Can Jensen be applied to multivariable functions?












1












$begingroup$


I was wondering, suppose we have a symmetric two variable function, in my case: $f(x,y)=frac{1}{x+y+1}$ with the restriction that $0le x,y le 1$, I took the second partial derivative with respect to $x$ which is $frac{2}{(x+y+1)^3}$, since the function is symmetric I didn't bother taking the partial derivative with respect to $y$, so we see that $f$ is convex in $(0,+infty)$, now I was wondering, given $0le a,b,c le 1$, can I argue that:$$f(a,b)+f(b,c)+f(c,a)ge 3f(frac{a+b+c}{3},frac{a+b+c}{3})$$
Or is this completely non-sense?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I was wondering, suppose we have a symmetric two variable function, in my case: $f(x,y)=frac{1}{x+y+1}$ with the restriction that $0le x,y le 1$, I took the second partial derivative with respect to $x$ which is $frac{2}{(x+y+1)^3}$, since the function is symmetric I didn't bother taking the partial derivative with respect to $y$, so we see that $f$ is convex in $(0,+infty)$, now I was wondering, given $0le a,b,c le 1$, can I argue that:$$f(a,b)+f(b,c)+f(c,a)ge 3f(frac{a+b+c}{3},frac{a+b+c}{3})$$
    Or is this completely non-sense?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I was wondering, suppose we have a symmetric two variable function, in my case: $f(x,y)=frac{1}{x+y+1}$ with the restriction that $0le x,y le 1$, I took the second partial derivative with respect to $x$ which is $frac{2}{(x+y+1)^3}$, since the function is symmetric I didn't bother taking the partial derivative with respect to $y$, so we see that $f$ is convex in $(0,+infty)$, now I was wondering, given $0le a,b,c le 1$, can I argue that:$$f(a,b)+f(b,c)+f(c,a)ge 3f(frac{a+b+c}{3},frac{a+b+c}{3})$$
      Or is this completely non-sense?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I was wondering, suppose we have a symmetric two variable function, in my case: $f(x,y)=frac{1}{x+y+1}$ with the restriction that $0le x,y le 1$, I took the second partial derivative with respect to $x$ which is $frac{2}{(x+y+1)^3}$, since the function is symmetric I didn't bother taking the partial derivative with respect to $y$, so we see that $f$ is convex in $(0,+infty)$, now I was wondering, given $0le a,b,c le 1$, can I argue that:$$f(a,b)+f(b,c)+f(c,a)ge 3f(frac{a+b+c}{3},frac{a+b+c}{3})$$
      Or is this completely non-sense?







      jensen-inequality






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 23 '18 at 13:41









      Spasoje DurovicSpasoje Durovic

      36010




      36010






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          You have the function $$g(rho):={1over 1+rho}qquad(rhogeq0) ,$$
          which is certainly convex, and then define $f(x,y):=g(x+y)$. It follows that
          $$eqalign{{f(a,b)+f(b,c)+f(c,a)over3}&={g(a+b)+g(b+c)+g(c+a)over3}geq gleft({2a+2b+2cover3}right)cr
          &=fleft({a+b+cover3},{a+b+cover3}right) .cr}$$
          Therefore your final statement is correct.



          But you can also prove generally that $f$ is convex. Write $(x,y)=:z$ and $phi(z):=x+y$. Then $f=gcircphi$, and
          $$eqalign{(1-lambda)f(z)+lambda f(z')&=(1-lambda)gbigl(phi(z)bigr)+lambda gbigl(phi(z')bigr)cr &geq gbigl((1-lambda)phi(z)+lambdaphi(z')bigr)=gbigl(phi((1-lambda)z+lambda z')bigr)cr &=fbigl((1-lambda)z+lambda z'bigr) .cr}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050350%2fcan-jensen-be-applied-to-multivariable-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            You have the function $$g(rho):={1over 1+rho}qquad(rhogeq0) ,$$
            which is certainly convex, and then define $f(x,y):=g(x+y)$. It follows that
            $$eqalign{{f(a,b)+f(b,c)+f(c,a)over3}&={g(a+b)+g(b+c)+g(c+a)over3}geq gleft({2a+2b+2cover3}right)cr
            &=fleft({a+b+cover3},{a+b+cover3}right) .cr}$$
            Therefore your final statement is correct.



            But you can also prove generally that $f$ is convex. Write $(x,y)=:z$ and $phi(z):=x+y$. Then $f=gcircphi$, and
            $$eqalign{(1-lambda)f(z)+lambda f(z')&=(1-lambda)gbigl(phi(z)bigr)+lambda gbigl(phi(z')bigr)cr &geq gbigl((1-lambda)phi(z)+lambdaphi(z')bigr)=gbigl(phi((1-lambda)z+lambda z')bigr)cr &=fbigl((1-lambda)z+lambda z'bigr) .cr}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              You have the function $$g(rho):={1over 1+rho}qquad(rhogeq0) ,$$
              which is certainly convex, and then define $f(x,y):=g(x+y)$. It follows that
              $$eqalign{{f(a,b)+f(b,c)+f(c,a)over3}&={g(a+b)+g(b+c)+g(c+a)over3}geq gleft({2a+2b+2cover3}right)cr
              &=fleft({a+b+cover3},{a+b+cover3}right) .cr}$$
              Therefore your final statement is correct.



              But you can also prove generally that $f$ is convex. Write $(x,y)=:z$ and $phi(z):=x+y$. Then $f=gcircphi$, and
              $$eqalign{(1-lambda)f(z)+lambda f(z')&=(1-lambda)gbigl(phi(z)bigr)+lambda gbigl(phi(z')bigr)cr &geq gbigl((1-lambda)phi(z)+lambdaphi(z')bigr)=gbigl(phi((1-lambda)z+lambda z')bigr)cr &=fbigl((1-lambda)z+lambda z'bigr) .cr}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                You have the function $$g(rho):={1over 1+rho}qquad(rhogeq0) ,$$
                which is certainly convex, and then define $f(x,y):=g(x+y)$. It follows that
                $$eqalign{{f(a,b)+f(b,c)+f(c,a)over3}&={g(a+b)+g(b+c)+g(c+a)over3}geq gleft({2a+2b+2cover3}right)cr
                &=fleft({a+b+cover3},{a+b+cover3}right) .cr}$$
                Therefore your final statement is correct.



                But you can also prove generally that $f$ is convex. Write $(x,y)=:z$ and $phi(z):=x+y$. Then $f=gcircphi$, and
                $$eqalign{(1-lambda)f(z)+lambda f(z')&=(1-lambda)gbigl(phi(z)bigr)+lambda gbigl(phi(z')bigr)cr &geq gbigl((1-lambda)phi(z)+lambdaphi(z')bigr)=gbigl(phi((1-lambda)z+lambda z')bigr)cr &=fbigl((1-lambda)z+lambda z'bigr) .cr}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                You have the function $$g(rho):={1over 1+rho}qquad(rhogeq0) ,$$
                which is certainly convex, and then define $f(x,y):=g(x+y)$. It follows that
                $$eqalign{{f(a,b)+f(b,c)+f(c,a)over3}&={g(a+b)+g(b+c)+g(c+a)over3}geq gleft({2a+2b+2cover3}right)cr
                &=fleft({a+b+cover3},{a+b+cover3}right) .cr}$$
                Therefore your final statement is correct.



                But you can also prove generally that $f$ is convex. Write $(x,y)=:z$ and $phi(z):=x+y$. Then $f=gcircphi$, and
                $$eqalign{(1-lambda)f(z)+lambda f(z')&=(1-lambda)gbigl(phi(z)bigr)+lambda gbigl(phi(z')bigr)cr &geq gbigl((1-lambda)phi(z)+lambdaphi(z')bigr)=gbigl(phi((1-lambda)z+lambda z')bigr)cr &=fbigl((1-lambda)z+lambda z'bigr) .cr}$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 23 '18 at 16:35









                Christian BlatterChristian Blatter

                173k7113326




                173k7113326






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050350%2fcan-jensen-be-applied-to-multivariable-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Cabo Verde

                    Gyllenstierna