Show that $f(z)$ has a zero in $mathbb{D}$ and that $|z_{0}|>frac{1}{M}$












1












$begingroup$


Suppose that $f(z)$ is analytic on the closed unit disk $overline{mathbb{D}}$ and $1<|f(z)|<M$ for $|z|=1$, while $f(0)=1$. Show that $f(z)$ has a zero in $mathbb{D}$ and that such zero $z_{0}$ satisfies $|z_{0}|>frac{1}{M}$.



My attempt:



Suppose $f$ has no zero in the unit disk. Then, by minimum modulus principle, $f$ attains its minimum on the boundary. But maximum modulus principle suggests that $f$ attains its maximum on the boundary. This implies that $|f(z)|=1$ for all $z$, and this is a contradiction to our initial assumption that $1<|f(z)|<M$ for $|z|=1$. Hence,$f(z)$ has a zero in $mathbb{D}$.



Now consider the mapping $$phi_{M^{-1}}=frac{M^{-1}-z}{1-overline{M^{-1}}z}$$. Then $phi_{M^{-1}}left(frac{f(z)}{M}right):mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ and maps $0$ to $0$.



Then, by Schwarz Lemma, $$left|phi_{M^{-1}}left(frac{f(z_0)}{M}right)right|=left|frac{1}{M}right|leq|z_0|$$



Any clarification is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Suppose that $f(z)$ is analytic on the closed unit disk $overline{mathbb{D}}$ and $1<|f(z)|<M$ for $|z|=1$, while $f(0)=1$. Show that $f(z)$ has a zero in $mathbb{D}$ and that such zero $z_{0}$ satisfies $|z_{0}|>frac{1}{M}$.



    My attempt:



    Suppose $f$ has no zero in the unit disk. Then, by minimum modulus principle, $f$ attains its minimum on the boundary. But maximum modulus principle suggests that $f$ attains its maximum on the boundary. This implies that $|f(z)|=1$ for all $z$, and this is a contradiction to our initial assumption that $1<|f(z)|<M$ for $|z|=1$. Hence,$f(z)$ has a zero in $mathbb{D}$.



    Now consider the mapping $$phi_{M^{-1}}=frac{M^{-1}-z}{1-overline{M^{-1}}z}$$. Then $phi_{M^{-1}}left(frac{f(z)}{M}right):mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ and maps $0$ to $0$.



    Then, by Schwarz Lemma, $$left|phi_{M^{-1}}left(frac{f(z_0)}{M}right)right|=left|frac{1}{M}right|leq|z_0|$$



    Any clarification is appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Suppose that $f(z)$ is analytic on the closed unit disk $overline{mathbb{D}}$ and $1<|f(z)|<M$ for $|z|=1$, while $f(0)=1$. Show that $f(z)$ has a zero in $mathbb{D}$ and that such zero $z_{0}$ satisfies $|z_{0}|>frac{1}{M}$.



      My attempt:



      Suppose $f$ has no zero in the unit disk. Then, by minimum modulus principle, $f$ attains its minimum on the boundary. But maximum modulus principle suggests that $f$ attains its maximum on the boundary. This implies that $|f(z)|=1$ for all $z$, and this is a contradiction to our initial assumption that $1<|f(z)|<M$ for $|z|=1$. Hence,$f(z)$ has a zero in $mathbb{D}$.



      Now consider the mapping $$phi_{M^{-1}}=frac{M^{-1}-z}{1-overline{M^{-1}}z}$$. Then $phi_{M^{-1}}left(frac{f(z)}{M}right):mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ and maps $0$ to $0$.



      Then, by Schwarz Lemma, $$left|phi_{M^{-1}}left(frac{f(z_0)}{M}right)right|=left|frac{1}{M}right|leq|z_0|$$



      Any clarification is appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose that $f(z)$ is analytic on the closed unit disk $overline{mathbb{D}}$ and $1<|f(z)|<M$ for $|z|=1$, while $f(0)=1$. Show that $f(z)$ has a zero in $mathbb{D}$ and that such zero $z_{0}$ satisfies $|z_{0}|>frac{1}{M}$.



      My attempt:



      Suppose $f$ has no zero in the unit disk. Then, by minimum modulus principle, $f$ attains its minimum on the boundary. But maximum modulus principle suggests that $f$ attains its maximum on the boundary. This implies that $|f(z)|=1$ for all $z$, and this is a contradiction to our initial assumption that $1<|f(z)|<M$ for $|z|=1$. Hence,$f(z)$ has a zero in $mathbb{D}$.



      Now consider the mapping $$phi_{M^{-1}}=frac{M^{-1}-z}{1-overline{M^{-1}}z}$$. Then $phi_{M^{-1}}left(frac{f(z)}{M}right):mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ and maps $0$ to $0$.



      Then, by Schwarz Lemma, $$left|phi_{M^{-1}}left(frac{f(z_0)}{M}right)right|=left|frac{1}{M}right|leq|z_0|$$



      Any clarification is appreciated.







      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 13 at 18:19









      Ya GYa G

      541211




      541211






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Your invoking minimum modulus principle is fine, but the subsequent argument using maximum principle does not produce $|f(z)|=1$ on the boundary (if there's an argument that can prove it, then you should include it in your proof.) I suggest instead to note that $|f(0)|=1<|f(z)|$ for all $|z|=1$. It says that the minimum of $|f(z)|$ cannot occur on $|z|=1$. This leads to a contradiction.



          About the second part, it looks fine except that the equality sign in
          $$
          left|frac{1}{M}right|leq|z_0|
          $$
          can be dropped since $|f(z)|=M$ cannot occur on the boundary.



          Here, I will present another way in which the Schwarz lemma can be applied. Define
          $$
          g:overline{mathbb{D}}ni wmapsto fleft(frac{w+z_0}{1+overline{z_0}w}right).
          $$
          Then we can see that $g(0)=f(z_0)=0$ and $|g(w)|<M$ for all $|w|=1$. Schwarz's lemma implies $$
          |g(w)|<M|w|
          $$
          for all $0<|w|le 1$. Finally the conclusion comes from noticing that
          $$
          |g(-z_0)|=|f(0)|=1<M|-z_0|=M|z_0|.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072349%2fshow-that-fz-has-a-zero-in-mathbbd-and-that-z-0-frac1m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Your invoking minimum modulus principle is fine, but the subsequent argument using maximum principle does not produce $|f(z)|=1$ on the boundary (if there's an argument that can prove it, then you should include it in your proof.) I suggest instead to note that $|f(0)|=1<|f(z)|$ for all $|z|=1$. It says that the minimum of $|f(z)|$ cannot occur on $|z|=1$. This leads to a contradiction.



            About the second part, it looks fine except that the equality sign in
            $$
            left|frac{1}{M}right|leq|z_0|
            $$
            can be dropped since $|f(z)|=M$ cannot occur on the boundary.



            Here, I will present another way in which the Schwarz lemma can be applied. Define
            $$
            g:overline{mathbb{D}}ni wmapsto fleft(frac{w+z_0}{1+overline{z_0}w}right).
            $$
            Then we can see that $g(0)=f(z_0)=0$ and $|g(w)|<M$ for all $|w|=1$. Schwarz's lemma implies $$
            |g(w)|<M|w|
            $$
            for all $0<|w|le 1$. Finally the conclusion comes from noticing that
            $$
            |g(-z_0)|=|f(0)|=1<M|-z_0|=M|z_0|.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Your invoking minimum modulus principle is fine, but the subsequent argument using maximum principle does not produce $|f(z)|=1$ on the boundary (if there's an argument that can prove it, then you should include it in your proof.) I suggest instead to note that $|f(0)|=1<|f(z)|$ for all $|z|=1$. It says that the minimum of $|f(z)|$ cannot occur on $|z|=1$. This leads to a contradiction.



              About the second part, it looks fine except that the equality sign in
              $$
              left|frac{1}{M}right|leq|z_0|
              $$
              can be dropped since $|f(z)|=M$ cannot occur on the boundary.



              Here, I will present another way in which the Schwarz lemma can be applied. Define
              $$
              g:overline{mathbb{D}}ni wmapsto fleft(frac{w+z_0}{1+overline{z_0}w}right).
              $$
              Then we can see that $g(0)=f(z_0)=0$ and $|g(w)|<M$ for all $|w|=1$. Schwarz's lemma implies $$
              |g(w)|<M|w|
              $$
              for all $0<|w|le 1$. Finally the conclusion comes from noticing that
              $$
              |g(-z_0)|=|f(0)|=1<M|-z_0|=M|z_0|.
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Your invoking minimum modulus principle is fine, but the subsequent argument using maximum principle does not produce $|f(z)|=1$ on the boundary (if there's an argument that can prove it, then you should include it in your proof.) I suggest instead to note that $|f(0)|=1<|f(z)|$ for all $|z|=1$. It says that the minimum of $|f(z)|$ cannot occur on $|z|=1$. This leads to a contradiction.



                About the second part, it looks fine except that the equality sign in
                $$
                left|frac{1}{M}right|leq|z_0|
                $$
                can be dropped since $|f(z)|=M$ cannot occur on the boundary.



                Here, I will present another way in which the Schwarz lemma can be applied. Define
                $$
                g:overline{mathbb{D}}ni wmapsto fleft(frac{w+z_0}{1+overline{z_0}w}right).
                $$
                Then we can see that $g(0)=f(z_0)=0$ and $|g(w)|<M$ for all $|w|=1$. Schwarz's lemma implies $$
                |g(w)|<M|w|
                $$
                for all $0<|w|le 1$. Finally the conclusion comes from noticing that
                $$
                |g(-z_0)|=|f(0)|=1<M|-z_0|=M|z_0|.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Your invoking minimum modulus principle is fine, but the subsequent argument using maximum principle does not produce $|f(z)|=1$ on the boundary (if there's an argument that can prove it, then you should include it in your proof.) I suggest instead to note that $|f(0)|=1<|f(z)|$ for all $|z|=1$. It says that the minimum of $|f(z)|$ cannot occur on $|z|=1$. This leads to a contradiction.



                About the second part, it looks fine except that the equality sign in
                $$
                left|frac{1}{M}right|leq|z_0|
                $$
                can be dropped since $|f(z)|=M$ cannot occur on the boundary.



                Here, I will present another way in which the Schwarz lemma can be applied. Define
                $$
                g:overline{mathbb{D}}ni wmapsto fleft(frac{w+z_0}{1+overline{z_0}w}right).
                $$
                Then we can see that $g(0)=f(z_0)=0$ and $|g(w)|<M$ for all $|w|=1$. Schwarz's lemma implies $$
                |g(w)|<M|w|
                $$
                for all $0<|w|le 1$. Finally the conclusion comes from noticing that
                $$
                |g(-z_0)|=|f(0)|=1<M|-z_0|=M|z_0|.
                $$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jan 13 at 20:40

























                answered Jan 13 at 18:36









                SongSong

                18.6k21651




                18.6k21651






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072349%2fshow-that-fz-has-a-zero-in-mathbbd-and-that-z-0-frac1m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna