Local minimum of the difference of two functions
$begingroup$
Consider the function $$u(x)=begin{cases}x qquad qquad xin[0,frac{1}{2}]\-x+1 qquad x in[frac{1}{2},1]end{cases}.$$
Certainly $u$ is continuous in $[0,1]$, derivable at each point except at $x=frac{1}{2}$.
I wonder if there is a formal way to prove that there is no $phiin C^1((0,1))$ such that $phi(frac{1}{2})=u(frac{1}{2})$ and its graph is locally under the graph of $u$, ie there exist $epsilon>0$ such that $phi(y)<u(y)$ for all $y in B_epsilon(frac{1}{2})={yin (0,1): |y-frac{1}{2}|<epsilon}$, $yneq frac{1}{2}$.
real-analysis derivatives extremal-graph-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the function $$u(x)=begin{cases}x qquad qquad xin[0,frac{1}{2}]\-x+1 qquad x in[frac{1}{2},1]end{cases}.$$
Certainly $u$ is continuous in $[0,1]$, derivable at each point except at $x=frac{1}{2}$.
I wonder if there is a formal way to prove that there is no $phiin C^1((0,1))$ such that $phi(frac{1}{2})=u(frac{1}{2})$ and its graph is locally under the graph of $u$, ie there exist $epsilon>0$ such that $phi(y)<u(y)$ for all $y in B_epsilon(frac{1}{2})={yin (0,1): |y-frac{1}{2}|<epsilon}$, $yneq frac{1}{2}$.
real-analysis derivatives extremal-graph-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the function $$u(x)=begin{cases}x qquad qquad xin[0,frac{1}{2}]\-x+1 qquad x in[frac{1}{2},1]end{cases}.$$
Certainly $u$ is continuous in $[0,1]$, derivable at each point except at $x=frac{1}{2}$.
I wonder if there is a formal way to prove that there is no $phiin C^1((0,1))$ such that $phi(frac{1}{2})=u(frac{1}{2})$ and its graph is locally under the graph of $u$, ie there exist $epsilon>0$ such that $phi(y)<u(y)$ for all $y in B_epsilon(frac{1}{2})={yin (0,1): |y-frac{1}{2}|<epsilon}$, $yneq frac{1}{2}$.
real-analysis derivatives extremal-graph-theory
$endgroup$
Consider the function $$u(x)=begin{cases}x qquad qquad xin[0,frac{1}{2}]\-x+1 qquad x in[frac{1}{2},1]end{cases}.$$
Certainly $u$ is continuous in $[0,1]$, derivable at each point except at $x=frac{1}{2}$.
I wonder if there is a formal way to prove that there is no $phiin C^1((0,1))$ such that $phi(frac{1}{2})=u(frac{1}{2})$ and its graph is locally under the graph of $u$, ie there exist $epsilon>0$ such that $phi(y)<u(y)$ for all $y in B_epsilon(frac{1}{2})={yin (0,1): |y-frac{1}{2}|<epsilon}$, $yneq frac{1}{2}$.
real-analysis derivatives extremal-graph-theory
real-analysis derivatives extremal-graph-theory
edited Jan 13 at 18:03
eleguitar
asked Jan 13 at 17:52
eleguitareleguitar
140114
140114
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Assume by contrary that $epsilon>0$ exists such that $$left|x-{1over 2}right|<epsilonto phi(x)le u(x)$$since $phi(0.5)=u(0.5)$ we can write$$phi(x)-phi(0.5)le u(x)-u(0.5)$$for $0.5<x<0.5+epsilon$ we obtain $${phi(x)-phi(0.5)over x-0.5}le {u(x)-u(0.5)over x-0.5}$$ and by tending $xto 0.5^+$ since $phiin C^1[(0,1)]$ we have $$phi'(0.5)le u'^+(0.5)=-1$$where $u'^+(0.5)$ is the right derivative of $u$ in $0.5$. Similarly $0.5-epsilon<x<0.5$ yields to $${phi(x)-phi(0.5)over x-0.5}ge {u(x)-u(0.5)over x-0.5}$$and $$phi'(0.5)ge u'^-(0.5)=1$$which leads to the impossible inequality $1le-1$. Therefore such $epsilon$ does not exist and the proof is complete.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072311%2flocal-minimum-of-the-difference-of-two-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Assume by contrary that $epsilon>0$ exists such that $$left|x-{1over 2}right|<epsilonto phi(x)le u(x)$$since $phi(0.5)=u(0.5)$ we can write$$phi(x)-phi(0.5)le u(x)-u(0.5)$$for $0.5<x<0.5+epsilon$ we obtain $${phi(x)-phi(0.5)over x-0.5}le {u(x)-u(0.5)over x-0.5}$$ and by tending $xto 0.5^+$ since $phiin C^1[(0,1)]$ we have $$phi'(0.5)le u'^+(0.5)=-1$$where $u'^+(0.5)$ is the right derivative of $u$ in $0.5$. Similarly $0.5-epsilon<x<0.5$ yields to $${phi(x)-phi(0.5)over x-0.5}ge {u(x)-u(0.5)over x-0.5}$$and $$phi'(0.5)ge u'^-(0.5)=1$$which leads to the impossible inequality $1le-1$. Therefore such $epsilon$ does not exist and the proof is complete.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume by contrary that $epsilon>0$ exists such that $$left|x-{1over 2}right|<epsilonto phi(x)le u(x)$$since $phi(0.5)=u(0.5)$ we can write$$phi(x)-phi(0.5)le u(x)-u(0.5)$$for $0.5<x<0.5+epsilon$ we obtain $${phi(x)-phi(0.5)over x-0.5}le {u(x)-u(0.5)over x-0.5}$$ and by tending $xto 0.5^+$ since $phiin C^1[(0,1)]$ we have $$phi'(0.5)le u'^+(0.5)=-1$$where $u'^+(0.5)$ is the right derivative of $u$ in $0.5$. Similarly $0.5-epsilon<x<0.5$ yields to $${phi(x)-phi(0.5)over x-0.5}ge {u(x)-u(0.5)over x-0.5}$$and $$phi'(0.5)ge u'^-(0.5)=1$$which leads to the impossible inequality $1le-1$. Therefore such $epsilon$ does not exist and the proof is complete.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume by contrary that $epsilon>0$ exists such that $$left|x-{1over 2}right|<epsilonto phi(x)le u(x)$$since $phi(0.5)=u(0.5)$ we can write$$phi(x)-phi(0.5)le u(x)-u(0.5)$$for $0.5<x<0.5+epsilon$ we obtain $${phi(x)-phi(0.5)over x-0.5}le {u(x)-u(0.5)over x-0.5}$$ and by tending $xto 0.5^+$ since $phiin C^1[(0,1)]$ we have $$phi'(0.5)le u'^+(0.5)=-1$$where $u'^+(0.5)$ is the right derivative of $u$ in $0.5$. Similarly $0.5-epsilon<x<0.5$ yields to $${phi(x)-phi(0.5)over x-0.5}ge {u(x)-u(0.5)over x-0.5}$$and $$phi'(0.5)ge u'^-(0.5)=1$$which leads to the impossible inequality $1le-1$. Therefore such $epsilon$ does not exist and the proof is complete.
$endgroup$
Assume by contrary that $epsilon>0$ exists such that $$left|x-{1over 2}right|<epsilonto phi(x)le u(x)$$since $phi(0.5)=u(0.5)$ we can write$$phi(x)-phi(0.5)le u(x)-u(0.5)$$for $0.5<x<0.5+epsilon$ we obtain $${phi(x)-phi(0.5)over x-0.5}le {u(x)-u(0.5)over x-0.5}$$ and by tending $xto 0.5^+$ since $phiin C^1[(0,1)]$ we have $$phi'(0.5)le u'^+(0.5)=-1$$where $u'^+(0.5)$ is the right derivative of $u$ in $0.5$. Similarly $0.5-epsilon<x<0.5$ yields to $${phi(x)-phi(0.5)over x-0.5}ge {u(x)-u(0.5)over x-0.5}$$and $$phi'(0.5)ge u'^-(0.5)=1$$which leads to the impossible inequality $1le-1$. Therefore such $epsilon$ does not exist and the proof is complete.
answered Jan 13 at 18:25
Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz
18.1k31040
18.1k31040
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072311%2flocal-minimum-of-the-difference-of-two-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown