One dimensional image of the adjoint action












0












$begingroup$


Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and let $mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional, nilpotent Lie algebra over $K$.



My question is, can we find an element $xinmathfrak{g}$ such that the image of $ad(x)$ is one dimensional over $K$? In other words can we find $xinmathfrak{g}$ such that $x$ is not central and there exists $zinmathfrak{g}$ such that for every $yinmathfrak{g}$, $[x,y]=alpha z$ for some $alphain K$.



This is not true if $K$ is not algebraically closed, but I haven't been able to find an example where we cannot find such an element $x$ after passing to a finite extension. Does anyone know whether this is true, or have a counterexample?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and let $mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional, nilpotent Lie algebra over $K$.



    My question is, can we find an element $xinmathfrak{g}$ such that the image of $ad(x)$ is one dimensional over $K$? In other words can we find $xinmathfrak{g}$ such that $x$ is not central and there exists $zinmathfrak{g}$ such that for every $yinmathfrak{g}$, $[x,y]=alpha z$ for some $alphain K$.



    This is not true if $K$ is not algebraically closed, but I haven't been able to find an example where we cannot find such an element $x$ after passing to a finite extension. Does anyone know whether this is true, or have a counterexample?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and let $mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional, nilpotent Lie algebra over $K$.



      My question is, can we find an element $xinmathfrak{g}$ such that the image of $ad(x)$ is one dimensional over $K$? In other words can we find $xinmathfrak{g}$ such that $x$ is not central and there exists $zinmathfrak{g}$ such that for every $yinmathfrak{g}$, $[x,y]=alpha z$ for some $alphain K$.



      This is not true if $K$ is not algebraically closed, but I haven't been able to find an example where we cannot find such an element $x$ after passing to a finite extension. Does anyone know whether this is true, or have a counterexample?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and let $mathfrak{g}$ be a finite dimensional, nilpotent Lie algebra over $K$.



      My question is, can we find an element $xinmathfrak{g}$ such that the image of $ad(x)$ is one dimensional over $K$? In other words can we find $xinmathfrak{g}$ such that $x$ is not central and there exists $zinmathfrak{g}$ such that for every $yinmathfrak{g}$, $[x,y]=alpha z$ for some $alphain K$.



      This is not true if $K$ is not algebraically closed, but I haven't been able to find an example where we cannot find such an element $x$ after passing to a finite extension. Does anyone know whether this is true, or have a counterexample?







      linear-algebra field-theory lie-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 23 '18 at 15:15









      AdJoint-repAdJoint-rep

      26718




      26718






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          $Vect(e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,e_5,e_6)$. $[e_1,e_2]=e_4, [e_1,e_3]=e_5, [e_2,e_3]=e_6$ the other brackets are zero. The center is $Vect(e_4,e_5,e_6)$, $dim(Im(ad_{e_i})=3, i=1,2,3$, $dim(Imad_{e_i}))=0, i=4,5,6$....






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Yes, that works fine, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – AdJoint-rep
            Dec 23 '18 at 16:55











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050411%2fone-dimensional-image-of-the-adjoint-action%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          $Vect(e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,e_5,e_6)$. $[e_1,e_2]=e_4, [e_1,e_3]=e_5, [e_2,e_3]=e_6$ the other brackets are zero. The center is $Vect(e_4,e_5,e_6)$, $dim(Im(ad_{e_i})=3, i=1,2,3$, $dim(Imad_{e_i}))=0, i=4,5,6$....






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Yes, that works fine, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – AdJoint-rep
            Dec 23 '18 at 16:55
















          0












          $begingroup$

          $Vect(e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,e_5,e_6)$. $[e_1,e_2]=e_4, [e_1,e_3]=e_5, [e_2,e_3]=e_6$ the other brackets are zero. The center is $Vect(e_4,e_5,e_6)$, $dim(Im(ad_{e_i})=3, i=1,2,3$, $dim(Imad_{e_i}))=0, i=4,5,6$....






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Yes, that works fine, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – AdJoint-rep
            Dec 23 '18 at 16:55














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          $Vect(e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,e_5,e_6)$. $[e_1,e_2]=e_4, [e_1,e_3]=e_5, [e_2,e_3]=e_6$ the other brackets are zero. The center is $Vect(e_4,e_5,e_6)$, $dim(Im(ad_{e_i})=3, i=1,2,3$, $dim(Imad_{e_i}))=0, i=4,5,6$....






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          $Vect(e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4,e_5,e_6)$. $[e_1,e_2]=e_4, [e_1,e_3]=e_5, [e_2,e_3]=e_6$ the other brackets are zero. The center is $Vect(e_4,e_5,e_6)$, $dim(Im(ad_{e_i})=3, i=1,2,3$, $dim(Imad_{e_i}))=0, i=4,5,6$....







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 23 '18 at 15:31

























          answered Dec 23 '18 at 15:22









          Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

          57.8k11445




          57.8k11445












          • $begingroup$
            Yes, that works fine, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – AdJoint-rep
            Dec 23 '18 at 16:55


















          • $begingroup$
            Yes, that works fine, thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – AdJoint-rep
            Dec 23 '18 at 16:55
















          $begingroup$
          Yes, that works fine, thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – AdJoint-rep
          Dec 23 '18 at 16:55




          $begingroup$
          Yes, that works fine, thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – AdJoint-rep
          Dec 23 '18 at 16:55


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050411%2fone-dimensional-image-of-the-adjoint-action%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna