Inverting the Laplacian












4












$begingroup$


I've had a hard time looking for literature on this, so here's my question:



We take a look at the Laplacian $-Delta$ as an unbounded operator on $mathrm{L}^2(mathbb{R}^3)$. We know that $-Delta$ is unitary equivalent to the multiplication operator with $|p|^2$ in Fourier space, so $-Delta=mathcal{F}^{-1} |p|^2 mathcal{F}$.



So one could now use functional calculus and define an inverse Laplacian by setting $(-Delta)^{-1}=mathcal{F}^{-1} (1/|p|^2 )mathcal{F}$, which will also be unbounded of course.



It is also known from theory of PDEs that one can invert the Laplacian on Schwartz functions using the Green's function $1/4pi |x|$, which is derived as a distributional Fourier transform of $1/|p|^2$. So define $G$ on $mathrm{L}^2(mathbb{R}^3)$ by convolution with $1/4pi |x|$:
$$(Gphi)(x)=int frac{phi(y)}{4pi |x-y|} dy$$
$G$ is also unbounded and coincides at least for the Schwartz functions with the above defined inverse Laplacian, $Gphi=(-Delta)^{-1}phi$ for all $phi inmathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)$.



Now my question is: Are both operators the same? Does $G=(-Delta)^{-1}$ hold, i. e. is $D(G)=D((-Delta)^{-1})$ and $Gphi=(-Delta)^{-1}phi$ for all $phi in D(G)=D((-Delta)^{-1})$?



My guess is that $mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)$ is a core of $(-Delta)^{-1}$, and as $(-Delta)^{-1}|_{mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)}=G|_{mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)}$ equality should follow by closing the restrictions.



Any comments, hints on how to proceed or references are welcome! Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    I've had a hard time looking for literature on this, so here's my question:



    We take a look at the Laplacian $-Delta$ as an unbounded operator on $mathrm{L}^2(mathbb{R}^3)$. We know that $-Delta$ is unitary equivalent to the multiplication operator with $|p|^2$ in Fourier space, so $-Delta=mathcal{F}^{-1} |p|^2 mathcal{F}$.



    So one could now use functional calculus and define an inverse Laplacian by setting $(-Delta)^{-1}=mathcal{F}^{-1} (1/|p|^2 )mathcal{F}$, which will also be unbounded of course.



    It is also known from theory of PDEs that one can invert the Laplacian on Schwartz functions using the Green's function $1/4pi |x|$, which is derived as a distributional Fourier transform of $1/|p|^2$. So define $G$ on $mathrm{L}^2(mathbb{R}^3)$ by convolution with $1/4pi |x|$:
    $$(Gphi)(x)=int frac{phi(y)}{4pi |x-y|} dy$$
    $G$ is also unbounded and coincides at least for the Schwartz functions with the above defined inverse Laplacian, $Gphi=(-Delta)^{-1}phi$ for all $phi inmathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)$.



    Now my question is: Are both operators the same? Does $G=(-Delta)^{-1}$ hold, i. e. is $D(G)=D((-Delta)^{-1})$ and $Gphi=(-Delta)^{-1}phi$ for all $phi in D(G)=D((-Delta)^{-1})$?



    My guess is that $mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)$ is a core of $(-Delta)^{-1}$, and as $(-Delta)^{-1}|_{mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)}=G|_{mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)}$ equality should follow by closing the restrictions.



    Any comments, hints on how to proceed or references are welcome! Thank you.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4


      4



      $begingroup$


      I've had a hard time looking for literature on this, so here's my question:



      We take a look at the Laplacian $-Delta$ as an unbounded operator on $mathrm{L}^2(mathbb{R}^3)$. We know that $-Delta$ is unitary equivalent to the multiplication operator with $|p|^2$ in Fourier space, so $-Delta=mathcal{F}^{-1} |p|^2 mathcal{F}$.



      So one could now use functional calculus and define an inverse Laplacian by setting $(-Delta)^{-1}=mathcal{F}^{-1} (1/|p|^2 )mathcal{F}$, which will also be unbounded of course.



      It is also known from theory of PDEs that one can invert the Laplacian on Schwartz functions using the Green's function $1/4pi |x|$, which is derived as a distributional Fourier transform of $1/|p|^2$. So define $G$ on $mathrm{L}^2(mathbb{R}^3)$ by convolution with $1/4pi |x|$:
      $$(Gphi)(x)=int frac{phi(y)}{4pi |x-y|} dy$$
      $G$ is also unbounded and coincides at least for the Schwartz functions with the above defined inverse Laplacian, $Gphi=(-Delta)^{-1}phi$ for all $phi inmathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)$.



      Now my question is: Are both operators the same? Does $G=(-Delta)^{-1}$ hold, i. e. is $D(G)=D((-Delta)^{-1})$ and $Gphi=(-Delta)^{-1}phi$ for all $phi in D(G)=D((-Delta)^{-1})$?



      My guess is that $mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)$ is a core of $(-Delta)^{-1}$, and as $(-Delta)^{-1}|_{mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)}=G|_{mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)}$ equality should follow by closing the restrictions.



      Any comments, hints on how to proceed or references are welcome! Thank you.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I've had a hard time looking for literature on this, so here's my question:



      We take a look at the Laplacian $-Delta$ as an unbounded operator on $mathrm{L}^2(mathbb{R}^3)$. We know that $-Delta$ is unitary equivalent to the multiplication operator with $|p|^2$ in Fourier space, so $-Delta=mathcal{F}^{-1} |p|^2 mathcal{F}$.



      So one could now use functional calculus and define an inverse Laplacian by setting $(-Delta)^{-1}=mathcal{F}^{-1} (1/|p|^2 )mathcal{F}$, which will also be unbounded of course.



      It is also known from theory of PDEs that one can invert the Laplacian on Schwartz functions using the Green's function $1/4pi |x|$, which is derived as a distributional Fourier transform of $1/|p|^2$. So define $G$ on $mathrm{L}^2(mathbb{R}^3)$ by convolution with $1/4pi |x|$:
      $$(Gphi)(x)=int frac{phi(y)}{4pi |x-y|} dy$$
      $G$ is also unbounded and coincides at least for the Schwartz functions with the above defined inverse Laplacian, $Gphi=(-Delta)^{-1}phi$ for all $phi inmathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)$.



      Now my question is: Are both operators the same? Does $G=(-Delta)^{-1}$ hold, i. e. is $D(G)=D((-Delta)^{-1})$ and $Gphi=(-Delta)^{-1}phi$ for all $phi in D(G)=D((-Delta)^{-1})$?



      My guess is that $mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)$ is a core of $(-Delta)^{-1}$, and as $(-Delta)^{-1}|_{mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)}=G|_{mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^3)}$ equality should follow by closing the restrictions.



      Any comments, hints on how to proceed or references are welcome! Thank you.







      functional-analysis pde operator-theory functional-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 23 '18 at 13:53









      MrMatzetoniMrMatzetoni

      1516




      1516






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$


          The operator $(-Delta +epsilon I)^{-1} : L^2(mathbb{R}^3)rightarrow W^{2,2}(mathbb{R}^3)$ is a bicontinuous bijection that is equivalently defined by the Fourier transform $mathscr{F}$ as
          $$
          (-Delta +epsilon I)^{-1}f = mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2+epsilon}(mathscr{F}f)(xi),;;; fin L^2(mathbb{R}^3).
          $$

          Suppose $fin L^2$. If $g(xi)=|xi|^{-2}(mathscr{F}f)(xi)$ is also in $L^2$, then
          $$
          g=L^2mbox{-}lim_{epsilondownarrow 0}(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f=mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2}mathscr{F}f = frac{1}{4pi}int_{mathbb{R}^3}frac{1}{|x-y|}f(y)dy.
          $$

          It is also true that, for such an $f$, the right side of the following converges to $f$ in $L^2$ as $epsilondownarrow 0$:
          $$
          -Delta(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f=f-epsilon(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f.
          $$

          And $(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f$ converges to $mathscr{F}^{-1}(|xi|^{-1}mathscr{F}f)$. Because $-Delta : W^{2,2}subset L^2rightarrow L^2$ is selfadjoint, it follows that $mathscr{F}^{-1}(|xi|^{-2}mathscr{F}f)inmathcal{D}(-Delta)$ and
          $$
          -Deltaleft[mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2}mathscr{F}fright] = f,
          $$

          which is equal to
          $$ -Delta frac{1}{4pi}int_{mathbb{R}^3}frac{1}{|x-y|}f(y)dy=f.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I already see this calculation as given. My question is about the technical aspect behind the inverse laplacian, specifically whether operators defined by functional calculus and defined by convolution are the same especially in terms of their natural domains. The calculation of the inv. FT just shows that both operators coincide on the schwartz functions, but their natural domains are larger.
            $endgroup$
            – MrMatzetoni
            Jan 2 at 21:42










          • $begingroup$
            @MrMatzetoni : Take another look at my latest operator-based revision.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Jan 4 at 2:04











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050362%2finverting-the-laplacian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$


          The operator $(-Delta +epsilon I)^{-1} : L^2(mathbb{R}^3)rightarrow W^{2,2}(mathbb{R}^3)$ is a bicontinuous bijection that is equivalently defined by the Fourier transform $mathscr{F}$ as
          $$
          (-Delta +epsilon I)^{-1}f = mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2+epsilon}(mathscr{F}f)(xi),;;; fin L^2(mathbb{R}^3).
          $$

          Suppose $fin L^2$. If $g(xi)=|xi|^{-2}(mathscr{F}f)(xi)$ is also in $L^2$, then
          $$
          g=L^2mbox{-}lim_{epsilondownarrow 0}(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f=mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2}mathscr{F}f = frac{1}{4pi}int_{mathbb{R}^3}frac{1}{|x-y|}f(y)dy.
          $$

          It is also true that, for such an $f$, the right side of the following converges to $f$ in $L^2$ as $epsilondownarrow 0$:
          $$
          -Delta(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f=f-epsilon(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f.
          $$

          And $(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f$ converges to $mathscr{F}^{-1}(|xi|^{-1}mathscr{F}f)$. Because $-Delta : W^{2,2}subset L^2rightarrow L^2$ is selfadjoint, it follows that $mathscr{F}^{-1}(|xi|^{-2}mathscr{F}f)inmathcal{D}(-Delta)$ and
          $$
          -Deltaleft[mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2}mathscr{F}fright] = f,
          $$

          which is equal to
          $$ -Delta frac{1}{4pi}int_{mathbb{R}^3}frac{1}{|x-y|}f(y)dy=f.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I already see this calculation as given. My question is about the technical aspect behind the inverse laplacian, specifically whether operators defined by functional calculus and defined by convolution are the same especially in terms of their natural domains. The calculation of the inv. FT just shows that both operators coincide on the schwartz functions, but their natural domains are larger.
            $endgroup$
            – MrMatzetoni
            Jan 2 at 21:42










          • $begingroup$
            @MrMatzetoni : Take another look at my latest operator-based revision.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Jan 4 at 2:04
















          1












          $begingroup$


          The operator $(-Delta +epsilon I)^{-1} : L^2(mathbb{R}^3)rightarrow W^{2,2}(mathbb{R}^3)$ is a bicontinuous bijection that is equivalently defined by the Fourier transform $mathscr{F}$ as
          $$
          (-Delta +epsilon I)^{-1}f = mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2+epsilon}(mathscr{F}f)(xi),;;; fin L^2(mathbb{R}^3).
          $$

          Suppose $fin L^2$. If $g(xi)=|xi|^{-2}(mathscr{F}f)(xi)$ is also in $L^2$, then
          $$
          g=L^2mbox{-}lim_{epsilondownarrow 0}(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f=mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2}mathscr{F}f = frac{1}{4pi}int_{mathbb{R}^3}frac{1}{|x-y|}f(y)dy.
          $$

          It is also true that, for such an $f$, the right side of the following converges to $f$ in $L^2$ as $epsilondownarrow 0$:
          $$
          -Delta(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f=f-epsilon(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f.
          $$

          And $(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f$ converges to $mathscr{F}^{-1}(|xi|^{-1}mathscr{F}f)$. Because $-Delta : W^{2,2}subset L^2rightarrow L^2$ is selfadjoint, it follows that $mathscr{F}^{-1}(|xi|^{-2}mathscr{F}f)inmathcal{D}(-Delta)$ and
          $$
          -Deltaleft[mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2}mathscr{F}fright] = f,
          $$

          which is equal to
          $$ -Delta frac{1}{4pi}int_{mathbb{R}^3}frac{1}{|x-y|}f(y)dy=f.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I already see this calculation as given. My question is about the technical aspect behind the inverse laplacian, specifically whether operators defined by functional calculus and defined by convolution are the same especially in terms of their natural domains. The calculation of the inv. FT just shows that both operators coincide on the schwartz functions, but their natural domains are larger.
            $endgroup$
            – MrMatzetoni
            Jan 2 at 21:42










          • $begingroup$
            @MrMatzetoni : Take another look at my latest operator-based revision.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Jan 4 at 2:04














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$


          The operator $(-Delta +epsilon I)^{-1} : L^2(mathbb{R}^3)rightarrow W^{2,2}(mathbb{R}^3)$ is a bicontinuous bijection that is equivalently defined by the Fourier transform $mathscr{F}$ as
          $$
          (-Delta +epsilon I)^{-1}f = mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2+epsilon}(mathscr{F}f)(xi),;;; fin L^2(mathbb{R}^3).
          $$

          Suppose $fin L^2$. If $g(xi)=|xi|^{-2}(mathscr{F}f)(xi)$ is also in $L^2$, then
          $$
          g=L^2mbox{-}lim_{epsilondownarrow 0}(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f=mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2}mathscr{F}f = frac{1}{4pi}int_{mathbb{R}^3}frac{1}{|x-y|}f(y)dy.
          $$

          It is also true that, for such an $f$, the right side of the following converges to $f$ in $L^2$ as $epsilondownarrow 0$:
          $$
          -Delta(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f=f-epsilon(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f.
          $$

          And $(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f$ converges to $mathscr{F}^{-1}(|xi|^{-1}mathscr{F}f)$. Because $-Delta : W^{2,2}subset L^2rightarrow L^2$ is selfadjoint, it follows that $mathscr{F}^{-1}(|xi|^{-2}mathscr{F}f)inmathcal{D}(-Delta)$ and
          $$
          -Deltaleft[mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2}mathscr{F}fright] = f,
          $$

          which is equal to
          $$ -Delta frac{1}{4pi}int_{mathbb{R}^3}frac{1}{|x-y|}f(y)dy=f.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




          The operator $(-Delta +epsilon I)^{-1} : L^2(mathbb{R}^3)rightarrow W^{2,2}(mathbb{R}^3)$ is a bicontinuous bijection that is equivalently defined by the Fourier transform $mathscr{F}$ as
          $$
          (-Delta +epsilon I)^{-1}f = mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2+epsilon}(mathscr{F}f)(xi),;;; fin L^2(mathbb{R}^3).
          $$

          Suppose $fin L^2$. If $g(xi)=|xi|^{-2}(mathscr{F}f)(xi)$ is also in $L^2$, then
          $$
          g=L^2mbox{-}lim_{epsilondownarrow 0}(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f=mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2}mathscr{F}f = frac{1}{4pi}int_{mathbb{R}^3}frac{1}{|x-y|}f(y)dy.
          $$

          It is also true that, for such an $f$, the right side of the following converges to $f$ in $L^2$ as $epsilondownarrow 0$:
          $$
          -Delta(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f=f-epsilon(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f.
          $$

          And $(-Delta+epsilon I)^{-1}f$ converges to $mathscr{F}^{-1}(|xi|^{-1}mathscr{F}f)$. Because $-Delta : W^{2,2}subset L^2rightarrow L^2$ is selfadjoint, it follows that $mathscr{F}^{-1}(|xi|^{-2}mathscr{F}f)inmathcal{D}(-Delta)$ and
          $$
          -Deltaleft[mathscr{F}^{-1}frac{1}{|xi|^2}mathscr{F}fright] = f,
          $$

          which is equal to
          $$ -Delta frac{1}{4pi}int_{mathbb{R}^3}frac{1}{|x-y|}f(y)dy=f.
          $$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 3 at 4:57

























          answered Jan 1 at 3:38









          DisintegratingByPartsDisintegratingByParts

          59.2k42580




          59.2k42580












          • $begingroup$
            I already see this calculation as given. My question is about the technical aspect behind the inverse laplacian, specifically whether operators defined by functional calculus and defined by convolution are the same especially in terms of their natural domains. The calculation of the inv. FT just shows that both operators coincide on the schwartz functions, but their natural domains are larger.
            $endgroup$
            – MrMatzetoni
            Jan 2 at 21:42










          • $begingroup$
            @MrMatzetoni : Take another look at my latest operator-based revision.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Jan 4 at 2:04


















          • $begingroup$
            I already see this calculation as given. My question is about the technical aspect behind the inverse laplacian, specifically whether operators defined by functional calculus and defined by convolution are the same especially in terms of their natural domains. The calculation of the inv. FT just shows that both operators coincide on the schwartz functions, but their natural domains are larger.
            $endgroup$
            – MrMatzetoni
            Jan 2 at 21:42










          • $begingroup$
            @MrMatzetoni : Take another look at my latest operator-based revision.
            $endgroup$
            – DisintegratingByParts
            Jan 4 at 2:04
















          $begingroup$
          I already see this calculation as given. My question is about the technical aspect behind the inverse laplacian, specifically whether operators defined by functional calculus and defined by convolution are the same especially in terms of their natural domains. The calculation of the inv. FT just shows that both operators coincide on the schwartz functions, but their natural domains are larger.
          $endgroup$
          – MrMatzetoni
          Jan 2 at 21:42




          $begingroup$
          I already see this calculation as given. My question is about the technical aspect behind the inverse laplacian, specifically whether operators defined by functional calculus and defined by convolution are the same especially in terms of their natural domains. The calculation of the inv. FT just shows that both operators coincide on the schwartz functions, but their natural domains are larger.
          $endgroup$
          – MrMatzetoni
          Jan 2 at 21:42












          $begingroup$
          @MrMatzetoni : Take another look at my latest operator-based revision.
          $endgroup$
          – DisintegratingByParts
          Jan 4 at 2:04




          $begingroup$
          @MrMatzetoni : Take another look at my latest operator-based revision.
          $endgroup$
          – DisintegratingByParts
          Jan 4 at 2:04


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3050362%2finverting-the-laplacian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Cabo Verde

          Gyllenstierna