Given $y = Acos(kt) + Bsin(kt)$, where $A, B, k$ are constants, prove that $y^{(2)} + (k^2)y = 0$
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
EDIT: There was a silly typo, $y^n$ is actually $y''$... sorry everyone!
In that case just finding $y''$ and substituting this and $y$ into the left side will yield the answer 0.
I have noted that $y^n$ refers to the nth derivative.
I found that the 1st, 5th, 9th, ..., $(4m+1)$th derivatives have a sign pattern of - and +, respectively, in front of each trig ratio.
That is, $y^n = -Ak^nsin kt + Bk^ncos kt$.
The 2nd, 6th, 10th, ..., $(4m+2)$th derivates have a sign pattern of - and -.
The 3rd, 7th, 11th, ... $(4m+3)$th derivates have a sign pattern of + and -.
Finally, the 4th, 8th, 12th, ..., $(4m+4)$th derivatives have a sign pattern of + and +.
I am not sure if this is relevant in breaking down the proof into cases...
Thank you in advance for any insight.
calculus derivatives trigonometry proof-writing
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
EDIT: There was a silly typo, $y^n$ is actually $y''$... sorry everyone!
In that case just finding $y''$ and substituting this and $y$ into the left side will yield the answer 0.
I have noted that $y^n$ refers to the nth derivative.
I found that the 1st, 5th, 9th, ..., $(4m+1)$th derivatives have a sign pattern of - and +, respectively, in front of each trig ratio.
That is, $y^n = -Ak^nsin kt + Bk^ncos kt$.
The 2nd, 6th, 10th, ..., $(4m+2)$th derivates have a sign pattern of - and -.
The 3rd, 7th, 11th, ... $(4m+3)$th derivates have a sign pattern of + and -.
Finally, the 4th, 8th, 12th, ..., $(4m+4)$th derivatives have a sign pattern of + and +.
I am not sure if this is relevant in breaking down the proof into cases...
Thank you in advance for any insight.
calculus derivatives trigonometry proof-writing
2
I'm pretty sure that your are looking at a misprint, $y^n$ is probably supposed to be $y''$ ( second derivative)
– WW1
Dec 3 at 3:01
2
Ah! In that case, I just find the second derivative and sub in!
– user424712
Dec 3 at 3:02
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
EDIT: There was a silly typo, $y^n$ is actually $y''$... sorry everyone!
In that case just finding $y''$ and substituting this and $y$ into the left side will yield the answer 0.
I have noted that $y^n$ refers to the nth derivative.
I found that the 1st, 5th, 9th, ..., $(4m+1)$th derivatives have a sign pattern of - and +, respectively, in front of each trig ratio.
That is, $y^n = -Ak^nsin kt + Bk^ncos kt$.
The 2nd, 6th, 10th, ..., $(4m+2)$th derivates have a sign pattern of - and -.
The 3rd, 7th, 11th, ... $(4m+3)$th derivates have a sign pattern of + and -.
Finally, the 4th, 8th, 12th, ..., $(4m+4)$th derivatives have a sign pattern of + and +.
I am not sure if this is relevant in breaking down the proof into cases...
Thank you in advance for any insight.
calculus derivatives trigonometry proof-writing
EDIT: There was a silly typo, $y^n$ is actually $y''$... sorry everyone!
In that case just finding $y''$ and substituting this and $y$ into the left side will yield the answer 0.
I have noted that $y^n$ refers to the nth derivative.
I found that the 1st, 5th, 9th, ..., $(4m+1)$th derivatives have a sign pattern of - and +, respectively, in front of each trig ratio.
That is, $y^n = -Ak^nsin kt + Bk^ncos kt$.
The 2nd, 6th, 10th, ..., $(4m+2)$th derivates have a sign pattern of - and -.
The 3rd, 7th, 11th, ... $(4m+3)$th derivates have a sign pattern of + and -.
Finally, the 4th, 8th, 12th, ..., $(4m+4)$th derivatives have a sign pattern of + and +.
I am not sure if this is relevant in breaking down the proof into cases...
Thank you in advance for any insight.
calculus derivatives trigonometry proof-writing
calculus derivatives trigonometry proof-writing
edited Dec 3 at 20:33
Paras Khosla
449
449
asked Dec 3 at 2:58
user424712
12
12
2
I'm pretty sure that your are looking at a misprint, $y^n$ is probably supposed to be $y''$ ( second derivative)
– WW1
Dec 3 at 3:01
2
Ah! In that case, I just find the second derivative and sub in!
– user424712
Dec 3 at 3:02
add a comment |
2
I'm pretty sure that your are looking at a misprint, $y^n$ is probably supposed to be $y''$ ( second derivative)
– WW1
Dec 3 at 3:01
2
Ah! In that case, I just find the second derivative and sub in!
– user424712
Dec 3 at 3:02
2
2
I'm pretty sure that your are looking at a misprint, $y^n$ is probably supposed to be $y''$ ( second derivative)
– WW1
Dec 3 at 3:01
I'm pretty sure that your are looking at a misprint, $y^n$ is probably supposed to be $y''$ ( second derivative)
– WW1
Dec 3 at 3:01
2
2
Ah! In that case, I just find the second derivative and sub in!
– user424712
Dec 3 at 3:02
Ah! In that case, I just find the second derivative and sub in!
– user424712
Dec 3 at 3:02
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
$$y^{''} =frac {d^2}{dt^2}y= frac {d}{dt}left({frac d{dt}y}right)= frac {d}{dt}(-Aksin(kt)+Bkcos(kt))=kfrac {d}{dt}(-Asin(kt)+Bcos(kt))=k^2(-Acos(kt)-Bsin(kt))=-k^2y$$
You must have done something erroneous! may be the derivatives of $sin(x)$ and $cos(x)$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
We have $y=A cos(kt)+B sin(kt)$ where ${ A, B, k }$ are constants. We are required to prove that $y^{(2)}+(k^2)y=0$ where $y^{(2)}$ denotes the second derivative of $y$ with respect to $t$.
$frac{dy}{dt}=-Ak sin(kt)+Bk cos(kt) implies frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=-Ak^2 cos(kt)+Bk^2 sin(kt) cdots $ (i)
Also, $k^2y=Ak^2 cos(kt)+Bk^2 sin(kt) cdots $ (ii)
Adding equations (i) and (ii) together we indeed get $0$ as the result. Hence, Proved
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
$$y^{''} =frac {d^2}{dt^2}y= frac {d}{dt}left({frac d{dt}y}right)= frac {d}{dt}(-Aksin(kt)+Bkcos(kt))=kfrac {d}{dt}(-Asin(kt)+Bcos(kt))=k^2(-Acos(kt)-Bsin(kt))=-k^2y$$
You must have done something erroneous! may be the derivatives of $sin(x)$ and $cos(x)$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
$$y^{''} =frac {d^2}{dt^2}y= frac {d}{dt}left({frac d{dt}y}right)= frac {d}{dt}(-Aksin(kt)+Bkcos(kt))=kfrac {d}{dt}(-Asin(kt)+Bcos(kt))=k^2(-Acos(kt)-Bsin(kt))=-k^2y$$
You must have done something erroneous! may be the derivatives of $sin(x)$ and $cos(x)$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
$$y^{''} =frac {d^2}{dt^2}y= frac {d}{dt}left({frac d{dt}y}right)= frac {d}{dt}(-Aksin(kt)+Bkcos(kt))=kfrac {d}{dt}(-Asin(kt)+Bcos(kt))=k^2(-Acos(kt)-Bsin(kt))=-k^2y$$
You must have done something erroneous! may be the derivatives of $sin(x)$ and $cos(x)$.
$$y^{''} =frac {d^2}{dt^2}y= frac {d}{dt}left({frac d{dt}y}right)= frac {d}{dt}(-Aksin(kt)+Bkcos(kt))=kfrac {d}{dt}(-Asin(kt)+Bcos(kt))=k^2(-Acos(kt)-Bsin(kt))=-k^2y$$
You must have done something erroneous! may be the derivatives of $sin(x)$ and $cos(x)$.
answered Dec 3 at 11:16
Sameer Baheti
1796
1796
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
We have $y=A cos(kt)+B sin(kt)$ where ${ A, B, k }$ are constants. We are required to prove that $y^{(2)}+(k^2)y=0$ where $y^{(2)}$ denotes the second derivative of $y$ with respect to $t$.
$frac{dy}{dt}=-Ak sin(kt)+Bk cos(kt) implies frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=-Ak^2 cos(kt)+Bk^2 sin(kt) cdots $ (i)
Also, $k^2y=Ak^2 cos(kt)+Bk^2 sin(kt) cdots $ (ii)
Adding equations (i) and (ii) together we indeed get $0$ as the result. Hence, Proved
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
We have $y=A cos(kt)+B sin(kt)$ where ${ A, B, k }$ are constants. We are required to prove that $y^{(2)}+(k^2)y=0$ where $y^{(2)}$ denotes the second derivative of $y$ with respect to $t$.
$frac{dy}{dt}=-Ak sin(kt)+Bk cos(kt) implies frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=-Ak^2 cos(kt)+Bk^2 sin(kt) cdots $ (i)
Also, $k^2y=Ak^2 cos(kt)+Bk^2 sin(kt) cdots $ (ii)
Adding equations (i) and (ii) together we indeed get $0$ as the result. Hence, Proved
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
We have $y=A cos(kt)+B sin(kt)$ where ${ A, B, k }$ are constants. We are required to prove that $y^{(2)}+(k^2)y=0$ where $y^{(2)}$ denotes the second derivative of $y$ with respect to $t$.
$frac{dy}{dt}=-Ak sin(kt)+Bk cos(kt) implies frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=-Ak^2 cos(kt)+Bk^2 sin(kt) cdots $ (i)
Also, $k^2y=Ak^2 cos(kt)+Bk^2 sin(kt) cdots $ (ii)
Adding equations (i) and (ii) together we indeed get $0$ as the result. Hence, Proved
We have $y=A cos(kt)+B sin(kt)$ where ${ A, B, k }$ are constants. We are required to prove that $y^{(2)}+(k^2)y=0$ where $y^{(2)}$ denotes the second derivative of $y$ with respect to $t$.
$frac{dy}{dt}=-Ak sin(kt)+Bk cos(kt) implies frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=-Ak^2 cos(kt)+Bk^2 sin(kt) cdots $ (i)
Also, $k^2y=Ak^2 cos(kt)+Bk^2 sin(kt) cdots $ (ii)
Adding equations (i) and (ii) together we indeed get $0$ as the result. Hence, Proved
answered Dec 3 at 19:38
Paras Khosla
449
449
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023555%2fgiven-y-a-coskt-b-sinkt-where-a-b-k-are-constants-prove-that-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
I'm pretty sure that your are looking at a misprint, $y^n$ is probably supposed to be $y''$ ( second derivative)
– WW1
Dec 3 at 3:01
2
Ah! In that case, I just find the second derivative and sub in!
– user424712
Dec 3 at 3:02