intuition expectation adapted processes
$begingroup$
Let $X=(X_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of independent identically distributed random variables satisfying $mathbb{E}X_1^2=1$. Let $mathbb{F}=(mathcal{F}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ the filtration generated by X. (Or $mathcal{F}_n=sigma(X_1,X_2,dots,X_n)$.)
Why is $mathbb{E}[X_n^2|mathcal{F}_{n-1}]=1$?
If it follows from independence of $X_n$ and $mathcal{F}_{n-1}$, what is the intuition behind it? Or does it follow from the fact that $X$ is iid? I would like a detailed answer so I can really understand what is happening here and be able to recognise similar situations in the future.
probability-theory conditional-expectation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X=(X_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of independent identically distributed random variables satisfying $mathbb{E}X_1^2=1$. Let $mathbb{F}=(mathcal{F}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ the filtration generated by X. (Or $mathcal{F}_n=sigma(X_1,X_2,dots,X_n)$.)
Why is $mathbb{E}[X_n^2|mathcal{F}_{n-1}]=1$?
If it follows from independence of $X_n$ and $mathcal{F}_{n-1}$, what is the intuition behind it? Or does it follow from the fact that $X$ is iid? I would like a detailed answer so I can really understand what is happening here and be able to recognise similar situations in the future.
probability-theory conditional-expectation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X=(X_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of independent identically distributed random variables satisfying $mathbb{E}X_1^2=1$. Let $mathbb{F}=(mathcal{F}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ the filtration generated by X. (Or $mathcal{F}_n=sigma(X_1,X_2,dots,X_n)$.)
Why is $mathbb{E}[X_n^2|mathcal{F}_{n-1}]=1$?
If it follows from independence of $X_n$ and $mathcal{F}_{n-1}$, what is the intuition behind it? Or does it follow from the fact that $X$ is iid? I would like a detailed answer so I can really understand what is happening here and be able to recognise similar situations in the future.
probability-theory conditional-expectation
$endgroup$
Let $X=(X_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a sequence of independent identically distributed random variables satisfying $mathbb{E}X_1^2=1$. Let $mathbb{F}=(mathcal{F}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ the filtration generated by X. (Or $mathcal{F}_n=sigma(X_1,X_2,dots,X_n)$.)
Why is $mathbb{E}[X_n^2|mathcal{F}_{n-1}]=1$?
If it follows from independence of $X_n$ and $mathcal{F}_{n-1}$, what is the intuition behind it? Or does it follow from the fact that $X$ is iid? I would like a detailed answer so I can really understand what is happening here and be able to recognise similar situations in the future.
probability-theory conditional-expectation
probability-theory conditional-expectation
asked Dec 23 '18 at 14:11
Lou95Lou95
659
659
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It follows from independence.
If $X$ and $Y$ are random variables then we can go searching for $Z=mathbb E[Xmid Y]$ (also denoted as $mathbb E[Xmid sigma(Y)]$) which is a random variable that is characterized by:
$Z$ is measurable wrt $sigma(Y)$.
$mathbb EXmathbf1_A=mathbb EZmathbf1_A$ for every $Ainsigma(Y)$
The first bullet can be restated as: $Z=f(Y)$ for some Borel-measurable function $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$.
The second bullet implies that $mathbb EXg(Y)=mathbb EZg(Y)$ for every Borel-measurable function $g$.
In the special case where $X$ and $Y$ are independent we can take for $Z=mathbb E[Xmid Y]$ the constant function that is prescribed by: $omegamapstomathbb EX$.
As a constant function of course it is measurable wrt $sigma(Y)$ (so the first bullet is satisfied).
Concerning the second bullet note that in this case $X$ and $mathbf1_A$ are independent so that: $$mathbb EXmathbf1_A=mathbb EXcdotmathbb Emathbf1_A=mathbb E[[mathbb EX]mathbf1_A]$$
So in your case we get:$$mathbb{E}[X_n^2|mathcal{F}_{n-1}]=mathbb{E}[X_n^2]=1$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050368%2fintuition-expectation-adapted-processes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It follows from independence.
If $X$ and $Y$ are random variables then we can go searching for $Z=mathbb E[Xmid Y]$ (also denoted as $mathbb E[Xmid sigma(Y)]$) which is a random variable that is characterized by:
$Z$ is measurable wrt $sigma(Y)$.
$mathbb EXmathbf1_A=mathbb EZmathbf1_A$ for every $Ainsigma(Y)$
The first bullet can be restated as: $Z=f(Y)$ for some Borel-measurable function $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$.
The second bullet implies that $mathbb EXg(Y)=mathbb EZg(Y)$ for every Borel-measurable function $g$.
In the special case where $X$ and $Y$ are independent we can take for $Z=mathbb E[Xmid Y]$ the constant function that is prescribed by: $omegamapstomathbb EX$.
As a constant function of course it is measurable wrt $sigma(Y)$ (so the first bullet is satisfied).
Concerning the second bullet note that in this case $X$ and $mathbf1_A$ are independent so that: $$mathbb EXmathbf1_A=mathbb EXcdotmathbb Emathbf1_A=mathbb E[[mathbb EX]mathbf1_A]$$
So in your case we get:$$mathbb{E}[X_n^2|mathcal{F}_{n-1}]=mathbb{E}[X_n^2]=1$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It follows from independence.
If $X$ and $Y$ are random variables then we can go searching for $Z=mathbb E[Xmid Y]$ (also denoted as $mathbb E[Xmid sigma(Y)]$) which is a random variable that is characterized by:
$Z$ is measurable wrt $sigma(Y)$.
$mathbb EXmathbf1_A=mathbb EZmathbf1_A$ for every $Ainsigma(Y)$
The first bullet can be restated as: $Z=f(Y)$ for some Borel-measurable function $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$.
The second bullet implies that $mathbb EXg(Y)=mathbb EZg(Y)$ for every Borel-measurable function $g$.
In the special case where $X$ and $Y$ are independent we can take for $Z=mathbb E[Xmid Y]$ the constant function that is prescribed by: $omegamapstomathbb EX$.
As a constant function of course it is measurable wrt $sigma(Y)$ (so the first bullet is satisfied).
Concerning the second bullet note that in this case $X$ and $mathbf1_A$ are independent so that: $$mathbb EXmathbf1_A=mathbb EXcdotmathbb Emathbf1_A=mathbb E[[mathbb EX]mathbf1_A]$$
So in your case we get:$$mathbb{E}[X_n^2|mathcal{F}_{n-1}]=mathbb{E}[X_n^2]=1$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It follows from independence.
If $X$ and $Y$ are random variables then we can go searching for $Z=mathbb E[Xmid Y]$ (also denoted as $mathbb E[Xmid sigma(Y)]$) which is a random variable that is characterized by:
$Z$ is measurable wrt $sigma(Y)$.
$mathbb EXmathbf1_A=mathbb EZmathbf1_A$ for every $Ainsigma(Y)$
The first bullet can be restated as: $Z=f(Y)$ for some Borel-measurable function $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$.
The second bullet implies that $mathbb EXg(Y)=mathbb EZg(Y)$ for every Borel-measurable function $g$.
In the special case where $X$ and $Y$ are independent we can take for $Z=mathbb E[Xmid Y]$ the constant function that is prescribed by: $omegamapstomathbb EX$.
As a constant function of course it is measurable wrt $sigma(Y)$ (so the first bullet is satisfied).
Concerning the second bullet note that in this case $X$ and $mathbf1_A$ are independent so that: $$mathbb EXmathbf1_A=mathbb EXcdotmathbb Emathbf1_A=mathbb E[[mathbb EX]mathbf1_A]$$
So in your case we get:$$mathbb{E}[X_n^2|mathcal{F}_{n-1}]=mathbb{E}[X_n^2]=1$$
$endgroup$
It follows from independence.
If $X$ and $Y$ are random variables then we can go searching for $Z=mathbb E[Xmid Y]$ (also denoted as $mathbb E[Xmid sigma(Y)]$) which is a random variable that is characterized by:
$Z$ is measurable wrt $sigma(Y)$.
$mathbb EXmathbf1_A=mathbb EZmathbf1_A$ for every $Ainsigma(Y)$
The first bullet can be restated as: $Z=f(Y)$ for some Borel-measurable function $f:mathbb Rtomathbb R$.
The second bullet implies that $mathbb EXg(Y)=mathbb EZg(Y)$ for every Borel-measurable function $g$.
In the special case where $X$ and $Y$ are independent we can take for $Z=mathbb E[Xmid Y]$ the constant function that is prescribed by: $omegamapstomathbb EX$.
As a constant function of course it is measurable wrt $sigma(Y)$ (so the first bullet is satisfied).
Concerning the second bullet note that in this case $X$ and $mathbf1_A$ are independent so that: $$mathbb EXmathbf1_A=mathbb EXcdotmathbb Emathbf1_A=mathbb E[[mathbb EX]mathbf1_A]$$
So in your case we get:$$mathbb{E}[X_n^2|mathcal{F}_{n-1}]=mathbb{E}[X_n^2]=1$$
edited Dec 23 '18 at 19:33
answered Dec 23 '18 at 14:29
drhabdrhab
101k544130
101k544130
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050368%2fintuition-expectation-adapted-processes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown