Proof of the Markov Property when Taking “Two steps at a time”.
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have seen the solution, but I would like to understand how it actually works.
A new variable is defined, $Z_n = (X_n, X_{n-1})$, this is kind of like the join probability of 2 consecutive steps; the smallest value of n in this case is 1. The proof proceeds as follows:
$P(Z_n = z_n|Z_{n-1}, Z_{n-2}...Z_1 = z_1)$
The above is equal to : $P(X_n = x_n, X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}, X_{n-2} = x_{n-2}...X_1 = x_1)$
Which is equal to: $P(X_n = x_n|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1})$
Which finally, is equal to : $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1} = z_{n-1})$
I'm struggling to understand how the RHS of the 2nd step came about, and also why the 3rd step automatically implies the last step is true.
Your help would be appreciated greatly, thanks in advance !
stochastic-processes markov-chains random-walk
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have seen the solution, but I would like to understand how it actually works.
A new variable is defined, $Z_n = (X_n, X_{n-1})$, this is kind of like the join probability of 2 consecutive steps; the smallest value of n in this case is 1. The proof proceeds as follows:
$P(Z_n = z_n|Z_{n-1}, Z_{n-2}...Z_1 = z_1)$
The above is equal to : $P(X_n = x_n, X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}, X_{n-2} = x_{n-2}...X_1 = x_1)$
Which is equal to: $P(X_n = x_n|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1})$
Which finally, is equal to : $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1} = z_{n-1})$
I'm struggling to understand how the RHS of the 2nd step came about, and also why the 3rd step automatically implies the last step is true.
Your help would be appreciated greatly, thanks in advance !
stochastic-processes markov-chains random-walk
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have seen the solution, but I would like to understand how it actually works.
A new variable is defined, $Z_n = (X_n, X_{n-1})$, this is kind of like the join probability of 2 consecutive steps; the smallest value of n in this case is 1. The proof proceeds as follows:
$P(Z_n = z_n|Z_{n-1}, Z_{n-2}...Z_1 = z_1)$
The above is equal to : $P(X_n = x_n, X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}, X_{n-2} = x_{n-2}...X_1 = x_1)$
Which is equal to: $P(X_n = x_n|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1})$
Which finally, is equal to : $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1} = z_{n-1})$
I'm struggling to understand how the RHS of the 2nd step came about, and also why the 3rd step automatically implies the last step is true.
Your help would be appreciated greatly, thanks in advance !
stochastic-processes markov-chains random-walk
I have seen the solution, but I would like to understand how it actually works.
A new variable is defined, $Z_n = (X_n, X_{n-1})$, this is kind of like the join probability of 2 consecutive steps; the smallest value of n in this case is 1. The proof proceeds as follows:
$P(Z_n = z_n|Z_{n-1}, Z_{n-2}...Z_1 = z_1)$
The above is equal to : $P(X_n = x_n, X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1}, X_{n-2} = x_{n-2}...X_1 = x_1)$
Which is equal to: $P(X_n = x_n|X_{n-1} = x_{n-1})$
Which finally, is equal to : $P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1} = z_{n-1})$
I'm struggling to understand how the RHS of the 2nd step came about, and also why the 3rd step automatically implies the last step is true.
Your help would be appreciated greatly, thanks in advance !
stochastic-processes markov-chains random-walk
stochastic-processes markov-chains random-walk
asked Nov 20 at 22:25
PEze
61
61
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
You can use the rule $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$ on step 2, where $A$ is the event $X_n=x_n$, $B$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}$, and $C$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, ; ... ; X_1=x_1$. By the Markov property, you can see that $P(A|BC)$ will simply reduce to $P(A|B)$. Given the definition of $B$ and $C$, it is trivial to see why $P(B|C) = 1$. This will lead you from step 2 to step 3.
Let's expand step 4:
$P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1}=z_{n-1})$
$=P(X_n=x_n, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (using $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$)
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (removing redundant term)
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1})$ (Markov property)
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
You can use the rule $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$ on step 2, where $A$ is the event $X_n=x_n$, $B$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}$, and $C$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, ; ... ; X_1=x_1$. By the Markov property, you can see that $P(A|BC)$ will simply reduce to $P(A|B)$. Given the definition of $B$ and $C$, it is trivial to see why $P(B|C) = 1$. This will lead you from step 2 to step 3.
Let's expand step 4:
$P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1}=z_{n-1})$
$=P(X_n=x_n, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (using $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$)
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (removing redundant term)
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1})$ (Markov property)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You can use the rule $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$ on step 2, where $A$ is the event $X_n=x_n$, $B$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}$, and $C$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, ; ... ; X_1=x_1$. By the Markov property, you can see that $P(A|BC)$ will simply reduce to $P(A|B)$. Given the definition of $B$ and $C$, it is trivial to see why $P(B|C) = 1$. This will lead you from step 2 to step 3.
Let's expand step 4:
$P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1}=z_{n-1})$
$=P(X_n=x_n, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (using $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$)
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (removing redundant term)
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1})$ (Markov property)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
You can use the rule $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$ on step 2, where $A$ is the event $X_n=x_n$, $B$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}$, and $C$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, ; ... ; X_1=x_1$. By the Markov property, you can see that $P(A|BC)$ will simply reduce to $P(A|B)$. Given the definition of $B$ and $C$, it is trivial to see why $P(B|C) = 1$. This will lead you from step 2 to step 3.
Let's expand step 4:
$P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1}=z_{n-1})$
$=P(X_n=x_n, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (using $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$)
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (removing redundant term)
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1})$ (Markov property)
You can use the rule $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$ on step 2, where $A$ is the event $X_n=x_n$, $B$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}$, and $C$ is the event $X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, ; ... ; X_1=x_1$. By the Markov property, you can see that $P(A|BC)$ will simply reduce to $P(A|B)$. Given the definition of $B$ and $C$, it is trivial to see why $P(B|C) = 1$. This will lead you from step 2 to step 3.
Let's expand step 4:
$P(Z_n=z_n|Z_{n-1}=z_{n-1})$
$=P(X_n=x_n, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1}, X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (using $P(AB|C) = P(A|BC)P(B|C)$)
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1},X_{n-2}=x_{n-2})$ (removing redundant term)
$=P(X_n=x_n|X_{n-1}=x_{n-1})$ (Markov property)
answered Dec 3 at 3:00
Aditya Dua
6458
6458
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006985%2fproof-of-the-markov-property-when-taking-two-steps-at-a-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown