Constant trajectory in Hamiltonian system












0












$begingroup$



Let the (non-canonical) Hamiltonian system be given in the form
$$dot{x}=J(x)DH(x)$$
where $H(x)$ is the Hamiltonian function, $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric symplectic matrix, and $DH$ denotes the vector of partial derivatives of $H$ (the gradient of $H$). Let $J(x)$ have a nonempty null space, and let a function $C(x)$ satisfy $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ for all $x$. Show that value of $C(x)$ is constant on any trajectory of the system regardless of the choice of $H$.




Here is my proposed solution. I use the fact that $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric in the fourth equality $big(J(x)^{-1} = J(x)^T = -J(x)big)$. The fact that $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ is used in the fifth equality.



begin{equation}
begin{split}
Cdot{(x)} & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}{x} \
& = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}J(x)DH(x) \
& = Big((J(x))^T(nabla{C})^TBig)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
& = Big(-J(x)DC(x)Big)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
& = 0boldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
& = 0
end{split}
end{equation}



Therefore, as $Cdot{(x)}=0$, this implies that $C(x)$ is constant along any trajectory.



I'm having trouble justifying the first equality and fourth equality. Is this the right approach to this problem? Is there an alternative approach that would lead to the right answer?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Let the (non-canonical) Hamiltonian system be given in the form
    $$dot{x}=J(x)DH(x)$$
    where $H(x)$ is the Hamiltonian function, $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric symplectic matrix, and $DH$ denotes the vector of partial derivatives of $H$ (the gradient of $H$). Let $J(x)$ have a nonempty null space, and let a function $C(x)$ satisfy $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ for all $x$. Show that value of $C(x)$ is constant on any trajectory of the system regardless of the choice of $H$.




    Here is my proposed solution. I use the fact that $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric in the fourth equality $big(J(x)^{-1} = J(x)^T = -J(x)big)$. The fact that $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ is used in the fifth equality.



    begin{equation}
    begin{split}
    Cdot{(x)} & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}{x} \
    & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}J(x)DH(x) \
    & = Big((J(x))^T(nabla{C})^TBig)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
    & = Big(-J(x)DC(x)Big)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
    & = 0boldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
    & = 0
    end{split}
    end{equation}



    Therefore, as $Cdot{(x)}=0$, this implies that $C(x)$ is constant along any trajectory.



    I'm having trouble justifying the first equality and fourth equality. Is this the right approach to this problem? Is there an alternative approach that would lead to the right answer?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Let the (non-canonical) Hamiltonian system be given in the form
      $$dot{x}=J(x)DH(x)$$
      where $H(x)$ is the Hamiltonian function, $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric symplectic matrix, and $DH$ denotes the vector of partial derivatives of $H$ (the gradient of $H$). Let $J(x)$ have a nonempty null space, and let a function $C(x)$ satisfy $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ for all $x$. Show that value of $C(x)$ is constant on any trajectory of the system regardless of the choice of $H$.




      Here is my proposed solution. I use the fact that $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric in the fourth equality $big(J(x)^{-1} = J(x)^T = -J(x)big)$. The fact that $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ is used in the fifth equality.



      begin{equation}
      begin{split}
      Cdot{(x)} & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}{x} \
      & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}J(x)DH(x) \
      & = Big((J(x))^T(nabla{C})^TBig)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = Big(-J(x)DC(x)Big)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = 0boldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = 0
      end{split}
      end{equation}



      Therefore, as $Cdot{(x)}=0$, this implies that $C(x)$ is constant along any trajectory.



      I'm having trouble justifying the first equality and fourth equality. Is this the right approach to this problem? Is there an alternative approach that would lead to the right answer?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      Let the (non-canonical) Hamiltonian system be given in the form
      $$dot{x}=J(x)DH(x)$$
      where $H(x)$ is the Hamiltonian function, $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric symplectic matrix, and $DH$ denotes the vector of partial derivatives of $H$ (the gradient of $H$). Let $J(x)$ have a nonempty null space, and let a function $C(x)$ satisfy $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ for all $x$. Show that value of $C(x)$ is constant on any trajectory of the system regardless of the choice of $H$.




      Here is my proposed solution. I use the fact that $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric in the fourth equality $big(J(x)^{-1} = J(x)^T = -J(x)big)$. The fact that $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ is used in the fifth equality.



      begin{equation}
      begin{split}
      Cdot{(x)} & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}{x} \
      & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}J(x)DH(x) \
      & = Big((J(x))^T(nabla{C})^TBig)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = Big(-J(x)DC(x)Big)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = 0boldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = 0
      end{split}
      end{equation}



      Therefore, as $Cdot{(x)}=0$, this implies that $C(x)$ is constant along any trajectory.



      I'm having trouble justifying the first equality and fourth equality. Is this the right approach to this problem? Is there an alternative approach that would lead to the right answer?







      proof-verification hamilton-equations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 19 '18 at 16:01









      Axion004Axion004

      319312




      319312






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046545%2fconstant-trajectory-in-hamiltonian-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046545%2fconstant-trajectory-in-hamiltonian-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Måne

          Storängen

          VLT Carioca