(Co)homology of $S^2×S^2/ℤ_2$
3
Cohomology of $S^2times S^2/mathbb{Z}_2$
I was looking at this question, the accepted answer uses the homology of the space to find the cohomology. I was wondering how one could compute the homology of an orbit space like this in the first place?
"The product of two spheres admits a diagonal $ℤ_2$ action, $(x, y)mapsto(−x,−y)$" - describe the homology groups of the orbit space of this free action.
general-topology algebraic-topology
edited Dec 9 at 5:12
Andrews
372317
asked Dec 9 at 0:50
Shelly B
383
|
show 7 more comments
3
Cohomology of $S^2times S^2/mathbb{Z}_2$
I was looking at this question, the accepted answer uses the homology of the space to find the cohomology. I was wondering how one could compute the homology of an orbit space like this in the first place?
"The product of two spheres admits a diagonal $ℤ_2$ action, $(x, y)mapsto(−x,−y)$" - describe the homology groups of the orbit space of this free action.
general-topology algebraic-topology
edited Dec 9 at 5:12
Andrews
372317
asked Dec 9 at 0:50
Shelly B
383
2
As long as you can construct a nice enough cell decomposition or triangulation of $S^2 times S^2$ has, you can derive a cellular decomposition or triangulation of the orbit, and then proceed from there directly using cellular or simplicial homology.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 0:57
@RolfHoyer I am sorry, I am not sure I understand you completely. Lets say I do a cellular decomposition of $S2 x S2$ $S2xS2$ has a one $e^2$ and one $e^0$ cell for each S2. So the cell structure for $S2 times S2$ is given by the cells $e^0 times e^0$, $e^2 times e^2$, two $e^0 times e^2$.
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:35
@RolfHoyer I am unsure how I can use this to find a decomposition of the orbit
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:37
That is one decomposition, but it isn't the only one. In order to get a nice cellular structure on the orbit, you need the group action to never produce a non-identity self-map from a cell to itself. That way, when you go to the quotient it just identifies cells without needing to do any folding. I would recommend subdividing your decomposition further. It should suffice to use the decomposition of $S^2$ into two cells in each of dimensions 0,1,2, I think.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 1:37
1
@RolfHoyer (3) works. I would write it up if and only if it is of interest to OP - I worry I would be writing something complicated and somewhat abstract for little gain for others. The cellular chain complex is not so impossible to calculate here (I remember doing this explicitly around the time of that original thread), but I do not have the energy to try again.
– Mike Miller
Dec 9 at 3:17
|
show 7 more comments
3
3
3
0
Cohomology of $S^2times S^2/mathbb{Z}_2$
I was looking at this question, the accepted answer uses the homology of the space to find the cohomology. I was wondering how one could compute the homology of an orbit space like this in the first place?
"The product of two spheres admits a diagonal $ℤ_2$ action, $(x, y)mapsto(−x,−y)$" - describe the homology groups of the orbit space of this free action.
general-topology algebraic-topology
edited Dec 9 at 5:12
Andrews
372317
asked Dec 9 at 0:50
Shelly B
383
Cohomology of $S^2times S^2/mathbb{Z}_2$
I was looking at this question, the accepted answer uses the homology of the space to find the cohomology. I was wondering how one could compute the homology of an orbit space like this in the first place?
"The product of two spheres admits a diagonal $ℤ_2$ action, $(x, y)mapsto(−x,−y)$" - describe the homology groups of the orbit space of this free action.
general-topology algebraic-topology
general-topology algebraic-topology
edited Dec 9 at 5:12
Andrews
372317
asked Dec 9 at 0:50
Shelly B
383
edited Dec 9 at 5:12
Andrews
372317
asked Dec 9 at 0:50
Shelly B
383
edited Dec 9 at 5:12
Andrews
372317
edited Dec 9 at 5:12
Andrews
372317
edited Dec 9 at 5:12
Andrews
372317
372317
asked Dec 9 at 0:50
Shelly B
383
asked Dec 9 at 0:50
Shelly B
383
asked Dec 9 at 0:50
Shelly B
383
383
2
As long as you can construct a nice enough cell decomposition or triangulation of $S^2 times S^2$ has, you can derive a cellular decomposition or triangulation of the orbit, and then proceed from there directly using cellular or simplicial homology.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 0:57
@RolfHoyer I am sorry, I am not sure I understand you completely. Lets say I do a cellular decomposition of $S2 x S2$ $S2xS2$ has a one $e^2$ and one $e^0$ cell for each S2. So the cell structure for $S2 times S2$ is given by the cells $e^0 times e^0$, $e^2 times e^2$, two $e^0 times e^2$.
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:35
@RolfHoyer I am unsure how I can use this to find a decomposition of the orbit
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:37
That is one decomposition, but it isn't the only one. In order to get a nice cellular structure on the orbit, you need the group action to never produce a non-identity self-map from a cell to itself. That way, when you go to the quotient it just identifies cells without needing to do any folding. I would recommend subdividing your decomposition further. It should suffice to use the decomposition of $S^2$ into two cells in each of dimensions 0,1,2, I think.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 1:37
1
@RolfHoyer (3) works. I would write it up if and only if it is of interest to OP - I worry I would be writing something complicated and somewhat abstract for little gain for others. The cellular chain complex is not so impossible to calculate here (I remember doing this explicitly around the time of that original thread), but I do not have the energy to try again.
– Mike Miller
Dec 9 at 3:17
|
show 7 more comments
2
As long as you can construct a nice enough cell decomposition or triangulation of $S^2 times S^2$ has, you can derive a cellular decomposition or triangulation of the orbit, and then proceed from there directly using cellular or simplicial homology.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 0:57
@RolfHoyer I am sorry, I am not sure I understand you completely. Lets say I do a cellular decomposition of $S2 x S2$ $S2xS2$ has a one $e^2$ and one $e^0$ cell for each S2. So the cell structure for $S2 times S2$ is given by the cells $e^0 times e^0$, $e^2 times e^2$, two $e^0 times e^2$.
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:35
@RolfHoyer I am unsure how I can use this to find a decomposition of the orbit
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:37
That is one decomposition, but it isn't the only one. In order to get a nice cellular structure on the orbit, you need the group action to never produce a non-identity self-map from a cell to itself. That way, when you go to the quotient it just identifies cells without needing to do any folding. I would recommend subdividing your decomposition further. It should suffice to use the decomposition of $S^2$ into two cells in each of dimensions 0,1,2, I think.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 1:37
1
@RolfHoyer (3) works. I would write it up if and only if it is of interest to OP - I worry I would be writing something complicated and somewhat abstract for little gain for others. The cellular chain complex is not so impossible to calculate here (I remember doing this explicitly around the time of that original thread), but I do not have the energy to try again.
– Mike Miller
Dec 9 at 3:17
2
2
As long as you can construct a nice enough cell decomposition or triangulation of $S^2 times S^2$ has, you can derive a cellular decomposition or triangulation of the orbit, and then proceed from there directly using cellular or simplicial homology.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 0:57
As long as you can construct a nice enough cell decomposition or triangulation of $S^2 times S^2$ has, you can derive a cellular decomposition or triangulation of the orbit, and then proceed from there directly using cellular or simplicial homology.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 0:57
@RolfHoyer I am sorry, I am not sure I understand you completely. Lets say I do a cellular decomposition of $S2 x S2$ $S2xS2$ has a one $e^2$ and one $e^0$ cell for each S2. So the cell structure for $S2 times S2$ is given by the cells $e^0 times e^0$, $e^2 times e^2$, two $e^0 times e^2$.
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:35
@RolfHoyer I am sorry, I am not sure I understand you completely. Lets say I do a cellular decomposition of $S2 x S2$ $S2xS2$ has a one $e^2$ and one $e^0$ cell for each S2. So the cell structure for $S2 times S2$ is given by the cells $e^0 times e^0$, $e^2 times e^2$, two $e^0 times e^2$.
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:35
@RolfHoyer I am unsure how I can use this to find a decomposition of the orbit
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:37
@RolfHoyer I am unsure how I can use this to find a decomposition of the orbit
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:37
That is one decomposition, but it isn't the only one. In order to get a nice cellular structure on the orbit, you need the group action to never produce a non-identity self-map from a cell to itself. That way, when you go to the quotient it just identifies cells without needing to do any folding. I would recommend subdividing your decomposition further. It should suffice to use the decomposition of $S^2$ into two cells in each of dimensions 0,1,2, I think.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 1:37
That is one decomposition, but it isn't the only one. In order to get a nice cellular structure on the orbit, you need the group action to never produce a non-identity self-map from a cell to itself. That way, when you go to the quotient it just identifies cells without needing to do any folding. I would recommend subdividing your decomposition further. It should suffice to use the decomposition of $S^2$ into two cells in each of dimensions 0,1,2, I think.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 1:37
1
1
@RolfHoyer (3) works. I would write it up if and only if it is of interest to OP - I worry I would be writing something complicated and somewhat abstract for little gain for others. The cellular chain complex is not so impossible to calculate here (I remember doing this explicitly around the time of that original thread), but I do not have the energy to try again.
– Mike Miller
Dec 9 at 3:17
@RolfHoyer (3) works. I would write it up if and only if it is of interest to OP - I worry I would be writing something complicated and somewhat abstract for little gain for others. The cellular chain complex is not so impossible to calculate here (I remember doing this explicitly around the time of that original thread), but I do not have the energy to try again.
– Mike Miller
Dec 9 at 3:17
|
show 7 more comments
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031879%2fcohomology-of-s2%25c3%2597s2-%25e2%2584%25a4-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031879%2fcohomology-of-s2%25c3%2597s2-%25e2%2584%25a4-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
As long as you can construct a nice enough cell decomposition or triangulation of $S^2 times S^2$ has, you can derive a cellular decomposition or triangulation of the orbit, and then proceed from there directly using cellular or simplicial homology.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 0:57
@RolfHoyer I am sorry, I am not sure I understand you completely. Lets say I do a cellular decomposition of $S2 x S2$ $S2xS2$ has a one $e^2$ and one $e^0$ cell for each S2. So the cell structure for $S2 times S2$ is given by the cells $e^0 times e^0$, $e^2 times e^2$, two $e^0 times e^2$.
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:35
@RolfHoyer I am unsure how I can use this to find a decomposition of the orbit
– Shelly B
Dec 9 at 1:37
That is one decomposition, but it isn't the only one. In order to get a nice cellular structure on the orbit, you need the group action to never produce a non-identity self-map from a cell to itself. That way, when you go to the quotient it just identifies cells without needing to do any folding. I would recommend subdividing your decomposition further. It should suffice to use the decomposition of $S^2$ into two cells in each of dimensions 0,1,2, I think.
– Rolf Hoyer
Dec 9 at 1:37
1
@RolfHoyer (3) works. I would write it up if and only if it is of interest to OP - I worry I would be writing something complicated and somewhat abstract for little gain for others. The cellular chain complex is not so impossible to calculate here (I remember doing this explicitly around the time of that original thread), but I do not have the energy to try again.
– Mike Miller
Dec 9 at 3:17