Hints on $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=|alpha|^dlambda^{d}(B)$
$begingroup$
Let $B in mathcal{B}^{d}$ and $alphaneq 0$
Any ideas on how to show:
$lambda^{d}(alpha B)=|alpha|^dlambda^{d}(B)$
My idea using "simple sets":
Let $B:=[a_{1},b_{1}[times...times[a_{d},b_{d}[$ this means:
Note without loss of generality $alpha > 0$ otherwise switch intervals $[a,b[$ to $[alpha b,alpha a[$
$alpha B=[alpha a_{1},alpha b_{1}[times...times[alpha a_{d},alpha b_{d}[$
Therefore $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=prod_{i=1}^{d}(alpha b_{i}-alpha a_{i})=alpha^{d}prod_{i=1}^{d}( b_{i}- a_{i})=alphalambda^{d}(B)$
Since ${[alpha a_{1},alpha b_{1}[times...times[alpha a_{d},alpha b_{d}[}$ is a $cap-$stable generator of $mathcal{B}^{d}$ it follows:
$lambda^{d}(alpha B)=|alpha|^dlambda^{d}(B)$ for any $B in mathcal{B}^{d}$
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $B in mathcal{B}^{d}$ and $alphaneq 0$
Any ideas on how to show:
$lambda^{d}(alpha B)=|alpha|^dlambda^{d}(B)$
My idea using "simple sets":
Let $B:=[a_{1},b_{1}[times...times[a_{d},b_{d}[$ this means:
Note without loss of generality $alpha > 0$ otherwise switch intervals $[a,b[$ to $[alpha b,alpha a[$
$alpha B=[alpha a_{1},alpha b_{1}[times...times[alpha a_{d},alpha b_{d}[$
Therefore $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=prod_{i=1}^{d}(alpha b_{i}-alpha a_{i})=alpha^{d}prod_{i=1}^{d}( b_{i}- a_{i})=alphalambda^{d}(B)$
Since ${[alpha a_{1},alpha b_{1}[times...times[alpha a_{d},alpha b_{d}[}$ is a $cap-$stable generator of $mathcal{B}^{d}$ it follows:
$lambda^{d}(alpha B)=|alpha|^dlambda^{d}(B)$ for any $B in mathcal{B}^{d}$
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hint: Show that the result holds for simple sets, then consider the class of sets such that it holds.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 17:57
$begingroup$
@Did So $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=int_{mathbb R^{d}}chi_{alpha B}dlambda^{d}$ does not help? I am confused as to how to use your hint
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 18:43
$begingroup$
No it does not. Re my hint, it has two parts. Let me suggest to first concentrate on the first part, and then to turn to the second part.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 18:45
$begingroup$
@Did I have edited my question, is it correct?
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 19:01
$begingroup$
Yes, although you might be more explicit about how you deduce the result for the class of Borel sets from the result for the smaller class.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 19:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $B in mathcal{B}^{d}$ and $alphaneq 0$
Any ideas on how to show:
$lambda^{d}(alpha B)=|alpha|^dlambda^{d}(B)$
My idea using "simple sets":
Let $B:=[a_{1},b_{1}[times...times[a_{d},b_{d}[$ this means:
Note without loss of generality $alpha > 0$ otherwise switch intervals $[a,b[$ to $[alpha b,alpha a[$
$alpha B=[alpha a_{1},alpha b_{1}[times...times[alpha a_{d},alpha b_{d}[$
Therefore $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=prod_{i=1}^{d}(alpha b_{i}-alpha a_{i})=alpha^{d}prod_{i=1}^{d}( b_{i}- a_{i})=alphalambda^{d}(B)$
Since ${[alpha a_{1},alpha b_{1}[times...times[alpha a_{d},alpha b_{d}[}$ is a $cap-$stable generator of $mathcal{B}^{d}$ it follows:
$lambda^{d}(alpha B)=|alpha|^dlambda^{d}(B)$ for any $B in mathcal{B}^{d}$
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure
$endgroup$
Let $B in mathcal{B}^{d}$ and $alphaneq 0$
Any ideas on how to show:
$lambda^{d}(alpha B)=|alpha|^dlambda^{d}(B)$
My idea using "simple sets":
Let $B:=[a_{1},b_{1}[times...times[a_{d},b_{d}[$ this means:
Note without loss of generality $alpha > 0$ otherwise switch intervals $[a,b[$ to $[alpha b,alpha a[$
$alpha B=[alpha a_{1},alpha b_{1}[times...times[alpha a_{d},alpha b_{d}[$
Therefore $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=prod_{i=1}^{d}(alpha b_{i}-alpha a_{i})=alpha^{d}prod_{i=1}^{d}( b_{i}- a_{i})=alphalambda^{d}(B)$
Since ${[alpha a_{1},alpha b_{1}[times...times[alpha a_{d},alpha b_{d}[}$ is a $cap-$stable generator of $mathcal{B}^{d}$ it follows:
$lambda^{d}(alpha B)=|alpha|^dlambda^{d}(B)$ for any $B in mathcal{B}^{d}$
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure
real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure
edited Jan 13 at 19:00
MinaThuma
asked Jan 13 at 17:51
MinaThumaMinaThuma
27010
27010
$begingroup$
Hint: Show that the result holds for simple sets, then consider the class of sets such that it holds.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 17:57
$begingroup$
@Did So $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=int_{mathbb R^{d}}chi_{alpha B}dlambda^{d}$ does not help? I am confused as to how to use your hint
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 18:43
$begingroup$
No it does not. Re my hint, it has two parts. Let me suggest to first concentrate on the first part, and then to turn to the second part.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 18:45
$begingroup$
@Did I have edited my question, is it correct?
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 19:01
$begingroup$
Yes, although you might be more explicit about how you deduce the result for the class of Borel sets from the result for the smaller class.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 19:03
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: Show that the result holds for simple sets, then consider the class of sets such that it holds.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 17:57
$begingroup$
@Did So $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=int_{mathbb R^{d}}chi_{alpha B}dlambda^{d}$ does not help? I am confused as to how to use your hint
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 18:43
$begingroup$
No it does not. Re my hint, it has two parts. Let me suggest to first concentrate on the first part, and then to turn to the second part.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 18:45
$begingroup$
@Did I have edited my question, is it correct?
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 19:01
$begingroup$
Yes, although you might be more explicit about how you deduce the result for the class of Borel sets from the result for the smaller class.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 19:03
$begingroup$
Hint: Show that the result holds for simple sets, then consider the class of sets such that it holds.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 17:57
$begingroup$
Hint: Show that the result holds for simple sets, then consider the class of sets such that it holds.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 17:57
$begingroup$
@Did So $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=int_{mathbb R^{d}}chi_{alpha B}dlambda^{d}$ does not help? I am confused as to how to use your hint
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 18:43
$begingroup$
@Did So $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=int_{mathbb R^{d}}chi_{alpha B}dlambda^{d}$ does not help? I am confused as to how to use your hint
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 18:43
$begingroup$
No it does not. Re my hint, it has two parts. Let me suggest to first concentrate on the first part, and then to turn to the second part.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 18:45
$begingroup$
No it does not. Re my hint, it has two parts. Let me suggest to first concentrate on the first part, and then to turn to the second part.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 18:45
$begingroup$
@Did I have edited my question, is it correct?
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 19:01
$begingroup$
@Did I have edited my question, is it correct?
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 19:01
$begingroup$
Yes, although you might be more explicit about how you deduce the result for the class of Borel sets from the result for the smaller class.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 19:03
$begingroup$
Yes, although you might be more explicit about how you deduce the result for the class of Borel sets from the result for the smaller class.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 19:03
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072309%2fhints-on-lambdad-alpha-b-alphad-lambdadb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072309%2fhints-on-lambdad-alpha-b-alphad-lambdadb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Hint: Show that the result holds for simple sets, then consider the class of sets such that it holds.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 17:57
$begingroup$
@Did So $lambda^{d}(alpha B)=int_{mathbb R^{d}}chi_{alpha B}dlambda^{d}$ does not help? I am confused as to how to use your hint
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 18:43
$begingroup$
No it does not. Re my hint, it has two parts. Let me suggest to first concentrate on the first part, and then to turn to the second part.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 18:45
$begingroup$
@Did I have edited my question, is it correct?
$endgroup$
– MinaThuma
Jan 13 at 19:01
$begingroup$
Yes, although you might be more explicit about how you deduce the result for the class of Borel sets from the result for the smaller class.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 13 at 19:03