Every Interval $I subset mathbb{R}$ is connected
The proof I've been given is
If not, there is a non-constant continuous $f$ from $I$ to
discrete ${0, 1}$. Then $f: I rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is also continuous which contradicts the Intermediate Value Theorem.
Why must $f: I rightarrow mathbb{R}$ also be continuous?
general-topology
add a comment |
The proof I've been given is
If not, there is a non-constant continuous $f$ from $I$ to
discrete ${0, 1}$. Then $f: I rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is also continuous which contradicts the Intermediate Value Theorem.
Why must $f: I rightarrow mathbb{R}$ also be continuous?
general-topology
$f: I rightarrow {0,1} subset mathbb R$. Viewing the space containing the codomain as a subset of a larger set does not affect whether a function is continuous or not. Continuity is determined by the behavior of the domain.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:58
1
I have to wonder though if that proof isn't circular and it is my impression that the Intermediate Value Theorem relies upon the connectedness of intervals in its proof.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:59
1
It $is$ circular. I never liked this proof because just as you say, the various proofs of IVT use at some point, the fact that intervals are connected.
– Matematleta
May 20 '17 at 16:02
add a comment |
The proof I've been given is
If not, there is a non-constant continuous $f$ from $I$ to
discrete ${0, 1}$. Then $f: I rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is also continuous which contradicts the Intermediate Value Theorem.
Why must $f: I rightarrow mathbb{R}$ also be continuous?
general-topology
The proof I've been given is
If not, there is a non-constant continuous $f$ from $I$ to
discrete ${0, 1}$. Then $f: I rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is also continuous which contradicts the Intermediate Value Theorem.
Why must $f: I rightarrow mathbb{R}$ also be continuous?
general-topology
general-topology
edited Dec 9 at 0:19
amWhy
191k28224439
191k28224439
asked May 20 '17 at 15:44
user440780
143
143
$f: I rightarrow {0,1} subset mathbb R$. Viewing the space containing the codomain as a subset of a larger set does not affect whether a function is continuous or not. Continuity is determined by the behavior of the domain.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:58
1
I have to wonder though if that proof isn't circular and it is my impression that the Intermediate Value Theorem relies upon the connectedness of intervals in its proof.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:59
1
It $is$ circular. I never liked this proof because just as you say, the various proofs of IVT use at some point, the fact that intervals are connected.
– Matematleta
May 20 '17 at 16:02
add a comment |
$f: I rightarrow {0,1} subset mathbb R$. Viewing the space containing the codomain as a subset of a larger set does not affect whether a function is continuous or not. Continuity is determined by the behavior of the domain.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:58
1
I have to wonder though if that proof isn't circular and it is my impression that the Intermediate Value Theorem relies upon the connectedness of intervals in its proof.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:59
1
It $is$ circular. I never liked this proof because just as you say, the various proofs of IVT use at some point, the fact that intervals are connected.
– Matematleta
May 20 '17 at 16:02
$f: I rightarrow {0,1} subset mathbb R$. Viewing the space containing the codomain as a subset of a larger set does not affect whether a function is continuous or not. Continuity is determined by the behavior of the domain.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:58
$f: I rightarrow {0,1} subset mathbb R$. Viewing the space containing the codomain as a subset of a larger set does not affect whether a function is continuous or not. Continuity is determined by the behavior of the domain.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:58
1
1
I have to wonder though if that proof isn't circular and it is my impression that the Intermediate Value Theorem relies upon the connectedness of intervals in its proof.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:59
I have to wonder though if that proof isn't circular and it is my impression that the Intermediate Value Theorem relies upon the connectedness of intervals in its proof.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:59
1
1
It $is$ circular. I never liked this proof because just as you say, the various proofs of IVT use at some point, the fact that intervals are connected.
– Matematleta
May 20 '17 at 16:02
It $is$ circular. I never liked this proof because just as you say, the various proofs of IVT use at some point, the fact that intervals are connected.
– Matematleta
May 20 '17 at 16:02
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The inclusion ${0,1} to mathbb{R}$ is continuous because ${0,1}$ has the discrete topology.
Compositions of continuous functions are continuous.
add a comment |
If $I$ is not connected, then by definition there are $A$ and $B$ both open such that $A cup B=I$, if you consider $f$ such that $f(A)=0$ and $f(B)=1$ than this is a continuos function by definition, infact in $ {0,1} $ as a subset of $mathbb R$ there is the discrete topology and $ f^{-1}( {0,1})=I $ that is open, $ f^{-1}( {0})=A $ that is open, $ f^{-1}( {1})=B $ that is open and
$ f^{-1}(emptyset)=emptyset $ that is open so you have a contraddiction with the IVT. However this demonstration is circular because you have to use the connectedness of $I$ for proving the IVT.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2289254%2fevery-interval-i-subset-mathbbr-is-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The inclusion ${0,1} to mathbb{R}$ is continuous because ${0,1}$ has the discrete topology.
Compositions of continuous functions are continuous.
add a comment |
The inclusion ${0,1} to mathbb{R}$ is continuous because ${0,1}$ has the discrete topology.
Compositions of continuous functions are continuous.
add a comment |
The inclusion ${0,1} to mathbb{R}$ is continuous because ${0,1}$ has the discrete topology.
Compositions of continuous functions are continuous.
The inclusion ${0,1} to mathbb{R}$ is continuous because ${0,1}$ has the discrete topology.
Compositions of continuous functions are continuous.
answered May 20 '17 at 15:47
user133281
13.6k22551
13.6k22551
add a comment |
add a comment |
If $I$ is not connected, then by definition there are $A$ and $B$ both open such that $A cup B=I$, if you consider $f$ such that $f(A)=0$ and $f(B)=1$ than this is a continuos function by definition, infact in $ {0,1} $ as a subset of $mathbb R$ there is the discrete topology and $ f^{-1}( {0,1})=I $ that is open, $ f^{-1}( {0})=A $ that is open, $ f^{-1}( {1})=B $ that is open and
$ f^{-1}(emptyset)=emptyset $ that is open so you have a contraddiction with the IVT. However this demonstration is circular because you have to use the connectedness of $I$ for proving the IVT.
add a comment |
If $I$ is not connected, then by definition there are $A$ and $B$ both open such that $A cup B=I$, if you consider $f$ such that $f(A)=0$ and $f(B)=1$ than this is a continuos function by definition, infact in $ {0,1} $ as a subset of $mathbb R$ there is the discrete topology and $ f^{-1}( {0,1})=I $ that is open, $ f^{-1}( {0})=A $ that is open, $ f^{-1}( {1})=B $ that is open and
$ f^{-1}(emptyset)=emptyset $ that is open so you have a contraddiction with the IVT. However this demonstration is circular because you have to use the connectedness of $I$ for proving the IVT.
add a comment |
If $I$ is not connected, then by definition there are $A$ and $B$ both open such that $A cup B=I$, if you consider $f$ such that $f(A)=0$ and $f(B)=1$ than this is a continuos function by definition, infact in $ {0,1} $ as a subset of $mathbb R$ there is the discrete topology and $ f^{-1}( {0,1})=I $ that is open, $ f^{-1}( {0})=A $ that is open, $ f^{-1}( {1})=B $ that is open and
$ f^{-1}(emptyset)=emptyset $ that is open so you have a contraddiction with the IVT. However this demonstration is circular because you have to use the connectedness of $I$ for proving the IVT.
If $I$ is not connected, then by definition there are $A$ and $B$ both open such that $A cup B=I$, if you consider $f$ such that $f(A)=0$ and $f(B)=1$ than this is a continuos function by definition, infact in $ {0,1} $ as a subset of $mathbb R$ there is the discrete topology and $ f^{-1}( {0,1})=I $ that is open, $ f^{-1}( {0})=A $ that is open, $ f^{-1}( {1})=B $ that is open and
$ f^{-1}(emptyset)=emptyset $ that is open so you have a contraddiction with the IVT. However this demonstration is circular because you have to use the connectedness of $I$ for proving the IVT.
edited May 20 '17 at 16:36
answered May 20 '17 at 15:56
StabiloBoss
865
865
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2289254%2fevery-interval-i-subset-mathbbr-is-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$f: I rightarrow {0,1} subset mathbb R$. Viewing the space containing the codomain as a subset of a larger set does not affect whether a function is continuous or not. Continuity is determined by the behavior of the domain.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:58
1
I have to wonder though if that proof isn't circular and it is my impression that the Intermediate Value Theorem relies upon the connectedness of intervals in its proof.
– fleablood
May 20 '17 at 15:59
1
It $is$ circular. I never liked this proof because just as you say, the various proofs of IVT use at some point, the fact that intervals are connected.
– Matematleta
May 20 '17 at 16:02