Mathematics doesn't always need to be decorated with strange symbols. And if the strange symbols reduced readability and comprehension, they should definitely not be used.
$endgroup$
– bubba
Jan 7 at 4:41
2
2
$begingroup$
This info is packed in the value of $text{sgn}(a-b)$, the signum of $a-b$.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Jan 7 at 1:33
$begingroup$
This info is packed in the value of $text{sgn}(a-b)$, the signum of $a-b$.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Jan 7 at 1:33
2
2
$begingroup$
What's wrong with "Is $agt b$ or is $a lt b$ or is $a=b$?", and then proving that one and only one of those options must hold., and which one actually holds.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Jan 7 at 1:35
$begingroup$
What's wrong with "Is $agt b$ or is $a lt b$ or is $a=b$?", and then proving that one and only one of those options must hold., and which one actually holds.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Jan 7 at 1:35
1
1
$begingroup$
It's irritating but no there is no standard notation. But there's nothing wrong with saying "I will use the symbol BLAH to mean whichever of the relations, >,<, or = applies between terms. Now $2x + 5 BLAH 10a + 7$ if and only if $x BLAH 5a + 1$ so ....."
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Jan 7 at 1:40
$begingroup$
It's irritating but no there is no standard notation. But there's nothing wrong with saying "I will use the symbol BLAH to mean whichever of the relations, >,<, or = applies between terms. Now $2x + 5 BLAH 10a + 7$ if and only if $x BLAH 5a + 1$ so ....."
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Jan 7 at 1:40
2
2
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out, you could use $text{sgn}(a-b)$ if space is limited. However, it is far better just to say something like "let's prove which of $a$ and $b$ is larger, or if they are equal." That's far more readable. Frankly, I wouldn't even use the $>$/$<$/$=$ symbols.
$endgroup$
– Ben W
Jan 7 at 1:44
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out, you could use $text{sgn}(a-b)$ if space is limited. However, it is far better just to say something like "let's prove which of $a$ and $b$ is larger, or if they are equal." That's far more readable. Frankly, I wouldn't even use the $>$/$<$/$=$ symbols.
$endgroup$
– Ben W
Jan 7 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Agree with others. Just use words. Mathematics doesn't always need to be decorated with strange symbols. And if the strange symbols reduced readability and comprehension, they should definitely not be used.
$endgroup$
– bubba
Jan 7 at 4:41
$begingroup$
Agree with others. Just use words. Mathematics doesn't always need to be decorated with strange symbols. And if the strange symbols reduced readability and comprehension, they should definitely not be used.
$endgroup$
– bubba
Jan 7 at 4:41
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064573%2fsymbol-to-show-if-a-is-greater-than-less-than-or-equal-to-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064573%2fsymbol-to-show-if-a-is-greater-than-less-than-or-equal-to-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
This info is packed in the value of $text{sgn}(a-b)$, the signum of $a-b$.
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Jan 7 at 1:33
2
$begingroup$
What's wrong with "Is $agt b$ or is $a lt b$ or is $a=b$?", and then proving that one and only one of those options must hold., and which one actually holds.
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Jan 7 at 1:35
1
$begingroup$
It's irritating but no there is no standard notation. But there's nothing wrong with saying "I will use the symbol BLAH to mean whichever of the relations, >,<, or = applies between terms. Now $2x + 5 BLAH 10a + 7$ if and only if $x BLAH 5a + 1$ so ....."
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Jan 7 at 1:40
2
$begingroup$
As has been pointed out, you could use $text{sgn}(a-b)$ if space is limited. However, it is far better just to say something like "let's prove which of $a$ and $b$ is larger, or if they are equal." That's far more readable. Frankly, I wouldn't even use the $>$/$<$/$=$ symbols.
$endgroup$
– Ben W
Jan 7 at 1:44
$begingroup$
Agree with others. Just use words. Mathematics doesn't always need to be decorated with strange symbols. And if the strange symbols reduced readability and comprehension, they should definitely not be used.
$endgroup$
– bubba
Jan 7 at 4:41